Next Article in Journal
Role of Antioxidant Molecules in the Oxidative Stress Response Networks in the Tangerine Pathotype of Alternaria alternata
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Carbon Nanotubes in Improving Drought Tolerance via Upregulation of the Physiological Processes of Peanut Plants Grown in Sandy Soils
Previous Article in Journal
The Responses of Stem and Leaf Functional Traits of Medicago sativa and Bromus inermis to Different Mixed Planting Patterns
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nano-Management Approaches for Salt Tolerance in Plants under Field and In Vitro Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biotechnology of Nanofiber in Water, Energy, and Food Sectors

1
Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi Street, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh 33516, Egypt
3
Plant Biotechnology Department, Biotechnology Research Institute, National Research Centre, 33 El Buhouth St., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt
4
Centre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, FAFSEM, University of Debrecen, P.O. Box 12, 4400 Nyíregyháza, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2023, 13(11), 2734; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112734
Submission received: 6 October 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 30 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Farming: Crucial Solutions for the Future)

Abstract

:
Natural resources including water, energy, and food have an increase in demand due to the global population increases. The sustainable management of these resources is an urgent global issue. These resources combined in a very vital nexus are called the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus. The field of nanotechnology offers promising solutions to overcome several problems in the WEF nexus. This review is the first report that focuses on the suggested applications of nanofibers in the WEF sectors. An economic value of nanofibers in WEF sectors was confirmed, which was mainly successfully applied for producing clean water, sustainable energy, and safe food. Biotechnological solutions of nanofibers include various activities in water, energy, and food industries. These activities may include the production of fresh water and wastewater treatment, producing, converting, and storing energy, and different activities in the food sector. Furthermore, microbial applications of nanofibers in the biomedicine sector, and the most important biotechnological approaches, mainly plant tissue culture, are the specific focus of the current study. Applying nanofibers in the field of plant tissue culture is a promising approach because these nanofibers can prevent any microbial contamination under in vitro conditions, but the loss of media by evaporation is the main challenge in this application. The main challenges of nanofiber production and application depend on the type of nanofibers and their application. Different sectors are related to almost all activities in our life; however, enormous open questions still need to be answered, especially the green approach that can be used to solve the accumulative problems in those sectors. The need for research on integrated systems is also urgent in the nexus of WEF under the umbrella of environmental sustainability, global climate change, and the concept of one’s health.

1. Introduction

Agriculture is the main source of our food, feed, fiber, and fuel. Fibers are one of the important agro-productivity sources. Fibers can originate from two main sources, natural and synthetic fibers. Natural fibers refer to the fibers obtained from plants, animals, and minerals. Concerning plants, natural fibers may originate from leaves, seeds, bark, fruit, and stalks as sources of fiber, whereas animal ones are derived from silk, wool, and hair as well as mineral fibers like asbestos [1]. The main properties of natural fibers may include renewable, safe, non-polluting, and legitimate sources of fiber, which could be employed for the manufacturing of several composites in the future [1]. Several recent publications issued on different applications of natural fibers, such as important sources for producing polymers (e.g., [1,2,3]). These applications may include the following fields, such as biomedicine [2], 4D printing technology [4], aerospace [5], filtration of water/wastewater [6], textiles [7], additive manufacturing applications [8], the automotive industry [9,10], the construction industry [11], thermal structure engineering [12], food packaging [13], harvesting and the storage of energy [14]. The water–energy–food (WEF) nexus has a strong relationship with nanofibers, which can support their components through mainly the following activities: food packaging [15], energy processing [16], and water handling [17].
Nanofibers are a kind of fiber that can be in natural and synthetic nanoforms (less than 100 nm). These fibers have several distinctive properties compared with natural fibers such as high porosity, large specific surface area, and high size uniformity [6]. Apart from natural fibers, nanofibers have been applied in many major sectors of our life, including agricultural [18], pharmaceutical [19], biomedical [20], and industrial fields [21] of the global water [22,23], energy [24], and food sectors [25]. Biotechnological applications of nanofibers have gained sound interest from scientists and industrial workers due to their promising roles in many fields such as delivering bioactive compounds [26], and the biomedical field [27]. The suggested roles of nanofibers in the main sectors of water, energy, and food are linked to the security of these sectors, and their nexus. Nanofibers in the water sector were discussed in many publications focusing on water treatment [6], water purification [28], and wastewater treatment [23]. Additional studies on energy and food industry applications of nanofibers could be noticed, which mainly focused on harvesting/storage of energy [24] or food packaging [25].
This study, as far as we know, is the first report discussing the relationship between nanofibers and the WEF nexus. The biotechnological applications of nanofibers in WEF and biomedical sectors also were included. This work was also designated to highlight the promising applications of nanofibers in the field of plant tissue culture and other further applications (e.g., mainly on a large scale in the industrial fields).

2. Nanofibers in Water, Energy and Food

What are the main properties of nanofibers? Nanofibers are polymeric fibers on a nano-scale, which have certain properties and can be produced using both natural and synthetic polymers. Plant natural fibers are the main sources for producing such fibers along with animal and mineral sources, which depend on the used plant fraction such as leaves, stems, stalks, and seeds (Figure 1). The most common plant fiber sources may include seed fibers from cotton (Gossypium arboretum L.), fruit fibers from coconut (Cocos nucifera L.), bark fibers from jute (Corchorus olitorius L.), leaf fibers from sisal (Agave sisalana L.), and banana (Musa sp.). Synthetic or artificial polymers of nanofibers are widely used due to their easy production, low cost, and higher mechanical properties, but they can cause long-term environmental and human health problems due to their nonbiodegradable disposal, toxic nature, and their persistence in the ecosystem for a long time [29]. Nanofibers possess several desired properties such as extremely high porosity, low density, high specific surface area, and a highly porous matrix. Nanofibers also have specific functionalities due to their large specific area, which allow immobilizing nanoparticles (NPs), metal–organic frameworks, and zeolites [29].
Due to the previous advantages, nanofibers have many applications such as drug delivery systems [30], industrial building design [31], biomedicine [32,33], 4D printing industry [34], textile industry [35,36], and wastewater remediation [37]. Nanofibers could be produced by electrospinning and non-electrospinning techniques (Figure 2). Several unique properties of electrospun nanofibers are well-known compared with other bulk materials such as adjustability of pore sizes, large surface area, and porosity, as well as the extracellular matrix [26]. These production methods with advantages and disadvantages can be presented in Figure 3. Microbial sources for producing nanofibers are considered an important approach, which is applied to many fields such as bacterial cellulose nanofiber [38], microbial fuel cells [39], microbial polysaccharides for controlled drug release [40], and monitoring of food packaging [41]. These fields will be discussed in the following sections.
The electrospinning method is the most widely used compared with other techniques for producing electrospun fibers due to its efficiency, operational simplicity, practicality, cost-effectiveness, and versatility [26]. The production of nanofibers is not only the main limiting factor but also the properties of these fibers, which should be evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other methods. Certain properties of nanofibers, which are important for their functions, will be discussed in the next section including physico-chemical, mechanical, and biological characteristics. On the microscopic level of nanofibers, SEM images of the fabrics revealed that the enhancement in fiber strength can be attributed to the formation of structures resembling bamboo nodes or wheat stem nodes within the fibers (Figure 4). The production of nano-sized fibers and the use of these fibers to create non-woven fabric was achieved by our lab (Nano Food Lab, Debrecen University, Debrecen, Hungary). These nanofibers were applied as specialized filtering materials for gases (air) and liquids, as well as for manufacturing functional filters. Several scientific attempts for producing nanofibers in our lab were developed on different levels including a laboratory scale, a pilot-scale device, and a full-scale manufacturing facility. Design, development, and optimization of nanofiber formation using different parameters (e.g., flow rate, voltage, electrode distance, surface, time, and solution concentration) were evaluated. Construction of a full-scale manufacturing facility included design, implementation, test production, and machine adjustment, as well as mass production of products, quality control, and implementation of a quality assurance system.

2.1. Nanofibers in the Water Sector

Nanofibers have certain properties that support their function including physico-chemical, mechanical, and biological characteristics (Figure 5). These properties have a great role during water filtration and wastewater treatment. They allow nanofibers to be preferable for many water processes such as wastewater treatment [37], desalination [42,43], removal of heavy metals [23], and eco-remediation of highly concentrated wastewater streams [44]. Water-based nanofibers are considered attractive alternatives to organic solvents, which are used during the electrospinning methods [45]. This kind of fiber can be applied to nanofibers such as water-resistant polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers [46], modified cellulose nanofibers [47], and cellulose succinate nanofiber [16]. Such hydrophilic cellulose nanofiber as a separator has a high porosity (60%), and a hydrophilic surface, which can enhance a strong electrostatic repulsion between facilitating ion transportation and fibrils and increase negative surface charges [16]. Microbial nanofibers are considered a favorable alternative to petrochemical-based membranes due to their higher flux rate, higher tensile strength, flux recovery, and favorable stability ratios, as well as sustainable and eco-friendly membranes [48].
For a long time, nanofibers synthesized using polymers synthetized from petroleum caused several environmental problems because they are non-degradable and persistent in the environment. So, green nanofibers are considered a promising approach on the industrial and academic levels to produce plant-derived nanofiber polymers instead of synthetic polymers derived from petroleum due to their sustainable, renewable, completely biodegradable, and eco-friendly nature [29,49,50]. More published studies on green nanofibers are presented in Table 1. Along with green nanofibers, animal sources of nanofibers were reported such as chitin from crab shells for coloring dyes [51], and wool keratin nanofibers for the biomedical field [52]. It has also recently reported on developing green tires using chitin nanofibers (from prawn shells), natural rubber, and carbon black as a sustainable and circular economy approach [53]. Interestingly, a new green approach for the wearable biosensors that can be used in monitoring the physiological metabolism in biofluids (e.g., sweat, blood, saliva, urine, and tears) was reported by detecting glucose and uric acid [54] or a non-green approach [55].
The microbial role in water treatment is noteworthy during water/wastewater processing. Many studies indicated this potential approach of applying microbes as immobilized carriers during wastewater treatment (e.g., [46,70,71]). Apart from microbial nanofibers, the microbial immobilization of wastewater treatment has proved its efficiency in removing and biodegradation of many types of wastewater pollutants for a low cost, highly efficient, high surface area, chemically and physically stable carriers, and excellent biological compatibility [72]. More concerns were focused on the microbial removal of emerging pollutants, and the green catalysts using enzymes such as laccase during wastewater treatment [73]. Concerning the suggested mechanism of nanofibers during the water treatment, this is presented in Figure 6, as well as the list of some suggested kinds of nanofibers as well.
Nanofibers have been used in the sector of water treatment as adsorbents, electrochemical electrodes, photocatalytic materials, and membranes for removing specific pollutants such as persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, emerging pollutants, and oily molecules. Electrospun nanofiber membranes have many advantages during water treatment, such as a homogeneous pore distribution, high surface area to volume ratio, a wide variety of polymers, ease of fabrication, high porosity, and high hydrophobicity [29]. Whereas, the disadvantages may include high voltage, differential pore size and fiber thickness, and toxic solvents. The mechanisms of removing pollutants (e.g., heavy metals and others) from wastewater using nanofibers involve the photocatalytic process, adsorption, ion exchange, diffusion dialysis, electrostatic processes, and metal–organic framework crystal or polymers [73]. The application of nanofibers as adsorbents mainly depends on their functional groups in the polymeric matrix, which have high selectivity for removing the target pollutants [29].

2.2. Nanofibers in Energy Sector

The energy sector represents a crucial resource for our life. At all times, a global urgent concern is needed for searching for new untraditional sources for producing and maximizing energy production. This approach could be achieved by applying different reliable agro-wastes as renewable, excellent, and affordable resources [74]. At the same time, the accumulation of agro- and industrial waste causes harmful environmental issues, which should be valorized into energy. The most important suggested approaches for the energy crisis may involve microbial and green energy, as sustainable strategies for producing energy apart from fossil sources. Microbial energy conversion or microbial energy technologies are sources where microbes can make fuels out of raw organic materials and convert the chemical energy in the agro-biomass into chemical energy in the form of hydrogen or ethanol through the bioenergy process (Figure 7) [75]. The main applications of nanofibers in the energy sector are lithium-ion batteries, solar cells of crystalline silicon using nanofiber, dye-sensitized solar cells, supercapacitors for electrospun carbon nanofibers, hydrogen storage using nanofiber membranes, and pressure-retarded osmosis (Figure 8). Using biomass-based nanofibers in energy storage has many advantages such as high specific surface area, unique porous structure, low cost, and easy availability [76].
Concerning green energy, cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) in addition to wood and other lignocellulose materials (e.g., agro-residues) are the most common renewable materials that can be used for producing this kind of energy [77]. Green nanofibers have a specific surface area, and high strength, and are lightweight, stiff, renewable, and biodegradable [59]. CNFs can be applied in different fields such as membranes and polymer films [47,48], reinforcing agents in plastic composites [56], wastewater treatment [21], food additives [15], paper coatings [65], energy storage [16], medicines [78] and cosmetic products [66]. It is worth mentioning that carbon nanofibers derived from nanocarbon materials have several integrated advantages, such as reducing chemical functionalization [62], chemical and structural flexibility [79], bulk production potential [80], better electrical conductivity [81], and use during different electrochemical processes [74]. Furthermore, generated carbonaceous NPs from biomass have shown a significant potential for use in bioimaging, fuel cells, medicinal delivery, catalysis, carbon fixation, and gas sensors [74]. Many kinds of nanofibers could be listed and their application for energy harvesting is as follows:
  • Carbon nanofiber network-based Zn-ion capacitor delivers [82];
  • Three-dimensional electrospun porous nanofiber materials for energy storage [83];
  • SiO2 nanofiber-reinforced P-based microporous polymer electrolytes [84];
  • Electrospinning polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers [85];
  • Carbon nanofibers decorated with copper–metal–organic frameworks [86];
  • Nanofiber-reinforced clay (montmorillonite)-based 2D nanofluidic for osmotic harvesting energy [87];
  • Electrospun nanofiber for electrochemical energy storage/conversion [88];
  • Electrospun metal–organic framework-derived nanofibers, as a next-generation technology for electrochemical energy storage [89];
  • BaTiO3:La embedded nanofiber membrane for wireless power transmission and harvesting energy [90];
  • Electrospun organic piezoelectric nanofibers due to their biocompatibility, eco-friendliness, flexibility, and biodegradability for energy harvesting and other bioapplications [91].
On the other hand, the biotechnological approach to energy can be found in microbial fuel cells (MFCs), which are considered sustainable bioelectrochemical systems. In an MFC system, electroactive microbes (e.g., bacteria or yeast) can be utilized in the biological treatment of wastewater via biochemical reactions to convert directly chemical energy into electrical energy [92]. The electricity can be generated in MFC systems through biodegrading organic pollutants in water bodies to obtain a new eco-friendly energy technology that has no biofouling, low operating cost, and a wide range of substrate sewage treatments [93,94]. Several recent studies focused on microbial energy under different conditions as presented in Table 2. These MFC systems used nanofibers, as mentioned in many studies, with a focus on converting and storing energy [92,95,96,97].

2.3. Nanofibers in the Food Sector

The production, handling, preservation, and storage of global food are essential items for the optimum management of food security. They need a suitable fiber or polymer for improving and controlling the properties of food. Maintaining freshness and food quality via food packaging has gained a great concern. As a multidisciplinary area, food packaging involves several sciences in addition to food science, which includes mainly food chemistry, food engineering, and food microbiology [103]. Recently, food packaging has had great progress thanks to the use of nanofibers (Table 3). Several applications of nanofibers in the food industry include three sectors: food analysis (antibiotics, food compositions, pathogens, and pesticide residues), food production (beverage filtration and delivery system for functional food), and food packaging (Figure 9). Using nanofibers in food packaging is a major contributor in the food sector, which may include the following applications, such as active packaging, edible packaging, gas sensors, food freshness sensors, intelligent packaging, time–temperature indicators, moisture removal packaging, and ethylene removal packaging [104]. In addition, pH indicators, functional bioactive packaging, antibacterial (thymol, gallic acid, curcumin), antifungal (curcumin, essential oils, etc.), and antioxidants (ascorbate, tocopherol, phenols) are common applications [105].
It is well-documented that the common methods for preparing nanofibers may include centrifugal spinning, electrospinning, and solution blow spinning toward active food packaging [121]. This active packaging of food is a crucial strategy for food maintenance, extension of their shelf life, and ensuring integrity, freshness, and safety, to meet the consumer demand for higher quality, healthier, and safer food [121]. What are the main advantages of nanofibers for packaging food? Nanofibers have been applied in food packaging because of their high porosity, specific surface area, and loading capacity of active compounds. There are several kinds of nanofibers that can be applied in the food industry, in general, and for food packaging, in particular, depending on the purpose, and which bioactives are needed (Table 3). For intelligent food packaging, electrospun nanofibers are considered to be promising tools due to their higher sensitivity and accurate pH labels [122]. In seeking sustainable and green approaches in the food sector, great progress in plant-based natural fibers has been achieved in the sector of food packaging [13]. These natural green fibers have several benefits compared with synthetic fiber, which includes lighter weight, low density and cost, superior life cycle, biodegradability, and good mechanical properties [123]. The main sources of natural nanofibers for food packaging involve cellulose [15], chitosan from chitin [124], gelatin from collagen [107], and silk fibroin from silkworms [125], and starch-based polymers can also be used to produce biodegradable food packaging [126].

2.4. Nanofibers in Water–Energy–Food Nexus

It is well-documented that by 2050, the global population will be around 9.7 billion, which means greater demand for all the major resources of our lives. This demand rate differs from sector to sector, for example, it increased by 70, 50, and 20–55% in the food, energy, and water sectors, respectively [127]. Therefore, these main sectors of water, energy, and food combine a crucial nexus (WEF) that requires urgent global management, as confirmed by several studies discussing this nexus from different points of view (e.g., [128,129,130]). This nexus has a very close relation to global climate change [131], the sustainable use of these resources [132], the sustainability of desalination [133], the ecosystem [134], and rainwater harvesting in arid zones [135]. This WEF nexus has a very closed relationship among all its components (water, energy, and food), which the factors of each component depend on each other, as well as it is impossible to secure any resource (e.g., food) without securing the others (i.e., water and energy) and vice versa [129,136].
Several applications of nanotechnology have been globally added to new strategies for improving and sustaining the components of this nexus, but still, environmental risks associated with this science need to be fully understood [128,137]. In the current study, nanofibers are the nano-form that can be applied to the components of this WEF nexus (Figure 10). Several research areas can be identified under the WEF nexus and apply nanofibers, such as using nanofiber-based biosorbents for ecological remediation [22,37], applying the microbial nanofibers for wastes and organic pollutants for remediation [138,139], the approach of producing nanofibers from food waste by converting energy using microbial fuel cells [101], and the general approach of how to use nanofibers in producing products of water–energy–food in integrated system research. The microbial role in this nexus and its components are very clear and involve several fields in all components such as biotechnological applications in agriculture, healthcare, and energy [140]. Under the WEF nexus and toward integrated system research, many investigations are needed including different relationships among these resources, in addition to integrated nexus management for enhancing the resilience and sustainability of the whole nexus system [129]. More suggested research areas and gaps are shown in Figure 11 in the entire nexus as well as in each one.
Green technologies under this nexus (WEF) have great outputs, which can achieve many goals of global sustainable development [141]. These green technologies are a hot topic, which has spread in the water, energy, and food sectors. These technologies mainly depend on plant species and their used part and/or microbe species (bacteria, fungi, or yeast). This technology produced different kinds of nanofibers (green and microbial), which have several excellent properties such as degradability, green, and biocompatibility, in addition to their high porosity, and high specific surface area [142]. Under the WEF nexus, green research is expected to include the following issues: green nanofibers for water activities, green techno-food for all food industries, and green energy production and handling. The main global issues including one health concept, sustainability, climate change, and the environment can be managed by using microbial nanofibers. These former questions are closely related to nanotechnology, whose nano-applications are a key approach to solving many environmental problems [143]. This approach was confirmed in many published studies such as the importance of environmental sustainability and health systems/healthcare as one concept [144], nano-based smart farming [145], eco-sustainability under nano additives for diesel engines [146], and waste management for sustainable future [147].

3. Most Common Applications of Nanofibers

It is well known that natural fibers derived from plants have gained great concern as a sustainable alternative to synthetic materials depending on plant species and the part used. Several cultivated plants have been used in fiber production such as the stem of the following plants Himalayacalamus falconeri [148], Lankaran acacia L. [149], Ficus benjamina L. [150], Waltheria indica L. [151], Myriostachya wightiana [152], and Cyperus platystylis R. Br. [153]. Chemical treatment is the main process for producing natural fibers, which may involve alkaline, acetylation, benzoylation, peroxide, potassium permanganate, silane, and stearic acid in addition to the surface treatments [6]. The biomedical sector has major applications of nanofibers among other different sectors including water, energy, and food. Enormous applications of nanofibers in biomedicine and therapy sectors are well-known and shown in Figure 12. Nanofiber composites can be used to deliver drugs, genes, or other biomolecules. Furthermore, they can be applied for engineering different tissues, from the skin through the blood to neural tissues as summarized in Figure 12. The therapeutic application of nanofiber composites is extensive, they can be used orally, transdermally, or intravenously in different types of therapies (Figure 12).
These applications may involve the delivery of drugs [30], bionanocomposites [154], and genes [155], as well as different applications in the field of tissue engineering for many human organs including bone [156], tendon [157], skin [158], cartilage [159], skeletal muscle [78], cardiac [160], vascular [161], and neural tissues [162]. Nanofibers exist in every branch of the medical sector, which contributes to several fields such as tissue engineering [163,164], regenerative medicine [165], and sensing and biomedical approaches [166]. These applications may involve drug delivery carriers [30], wound dressing [167], and facemasks [168]. These nanofibers are useful for tissue regeneration by mimicking a porous topography, enhancing the adhesion cells, and improving physiological acceptability and mechanical strength [169].

4. Further Applications of Nanofibers

Nanotechnology is one of the fastest growing fields of advanced technology and has been proven to have an essential role in achieving significant development in agricultural systems and many different scopes of science and technology [170]. It has an extremely wide range of applications that could be employed for modern industry, agriculture as nanofertilizers [171], nanopesticides, the food sector, electronics, bioengineering, renewable energy, medicine, pharmacy, cosmetics, and sensor technology [172,173]. Nanotechnology has changed the delivery properties of metal elements into plant cells and has affected the biological systems including plant survival, biosynthesis, antioxidant status, enzyme activity, growth, and development processes, and it has an active interference with the environment [174]. Nanoparticles (NPs) have proven to exhibit catalytic, optical, antibacterial, and antifungal properties [175,176]. With the advancement of nanotechnology, numerous potential applications of nanoparticles have attracted considerable attention due to their unequaled physiochemical, non-toxic properties, and practical effects of their very tiny molecules as well as the low cost and stability at high temperatures [170].
Plant tissue cultures are the center of plant biology and play a significant role in the conservation of plant resources, mass propagation, genetic manipulation, bioactive metabolites production, and plant improvement [177]. In recent years, plant tissue culture applications using nanotechnology, called plant nanobiotechnology, have become feasible and more popular [173]. The promising applications in plant tissue culture field include callus induction and proliferation [170,173,174,175], biodiversity preservation of plants by cryopreservation [178], embryogenic callus formation and plant development via somatic embryogenesis [172,179,180], and in vitro shoot multiplication and plant regeneration or organogenesis [170,177,181,182,183,184].
Moreover, NPs have been used in plant tissue cultures to improve in vitro seed germination for commercial production of seedlings by nano-priming [185], antifungal nano-composite [186], copper oxide nanoparticles [187], and iron nanoparticles [188]. NPs also have been applied for enhancing root induction [170,182,186] and stimulating the production of bioactive compounds as they can be used as elicitors in plant tissue cultures [177,180,189,190,191,192,193,194]. On the other hand, NPs may induce or reduce the somaclonal variation of in vitro cultured plants [177]. Genetic and phenotype variations that could be stimulated in vitro by Ag-NPs are very desirable in breeding programs and plant improvement [195]. Furthermore, nanoparticles could be utilized for the genetic transformation of plants via gene delivery “Nanoparticles-based delivery technique” into the plant genome, with the purpose of improving the quality and quantity of agricultural crops [196].
In addition to the direct actions of NPs on in vitro cultures, silver and cobalt nanoparticles (Ag-NPs, Co-NPs) have been used to overcome leaf abscission and enhance the growth, development, and survival rate of the in vitro propagated plantlets. They act as ethylene inhibitors [197]. Ethylene could accumulate in culture vessels and negatively affect the growth of the tissues by increasing the activity of hydrolytic enzymes leading to abnormal phenomena of leaf abscission, yellowing, and hyperhydricity of some species accordingly, which decreases the shoot quality [182]. Ag-NPs were successfully applied to reverse hyperhydricity and regain the normal growth of in vitro shoots [198]. NPs were proven to have the ability to enhance the tolerance of in vitro plants to abiotic stress. The application of iron nanoparticles could significantly mitigate the harmful effects of salinity or drought on the plant tissues cultured in vitro. This is an efficient method to produce plant materials that are tolerant to various abiotic stresses [188,199,200].
Several in vitro studies reported the antimicrobial behavior of NPs. They have the potential use to reduce the fungal and bacterial contamination of tissue-cultured plants [176,186], consequently ensuring aseptic environmental culture conditions. However, they should be used at optimal concentrations, to avoid possible toxicity to plant tissues, due to the cytotoxic behavior of the element itself (i.e., copper). CuO-NPs and Ag-NPs are considered the most effective antimicrobials commonly used in plant tissue cultures mainly for in vitro propagation of plants. They are applied by supplementing the culture media or as an explant disinfectant by surface sterilization [186,197,201,202,203]. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) showed potential for inhibition of bacterial growth in plant tissue culture media [204].
Preliminary trials on the possible use of the nanofiber as an antimicrobial in plant tissue cultures were carried out as reported in both Table 4 and Figure 13. These experiments were performed in order to answer the following questions: what kind of nanofibers did we apply? What is the main source of these nanofibers? What is the main target of this application? What are the main results of these experiments? To what extent can we use nanofibers in the plant tissue culture field? What are the main limitations and future perspectives of this application? More justifications and validations can be extracted from these experiments by answering the previous questions.
This study was carried out using the electrospinning method for preparing the nanofibers produced by Dispomedicor Ltd. (Hajdúböszörmény, Hungary). The nanofiber was between two melt-blown nonwoven PE layers. The nanofiber was used as a closure of culture vessels. We aimed to determine whether nanofiber could be used to eliminate microbial contamination in plant tissue culture media or not, and to what extent these nanofibers allow good ventilation for enhancing the growth and quality of tissue-cultured plants as well. The recorded observations for these initial experiments indicated that nanofibers are promising tools and could be used efficiently to eliminate microbial contamination in the culture medium but they need some more modifications in further studies to control the high rate of evaporation from the medium, which may cause stress to the cultured tissues, and to keep the explants alive so they can grow and develop. Accordingly, obtain clean and high-quality tissue-cultured plants. Therefore, future investigations are needed on these kinds of nanofibers for more applicability. The future aim is to use these nanofibers for closing the culture vessels, not only at a small scale in the scientific labs, but also in the tissue culture companies that use big bioreactors, and/or in the nurseries of plant propagation for commercial production in a large scale.
We successfully developed a laboratory-scale electrospinning device capable of producing nanofibers from different composition solutions. By combining atomization and electrospinning, we managed to develop and apply nanofiber-producing heads suitable for industrial-scale production. Various nano-powder additives for the fibers were tested and developed using a 3% graphite, 3% nano-selenium, and 10–12% PVB alcohol solution for nanofiber production (unpublished data). Further remaining tasks may include controlling and depositing the fibers produced by the atomization-based electrospinning technology onto a carrier, further investigation of the filtration efficiency of nano-fabrics, and exploring the potential applications of nanofibers with nanoparticle additives. Industrial optimization of these nanofibers may significantly contribute to the advancement and potential commercial applications of the developed technology.

5. General Discussion

In this section, some questions will present more justifications to highlight the potential of applied nanofibers in different sectors. What are the economic benefits of nanofibers in WEF sectors? To what extent can nanofibers be applied in the plant tissue culture sector? Are nanofibers promising tools for producing sustainable, clean, and safe water/energy/food? What are the main challenges of nanofiber production and application? What are the open questions that still need to be answered? It is well documented that nanofibers were produced using the electrospinning method several years ago. The electrospinning nanofibers are preferred over other methods due to their high quality.
Based on green and sustainable photocatalysis technology, photocatalytic fibers are considered innovative strategies for the remediation of water and air environments in addition to energy conversion [205,206]. They are promising for the degradation of volatile and gaseous pollutants in the air because of their high light utilization efficiency, high specific surface area, easy regeneration, and sustainability [207]. Many recent studies reported on the effective photocatalytic degradation using nanofibers in oilfield-produced water treatment [208], degradation of organic dyes [209], and for degradation of antibiotics using heterojunction photocatalytic nanomaterials [210] or ceramic nanofibers [211].
What is the scientific research progress concerning nanofibers in the energy sector? Many recently published articles answered this question by presenting different published materials. These publications focused mainly on sectors of energy production and the harvesting of energy, tools of green energy, energy conservation and storage, as well as nanofibers for producing microbial “bioelectricity” energy. Nanofibers are considered promising tools in both energy and water sectors when both can be applied for producing energy and water remediation at the same time [212]. Using nanofibers for the separation of oil spills from water is an emerging technology for treating oil/water emulsions [213]. More improvement in nanofibers and their functional structures or physicochemical characteristics are needed to increase their efficiency for energy generation and storage [214]. Applying piezoelectric catalysis is an engineering strategy for water treatment (sterilization, degradation of organic pollutants) and energy regeneration (CO2 reduction, H2 production). Water and energy are rich sectors, and scientific research every day can find innovative [215] solutions like applying polymeric polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers in such fields [216].
Concerning the economic value of nanofibers in WEF sectors, these benefits are common in the applications of these sectors, which were mainly successfully applied for producing clean water, sustainable energy, and safe food. Applying nanofibers in the field of plant tissue culture is a promising approach because these nanofibers can prevent any microbial contamination under in vitro conditions, but the loss of media by evaporation is the main challenge in this application. The main challenges of nanofiber production and application depend on the type of nanofibers and their application. In the case of biomedical applications, the major sector for applying nanofibers, there have been many recent advancements in the fabrication of nano-fibers and their technology [217,218]. For WEF sectors, each one has many challenges such as water and air pollution, food pollution and spoilage, agro-waste burning and loss, whereas the possible solutions using nanofibers may involve green nanofibers, green techno-food, green energy production, integrated farming water/energy/food, and plant factory for water/energy/food production. Regarding the open questions that still need to be answered, there are many questions for each sector such as to what extent can nanofiber monitor moisture changes in food packaging? Which nanofiber criteria can save the sustainable alternatives of WEF? Which microbial biotechnological approaches are needed using renewable bioprocessing for future energy systems? To what extent can nanofibers deliver different bioactives in the field of food and pharmaceuticals?

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

During our life, there is a need for water, energy, and food, as essentialities for livelihood. There is an increased global demand for these issues, which may pose an increased decline in their abundance in the future. The WEF nexus has a very strong link with these resources, which should be investigated on all levels including local, national, and global ones. WEF nexus has sustainable and green approaches when we can use many applications of nanotechnology (mainly in this study, nanofibers). After the amazing progress in nanotechnology, nanofibers have penetrated several fields, nearly all aspects of human life, due to their distinguished characteristics. The main fabrication methods of nanofibers may include drawing, self-assembly, template assist, interfacial polymerization, phase separation, and electrospinning. The electrospinning technique is a sophisticated method enabling both researchers and companies to fabricate nanofibers with a variety of arrangements, architecture from different sources of materials, and morphology.
Therefore, the production and storage of energy, obtaining fresh and clear water, and maintaining the food and packaging are the main suggested benefits of nanofibers in this review. More biotechnological applications were discussed in the three previous sectors, primarily microbial applications in such areas. A novel application of nanofibers in the plant tissue culture field was presented in this review. Due to the very wide biotechnological applications of nanofibers, more highlights were shed on the biomedical sector as well. Furthermore, enormous questions still need to be answered, which mainly focus on integrated research in such areas.
In general, there is no doubt that water, energy, and food are essential resources, which attracted several workers to focus on them and this is the main motivation for this review. These resources used nanofibers in their activities to produce the needed water, energy, and food for human life. This potential is great in biomedicine applications, which do not need to be proven as they are very common in our lives. The integration production of energy, water, and food at the same time can be achieved when these nanofibers can be applied for using agro-wastes for producing nanofibers for energy/water treatments. What about the limitations of this study? This study still needs more experiments on field plant tissue culture to know how and when can we use the nanofibers in such fields. What about the research gaps/future perspectives that should be identified based on this review? The main aim of this study was to identify to what extent can nanofibers be applied in the field of plant biotechnology. However, this was not the only aim of this study. The green application of nanofibers and microbial nanofibers is a great area for the society of researchers to find a sustainable solution on the farm and industry level as well.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A., H.E.-R. and J.P.; methodology, D.S.; software, A.M.; validation, J.D. and J.P.; formal analysis, A.N.; investigation, N.A.; resources, D.S. and J.P.; data curation, H.E-R. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, N.A. and H.E.-R.; writing—review and editing, N.A., H.E.-R. and J.D.; visualization, H.E.-R. and N.A.; supervision, J.P.; project administration, J.P.; funding acquisition, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank the financial support of the 2020-1.1.2-PIACI-KFI-2020-00100 Project “Development of innovative food raw materials based on Maillard reaction by functional transformation of traditional and exotic mushrooms for food and medicinal purposes”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support of this research from “Project no. TKP2021-EGA-20 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme”. Neama Abdalla greatly thanks Zsuzsa Cseh and Ivett Novák-Hermann; Plant Biotechnological Laboratory, Centre for Agricultural Genomics and Biotechnology, Faculty of the Agricultural and Food Science and Environmental Management (FAFSEM), University of Debrecen, 4400 Nyíregyháza, Hungary; for technical helping in performing trials mentioned in the review article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kurien, R.A.; Anil, M.M.; Mohan, S.L.S.; Thomas, J.A. Natural fiber composites as sustainable resources for emerging applications—A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dimple Singh, G.P.; Mangal, R. A comprehensive review of natural fiber reinforced composite and their modern application. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mohammed, M.; Oleiwi, J.K.; Mohammed, A.M.; Jawad, M.A.; Osman, A.F.; Adam, T.; Betar, B.O.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Dahham, O.S.; Jaafar, M. Comprehensive Insights on Mechanical Attributes of Natural-Synthetic Fibres in Polymer Composites. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 25, 4960–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kishore, S.R.; Sridharan, A.P.; Chadha, U.; Narayanan, D.; Mishra, M.; Selvaraj, S.K.; Patterson, A.E. Natural fiber biocomposites via 4D printing technologies: A review of possibilities for agricultural bio-mulching and related sustainable applications. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bhadra, D.; Dhar, N.R. Selection of the natural fiber for sustainable applications in aerospace cabin interior using fuzzy MCDM model. Materialia 2022, 21, 101270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Badgar, K.; Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Prokisch, J. Sustainable Applications of Nanofibers in Agriculture and Water Treatment: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Vos, B.; De Souza, M.F.; Michels, E. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) field cultivation in a phytoattenuation strategy and valorization potential of the fibers for textile production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 41665–41681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Adapa, S.K. Jagadish Prospects of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Additive Manufacturing Applications: A Review. J. Miner. 2023, 75, 920–940. [Google Scholar]
  9. Akter, M.; Uddin, M.H.; Anik, H.R. Plant fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on modification, fabrication, properties, and applications. Polym. Bull. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dua, S.; Khatri, H.; Naveen, J.; Jawaid, M.; Jayakrishna, K.; Norrrahim, M.N.F.; Rashedi, A. Potential of natural fiber based polymeric composites for cleaner automotive component production—A comprehensive review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023, 25, 1086–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdalla, J.A.; Hawileh, R.A.; Bahurudeen, A.; Jyothsna, G.; Sofi, A.; Shanmugam, V.; Thomas, B.S. A comprehensive review on the use of natural fibers in cement/geopolymer concrete: A step towards sustainability. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sekhar, V.C.; Dasore, A.; Yalamasetti, B.; Madhuri, K.S.; Narendar, G. Flexural behavior of natural fiber epoxy composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bangar, S.P.; Ilyas, R.A.; Chaudhary, N.; Dhull, S.B.; Chowdhury, A.; Lorenzo, J.M. Plant-Based Natural Fibers for Food Packaging: A Green Approach to The Reinforcement of Biopolymers. J. Polym. Environ. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Manjakkal, L.; Jain, A.; Nandy, S.; Goswami, S.; Carvalho, J.T.; Pereira, L.; See, C.H.; Pillai, S.C.; Hogg, R.A. Sustainable electrochemical energy storage devices using natural bast fibres. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 465, 142845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Gharrawi, M.Z.; Wang, J.; Bousfield, D.W. Improving water vapor barrier of cellulose based food packaging using double layer coatings and cellulose nanofibers. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deerattrakul, V.; Sakulaue, P.; Bunpheng, A.; Kraithong, W.; Pengsawang, A.; Chakthranont, P.; Iamprasertkun, P.; Itthibenchapong, V. Introducing hydrophilic cellulose nanofiber as a bio-separator for “water-in-salt” based energy storage devices. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 453, 142355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, M.; Jiang, G.; Demir, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Liu, T. PTFE-based composite nanofiber membranes for solar-driven interfacial water evaporation. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 32, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kandeh, S.H.; Amini, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. PVA/Stevia/MIL-88A@AuNPs composite nanofibers as a novel sorbent for simultaneous extraction of eight agricultural pesticides in food and vegetable samples followed by HPLC-UV analysis. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ravindran, J.; Kumar, P.S.; Saravanan, A.; Lenin, N.; Baskaran, A. Fabrication and characterization of polyvinyl-alcohol-combined bromelain nanofiber and assessment of its antimicrobial potencies. Appl. Nanosci. 2023, 13, 4157–4165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Valachová, K.; Švík, K.; Jurčík, R.; Ondruška, Ľ.; Biró, C.; Šoltés, L. Enhanced healing of skin wounds in ischemic rabbits using chitosan/hyaluronan/edaravone composite membranes: Effects of laponite, carbon and silver-plated carbon nanofiber fillers. Chem. Pap. 2023, 77, 1835–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhuyan, C.; Konwar, A.; Bora, P.; Rajguru, P.; Hazarika, S. Cellulose nanofiber-poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanocomposite membrane from waste materials for treatment of petroleum industry wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 129955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khurana, D.; Sadashiva, S.; Dey, B.; Guruprasad, K.P.; Bhat, S.N.; Singh, B.N. Recent advancement in development and modification of nanofibrous matrix for the application in sensing and remediation of water pollutants. Appl. Nanosci. 2023, 13, 6115–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, X.; Lv, H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.G. Recent progress in electrospun nanofibers and their applications in heavy metal wastewater treatment. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2023, 17, 249–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Venkatesan, M.; Chandrasekar, J.; Liang, F.C.; Lin, W.C.; Chen, W.C.; Cho, C.J.; Chen, Y.-T.; Lee, W.-Y.; Su, C.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Surface-enhanced fully nanofiber-based self-cleanable ultraviolet resistive triboelectric energy harvester for wearable smart garments. Nano Energy 2023, 113, 108556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nkede, F.N.; Wardana, A.A.; Phuong, N.T.H.; Takahashi, M.; Koga, A.; Wardak, M.H.; Fanze, M.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/Lemongrass Oil/Cellulose Nanofiber Pickering Emulsions Active Packaging and Its Application on Tomato Preservation. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4930–4945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Aassar, M.R.; Ibrahim, O.M.; Al-Oanzi, Z.H. Biotechnological Applications of Polymeric Nanofiber Platforms Loaded with Diverse Bioactive Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Langwald, S.V.; Ehrmann, A.; Sabantina, L. Measuring Physical Properties of Electrospun Nanofiber Mats for Different Biomedical Applications. Membranes 2023, 13, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shang, M.; Ma, B.; Hu, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Biomimetic Core-Shell-Structured Nanofiber Membranes for Rapid and Portable Water Purification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 44849–44858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Agrawal, S.; Ranjan, R.; Lal, B.; Rahman, A.; Singh, S.P.; Selvaratnam, T.; Nawaz, T. Synthesis and Water Treatment Applications of Nanofibers by Electrospinning. Processes 2021, 9, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vojoudi, E.; Babaloo, H. Application of Electrospun Nanofiber as Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. Pharm. Nanotechnol. 2023, 11, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Liu, T. Application of Carbon Nanofiber-Modified Concrete in Industrial Building Design. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2023, 2023, 2587551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abadi, B.; Goshtasbi, N.; Bolourian, S.; Tahsili, J.; Adeli-Sardou, M.; Forootanfar, H. Electrospun hybrid nanofibers: Fabrication, characterization, and biomedical applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 986975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Seedi, H.R.; Said, N.S.; Yosri, N.; Hawash, H.B.; El-Sherif, D.M.; Abouzid, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Yaseen, M.; Omar, H.; Shou, Q.; et al. Gelatin nanofibers: Recent insights in synthesis, bio-medical applications and limitations. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khalid, M.Y.; Arif, Z.; Noroozi, R.; Zolfagharian, A.; Bodaghi, M. 4D printing of shape memory polymer composites: A review on fabrication techniques, applications, and future perspectives. J. Manuf. Process. 2022, 81, 759–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mallakpour, S.; Radfar, Z.; Hussain, C.M. Current advances on polymer-layered double hydroxides/metal oxides nanocomposites and bionanocomposites: Fabrications and applications in the textile industry and nanofibers. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 206, 106054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, H.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Bai, C.; Liu, B.; Liao, H.; Yan, M.; Liu, F.; Han, P.; Zhang, H.; et al. Preparation of nanofiber core-spun yarn based on cellulose nanowhiskers/quaternary ammonium salts nanocomposites for efficient and durable antibacterial textiles. Compos. Commun. 2022, 36, 101388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tian, G.; Duan, C.; Zhou, B.; Tian, C.; Wang, Q.; Chen, J. Lignin-based electrospun nanofiber membrane decorated with photo-Fenton Ag@MIF-100(Fe) heterojunctions for complex wastewater remediation. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2023, 17, 930–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernandes, A.; Cruz-Lopes, L.; Esteves, B.; Evtuguin, D. Nanotechnology Applied to Cellulosic Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wu, X.; Li, X.; Shi, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, C.M. Electrospinning Mo-Doped Carbon Nanofibers as an Anode to Simultaneously Boost Bioelectrocatalysis and Extracellular Electron Transfer in Microbial Fuel Cells. Materials 2023, 16, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bayer, I.S. Controlled Drug Release from Nanoengineered Polysaccharides. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Min, T.; Zhou, L.; Sun, X.; Du, H.; Bian, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wen, Y. Enzyme-responsive food packaging system based on pectin-coated poly (lactic acid) nanofiber films for controlled release of thymol. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ozbey-Unal, B.; Gezmis-Yavuz, E.; Eryildiz, B.; Koseoglu-Imer, D.Y.; Keskinler, B.; Koyuncu, I. Boron removal from geothermal water by nanofiber-based membrane distillation membranes with significantly improved surface hydrophobicity. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Luo, B.; Liu, H.; He, M.; Wang, R.; Wang, L.; Quan, Z.; Yu, J.; Qin, X. 3D printed electrospun nanofiber-based pyramid-shaped solar vapor generator with hierarchical porous structure for efficient desalination. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdulhamid, M.A.; Muzamil, K. Recent progress on electrospun nanofibrous polymer membranes for water and air purification: A review. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zumstein, M.; Battagliarin, G.; Kuenkel, A.; Sander, M. Environmental Biodegradation of Water-Soluble Polymers: Key Considerations and Ways Forward. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 2163–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, Y.; Fang, K.; Wang, W.; Niu, H. A Water-Soluble Epoxy-Based Green Crosslinking System for Stabilizing PVA Nanofibers. Molecules 2022, 27, 4177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liao, Q.; Liu, H.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, R.; Cui, Z.; Wen, C.; Sa, B. Flexible and ultrathin dopamine modified MXene and cellulose nanofiber composite films with alternating multilayer structure for superior electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Front. Phys. 2023, 18, 33300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jia, F.; Li, S.; Li, S.; Sarp, S.; Youravong, W.; Li, Z. Microbial fabrication of cellulose nanofiber-based ultrafiltration membrane: A sustainable strategy for membrane manufacture. Cellulose 2023, 30, 5001–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, J.; Wei, J.; Massey, I.Y.; Peng, T.; Yang, F. Immobilization of Microbes for Biodegradation of Microcystins: A Mini Review. Toxins 2022, 14, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Harun-Ur-Rashid, M.; Imran, A.B.; Susan, M.A.B.H. Green Polymer Nanocomposites in Automotive and Packaging Industries. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2023, 24, 145–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kishimoto, M.; Izawa, H.; Saimoto, H.; Ifuku, S. Dyeing of chitin nanofibers with reactive dyes and preparation of their sheets and nanofiber/resin composites. Cellulose 2022, 29, 2829–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sanchez Ramirez, D.O.; Vineis, C.; Cruz-Maya, I.; Tonetti, C.; Guarino, V.; Varesano, A. Wool Keratin Nanofibers for Bioinspired and Sustainable Use in Biomedical Field. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 14, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mathew, M.; Midhun Dominic, C.D.; Neenu, K.V.; Begum, P.M.S.; Dileep, P.; Kumar, T.G.A.; Sabu, A.A.; Nagane, D.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Badawi, M. Carbon black and chitin nanofibers for green tyres: Preparation and property evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 310, 120700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zheng, H.; Han, X.; Wei, Q.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J. A green flexible and wearable biosensor based on carbon nanofibers for sensitive detection of uric acid in artificial urine. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 8450–8461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Z.; Sun, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Z. A Dual-Function Wearable Electrochemical Sensor for Uric Acid and Glucose Sensing in Sweat. Biosensors 2023, 13, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jeencham, R.; Tawonsawatruk, T.; Numpaisal, P.O.; Ruksakulpiwat, Y. Reinforcement of Injectable Hydrogel for Meniscus Tissue Engineering by Using Cellulose Nanofiber from Cassava Pulp. Polymers 2023, 15, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. El-Wahab, R.M.A.; Fadel, S.M.; Abdel-Karim, A.M.; Eloui, S.M.; Hassan, M.L. Novel green flexible rice straw nanofibers/zinc oxide nanoparticles films with electrical properties. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Li, M.C.; Chen, W.; Xu, W.; Hong, S.; Wu, Q.; Mei, C. Lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers made with microwave-aid green solvent treatment for magnetic fluid stabilization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Du, Z.; Lv, H.; Wang, C.; He, D.; Xu, E.; Jin, Z.; Yuan, C.; Guo, L.; Wu, Z.; Liu, P.; et al. Organic solvent-free starch-based green electrospun nanofiber mats for curcumin encapsulation and delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 232, 123497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Namvari, M.; Inan, T.; Altan, A. MXene-cellulose nanofiber composites: Toward green, multi-functional, flexible, and highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding materials. Graphene 2D Mater. 2023, 8, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Suzuki, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Asada, C. Production of polylactic acid biocomposite reinforced with environmentally friendly cellulose nanofiber derived from steam-treated bamboo. Biomass Conv. Biorefin. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Cai, X.; Zhao, S.; Qiao, K.; Yuan, X.; Yu, J.; Sun, N.; Li, C.; Liang, X.; et al. Uniform doping of onion-like carbon nanofillers in carbon nanofibers via functionalization and in-situ polymerization for improved fiber graphitic structure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 674, 131874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Taha, R.H.; Refaat, D.; Yahia, M. Nanofiber Integrated Nanocomplex as Advanced Technology for the Treatment of Pathogens-Contaminated Water at Jouf Region. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4714–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rajati, H.; Alvandi, H.; Rahmatabadi, S.S.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Arkan, E. A nanofiber-hydrogel composite from green synthesized AgNPs embedded to PEBAX/PVA hydrogel and PA/Pistacia atlantica gum nanofiber for wound dressing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 1426–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fadel, S.M.; Abou-Elseoud, W.S.; Hassan, E.A.; Ibrahim, S.; Hassan, M.L. Use of sugar beet cellulose nanofibers for paper coating. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 180, 114787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lima, A.R.; Cristofoli, N.L.; da Costa, A.M.R.; Saraiva, J.A.; Vieira, M.C. Comparative study of the production of cellulose nanofibers from agro-industrial waste streams of Salicornia ramosissima by acid and enzymatic treatment. Food Bioprod. Process. 2023, 137, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ratnawati; Septevani, A.A.; Nurul, A.; Arifin, Y.; Handayani, A.S.H. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose nanofiber/poly-vinyl alcohol (CNF/PVA) nanocomposites for gas barrier applications in paper packaging. Mater. Today Process. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wigati, L.P.; Wardana, A.A.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Application of pregelatinized corn starch and basil essential oil edible coating with cellulose nanofiber as Pickering emulsion agent to prevent quality-quantity loss of mandarin orange. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 35, 101010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wardana, A.A.; Wigati, L.P.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Incorporation of co-stabilizer cellulose nanofibers/chitosan nanoparticles into cajuput oil-emulsified chitosan coating film for fruit application. Food Control 2023, 148, 109633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mannacharaju, M.; Ganesan, S.; Lee, J.K.; Rajagopal, R.; Chang, S.W.; Ravindran, B. Bacterial cell immobilized packed bed reactor for the elimination of dissolved organics from biologically treated post-tanning wastewater and its microbial community profile. Chemosphere 2023, 320, 138022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, Y.; Hussain, A.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, T.; Bamanu, B.; Su, D. Electrospinning micro-nanofibers immobilized aerobic denitrifying bacteria for efficient nitrogen removal in wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 343, 118230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bouabidi, Z.B.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zhang, Z. Immobilization of microbial cells for the biotreatment of wastewater: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jatoi, A.S.; Ahmed, J.; Akhter, F.; Sultan, S.H.; Chandio, G.S.; Ahmed, S.; Hashmi, Z.; Usto, M.A.; Shaikh, M.S.; Siddique, M.; et al. Recent Advances and Treatment of Emerging Contaminants Through the Bio-assisted Method: A Comprehensive Review. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2023, 234, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Malode, S.J.; Shanbhag, M.M.; Kumari, R.; Dkhar, D.S.; Chandra, P.; Shetti, N.P. Biomass-derived carbon nanomaterials for sensor applications. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 222, 115102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ramamurthy, P.C.; Singh, S.; Kapoor, D.; Parihar, P.; Samuel, J.; Prasad, R.; Kumar, A.; Singh, J. Microbial biotechnological approaches: Renewable bioprocessing for the future energy systems. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jiang, H.; Yao, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Hong, W. Advances in biomass-based nanofibers prepared by electrospinning for energy storage devices. Fuel 2024, 355, 129534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Song, X.; Qin, C.; Wang, S.; Li, K. A bio-mechanical process for cellulose nanofiber production—Towards a greener and energy conservation solution. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 208, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Dos Santos, A.E.A.; Cotta, T.; Santos, J.P.F.; Camargos, J.S.F.; do Carmo, A.C.C.; Alcântara, E.G.A.; Fleck, C.; Copola, A.G.L.; Nogueira, J.M.; Silva, G.A.B.; et al. Bioactive cellulose acetate nanofiber loaded with annatto support skeletal muscle cell attachment and proliferation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1116917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhang, B.; Han, Z.; Lau, W.M.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, M.; Zhou, D. Novel porous CoS1.097@carbon nanofibers as flexible and binder-free anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 956, 170341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Bao, S.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, J. Hollow FeS2 nanospheres encapsulated in N/S co-doped carbon nanofibers as electrode material for electrochemical energy storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 905, 164184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xing, L.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; He, C.; Wu, T.; Xia, H.; Shen, K.; Tong, G.; Wu, W. Incorporation of FexOy nanoparticles into 3D interlinked porous carbon nanofiber networks to synergistically enhance the electrical insulation, electromagnetic wave absorbing/shielding performance and thermal conductivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 469, 143952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Qin, Y.; Song, Z.; Miao, L.; Hu, C.; Chen, Y.; Liu, P.; Lv, Y.; Gan, L.; Liu, M. Hydrogen-bond-mediated micelle aggregating self-assembly towards carbon nanofiber networks for high-energy and long-life zinc ion capacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Awang, N.; Nasir, A.M.; Yajid, M.A.M.; Jaafar, J. A review on advancement and future perspective of 3D hierarchical porous aerogels based on electrospun polymer nanofibers for electrochemical energy storage application. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Borah, S.; Saikia, L.; Guha, A.K.; Deka, M. SiO2 nanofiber reinforced P(VdF-HFP) based microporous polymer electrolytes for advanced energy storage applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 673, 131819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, H.; Shi, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.G. Processes of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride-Based Nanofibers, Their Piezoelectric Properties, and Several Fantastic Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Singh, M.; Gupta, A.; Saharan, P.; Kumar, C.; Sundriyal, S.; Padhye, R.; Daeneke, T.; Choudhary, N.R.; Dhakate, S.R. Rational designed Cu-MOF@1D carbon nanofibers as free-standing and flexible electrode for robust electrochemical energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2023, 67, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Qin, R.; Tang, J.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, T.; Liu, Z.; Jin, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, H. Nanofiber-reinforced clay-based 2D nanofluidics for highly efficient osmotic energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2022, 100, 107526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, N.; Wang, B.; Wang, W.; Yang, H.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, L.; Yao, Y.; Teng, X.; Meng, C.; et al. Structural design of electrospun nanofibers for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 935, 167920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mukhiya, T.; Tiwari, A.P.; Chhetri, K.; Kim, T.; Dahal, B.; Muthurasu, A.; Kim, J.Y. A metal–organic framework derived cobalt oxide/nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube nanotentacles on electrospun carbon nanofiber for electrochemical energy storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 129679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xi, B.; Wang, L.; Yang, B.; Xia, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, X. Boosting output performance of triboelectric nanogenerator based on BaTiO3:La embedded nanofiber membrane for energy harvesting and wireless power transmission. Nano Energy 2023, 110, 108385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yu, S.; Tai, Y.; Milam-Guerrero, J.; Nam, J.; Myung, N.V. Electrospun organic piezoelectric nanofibers and their energy and bio applications. Nano Energy 2022, 97, 107174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Guo, S.; Xie, H.; Li, C. Enhanced oxygen reduction upon Ag-Fe-doped polyacrylonitrile@UiO-66-NH2 nanofibers to improve power-generation performance of microbial fuel cells. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 648, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lin, X.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, M.; Qin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Li, C. Simultaneous boost of anodic electron transfer and exoelectrogens enrichment by decorating electrospinning carbon nanofibers in microbial fuel cell. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, X.; Xu, H.; Huang, S.; Zeng, X.; Li, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, W. CoFe alloy nanoparticles embedded in vertically grown nanosheets on N-doped carbon nanofibers as a trifunctional electrocatalyst for high-performance microbial fuel cells. Appl. Surface Sci. 2023, 609, 155452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Moradian, J.M.; Yang, F.Q.; Xu, N.; Wang, J.Y.; Wang, J.X.; Sha, C.; Ali, A.; Yong, Y.C. Enhancement of bioelectricity and hydrogen production from xylose by a nanofiber polyaniline modified anode with yeast microbial fuel cell. Fuel 2022, 326, 125056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jiang, N.; Song, J.; Yan, M.; Hu, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Huang, M. Iron cobalt-doped carbon nanofibers anode to simultaneously boost bioelectrocatalysis and direct electron transfer in microbial fuel cells: Characterization, performance, and mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 367, 128230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Qin, Y.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.; Guo, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhai, Z.; Li, C. Directional assembly of multi-catalytic sites CoCu-MOFs with porous carbon nanofiber templates as efficient catalyst for microbial fuel cells. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Guo, S.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, C. Heterostructure-induced enhanced oxygen catalysis behavior based on metal cobalt coupled with compound anchored on N-doped carbon nanofiber for microbial fuel cell. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 636, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Guo, S.; Li, C. One-piece adhesive-free molding polyvinylidene fluoride @Ag nanofiber membrane for efficient oxygen reduction reaction in microbial fuel cells. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Barakat, N.A.M.; Ali, R.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Nassar, M.M.; Fadali, O.A.; Tolba, G.M.K.; Moustafa, H.M.; Ali, M.A. Carbon Nanofibers-Sheathed Graphite Rod Anode and Hydrophobic Cathode for Improved Performance Industrial Wastewater-Driven Microbial Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, C. Enhanced performance of microbial fuel cells with a bacteria/shape-controllable aligned carbon nanofibers hybrid biofilm. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 1107–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Ren, T.; Li, C. Co-filtration of bacteria/electrospun oriented carbon nanofibers integrating with carbon nanotubes for microbial fuel cell. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Lu, R.; Li, R.; Dai, J.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, Y. Electrospun nanofibers food packaging: Trends and applications in food systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 6238–6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Huang, H.; Song, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, X.; Wang, C. Electrospun Nanofibers: Current Progress and Applications in Food Systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 1391–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Topuz, F.; Uyar, T. Antioxidant, antibacterial and antifungal electrospun nanofibers for food packaging applications. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Duan, M.; Sun, J.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Hu, Y.; Pang, J.; Wu, C. Electrospun gelatin/chitosan nanofibers containing curcumin for multifunctional food packaging. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Maroufi, L.Y.; Norouzi, R.; Ramezani, S.; Ghorbani, M. Novel electrospun nanofibers based on gelatin/oxidized xanthan gum containing propolis reinforced by Schiff base cross-linking for food packaging. Food Chem. 2023, 416, 135806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wu, X.; Liu, Z.; He, S.; Liu, J.; Shao, W. Development of an edible food packaging gelatin/zein based nanofiber film for the shelf-life extension of strawberries. Food Chem. 2023, 426, 136652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ertan, K.; Celebioglu, A.; Chowdhury, R.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S.; Altier, C.; Uyar, T. Carvacrol/cyclodextrin inclusion complex loaded gelatin/pullulan nