Next Article in Journal
Chemical and Microbial Characterization of Fermented Forest Litters Used as Biofertilizers
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Biohythane Production from Rice Straw in an Integrated Anaerobic Bioreactor under Thermophilic Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Etiology and Clinical Outcomes of Pleural empyema during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
Promoting the Circular Economy on an Island: Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Local Organic Substrates as a Possible Renewable Energy Source
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Biogenic Coalbed Methane Experimental Studies in China

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, Carbon Neutrality Institute, CUMT, Xuzhou 221008, China
2
Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resource & Reservoir Formation History, Ministry of Education, School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020304
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 24 January 2023

Abstract

:
Biogenic coalbed methane (CBM) is an important alternative energy that can help achieve carbon neutrality. Accordingly, its exploration and development have become a research hotspot in the field of fossil energy. In this review, the latest detection technologies for and experimental research on biogenic CBM in China in recent decades are summarized. The factors influencing the generation of biogenic CBM and the identification method of biogenic CBM are systematically analyzed. The technologies to detect biogas and the research methods to study microbial diversity are summarized. The literature shows that biogenic CBM is easily produced in the presence of highly abundant organic matter of low maturity, and the organic matter reaching a certain thickness can compensate for the limitation of biogenic CBM gas production due to the small abundance of organic matter to a certain extent. Biogenic CBM production could be increased in an environment with low salinity, medium alkalinity, and rich Fe2+ and Ni2+ sources. Furthermore, biogenic CBM can be identified by considering three aspects: (1) the presence of gas composition indicators; (2) the content of heavy hydrocarbon; and (3) variation in the abundance of biomarkers. In recent years, research methods to study the microbial community and diversity of CBM-producing environments in China have mainly included 16S rRNA gene library, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and high-throughput sequencing, and the dominant microorganisms have been determined in various basins in China. The results of numerous studies show that the dominant bacterial phyla are commonly Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, while the archaeal fraction mainly includes Methanoculleus, Methanobacterium, Methanocorpusculum, and Methanothrix. This review summarizes and discusses the advances in biogenic CBM production and the associated microbial community in order to promote further development of coal biotransformation and CO2 bio-utilization to meet energy demands under carbon neutrality.

1. Introduction

Fossil fuels are the most important source of energy for human society; however, the burning of coal, in particular, releases large amounts of greenhouse gases that cause climate change [1]. The total energy consumption of standard coal has increased from 517 million tons in 1980 to 4.98 billion tons in 2020 in China [2]. In the foreseeable future, coal remains in the dominant position for energy consumption. Energy consumption has allowed rapid development in China, and it has brought a large number of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2020, about 9.9 billion tons of energy-related CO2 was emitted in China, which accounted for 30.9% of the global CO2 emissions [3,4]. In 2021, the Chinese government committed to peaking carbon emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. However, this does not mean that fossil fuels will be completely deactivated; instead, two pathways are required: (1) the efficient development and clean utilization of fossil fuel energy; and (2) the isolation, sequestration and utilization of CO2.
Coalbed methane (CBM) is an unconventional natural gas that is similar to conventional natural gas in calorific value and CO2 emissions, and it has attracted global attention. Biogenic CBM is formed through the synergic degradation of organic matter by the microbial community in a coal seam, and is formed by the microorganisms through both acetic acid fermentation and CO2 reduction [5]:
acetic   acid   fermentation   CH 3 COOH CH 4 + CO 2
CO 2   reduction   CO 2 + 4 H 2 CH 4 + 2 H 2 O
The factors influencing the biogenic CBM yield include organic matter abundance, maturity, temperature, pH, Eh, porosity, microbial community, and trace elements. Since the production mechanism of the biogenic CBM was discovered, efforts have been made to increase CBM production through biostimulation and bioaugmentation [6,7]. Biostimulation uses the injection of nutrients to stimulate the indigenous microbial community to degrade organic compounds. Bioaugmentation uses selected allochthonous microorganisms and nutrients to increase methane production [8]. Thus, in this paper, based on the research of biogenic CBM-related fields in China in recent decades, the latest and most widely used research methods in China are summarized. At the same time, the influential factors in the accumulation process of typical biogas reservoirs in China are analyzed, and the identification methods of biogas in coal seams in China are classified. In addition, the unique dominant microorganisms in Chinese coal reservoirs are summarized in this article, pointing out the shortcomings of China in the field of biogenic CBM and proposing future research directions. The objectives of this review are to provide theoretical support for the realistic application of microbially-enhanced CBM production in China and to promote further development of coal bioconversion and CO2 bio-utilization in order to meet the energy demand under carbon neutrality.

2. Progress in Techniques and Methods

There are numerous techniques and methods to study biogenic CBM, and the main focus of research is on the identification of biogenic CBM and the mechanism of gas production. Identification of biogenic CBM is mainly based on the characteristics of its gas components and the isotope distribution, which are most commonly analyzed through gas chromatography and isotope analysis. The approaches for the analytical assessment of geochemical signatures in natural gas have rapidly developed in recent years, mainly in the form of innovations in geochemical techniques, such as measuring monomeric hydrocarbon hydrogen isotopes, biomarker carbon isotopes, and carbon isotope kinetics, which have led to more effective technical support for the identification of biogenic CBM [9]. The mechanism of biogenic CBM generation has been a research hotspot for Chinese scholars, many of whom have carried out laboratory simulations to study biogenic CBM production and found that the process of microbial degradation to produce biogenic CBM has multiple effects [10]. With the deepening of research, laboratory simulation experiments have revealed a more complete set of research tools for gas, liquid, and solid phase products. Meanwhile, research methods to study coal seam microbial community characteristics have also been actively developed.

2.1. Geochemical Technologies

2.1.1. Gas Chromatography

Gas chromatography is the most common means to determine the gaseous composition of biogenic coalbed methane. Due to the limitations of early testing conditions, the utilized gas chromatography techniques had disadvantages, such as cumbersome operation, long analysis time, and large errors in manual injection. With the development of chromatographic techniques, the multidimensional gas chromatography analytical technique, which uses a combination of multiple valves and columns, has emerged [11,12]. This technique can determine the outflow order of biogenic CBM components via the valve opening and closing time, which can facilitate the determination of all components in a sample with one injection. It is easy to operate and largely improves the analysis efficiency, has good repeatability and high accuracy, and is widely used to determine biogenic CBM components [11,13,14].

2.1.2. Isotope Analysis

(1)
Hydrogen isotope analysis of monomeric hydrocarbons. This technique mainly uses chromatography mass spectrometry to perform the online analysis of monomeric hydrogen isotopes. It is mainly used to investigate the effect of cracking temperature on the analysis of monomeric hydrocarbon hydrogen isotopes [9,15]. Monomeric hydrogen isotope analysis has made a substantial leap forward in the analysis of hydrogen isotopes, which is important for studying the maturity, origin and formation environment of natural gas, and it also creates the conditions for an in-depth understanding for analyzing the internal microstructure and fractionation process of stable isotopes in nature [13].
(2)
Carbon isotope kinetic technique. Carbon isotope kinetic simulation studies can simulate the evolution of stable carbon isotopes and effectively relate this to the sedimentary and thermal history of a basin to dynamically reproduce the formation of natural gas and fractionation of the carbon isotopes [9,16]. Its advantages make it important for identifying gas genesis types and gas sources. Furthermore, it is not only useful for screening primary or secondary gas, but also for predicting the nature and composition of reservoir gas and addressing other related issues.
(3)
Biomarker carbon isotope analysis. It was found that the carbon isotopes of biomarkers contain rich biological, geological, and geochemical information, and it is important to study the carbon isotopes within organic compounds [17]. The development of gas/liquid chromatography coupled with stable isotope mass spectrometry has allowed biomarker detection to evolve from simple content analysis to stable isotope analysis of a single compound [18]. Biomarker carbon isotope analysis can establish the connection between biological precursors and their products during diagenesis through structural inheritance and carbon isotope composition characteristics of the monomeric compounds, which can not only explain multiple genesis pathways of the same biomarker compound, but also record the environmental information at the time of organic matter production, as well as the transformation characteristics during degradation, thereby revealing the complex geochemical processes [13,19].

2.2. Methods and Means of Products in Biological CBM Simulation Experiments

(1)
Gas composition determination. For the characterization of gas components produced during the anaerobic fermentation of coal, the composition of the gas mixture is generally examined using gas chromatography.
(2)
Liquid Phase Testing. This technique includes detection of the liquid phase organic and inorganic ions. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry is generally used to determine the content of volatile organic compounds [20]. For some large-molecule organic compounds that are difficult to volatilize, such as pyruvic acid and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, the more efficient liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer is required [21]. Two methods are generally used for inorganic ion testing: ion chromatography and chemical methods. In addition to detecting anions, ion chromatography is also widely used in the detection of inorganic cations, such as SO 4 2 , NO 2 and NH 4 + [22].
(3)
Solid Phase Testing. The solid phase test includes the analysis of components, structure, morphology, functional groups, surface elements, and pores of coal. Physical analysis is often performed on coal according to the national standards for industrial, elemental, specular group reflectance, and maceral components. The structure of coal is generally analyzed using X-ray diffraction with Raman spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction analysis is an effective tool to study the crystal structure and material structure in coal and kerogen [23]. Raman spectroscopy can analyze the changes in single chemical bonds within the structure of coal crystals, as well as the vibrations of groups [24]. Coal morphology and bacteria on the coal surface can be observed by light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy [9]. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is generally used to analyze the structure of coal functional groups during methane production by microbial fermentation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is used to understand the composition and state of elements on the coal surface, which can provide important information about the elemental species, chemical composition, and related electronic structure on the surface of coal samples [25]. The current parameters used to study the coal body pore structure are pore size, pore shape, and pore surface complexity, and the associated testing methods include gas adsorption operation, mercury intrusion porosimetry, microcomputed tomography, and small angle X-ray scattering [26].

2.3. Methods and Means of Microbial Community Analysis

The methods for researching microorganisms were developed over 3 stages. The first stage, which occurred prior to the 1970s, involved the development of traditional isolation and cultivation methods, allowing direct observation of colony morphology; however, only a very small number of bacteria with specific physiological functions can be isolated and cultured. The second stage, in the 1970s and 1980s, saw the development of biomarker analyses, which have high sensitivity compared with traditional culture methods and greatly advanced the understanding of microbial community diversity [27]. The third stage, which began in the late 1980s to 1990s, was the development of microbial molecular ecology. This approach was based on the phylogenetic study of 16S rRNA gene sequences (Figure 1), which can more comprehensively reveal the diversity of microorganisms [28,29].
The research on coal seam geological microorganisms in China has mainly focused on the screening and isolation of anaerobic bacteria, enrichment cultures, and experimental simulation of biogenic gas. Initially, the number and distribution of microorganisms in a coal seam were mainly counted by the traditional isolation and culture method: the most probable number counting method [33]. With the progression of experimental techniques in microbiology, scholars in China began to use microbial molecular ecology methods to study the community characteristics and diversity of microorganisms. The main microbial molecular ecology techniques currently applied to study coalbed microorganisms are 16S rRNA gene library analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and high-throughput sequencing.
16S rRNA gene library analysis, as the main technical means of studying microbial diversity, is widely used in microbial molecular ecology research. Its principle is to extract DNA from microbial samples, obtain 16S rRNA gene sequences by amplification and sequencing of the DNA, and compare the obtained information with sequences in 16S rRNA databases to obtain microbial diversity information. Finger-printing techniques based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, are widely used to study coalbed microorganisms [27]. The 16S rRNA gene library analysis can detect a variety of bacterial species simultaneously and reflect the abundance of various bacterial species in the bacterial community, but it cannot accurately quantify the number of various bacterial species in the bacterial community [34].
FISH is the use of fluorescently labeled specific oligonucleotide fragments as probes to hybridize with target DNA in the genome to detect the presence and abundance of specific microbial populations. FISH is a molecular technique that does not rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and has the advantage of presenting a clearer picture of the microbial environment and of providing information about some strains that are difficult to cultivate under laboratory conditions. It has been widely used in microbial molecular ecology and environmental microbiology, and has become an important technical tool for microbial community research. The development of this technique has allowed researchers to visualize the symbiotic relationships between microorganisms and promote the development of molecular ecology research of microorganisms [35].
High-throughput sequencing is the most commonly used next-generation sequencing technology, especially in microbial community structure characterization and diversity analysis [36]. Amplicon sequencing, metatranscriptomic sequencing and metagenomics sequencing can meet the needs of the large number and variety of microorganisms in the samples [32]. Amplicon sequencing is a method of amplifying specific regions of microbial community genome based on PCR, and using high-throughput sequencing to study microorganisms composition and function in samples. It has the characteristics of rapidity and low cost in analyzing microbial community [32]. Metatranscriptomics sequencing can correlate microbial community structure and, in situ, function to effectively monitor changes in community structure and function caused by environment [31]. Metagenomics sequencing allows the direct study of genetic material from the microbial community of a sample, independent of culture techniques, to obtain information on a large number of gene fragments within the overall microbial community. The high-throughput sequencing data can be visualized by principal component analysis and Venn diagrams to assess the microbial community structure, and the gene sequences can also be compared with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database to further analyze the relationships between microbial composition and gene function [10].
The development of microbial molecular ecology has facilitated the study of microorganisms in coal seams, and the breadth and depth of microbial diversity analysis has been improved compared to traditional methods. However, different methods have their inherent limitations, such as PCR-based methods, which are prone to bias in microbial understanding due to primer selection and PCR itself, and high-throughput sequencing, which makes it difficult to obtain an accurate map from sequence to function. Therefore, in future research, the choice of method should be based on the specific research content.

3. Progress in Influencing Factors and Identification

3.1. Biogenic Coalbed Methane Identification

Biogenic CBM has certain similarities and differences compared to conventional natural gas components. The component characteristics and hydrocarbon isotopic composition are often analyzed to identify biogenic CBM; however, due to the phenomenon of isotopic fractionation during the process of formation of some CBM reservoirs, it is necessary to use the degradation characteristics of organic molecules from the coal to identify biogenic CBM when the gas composition cannot be well characterized [37]. Scholars in China have detected the presence of secondary biogenic gas in Liyazhuang in Shanxi, Enhong in Yunnan, Huainan, and Huaibei [38,39,40,41]. Furthermore, about 30 biogenic gas reservoirs have been discovered [42], with proven geological reserves of biogenic gas accounting for about 7% of the total proven natural gas volume [43]. Biogenic CBM can be an important replacement for natural gas and has great potential value. As a clean energy source, it can promote the adjustment of China’s energy structure and help achieve the strategic goal of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”. Based on the results of laboratory simulation of biogenic CBM, this paper summarizes the discriminative pathway of biogenic CBM by our scholars into three points: gas composition, isotope composition, and biomarker compounds.

3.1.1. Identification of Gas Composition

The gas composition of biogenic CBM is predominantly characterized by a CH4 content of more than 90%, with little or almost no heavy hydrocarbons [44], which represents a typical dry gas or extra dry gas [38,45]. The proportion of heavy hydrocarbons in the gas is often used as a criterion for biogenic CBM identification, but the upper limit criteria for heavy hydrocarbon content differs between domestic and foreign scholars. Sohoell [46] and Edward et al. [47] suggest that the heavy hydrocarbon content in biogenic gas is generally less than 0.2%, while Whiticar et al. [48] suggest that the heavy hydrocarbon content in biogenic gas should not exceed 1% in general. Domestically, Dai et al. [49] proposed an upper limit of 0.5% for the heavy hydrocarbon content in biogenic gas. Additionally, when studying CBM in a coal seam of Xinji mine in Anhui province, Tao et al. [50] found that the heavy hydrocarbon content was very low as a mixed genesis CBM with an ethane content of 0~0.42% and propane content of 0~0.18%.
At the same time, in order to distinguish biogenic CBM from thermal genesis-generated CBM in low and high coal-grade stages, some of the indicators currently utilized for biogenic CBM discrimination include φ(C1)/Σφ(C15), φ(C1)/φ(C2 + C3), and CDMI (CDMI = φ(CO2)/[φ(CO2) + φ(CH4)]) [51]. The φ(C1)/Σφ(C15) index can distinguish between biogenic and thermally-degraded gases. Biogenic and thermally-cracked gases have dry gas characteristics with φ(C1)/Σφ(C15) > 0.95, and thermally-degraded gases have φ(C1)/Σφ(C15) ≤ 0.95. Thermal-cracked gas and biogenic gas can be effectively distinguished by φ(C1)/φ(C2 + C3) and δ13C(CH4). The value of φ(C1)/φ(C2 + C3) of biogenic gas is greater than 1000, the value of φ(C1)/φ(C2 + C3) of thermally degraded gas is less than 100, and the value of φ(C1)/φ(C2 + C3) of mixed gas is between 100 and 1000. CDMI can discriminate between both inorganic and organic sourced gases. When the CO2 concentration in a coal seam reaches 60% or more and the CDMI exceeds 90%, it is judged to be inorganic-formed gas [49]. When the CO2 concentration in the coal seam reaches 60% or more and the CDMI exceeds 90%, it is judged as inorganic gas. When the CO2 concentration is less than 15%, it is organic genetic gas, among which, the CDMI of the biogenic gas is ≤5%, the CDMI of thermally-degraded gas is ≤90%, and the CDMI of thermally-cracked gas is ≤0.15% [52]. After continuous research by previous authors, the classification of the CBM genesis is summarized (Table 1). Obviously, mastering the geochemical characteristics of each genetic type of CBM can help to better identify biogenic CBM [52].

3.1.2. Identification of Isotopic Composition

The carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions are another way to identify bio-genic CBM. Hu et al. [53] studied the components, including the carbon and hydrogen isotopes, of biogenic gas from five biogenic gas reservoirs in China and found a good negative correlation between the content of iso-alkanes in light hydrocarbon natural gas and δ13C1 values. A δ13C1 < −55‰ is generally chosen as the upper limit standard for biogenic gas during biogenic CBM identification [54,55,56], while the methane δD distribution range is considered to be −400‰ to −150‰. Specifically, acetic acid fermentation genesis methane δ13C1 is distributed from −65‰ to −50‰ and the δD is distributed from −400‰ to −250‰, while CO2 reduction genesis methane δ13C1 is distributed from −110‰ to −65‰ and the δD is distributed from −250‰ to −150‰ [56]. Additionally, in the biogas reservoirs found in China, the main formation method of biogenic CBM is CO2 reduction, such as in Qidong Basin, Luliang Basin, and Jinhu Basin. A part is biogenic CBM formed by mixed transition, such as in Baoshan Basin, Songliao Basin and Sanshui Basin; another part is biogenic CBM formed by both mixed transition and CO2 reduction in the basin, such as in Yinggehai Basin and Qaidam Basin, while there are few biogas reservoirs with acetic acid fermentation genesis, such as the Powder River Basin (Figure 2). It is worth noting that the lower δ13C1 identification value is considered a relative delineation criterion, and the values of biogenic gas δ13C1 in the coal seams of the Xinji, Liyazhuang and Enhong areas of China are significantly less than −55‰ [51].
Meanwhile, many scholars have noticed that the carbon isotopes of CBM are generally lighter than those of conventional CBM [45,57,58,59,60]. Qin et al. [61] indicated that the flow of groundwater leads to methane carbon isotope fractionation, which results in the lightening of methane carbon isotopes in the coal seam. Wang et al. [62] also found that water can fractionate methane carbon isotopes, which become significantly lighter with increasing leaching time. However, further studies are needed to determine whether the dissolution of flowing groundwater causes the lightening of methane carbon isotopes. Different enzymatic reactions are involved in microbial methanogenic pathways with different isotopic fractionation capacities. The distribution of δ13C-CH4 produced by the metabolism of hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaea ranges from −110‰ to −65‰, while the distribution of δ13C-CH4 produced by the metabolism of acetic acetotrophic methanogenic archaea ranges from −65‰ to −50‰. The range of δD-CH4 for CBM is influenced by the maturity of the coal and the hydrogen isotopes in the coalbed water, and its range is relatively large, with δD-CH4 generally distributed around −225‰ ± 25‰ [59]. Some scholars also believe that some models or theories cannot account for the lighter carbon isotopes of CBM. Song et al. [63] suggested that the content of CO2 in coal seams is low and the carbon isotopes are heavy, and that the methane carbon isotopes become heavier with the desorption–diffusion of CBM, but these models or theories do not explain the general lightening of methane carbon isotopes. The characteristics of hydrocarbon isotopes can be more accurately discerned for CBM in China, but some indicators can only be used as a relative classification standard; thus, the phenomenon of light carbon isotopes of CBM needs further study.
Figure 2. Genetic discrimination of coalbed methane (Adapted from [48,64,65,66,67]).
Figure 2. Genetic discrimination of coalbed methane (Adapted from [48,64,65,66,67]).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g002

3.1.3. Biomarker Compound Identification

The strength of resistance to organic compound degradation in coal is generally as follows: n-alkanes < isoprenoid alkenes < steranes < patchouli < aromatized steranes < porphyrins [68]. Therefore, biogenic CBM can be identified based on the characteristic changes in gas-producing parent biomarker compounds during the coalification stage. Studies have shown that among saturated hydrocarbons, the degradability of n-alkanes is smaller compared to isoprenoid alkanes, and with increased maturity and burial depth, the odd carbon advantage possessed by n-alkanes gradually disappears and they become preferentially degraded by microorganisms, while isoprenoid alkanes are retained, so the generation of biogenic CBM can be judged based on changes in the relative abundance of the two types [50]. Pan et al. [69] found that after biodegradation of shallow natural gas in the Yinggehai Basin, in addition to a decreased n-alkane concentration, biogenic olefins were detected in gas with weak degradation, which can also be used as a marker for identifying biogenic CBM. It can be seen that the recalcitrant characteristics of the biomarker compounds are important for the identification of biogenic CBM, which can be supplemented if there is uncertainty in the characterization of biogenic CBM biogas components. Thus, the recalcitrant characteristics of biomarker compounds are important for identifying biogenic CBM, which is complementary to the two identification methods of coalbed gas component characteristics and isotope characteristics.

3.2. Influencing Factors of Biogenic Gas Generation in Coal Seam

The source rock and reservoir have a profound influence on the gas content and gas generation rate of biogenic CBM. Characteristics such as the difference in organic matter abundance, type, maturity, and deposition environment and burial time will give the biogenic CBM a special state of fugacity. In recent years, scholars in China have conducted in-depth research on the reservoir characteristics of biogenic CBM. As such, this paper summarizes the influence of coal reservoirs on the generation of biogenic CBM in the following aspects.

3.2.1. Effect of Coal Reservoirs on Gas Production

(1)
Organic matter abundance. Organic matter is the material basis for biogenic CBM generation. The higher the abundance of organic matter, the more favorable the biogenic CBM generation. The total organic carbon (TOC) abundance can reflect the organic matter abundance in hydrocarbon source rock to some extent [70] (Table 2). Generally speaking, the higher the TOC, the easier it is to generate biogas. For example, the TOC content of hydrocarbon source rock in the southern Junggar Basin of China is 0.54~1.42%, and the TOC content of hydrocarbon source rock in the Dongying Formation of the Bohai Bay Basin is 0.3~5% [43]. Related studies have shown that atmospheric fields can be formed with a low organic carbon content under high deposition rates and large deposition thicknesses. Huang et al. [71] studied the biogenic gas characteristics of the Yinggehai Basin and showed that the average organic carbon content in source rocks where organic matter is present is about 0.4%, and that the basin is in an active biogenic gas generation stage. The average organic carbon content is 0.3% in the Quaternary lacustrine mudstone of the Qaidam Basin, which also forms an atmospheric field [72]. It has been shown that the thickness of the organic matter in gas source rocks can compensate for the limitation of organic matter abundance to some extent. For example, the existence of thick hydrocarbon source rock in the Norbei basin of the Sanhu depression in China compensates for the low TOC fraction, forming biogenic gas reservoirs with great potential [73,74]. Li [75] studied the abundance of soluble organic matter within hydrocarbon source rocks in the Sanhu area of the Qaidam Basin and found that the abundance of soluble organic matter in the Neoproterozoic–Quaternary strata is much greater than the conventional TOC detection value, which is significant for the evaluation of biogenic CBM resources. Obviously, the higher the organic matter abundance, the more favorable the bio-methane output. It is also worth noting that the evaluation index for organic matter abundance is an important evaluation criterion for biomethane generation, but it is not a decisive factor for evaluating the gas volume of biomethane reservoirs in a region.
(2)
Type of organic matter. The organic matter type is closely related to the production of biogenic CBM. Different types of organic matter have different properties and are used by microorganisms with different degrees of ease. Among the organic matter types used to generate biogenic gas, humic parent material in coal is the most easily degraded by microorganisms [76]. Semi-humic and herbaceous humic organic matter can provide the carbohydrates, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, sugars, and starch, needed for microbial metabolism, which promotes biogenic CBM production [54]. Hydrogen-rich, oxygen-rich organic matter also facilitates the production of biogenic CBM. Wang et al. [77] studied the Lu Liang Basin and found rich organic matter, and discovered that the organic matter composition of its Neoproterozoic gas source rock contains more type II casein, which is rich in protein and lipid-like compounds and has great potential for biogenic CBM. Zhang et al. [78] found that the biogenic gas reservoirs of the Sanjiang Basin are also dominated by type II organic matter. Meanwhile, many scholars have studied the hydrocarbon generation capacity of maceral components and found that different maceral components have different hydrocarbon generation capacities. Liu et al. [79] made a systematic study of the gas production characteristics of different maceral and their effect on gas production using thermal simulation experiments, showing that the main gas-producing microfractions were vitrinite and the exinite. Furthermore, with the increase in temperature, the ability of vitrinite to produce methane was higher than that of exinite, while the gas production rate of fusinite was very low. As shown in Figure 3 [80,81], our scholars selected lignite, long flame coal, gas coal, and fat coal produced from LiangJia coal mines, YiMa coal mines, DaTong coal mines, and PanYi coal mines as experimental samples, and found that the main maceral components of gas production were vitrinite/huminite in the biogenic CBM simulation output experiments, while the highest gas production was found in vitrinite/huminite in coal, followed by raw coal, and the lowest production was in exinite/liptinite.
(3)
Organic matter maturity. Organic matter maturity determines the biogenic CBM production to some extent (Table 3). It was found that low-rank coal is easier to degrade and produce methane than high-rank coal. The maturity of organic matter in the biogenic gas source rock is generally in the immature-low maturity stage (Ro < 0.4%) [74,78,82] with a low degree of condensation of organic matter aromatic nuclei. Furthermore, its molecular structure contains a large number of branched chains and oxygen-containing functional groups, and the pore structure of the coal sample is easily changed after biodegradation, which is conducive to biological enzyme activity on macromolecules and, thus, it is easily degraded by microorganisms [83]. Guo et al. [84] found that the organic matter content of low rank coal slurry is higher and that the aliphatic structure, hydroxyl, and amino groups in the coal are easily shed, which promotes microbial degradation. Biogas reservoirs have been formed in basins where the organic matter maturity of the biogas source rock is at the immature–low maturity stage, such as that observed in the Yinggehai Basin [85], the Qidong area of the Yangtze River Delta [86], and the Norbei area [73] in China.

3.2.2. Effect of Coal Reservoir Environment on Gas Production

(1)
Temperature. The right temperature will encourage microorganisms to perform at optimum efficiency, maximizing methane production. Through anaerobic coal fermentation experiments at different temperatures, domestic scholars have concluded that the methane yield is largest in the range of 303 K to 328 K, and the biomethane yield increases with increasing temperature within a certain range [88,89,90]. However, further research is needed to study the effect of temperature in a narrower range on the biomethane production. The optimum temperature for anaerobic fermentation of indoor coal is now generally considered to be 308 K [91]. Meanwhile, Tang et al. [92] found that at 338 K, the biomethane production mode was dominated by the acetic acid decomposition type, whereas above 338 K, the biomethane production mode was dominated by the CO2 reduction type, indicating that temperature not only affects the activity of methanogenic archaea, but also affects the biomethane output mode.
(2)
Trace elements. Trace elements influence the microbial community, and thus methane production during anaerobic metabolism [93,94]. Xia et al. [95] found that the production of biogenic CBM is stimulated by trace elements. For example, the combination of Fe2+ and Ni2+ has a production-enhancing effect on biogenic CBM, which can shorten the gas production cycle, while the fugacity state of the trace elements in coal shift toward the direction of improving biological effectiveness. Su et al. [96] also found that iron, nickel and cobalt elements affect in situ microorganisms in coal seams, and that iron and nickel elements have a greater impact. Sun et al. [94] investigated the effect of trace elements on the microbial structure in anaerobic fermentation systems and showed that the effect of trace elements on bacterial communities was most prominent for the phyla Bacteroides, thick-walled Bacteroides and Helicobacter, which induced the enrichment of acetic acetotrophic methanogens while promoting the balance between hydrolytic acidification and methanation during anaerobic digestion. Huang et al. [97] found that Fe2+ could promote the synthesis of hydrogenase, thereby increasing gas production. The production of CBM can be stimulated by adding trace elements, the effects of which are different for different types of trace elements. The specific reaction mechanism needs to be further discussed.
(3)
Ph and oxidation-reduction potential (Eh). The activity, as well as the physiological and biochemical characteristics of microorganisms during anaerobic fermentation, is closely related to the pH, and either too high or too low pH will affect biomethane production [98,99,100]. Biogenic CBM simulation experiments using coal samples as a substrate showed that the CH4 output is better at pH 7~8, and both overly-acidic and alkaline environments cause the CH4 output to decrease. Biogenic CBM simulation experiments using seafloor sediments as a substrate showed that the effect of pH on CH4 output varies with the burial depth of the samples (Figure 4) [101,102]. Jin et al. [103] studied the characteristics of microbial community at different pH and showed that pH affects the activity of coal as well as the microbial metabolic processes. When studying the formation pathway of secondary biogenic gas in Huainan, Ding et al. [104] found that pH within 7.2~7.9 is a suitable range for anaerobic bacteria and methanogenic archaea. It has been suggested that the optimal pH for methanogenesis is within the medium–basic range [105]. The lower Eh are suitable for biogenic CBM generation. Using low-rank coal substrate from ShaQu mine and YiMa mine, it was concluded from simulated biogenic CBM production experiments that a lower Eh makes methanogenic archaea metabolically active, thereby promoting the maximum amount and mass fraction for methane production (Figure 5) [106,107].
(4)
Salinity. Salinity has an effect on biogenic CBM production and the activity of methanogenic archaea. Biogenic CBM simulation experiments using low-rank coal as a substrate showed that the activity of methanogenic archaea was restricted with increasing salinity, thereby inhibiting methane gas production, and the corresponding decrease in gas production became obvious with increasing salinity [101]. In contrast, biogenic CBM simulation experiments using seafloor sediments showed that the effect of salinity variation on CH4 production was not significant (Figure 6) [102]. Other studies have also shown that increasing salinity causes a decrease in methane production and a lower methane concentration generated by anaerobic coal fermentation, which is not conducive to biogenic CBM production [108,109].
(5)
Specific surface area and particle size. The specific surface area and particle size affect biomethane production to some extent (Figure 7). A smaller coal particle size and an larger specific surface area enable microorganisms to be in full contact with the coal surface, which contributes to higher biomethane production [98]. Guo et al. [110] conducted gas production experiments using subbituminous coal and found that gas production increased as the coal particle size decreased. In gas production experiments using lignite of different particle sizes, Wang et al. [111] found that the smaller the particle size, the easier it was to produce methane; however, when the particle size was less than 0.15 mm, the effect of particle size on gas production was no longer obvious.

3.2.3. Deposition Environment and Deposition Time

(1)
Sedimentary environment. Some scholars believe that the mode of formation for biogenic CBM is closely related to the sedimentary environment. The formation pathway for biogenic CBM is closely related to the depositional environment. Biomethane in the marine environment is formed mainly through the reduction of CO2 [112]. Biomethane in the freshwater environment is formed mainly by acetic acid fermentation [113]. It has also been suggested that the biogenic CBM formation mechanism does not depend entirely on the depositional environment, and that both pathways of formation can exist in both the marine and terrestrial environments [114]. By analyzing the carbon and hydrogen isotopic compositions of 31 gas samples from 10 biogenic gas reservoirs in China, Shen et al. [115] studied their formation pathways and reservoir characteristics and showed that the formation pathway of biogenic CBM under marine conditions was the typical CO2 reduction pathway with a heavy hydrogen isotopic composition, but the biogenic gas formed under terrestrial conditions was also mainly the CO2 reduction pathway. Therefore, the formation mode of biogas is closely related to, but not entirely dependent on, the sedimentary environment.
(2)
Deposition time. Biogenic CBM production is related to the deposition time and, for shallow biogenic CBM, methane increases with deposition time. It has been shown that in well-preserved strata, gas reservoirs with industrial value can be formed with the change in deposition time, even if the organic carbon content is very low [116]. Lin et al. [117,118] studied the Late Quaternary biogenic gas reservoir in the coastal plain of Hangzhou Bay, China, and found that the formation of this gas reservoir did not exceed 12,000 years, and that the total gas volume reached 2445.27 × 108 m3. Moreover, the formation in the Dafosi well field in the Ordos Basin, which produces biogenic gas from the coal seam, has undergone a very long period of intermittent deposition, allowing atmospheric precipitation to transport microorganisms into the coal seam and promote the generation of biogenic CBM in the area [119].

3.3. Microorganisms

3.3.1. Microbial Characteristics of Coal Reservoirs

The generation of biogenic CBM is inseparable from the activities of the associated microbial community. Similar to a suitable temperature [89], lower redox environment [106], medium alkalinity [101], low mineralization [109], and appropriate trace elements [95], a suitable coal reservoir can provide a good environment for the reproduction of methanogenic archaea, thereby promoting the formation of biogenic CBM [120]. This study shows that the microbial community structure in each coal reservoir has a similar broadness, as well as uniquely dominant microbial groups and abundant taxa. Methanogenic archaea, particularly Methanoculleus and Methanosarcina, are present in the coal of some coal mining areas in the Ordos Basin, while the bacteria are mainly Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria [91]. Su et al. [96] studied the diversity of microorganisms in coal from 10 representative mining areas of China, showing that microorganisms were more diverse and abundant in areas with known biogenic CBM and that the bacterial communities were mainly dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, and the prevalent methanogenic archaea were mainly Methanoculleus, Methanobacterium and Methanolobus. Guo et al. [84] analyzed the compositional characteristics of the microbial community in the coal slurry from the Xilingole in Inner Mongolia, the Yanzishan and Malan mines in Shanxi, and the Zhaoguyi mine in Henan province, and found that there was little variability in the composition of different coal slurry microorganisms, with bacteria dominated by Pseudomonas and Macellibacteroides, and archaea dominated by Methanocorpusculum and Methanothrix. The study concluded that the main widely-distributed bacteria in coal seams are Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, while the archaea are mainly dominated by members of the phylum Euryarchaeota, including Methanococcales, Methanopyrales, Methanobacteriales, Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanocellales (Table 4). Recent studies have identified new methanogenic branches, such as Methanomassiliicoccales [121], Methanofastidiosa [122], Methanonatronarchaeia [123], Verstraetearchaeota [124], and Bathyarchaeota [125], but further studies are needed for the detection, isolation and cultivation of novel methanogenic archaea.
Meanwhile, there are differences in the characteristics of microbial community during the four stages of biogenic CBM generation [7]. The main microorganism involved in the hydrolysis phase of polymeric organic matter are Acinetobacter, Lysinibacillus, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Comamonas and Proteiniphilum [10]. Among them, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas are domestics capable of degrading hydrocarbons and many aromatic compounds [142]. Bacillus not only enhances the thermal stability of cellulose, but also promotes macromolecule hydrolysis [143]. Proteiniphilum is capable of hydrolyzing proteins and lipids [144,145]. Archaea, such as Methanoculleus and Methanobacterium, are also present during this stage, but they are not very active [10].
The main microorganisms involved in the acid-producing fermentation stage are Clostridium, Macellibacteroides, Tissierella, Petrimonas, Desulfosporosinus, and Desulfitobacterium [10]. Among them, Macellibacteroides ferments large molecules of soluble organic matter generated during the hydrolysis stage that produces small molecules of fatty acids, such as acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid [146]. Petrimonas can utilize elemental sulfur and nitrate ions to produce sulfide and ammonia [147]. Both Desulfosporosinus and Desulfitobacterium are able to decompose propionic acid, benzoic acid, acetic acid, and aromatic compounds [148]. During this process, coenzyme F420 activity increases rapidly [149].
The main taxa involved in the hydrogen and acetic acid-producing stage are Syntrophobacter, Sporotomaculum, Syntrophomonas, Desulfitobacterium, Desulfolubous, and Enterobacter [10]. Syntrophobacter degrades propionic acid, producing acetic acid and hydrogen [150]. Sporotomaculum uses fermented benzoic acid to produce butyric acid, acetic acid, and CO2 [151]. Both Syntrophomonas are butyric acid-degrading bacteria that oxidize butyric acid to produce hydrogen and acetic acid [152]. Desulfitobacterium decomposes propionic acid, benzoic acid, ethanol, and aromatic compounds [148]. Desulfolubous degrades propionic acid in the presence of sulfate. The main metabolites of Enterobacter include acetic acid, ethanol, and formic acid, as well as small amounts of H2 and CO2 [153,154]. The hydrotropic methanotrophic Methanobacterium is present at this stage, but the methane yield is not significant due to substrate limitation [135].
The main groups of archaea involved in the methanogenic phase are Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Methanopyrales, Methanocellales, and Methanomassiliicoccales [155,156,157]. Almost all methanogens in the orders Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanopyrales are capable of producing methane via the H2/CO2 pathway [158]. Methanosarcinales is a typical acetic acid-degrading methanogen found in nature [159,160]. Methanobrevibacter, Methanobacterium, and Methanocorpusculum are hydrogenotrophic methanogens that use H2 to reduce CO2, producing methane [136,161]. Methanosarcina and Methanothrix are acetic acid trophic methanogenic archaea that use acetic acid as a fermentation substrate [132]. Both Methanococcus and Methanolobus are methanotrophic methanogenic archaea capable of anaerobic fermentation for methane production by mainly using formic acid, methanol, and methylamines as substrates [132,136,161].
It can be seen that each coal reservoir has its unique dominant and abundant microorganisms, and different dominant microorganisms will be involved in the biogenic CBM formation stage. However, exploration of the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of microbial metabolism during anaerobic coal fermentation for methane production has not yet begun; thus, there is an urgent need to conduct research in the field of metabolomics.

3.3.2. Microbially-Enhanced Biogenic CBM Production

Increased production of biogenic CBM can be achieved by biostimulation and bioaugmentation [162,163]. The addition of chemical substances and organic nutrients, such as trace elements, inorganic minerals, yeast paste, and ethanol, can stimulate the activation of in situ the microbial community of a CBM field, resulting in greater sustained in situ methane production [99,164]. Trace elements, such as Fe, Ni, and Co, are capable of promoting the activity of various enzymes, such as coenzyme F430, coenzyme F420, and hydrogenase, which have a stimulating effect on biomethane production [95,165,166]. Inorganic minerals such as kaolinite and magnetite also have an effect on biological enzyme activity [167]. The addition of kaolin affects F420 enzyme activity, the microbial community structure, and thus the biogenic CBM production process [167]. The addition of nanoscale magnetite [168] promotes the production of acetate and methane, while nanoscale FeCl2/FeS2 results in the formation of an amorphous substance on the coal surface, both of which result in a more stable anaerobic reaction system and an increased methane yield [169]. Wang et al. [98] stimulated microorganisms to increase methane production by adding nutrients, such as yeast paste. The addition of ethanol can change the structure of coal fermenting microorganisms, thereby changing the way biogenic CBM is produced and also increasing the methane content [170,171]. In a pilot field experiment conducted at the surface of a CBM well in the Zheng1 block of Jincheng (Shanxi, China), in situ injection of nutrient fluid into the coalbed led to an increase in the average gas production from an original 16.81 m3/d to 75.13 m3/d, thereby achieving increased CBM production [162].
It has been demonstrated that exogenous methanogenic colonies can degrade coal and produce methane, and that heterogenous colonies have a significantly higher gas production efficiency after domestication with coal as the sole carbon source [172,173]. For coal seams with low biomass, the introduction of exogenous high-efficiency methanogenic archaea can increase biomass and optimize coal seam biological populations and stimulate native bacteria while degrading organic matter and increasing methane production [174]. Lin et al. [175] enriched and domesticated anaerobic sludge samples containing anaerobic microorganisms that could utilize coal methanogenic sites, and the results showed that domestication significantly increased the ability of the strains to utilize coal and the amount of gas production increased [175]. Su et al. [176,177,178] found that white-rot fungi were able to degrade coal and that a combined culture of methanogenic archaea and white-rot fungi was the best optimized solution for the biodegradation of lean coal for methane production. Wang [174] screened microbial populations from mangrove sediments for their ability to degrade organic matter for methane production and found that the addition of this microbial population led to increased methane production in a simulated gas production process using lignite as a substrate.
Field experiments studying the addition of nutrients to stimulate indigenous microorganisms and the addition of exogenous methanogenic archaea have demonstrated that both of these methods can achieve enhanced microbial production. However, the problem that the addition of exogenous methanogens to increase CBM production may lead to contamination of the indigenous microorganisms in the coal seam has not been effectively solved, and the understanding of coal biodegradation for methane production is still insufficient, so this method for increased microbial production has not been widely applied. Therefore, in the future, it is necessary to strengthen research on the isolation and metabolic characterization of key microorganisms and to consider the in situ environmental factors in the coal seam, as well as when studying the technology during laboratory simulation of CBM output, which is conducive to advancing the application process of microbially-enhanced CBM production [164].

4. Conclusions

The introduction of new technologies and methods has not only led to a deeper understanding of the characteristics of microbial community in coal, but also strengthened the knowledge of the synergistic effects within microbial community. Studying the evolutionary characteristics of organic matter in coal during microbial degradation enriches the basic theory of CBM. Exploring chemical treatment methods for coal has accelerated the course of gas production from the microbial degradation of coal.
(1)
An improved understanding of the influencing factors during the process of anaerobic coal fermentation and the mechanism of CBM production has greatly facilitated the process of using geochemical methods to search for natural gas deposits (for example, carbon isotope analysis techniques for biomarker compounds and hydrogen isotope analysis techniques for monomeric hydrocarbons) to better serve the needs of natural gas exploration.
(2)
The characteristics of the microbial community in coal and the exploration of synergistic effects within the microbial community have led to the rapid development of microbial production-enhancing technologies, such as bioaugmentation and biostimulation, which not only enrich the current production-enhancing methods for biogenic CBM, but also greatly improves the gas production potential of small and medium-sized gas reservoirs in China. Thus, as an important replacement energy source for natural gas, biogenic CBM is expected to become one of the main clean energy sources for the next stage of national economic development.
(3)
Experiments simulating coal gas production demonstrate that chemical pretreatment of coal can effectively depolymerize the complex macromolecules in coal into smaller molecules, making the coal matrix more accessible to microorganisms and, thus, increasing the coal bioconversion rate. The chemical pretreatment of coal provides a new direction to shorten the gas production process of microbial coal degradation, and also facilitates the increased production of biogenic CBM, which can better promote CBM towards a diversified path.
(4)
In the context of the “carbon peak, carbon neutrality” strategy, underground coal gasification–carbon capture utilization and storage technologies is one of the essential ways to reduce carbon emissions. Among them, with respect to CBM, in addition to CO2 replacement of CBM to achieve increased production of CBM, the injection of CO2 into goafs and abandoned mines and the recycling of CO2 through CO2 methanation can not only achieve the clean utilization of residual coal, but also promote CO2 emission reduction, which is expected to achieve the strategic goal of “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” as soon as possible.
At the same time, due to the late start of China’s research in the field of biological CBM production, the microbiological research in China is still limited to the screening and isolation of strains, and studying their characteristics and enzyme activities. Meanwhile, low-temperature and efficient methanogenic strains for CBM production have not been cultivated to adapt to the prevailing coal reservoir temperatures in China, and relevant engineering tests are also lacking. The CO2 methanation technology in the field of biogenic CBM is still in the theoretical stage and needs further research. The future research directions for Chinese scholars are likely to focus on the following areas: (1) a study of the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of microbial metabolism during the anaerobic fermentation of coal for methane production; (2) reasonably accessing the best mined and unmined areas for engineering tests for microbial CBM production enhancement; and (3) an in-depth study of the formation mechanism of CO2 methanation.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Y.B. and Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.B. and R.C.; supervision, R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41572138) and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization (No. 2020ZDZZ01A).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IPCC. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Caputre and Storage; Prepared by Working Gourp III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H.C., Loos, M., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge UniversityPress: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 442. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zou, C.N.; He, D.B.; Jia, C.Y.; Xiong, B.; Zhao, Q. Connotation and pathway of world energy transition and its significance for carbon neutral. Acta Pet. Sin. 2021, 42, 233–247. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, R.; Li, G.F. Coalbed Methane Industry Development Framework and Its Limiting Factors in China. Geofluids 2022, 2022, 336315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.S.; Dong, T.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.W. Current status and trends in energy production, consumption, and storage under carbon neutrality conditions in China. Scientia 2021, 66, 4466–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, C.M.; Li, Y.L.; Qi, B.W. Research status and exploration potential of biogenic gas. J. Pala. 2006, 8, 317–330. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rathi, R.; Priya, A.; Vohra, M.; Lavania, M.; Lal, B.; Sarma, P.M. Development of a microbial process for methane generation from bituminous coal at thermophilic conditions. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 147, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ritter, D.J.; Vinson, D.S.; Barnhart, E.P.; Akob, D.M.; Fields, M.W.; Cunningham, A.B.; Orem, W.H.; McIntosh, J.C. Enhanced microbial coalbed methane generation: A review of research, commercial activity, and remaining challenges. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 146, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wang, Y.Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, L.L.; Zhang, P.F.; Li, M. Developing Process and Research Progress of Microbially Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery. Coal Technol. 2018, 37, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Song, Y.; Zhao, M.J.; Hu, G.Y.; Zhu, G.Y. Progress and perspective of natural gas geochemistry researches in China. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2012, 31, 529–542. [Google Scholar]
  10. Su, X.B.; Xia, D.P.; Zhao, W.Z.; Fu, H.J.; Guo, H.G.; He, H.; Bao, Y.; Li, D.; Wei, G.Q. Research advances of coalbed gas bioengineering. Coal Sci. Technol. 2020, 48, 104585. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dong, J. Application of New Gas Chromatography Techniques in Oilfield Natural Gas Composition Analysis. J. Jilin TV Rad. Univ. 2011, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wei, R.B.; Li, D.; Li, B.; Zhou, X.Z. Analysis of Components in Refinery Gases by Gas Chromatograph -External Standard Normalization. Chem. Eng. Oil Gas. 2009, 38, 444–447. [Google Scholar]
  13. Si, W.X. New Progress of Organic Geochemistry Experimental Technology. Sino-Global Energy. 2018, 23, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, H.P. Composition Analysis of Natural Gas by Multi-Dimensional Gas Chromatography. Xinjiang Oil Gas. 2014, 10, 49. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, X.B.; Li, Z.P.; Zhang, M.J.; XIng, L.T.; Cao, C.H.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.W. Compound-specific hydrogen isotope analysis for trace hydrocarbons in natural gas by using solid phase micro-extraction coupled to gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2016, 27, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, X.Q.; Xiao, X.M.; Tian, H.; Tang, Y.C.; Fang, J.H.; Zhou, Q. The modelling of carbon isotope kinetics and its application to the evaluation of natural gas. Earth Sci. Front. 2005, 12, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lu, Z.D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.L.; Fan, Y.P.; Wen, Z.G.; Xu, Y.H.; Jin, N.; Tian, Y.J.; Liu, B.; Xie, X.M.; et al. An improved method and indications for the compound specific isotopic analysis of hopanes in source rock extracts. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2022, 44, 288–294. [Google Scholar]
  18. Feng, X.J.; Wang, Y.Y.; Liu, T.; Jia, J.; Dai, G.H.; Ma, T.; Liu, Z.G. Biomarkers and their applications in ecosystem research. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2020, 44, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, H.L.; Tao, S.Q.; Yu, M.; Zhao, M.X. A review on techniques and applications of biomarker compound-specific radiocarbon analysis. Adv. Earth Sci. 2017, 32, 1193–1203. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dong, F.J. Application of GC-MS in Environmental Monitoring. Shandong Chem. Ind. 2020, 49, 75–76, 78. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu, T.R.; Liu, X.Y.; Xu, G.W. Advances of Analytical Methods for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics. J. Instrum. Anal. 2020, 39, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Z. Application analysis of ion chromatography technology in water environment detection. Leather Manuf. Environ. Technol. 2021, 2, 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, B.G. Application of X-ray diffraction (XRD) in study of coal structure. Mod. Bus. Tra. Ind. 2014, 26, 195–196. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, B.; Yang, Y.Z.; Liu, L.T.; Bai, B.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wang, C.X. Application of Raman spectroscopy in coal properties analysis. Clean Coal Technol. 2015, 21, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, H.P.; Zhang, S.C.; Xuan, Y.; Wang, Q. The Research Progress of Oxygen Containing Functional Groupsin Coal. J. Northeast. Electr. Power Univ. 2017, 37, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fu, X.X.; Zhang, D.F.; Kang, W.P.; Lun, Z.M.; Zhao, C.P.; Wang, H.T.; Li, Y.H. Influence of physicochemical properties of coals on pore morphology and methane adsorption: A perspective. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2019, 38, 2714–2725. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, C.; Li, J.B.; Rui, J.P.; An, J.X.; Li, X.Z. The applications of the 16S rRNA gene in microbial ecology: Current situation and problems. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 35, 2769–2788. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, A.K.; Qin, Y. Research status and progress of experimental study on biogenic coalbed methane. Coal Geol. Explor. 2010, 38, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu, Z.J. Application of Microbial Molecular Ecological Technology in the Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soil. Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University, BeiJing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dahllöf, I. Molecular community analysis of microbial diversity. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2002, 13, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, X.H.; Li, X.X.; Zhang, W.; Yan, Y.L.; Chen, M.; Lu, W. Application of Metatranscriptomics in Microbial Ecology. J. Agr. Sci. Tech-Iran. 2011, 13, 58–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, Z.; Yan, Y.P.; Cui, J.N.; Hu, J.H.; Li, Y.L.; Zhu, M.D.; Liu, Z.Y. Advances in Methods of Microbial Molecular Ecology. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2022, 43, 483–492. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, A.K.; Qin, Y. Performance of indigenous bacteria during the biogenic gas generation from brown coal. J. China Univ. Min. Tech. 2011, 40, 888–893. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, S.Y.; Guo, X.Q.; Li, Z.J.; Ye, C.Y.; Zhao, A.L.; Xu, J.G. Evaluation of 16S rRNA Gene Clone Library in Analyzing Bacterial Flora by Mixed Bacterial Suspension. J. Army Med. Univ. 2008, 30, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, B. Application of Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Monitor of Environmental Microbial Ecology. Biotechnology 2007, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, S.; Yang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Jing, Y. Application of High Throughput Sequencing in the Diversity of Water Microbial Communities. Chemistry 2014, 77, 196–203. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen, R.; Qin, Y.; Wang, A.K.; Yang, Z.B.; Wang, G.L. Advances on Research and Application of Fractionated Effect of Coalbed Gas. Coal. Geol. China 2009, 21, 27–33, 81. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tao, M.X.; Wang, W.C.; Jie, G.X.; Li, J.Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.J.; Zhang, H.; Shi, B.G.; Gao, B. Secondary biogenic coalbed methane found in some coalfields in China. Scientia 2005, S1, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, W.C.; Tao, M.X.; Zhang, X.J.; Ren, J.H. C25, C30 and Other Acyclic Isoprenoid Alkanes in the Coal Rock of the Liyazhuang Coal Mine and Their Geochemical Significance. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2006, 24, 897–900. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, X.J.; Tao, M.X.; Jie, G.X.; Wang, Y.L.; Shi, B.G. Studies on Resources Significance and Mixing Proportion of Secondary Biogenic Gas in Coalbed Gases, Huainan Coalfield. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2007, 25, 314–318. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tong, L.; Ju, Y.W.; Yang, M.; Hou, Q.L.; Zhang, W.J.; Fang, L.Z.; Yan, Z.F. Geochemical evidence of secondary biogenic and generation approach in Luling Coal Mine of Huaibei coalfield. J. China Coal Soc. 2013, 38, 288–293. [Google Scholar]
  42. Guan, D.S. Basic geological factors controlling biogas rich integrated reservoirs. Nat. Gas Ind. 1997, 4, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Dai, J.X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.B. The Geochemical behaviors and exploration domains of biogenetic gas in China. Nat. Gas Ind. 2009, 29, 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, T. Theory Progress of Natural gas geology and strategy of gas exploration. Oil Gas Geology 2002, 32, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cao, D.Y.; Li, X.M.; Wei, Y.C.; Zhang, S.R. Study on pyrogenation hydrocarbon generation character of deformed coal and undeformed coal. Coal Geol. Explor. 2005, 33, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
  46. Schoell, M. The hydrogen and carbon isotopic composition of methane from natural gases of various origins. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 1980, 44, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Edward, A.; Mitsurru, E. Solar-system abundances of the elements. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 1982, 46, 2363–2380. [Google Scholar]
  48. Whiticar, M.J.; Fabei, E.; Schoell, M. Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation-Isotopic evidence. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 1986, 50, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dai, J.X.; Shi, X.; Wei, Y.Z. Theory of inorganic origin oil and gas and overview of inorganic origin gas fields (reservoirs). Acta Pet. Sin. 2001, 22, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
  50. Tao, M.X.; Wang, W.C.; Li, Z.P.; Ma, Y.Z.; Li, J.; Li, X.B. Comprehensive study on genetic pathways and parent materials of secondary biogenic gas in coalbeds. Scientia 2014, 59, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, R.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, L.L.; Liu, G.W. Research progress on characteristics of biogenic coalbed gases and its influence factors. Coal Sci. Technol. 2016, 44, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  52. Su, X.B.; Lin, X.Y. Coalbed Methane Geology, 3rd ed.; China Coal Industry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2009; pp. 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hu, G.Y.; Luo, X.; Li, Z.S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Li, J.; Ni, Y.Y.; Tao, X.W. The geochemical characteristics and origin of light hydrocarbons in biogenic gas. Sci. Sin. Terr. 2010, 40, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.G.; Chen, H.J. On the generation and accumulation of biogenic gas. Oil Gas Geol. 1983, 4, 160–170. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bao, Y. Study on Quantitative Identification of Biogenic Coalbed Methane and its Reservoir Formaing. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of mining and technology, Xuzhou, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, Y.; Dai, J.X.; Qi, H.F. On some theoretiical and methodological topics of biogenic gas studies. Pet. Geol. Exp. 1994, 16, 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dai, J.X.; Qi, H.F.; Song, Y.; Guan, D. CBM components, carbon isotope types and their genesis and significance in China. Sci. Sin. Chim. 1986, 12, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar]
  58. Qin, Y.; Tang, X.Y.; Ye, J.P.; Jiao, S.H. Characteristics and Origins of Stable Carbon Isotope in Coalbed Methane of China. J. China Univ. Min. Tech. 2000, 29, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ju, Y.W.; Li, Q.G.; Yan, Z.F.; Sun, Y.; Bao, Y. Origin types of CBM and their geochemical research progress. J. China Coal Soc. 2014, 39, 806–815. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bao, Y.; Hu, Y.L.; Li, D.; Sun, X.Y.; Ju, Y.W. Advance on the genetic mechanism of lighter carbon isotopic composition in coalbed methane. J. Xian Univ. Sci. Tech. 2021, 41, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar]
  61. Qin, S.F.; Tang, X.Y.; Song, Y.; Wang, H.Y. Carbon isotope distribution characteristics and fractionation mechanism of coal seam methane. Sci. Sin. Terr. 2006, 36, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, B.; Jiang, B.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, H.L.; Chen, Z.H.; Li, G.Z. Experimental Study on Physical Modeling of Hydrodynamic Condition in Low-Rank Coalbed Methane Reservoir. Xinjiang Pet. Geol. 2006, 27, 176–177. [Google Scholar]
  63. Song, Y.; Qin, S.F.; Zhao, M.J. Two key geological factors controlling the coalbed methane reservoirs in china. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2007, 18, 545–553. [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith, J.W.; Pallasser, R.J. Microbial origin of Australian coalbed methane. AAPG Bull. 1996, 80, 891–897. [Google Scholar]
  65. Shurr, G.W.; Ridgley, J.L. Unconventional shallow biogenic gas systems. AAPG Bull. 2002, 86, 1939–1969. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, G.S. Potential Evaluation of Coalbed Methane Resources in The North of Bowen Basin, Australia. Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), BeiJing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  67. Tang, Y.; Gu, F.; Wu, X.D.; Ye, H.; Yu, Y.X.; Zhong, M.H. Coalbed methane accumulation conditions and enrichment models of Walloon Coal measure in the Surat Basin, Australia. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2018, 5, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chosson, P.; Connan, J.; Dessort, D. In vitro biodegradation of steranes and terpanes: A clue to understanding geological situations. In Biological Markers in Sediments and Petroleum; Moldowan, J.M., Albrecht, P., Philp, R.P., Eds.; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1992; pp. 320–394. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pan, X.Z.; Zhang, G.H.; Huang, B.J.; Huang, Y.W.; Li, L.; Jiang, Z.S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.S.; Luo, X. Biodegradation and mixed sources of shallow gasfields in Yinggehai Basin. China Offshore Oil and Gas. 2002, 16, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
  70. Guan, P.; Zhang, D.R.; Huang, D.P. Eochemistry of biogas and organic acids in the eastern Qaidam Basin. Pet. Explor. Dev. 1995, 22, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  71. Huang, B.J.; Xiao, X.M. Characteristics and Generation Evolution Model of Marine Biogas in the Yinggehai Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2002, 20, 462–469. [Google Scholar]
  72. Wei, G.Q.; Liu, D.L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.L.; Hu, G.Y.; Li, J. Formation mechanism, distribution feature and exploration prospect of the Quaternary biogenic gas in Qaidam Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2005, 32, 84–89. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lin, P.X.; Zhang, X.; Lin, C.M.; Wang, D.H.; Zhang, K.H.; Xiao, Y.J.; Luan, S.L. Formation Mechanism and Factors on the Accumulations of the Quaternary Biogenic Gas in the Nuobei Area in the Sanhu Depression, Qaidam Basin. Geol. J. China Univ. 2018, 24, 810–821. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhou, T.S.; Zhang, W.W.; Ju, J.C.; Han, H.W.; Wang, Y.S.; Yang, S.J.; Cao, Y.S. Discovery of regional salt crust and geological significance of biogas exploration in Sanhu Depression of Tsaidam Basin. J. Northeast Pet. Univ. 2020, 44, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  75. Li, J. Geochemical Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Natural Gas in Sanhu-Yiliping Area, Qaidam Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wang, A.K. Generation and Mechanism of Gas from Brown Coal under Action of Parent Bacterium. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of mining & technology, Xuzhou, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang, D.R.; Luo, H.Z. Geochemical characteristics of the natural gas and source rocks in Luliang basin, Yunnan province- a possibility of sur-veying biogas fields in Dian-Qian-Gui region. Nat. Gas Ind. 2000, 12–15, 10. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhang, W.H.; Li, S.Z.; Wang, D.D.; Zhou, X.G.; Zhang, J.D.; Liu, W.B. An important discovery of shallow biogas in Sanjiang Basin, Northeast China. Geol. China. 2019, 46, 1578–1579. [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, Q.Y.; Liu, W.H.; Qin, S.F.; Wang, W.C.; Gao, B. Gas-generation characteristics of coal rock and its marceral in thermal simulation. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2002, 24, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  80. Song, J.X.; Guo, H.Y.; Chen, S.L.; Xia, D.P.; Wang, S.S.; Su, X.B. Control effects of coal maceral composition on the metabolism of biogenic methane. Nat. Gas Ind. 2016, 36, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  81. Jin, H. The Simulation Experiment Study on Biogenic Coalbed Methane Production from Low and Middle Rank Coal Macerals. Master’s Thesis, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhang, R.; Xia, Y.C.; Tan, J.L.; Ding, S.H.; Xing, Y.W.; Gui, X.H. Analysis and research on low rank coal carbon structure. China Coal. 2018, 44, 88–94, 116. [Google Scholar]
  83. Xia, D.P.; Guo, H.Y.; Ma, J.Q.; Si, Q.; Su, X.B. Impact of Biogenic Methane Metabolism on Pore Structure of Coals. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2014, 25, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar]
  84. Guo, H.Y.; Zhao, S.F.; Chen, Z.H.; Shen, Y.; Ji, C.J.; Xu, X.K. Analysis of influencing factors of biological methane production with coal slime by anaerobic fermentation. J. China Coal Soc. 2021, 46, 840–848. [Google Scholar]
  85. Shen, S. Research on the Resources Potential of Biogenic Gas in the North of SongLiao Basin. Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum, ShanDong, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  86. Feng, X.D. Research about Geochemistry Characteristics of the Holocene Shallow-Biogenic Gas Source Sediments in Jiangzhe Coastal Plains area. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  87. Cui, X.C. Evaluation on Coal Gas Source Rock of Carboniferous-Perminan in HuangHeBei Coalfield and Jiyang Basin. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  88. Guan, D.S. Existing Conditions for Methanobacteria and Biogenetic Gases. Nat. Gas Ind. 1990, 10, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  89. Su, X.B.; Wu, Y.; Xia, D.P.; Chen, X. Effect of temperature on biological methane generation of low rank coal. Coal Geol. Explor. 2012, 40, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang, Y.T.; Han, Y.X.; He, H.; Wang, S.S.; Leng, Y.W. Study on Influencing Factors for Biogenic Gas Production in lignite. Coal Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 120–128. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tang, Y.Q.; Ji, P.; Lai, G.L.; Chi, C.Q.; Liu, Z.S.; Wu, X.L. Diverse microbial community from the coalbeds of the Ordos Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 90, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tang, Y.; Matsui, T.; Morimura, S.; Wu, X.; Kide, K. Effect of temperature on microbial community of a glucose-degrading methanogenic consortium under hyperthermophilic chemostat cultivation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cao, W.; Wang, M.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Miao, Y.; Sun, C.; Hu, C. The chemical and dynamic distribution characteristics of iron, cobalt and nickel in three different anaerobic digestates: Effect of pH and trace elements dosage. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Sun, J.; Li, D.; Zheng, T.; Liu, X.F.; Chen, L.; He, M.Y. Effects of trace elements on microbial community structure in continuous anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2019, 25, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  95. Xia, D.P.; Lan, J.Y.; Chen, X.; Su, X.B. Study on the excitation and blocking system of trace elements in coals on the production of biogenic methane. J. China Coal Soc. 2017, 42, 1230–1235. [Google Scholar]
  96. Su, X.B.; Zhao, W.Z.; Xia, D.P. The diversity of hydrogen-producing bacteria and methanogens within an in situ coal seam. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2018, 11, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Huang, S.; Xia, D.P.; Yan, X.T.; Liu, C.L.; Sun, C.Y.; Guo, H.Y. Response Analysis of Acclimation to Hydrogenase Activity During the Process of Biogenic Gas Generation from Long Flame Coal. Coal Convers. 2021, 44, 22–30. [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang, H.; Lin, H.; Dong, Y.B.; Sui, M.Q.; Li, Y.Z. Experiments on the gas production of brown coal degraded by exogenous methanogens. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2012, 39, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, S.; Dong, H.L.; Hou, W.G.; Jiang, H.Z.; Wan, Y.Y.; Wei, X.F.; Shuai, Y.H. Isotopic and Microbiological Charicterization of Secondary Biogenic Coalbed Methane. Earth Environ. 2013, 41, 335–345. [Google Scholar]
  100. Nie, Z.Q.; Yang, X.Q.; Han, Z.Y. Function and diversity of microbial community in biogenic coal-bed methane with different coal ranks: A review. Microbiol. China 2019, 46, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar]
  101. Su, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xia, D.P. Effect of salinity and pH on biogenic methane production of low-rank coal. J. China Coal Soc. 2011, 36, 1302–1306. [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Lin, X.Y.; Kong, B.; Xiao, Q.L. Evolution characteristics of biogas in seabed sediments and their influencing factors on gas sources. Mar. Geol. Quat. Geol. 2020, 40, 169–177. [Google Scholar]
  103. Jin, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wang, P.; Jin, R.; Gao, M.; Wang, Q.; Chang, T.C.; Ma, H. Volatile fatty acids production from saccharification residue from food waste ethanol fermentation: Effect of pH and microbial community. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ding, F.F.; Li, J.F.; Li, B.L.; Shi, M.J.; Ran, Z.K. Study on Formation Pathway of Secondary Biological Coalbed Methane in Huainan Coal Seam. Environ. Prot. Oil Gas Fields. 2021, 31, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wang, K.; Yin, J.; Shen, D.; Li, N. Anaerobic digestion of food waste for volatile fatty acids (VFAs)production with different types of inoculum: Effect of pH. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 161, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xia, D.P.; Chen, X.; Su, X.B.; Wu, Y. Impact of oxidation-reduction potential on the generation of biogenic methane in low-rank coals. Nat. Gas Ind. 2012, 32, 107–110. [Google Scholar]
  107. Qiao, L.H.; Xia, D.P.; Tang, S.H.; Song, S.H.; Zhang, W.D. The control of pH and Eh of the gas production of low rank coal. Coal Geol. Explor. 2016, 44, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  108. Li, B.L.; Wang, M.M.; Ran, Q.G.; Peng, X.L.; Zhang, D.W.; Wang, J.P. Effect of the salinity of formation water on biogas migration, accumulation and reservoir formation. Nat. Gas Ind. 2003, 23, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  109. Ge, J.L.; Xu, H.Y.; Zhang, L.L. Research Status Quo of Biogenic Coal-Bed Methane. J. Microbiol. 2016, 36, 90–95. [Google Scholar]
  110. Guo, H.; Liu, X.; Bai, Y.; Chen, S. Impact of Coal Particle Size on Biogenic Methane Metabolism and Its Significance. J. Comput. Theor. Nanoscience. 2016, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wang, A.K.; Qin, Y.; Shao, P. Effect Characteristics of Coal Particle Size on Lignite Biogas Generation. China Coalbed Methane. 2015, 12, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang, H.; Lian, L.W.; Zhang, H.N. The composition and distribution of some kinds of anaerobic microorganisms in the different sedimentary environments. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 1992, 32, 182–190. [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang, S.C.; Zhao, W.Z.; Li, X.Q.; Huang, H.P.; Su, A.G.; Shuai, Y.H. Advances in biogenic gas studies and play strategies. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2005, 32, 90–96. [Google Scholar]
  114. Dai, J.X.; Chen, Y. Carbon isotope characteristics and identification markers of alkane components in biogas in China. Sci. Sin. Chim. 1993, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shen, P.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, Y.; Shi, B.G.; Xu, Y.C. Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopic Compositions: Generation pathway of bacterial gas in China. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2010, 28, 183–187, 207. [Google Scholar]
  116. Lu, W.W.; Hai, X.Z. Simulation Experiments on Biogas Generation and Estimation of Generation amount of Biogas in Atrata. Pet. Geol. Exp. 1991, 13, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  117. Lin, C.M.; Huang, Z.C.; Zhu, S.Z.; Li, C.X.; Jiang, W.S. Late Quaternary Sedimentary Characteristics and Processes in the Hangzhou Bay Coastal Plain. Acta Geol. Sin. 1999, 73, 120–130. [Google Scholar]
  118. Lin, C.M.; Zhuo, H.C.; Li, G.Y.; Chen, H.Y. Estmi ates of shallow biogas resources in Hangzhou Bay area and its geological implications. Oil Gas Geol. 2005, 26, 823–830, 839. [Google Scholar]
  119. Liu, H.N.; Cao, H.F. Dafosi Mine Field Coalbed Methane Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis Analysis. Coal Technol. 2020, 39, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  120. Hao, H.L.; Wang, H.C.; Tian, J.J.; Yang, S.B.; Cheng, X.Q. Discussion on genesis of coalbed methane in Fukang Mining Area. Saf. Coal Mines. 2021, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  121. Tajima, K.; Nagamine, T.; Matsui, H.; Nakamura, M.; Aminov, R.I. Phylogenetic analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA libraries from the rumen suggests the existence of a novel group of archaea not associated with known methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 200, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nobu, M.K.; Narihiro, T.; Kuroda, K.; Mei, R.; Liu, W.T. Chasing the elusive Euryarchaeota class WSA2: Genomes reveal a uniquely fastidious methyl-reducing methanogen. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2478–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sorokin, D.Y.; Makarova, K.S.; Abbas, B.; Ferrer, M.; Golyshin, P.N.; Galinski, E.A.; Ciordia, S.; Mena, M.C.; Merkel, A.Y.; Wolf, Y.I.; et al. Discovery of extremely halophilic, methyl-reducing euryarchaea provides insights into the evolutionary origin of methanogenesis. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Vanwonterghem, I.; Evans, P.N.; Parks, D.H.; Jensen, P.D.; Woodcroft, B.J.; Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G.W. Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Evans, P.N.; Parks, D.H.; Chadwick, G.L.; Robbins, S.J.; Orphan, V.J.; Golding, S.D.; Tyson, G.W. Methane metabolism in the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota revealed by genome-centric metagenomics. Science 2015, 350, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Zhang, J.; Park, S.Y.; Liang, Y.N.; Harpalani, S. Finding cost-effective nutrient solutions and evaluating environmental conditions for biogasifying bituminous coal to methane ex situ. Appl. Energy. 2016, 165, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Wei, M.; Yu, Z.S.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, H.X. Microbial diversity and biogenic methane potential of a thermogenic-gas coal mine. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 134, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gallagher, L.K.; Glossner, A.W.; Landkamer, L.L.; Figueroa, L.A.; Mandernack, K.W.; Munakata-Marr, J. The effect of coal oxidation on methane production and microbial community structure in Powder River Basin coal. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2013, 115, 71–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Guo, H.; Liu, R.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yun, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Pan, J. Pyrosequencing reveals the dominance of methylotrophic methanogenesis in a coal bed methane reservoir associated with Eastern Ordos Basin in China. Int. J. Coal Geology. 2012, 93, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, J.; Liang, Y.; Pandey, R.; Harpalani, S. Characterizing microbial com- munities dedicated for conversion of coal to methane in situ and ex situ. Int. J. Coal Geology. 2015, 146, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Fuertez, J.; Córdoba, G.; McLennan, J.D.; Adams, D.J.; Sparks, T.D. Potential application of developed methanogenic microbial consortia for coal biogasification. Int. J. Coal Geology. 2018, 188, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Strąpoć, D.; Mastalerz, M.; Dawson, K.; Macalady, J.; Callaghan, A.V.; Boris, W.; Turich, C.; Ashby, M. Biogeochemistry of Microbial Coal-Bed Methane. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2011, 39, 617–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Shimizu, S.; Akiyama, M.; Naganuma, T.; Fujioka, M.; Nako, M.; Ishijima, Y. Molecular characterization of microbial communities in deep coal seam groundwater of northern Japan. Geobiology 2007, 5, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Meslé, M.; Dromart, G.; Oger, P. Microbial methanogenesis in subsurface oil and coal. Res. Microbiol. 2013, 164, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Strapoc, D.; Picardal, F.W.; Turich, C.; Schaperdoth, I.; Macalady, J.L.; Lipp, J.S.; Lin, Y.S.; Ertefai, T.F.; Schubotz, F.; Hinrichs, K.-U.; et al. Methane-pro-ducing microbial community in a coalbed of the Illinois Basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2424–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Liu, Y.C.; Whitman, W.B. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2008, 1125, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yang, Y.X. Syntrophic Cultivation of Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens and Syntrophic Propionate-Oxidizing Bacteria. Master’s Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  138. Klein, D.A.; Flores, R.M.; Venot, C.; Gabbert, K.; Schmidt, R.; Stricker, G.D.; Pruden, A.; Mandernack, K. Molecular sequences derived from Paleocene Fort Union Formation coals vs associated produced waters: Implications for CBM regeneration. Int. J. Coal Geology. 2008, 76, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lu, X.F. Enhanced Efficiency of Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion by an Iron Oxidezeolite System. Ph.D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  140. Feldewert, C.; Lang, K.; Brune, A. The hydrogen threshold of obligately methyl-reducing methanogens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Duan, C.H.; Zhang, C.J.; Sun, Y.H.; Li, M. Recent advances on the novel methanogens. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2019, 59, 981–995. [Google Scholar]
  142. Mara, K.; Decorosi, F.; Viti, C.; Giovannetti, L.; Papaleo, M.C.; Maida, I.; Perrin, E.; Fondi, M.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Nemec, A. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Acinetobacter strains able to degrade diesel fuel. Res. Microbiol. 2012, 163, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Arima, K.; Kakinuma, A.; Tamura, G. Surfactin, a crystalline peptidelipid surfactant produced by Bacillussubtilis: Isolation, characterization and its inhibition of fibrin clot formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1968, 31, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chen, S.Y.; Dong, X.Z. Proteiniphilum acetatigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., from a UASB reactor treating brewery wastewater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Hahnke, S.; Langer, T.; Klocke, M. Proteiniborus indolifex sp nov, isolated from a thermophilic industrial-scale biogas plant. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jabari, L.; Gannoun, H.; Cayol, J.L.; Hedi, A.; Sakamoto, M.; Falsen, E.; Ohkuma, M.; Hamdi, M.; Fauque, G.; Ollivier, B.; et al. Macellibacteroides fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Porphyromonadaceae isolated from an upflow anaerobic filter treating abattoir wastewaters. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 2522–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Grabowski, A.; Tindall, B.J.; Bardin, V.; Blanchet, D.; Jeanthon, C. Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Robertson, W.J.; Bowman, J.P.; Franzmann, P.D.; Mee, B.J. Desulfosporosinus meridiei sp nov: A spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from gasolene-contaminated groundwater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Wang, S. Construction of dominant Hydrogen-Producing Acetogens and the Bioaugmentation for Developing the Efficacy of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment System. Master’s Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin, Harbin, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  150. Boone, D.R.; Bryant, M.P. Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1980, 40, 626–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Brauman, A.; Müller, J.A.; Garcia, J.L.; Brune, A.; Schink, B. Fermentative degradation of 3-hydroxybenzoate in pure culture by a novel strictly anaerobic bacterium, Sporotomaculum hydroxybenzoicum gen. nov., sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1998, 48, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Müller, N.; Worm, P.; Schink, B.; Stams, A.J.M.; Plugge, C.M. Syntrophic butyrate and propionate oxidation processes: From genomes to reaction mechanisms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Guo, H.; Cheng, Y.; Huang, Z.; Urynowicz, M.A.; Liang, W.; Han, Z.; Liu, J. Factors affecting co-degradation of coal and straw to enhance biogenic coalbed methane. Fuel 2018, 244, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Faiz, M.; Stalker, L.; Sherwood, N.; Saghafi, A.; Wold, M.; Barclay, S.; Choudhury, J.; Barker, W.; Wang, I. Bioenhancement of coal bed methane resources in the southern Sydney Basin. APPEA J. 2003, 43, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Bapteste, É.; Brochier, C.; Boucher, Y. Higher-level classification of the Archaea: Evolution of methaeogenesis and methanogens. Archaea 2005, 1, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Sakai, S.; Imachi, H.; Hanada, S.; Ohashi, A.; Harada, H.; Kamagata, Y. Methanocella paludicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon, the first isolate of the lineage ‘Rice Cluster I’, and proposal of the new archaeal order Methanocellales ord. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Lang, K.; Schuldes, J.; Klingl, A.; Poehlein, A.; Daniel, R.; Brune, A. New Mode of Energy Metabolism in the Seventh Order of Methanogens as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis of “Candidatus Methanoplasma termitum”. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2015, 81, 1338–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Wang, Y.F. The Effects of Temperature on Methanogenic Metabolic Pathways and Microbial Community during the processes of Anaerobic Digestion. Master’s Thesis, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  159. Yashiro, Y.; Sakai, S.; Ehara, M.; Miyazaki, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Imachi, H. Methanoregula formicica sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon isolated from methanogenic sludge. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Barnhart, E.P.; DeLeón, K.B.; Ramsay, B.D.; Cunningham, A.B.; Fields, M.W. Investigation of coal-associated bacterial and archaeal populations from a diffusive microbial sampler (DMS). Int. J. Coal Geol. 2013, 115, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Green, M.S.; Flanegan, K.C.; Gilcrease, P.C. Characterization of a methanogenic consortium enriched from a coalbed methane well in the Powder River Basin, U.S.A. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2008, 76, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ren, F.P.; Han, C.S.; Wang, L.X.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, S.Z.; Liu, B. Microbially enhanced CBM well production rate technology and its application. Oil Drill. Prod. Technol. 2016, 38, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
  163. Bao, Y.; Chang, J.N.; Liu, X.R.; Xia, D.P.; Wang, Y.Y. Research progress and mechanism of pretreatment key technologies in coalbed gas bioengineering. Coal Geol. Explor. 2022, 50, 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  164. Guo, H.G.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.G. Research progress of microbially enhanced coalbed methane. Microbiol. China 2015, 42, 584–590. [Google Scholar]
  165. Lin, M.; Ren, N.Q.; Wang, A.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Ma, F. Promotion of hydrogen producing ability of hydrogen producing bacteria by several kinds of metal ions. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 2003, 35, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  166. Rui, D.; Xia, D.P.; Wang, X.J.; Yan, X.T. Effects of Fe2+, Ni2+ and complexes on biomethane from coal and its kinetics mechanism study. Coal Sci. Technol. 2021, 49, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  167. He, H.; Huang, X.Y.; Huang, Z.X.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Z.H.; Zhao, H.; Ren, H.X.; Huang, G.H. Effect of kaolin on biogenic coalbed methane production and the response of microbial community. Coal Geol. Explor. 2022, 50, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  168. Yang, Z.M.; Xu, x.C.; Guo, R.B.; Fan, X.L.; Zhao, X.X. Accelerated methanogenesis from effluents of hydrogen-producing stage in anaerobic digestion by mixed cultures enriched with acetate and nano-sized magnetite particles. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 190, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Xia, D.P.; Huang, S.; Gao, Z.X.; Su, X.B. Effect of different inorganic iron compounds on the biological methanation of CO2 sequestered in coal seams. Renew. Energy. 2021, 164, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Yang, X.Q.; Liang, Q.; Han, Z.Y. Effect of Ethanol on the Structure and Gas Production Pathways of Coal Geological Microorganisms in Biogas Production Process. J. Shanxi Univ., Nat. Sci. Ed. 2019, 42, 941–950. [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhang, J.; Liang, Y.N.; Harpalani, S. Optimization of methane production from bituminous coal through biogasification. Appl. Energy. 2016, 183, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Faiz, M.; Hendry, P. Significance of microbial activity in Australian coal bed methane reservoirs -- a review. Bull. Can. Pet. Geol. 2006, 54, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Wang, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, J.B.; Liang, M. Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 848–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wang, H. Research on Screening of Microbial Communities for Bioenhancement of Coal Seam Methane and Biohydrogen Production and Microbial Community Structure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  175. Lin, H.; Sui, M.Q.; Wang, H. Domestication of microbially enhanced coalbed methane microorganism. J. China Coal Soc. 2012, 37, 1359–1363. [Google Scholar]
  176. Su, X.B.; Chen, X.; Xia, D.P.; Cui, Q.Y.; Zhang, H.Q. Study on degradation of different rank coals by white-rot fungus. J. Henan Polytech. Univ. Nat. Sci. 2013, 32, 281–284. [Google Scholar]
  177. Su, X.B.; Wu, Y.; Xia, D.P.; Chen, X. Experimental study on the simulated biological methane production process with lean coal. J. China Coal Soc. 2013, 38, 1055–1059. [Google Scholar]
  178. Su, X.B.; Wu, Y.; Xia, D.P.; Chen, X. Experimental design schemes for bio-methane production from coal and optimal selection. Nat. Gas Ind. 2013, 33, 132–136. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Common molecular approaches to study microbial diversity (Adapted from [30,31,32]). Boxes with bold frames indicate necessary preparatory steps before detection and analysis can be performed; boxes with thin frames represent detection techniques. FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; T-RFLP, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism; DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.
Figure 1. Common molecular approaches to study microbial diversity (Adapted from [30,31,32]). Boxes with bold frames indicate necessary preparatory steps before detection and analysis can be performed; boxes with thin frames represent detection techniques. FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; T-RFLP, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism; DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.
Microorganisms 11 00304 g001
Figure 3. Relationship between maceral and gas production (Adapted from [80,81]). (The coal samples of LiangJia coal mines, YiMa coal mines, DaTong coal mines and PanYi coal mines are abbreviated as LJ coal, YM coal, DT coal, and PY coal, respectively, in Figure).
Figure 3. Relationship between maceral and gas production (Adapted from [80,81]). (The coal samples of LiangJia coal mines, YiMa coal mines, DaTong coal mines and PanYi coal mines are abbreviated as LJ coal, YM coal, DT coal, and PY coal, respectively, in Figure).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g003
Figure 4. The relationship between pH and gas production (Adapted from [101,102]).
Figure 4. The relationship between pH and gas production (Adapted from [101,102]).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between Eh and gas production (Adapted from [106,107]). (The coal samples of ShaQu coal mines and YiMa coal mines are abbreviated as SQ and YM, respectively, in Figure).
Figure 5. The relationship between Eh and gas production (Adapted from [106,107]). (The coal samples of ShaQu coal mines and YiMa coal mines are abbreviated as SQ and YM, respectively, in Figure).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g005
Figure 6. The relationship between salinity and gas production (Adapted from [101,102]).
Figure 6. The relationship between salinity and gas production (Adapted from [101,102]).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g006
Figure 7. The relationship between particle size and gas production (Adapted from [110,111]).
Figure 7. The relationship between particle size and gas production (Adapted from [110,111]).
Microorganisms 11 00304 g007
Table 1. Classification of coalbed methane genetic types [52].
Table 1. Classification of coalbed methane genetic types [52].
Genetic TypeTracer IndicatorsRo/%
Isotopic Composition
δ13C1(PDB), δD1(SMOW)
Component Ratio
Organic genesisBiogenesisProtobiogenic gasδ13C1 < −55‰φC1/φC15 > 0.95≤0.5
Secondary biogenic gasδ13C1 < −55‰
δD1: −250‰~−150‰
φC1/φC15 > 0.950.3~1.5
Thermo-genesisPrimary thermogenesisThermal degradation gasδ13C1: −46.2‰~−35.1‰
δD1: −247.3‰~−225.9‰
φC1/φC1n: 0.84~0.94
CDMI: 0~90.55%
0.5~2.0
Thermal cracking gasδ13C1: −37.5‰~−29.6‰
δD1: >−200‰
φC1/φC1+2 > 0.99
φC1/φC2 ≥ 3385
CDMI: ≤0.13%
>2~
2.5
Secondary thermogenesisThe hydrocarbon isotopes of methane become even lighterThe drying coefficient increased further, but the CO2 content increased>0.5
Mixed genesisGas mixtureδ13C1: −61.3‰~−50.7‰
δD1: −242.5‰~−219.4‰
δ13C2: −26.7‰~−15.9‰
Δδ13CC2C1: 30.7‰~57.4‰
φC1/φC1n: 0.993~1.0
φC1/φC2: 188.6~2993.7
φCO2 < 2%
CDMI: 0.64%~3.06%
>0.5
Inorganic genesisInorganic gas The content of CO2 > 60%, CDMI > 90
Table 2. Biologic gas source rock evaluation table [70].
Table 2. Biologic gas source rock evaluation table [70].
IndexExcellentFineGoodMediumPoorNon-Source Rock
TOC/%>4.02.0~4.01.0~2.00.5~1.00.25~0.5<0.25
chloroform bitumen
“A”/ppm
>40002000~40001000~2000300~1000100~300<100
Organic acid content/%>2.01.0~2.00.5~1.00.2~0.20.1~0.2<0.1
Table 3. Main indicators for classification of mature stages of coal measures source rocks [87].
Table 3. Main indicators for classification of mature stages of coal measures source rocks [87].
IndexImmaturityLow MatureMatureHigh MatureOver Mature
Ro (%)<0.50.5~0.70.7~1.31.3~2.0>2.0
Buried depth (km)Present buried depth<2~3<2~3.5<3~5.3<3.8~6.2
Ancient burial depth<2~32~3.53~5.33.8~6.2>5~6.2
Paleogeotemperature (K)Measured ground temperature<323~363<333~388<355~443<373~467>403~467
homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions<50~9060~11585~170100~194>130~194
apatite fission track<50~9060~11585~170100~194>130~194
TTI<33~2020~160160~600>600
Thermal weightlessness of coal (%)>20 <5
coal volatile (%)>25~30 <10
Ultimate analysisH/C atomic ratio0.75~0.85 <0.6
O/C atomic ratio<0.2~0.25 <0.05
Exinoid groupthermal alteration index<2.52.5~3.53.5~4.5>4.55
colorfaint yellow
-yellow
yellow-yellowish-brownYellowish brown-brownDark brown-brownish blackblack
PyrogenationTmax (K)<703703~710710~748743~813>773
IH (mg/g)150~250 <0.6
Table 4. Bacterial and archaeal genera found in microbial consortia.
Table 4. Bacterial and archaeal genera found in microbial consortia.
GenusSubstrateRef:
Bacteria
ProteobacteriaSyntrophuslong-chain fatty acid; aromatics; long chain alkane[126]
Rheinheimera[127]
Pseudomonas[128]
Acinetobacter[129]
ArcobacterCitrate[129]
Ferribacteriumaromatic hydrocarbon; naphthalene[127]
Desulfofustis[130]
Desulfonema
Aquamicrobiumpolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[131]
Achromobactersaturation; aromatics; organic acids; amino acids; carbohydrates[131]
Advenella
Comamonas
Thauera
Desulfovibriocarbohydrates; hydrocarbon; organic acids[131]
Citrobacterhydrocarbon[131]
Stenotrophomonas
ActinobacteriaGordoniadibenzothiophene[96]
Mycobacterium
Rhodococcus[129]
Brevundimonas [129]
Cellulomonascellulolytic; poor water soluble organic compounds[131]
BacteroidetesBacteroidescarbohydrate; saccharides[129]
Petrimonasorganic acids and polymers[131]
ProlixibacterVFA[96]
Proteiniphilumprotein; alcohols; saccharides[96]
Sediminibacterium
Macellibacteroides
FirmicutesClostridiumstarch; cellulose; chitin; xylan[132]
Acidoaminococcus[133]
Ruminococus[130]
Sporomusa[128]
Tissierellaaromatics; amino acid[96]
Tyzzerellamacromolecular[131]
Lachnoclostridiumcellulolytic[131]
Anaerofilum
Syntrophomonas[134]
Acetonema[131]
Dehalobacterchlorinated aliphatic; aromatic compounds[131]
Desulfitobacterium [131]
SynergistetesAminobacteriumamino acids[131]
Methanogen
HydrogenotrophicMethanocorpusculumH2/CO2[135]
Methnolinea
Methanoregula
[136]
Methanosphaerula
Methanothermus
Methanocaldococcus
Methanogenium
Methanolacinia
Methanopyrus
Methanotorris
Methanofollis[131]
Methanocalculus
Methanocella[137]
Methanoculleus[96]
Methanobacterium
Methanothermobacter
Methanothermococcus[138]
Methanoplanus[139]
AceticlasiticMethanococcusacetic acid
H2/CO2
[138]
Methanosaeta[134]
Methanothrix[96]
Methanobrevibacter
Methanomicrobium
Methanolinea
MethylotrophicMethanosphaeraMethylamine; formic acid; methanol[136]
Methanomassiliicoccus
Methermicoccus
Halomethanococcus
Methanosalsum
Methanohalobium
Methanohalophilus
Methanococcoides
Methanomethylovorans[96]
Methanolobus
Methanosarcina[134]
Methanimicrococcus[140]
Methanofastidiosa[141]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, R.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, Y. A Review of Biogenic Coalbed Methane Experimental Studies in China. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020304

AMA Style

Chen R, Bao Y, Zhang Y. A Review of Biogenic Coalbed Methane Experimental Studies in China. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Run, Yunxia Bao, and Yajun Zhang. 2023. "A Review of Biogenic Coalbed Methane Experimental Studies in China" Microorganisms 11, no. 2: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop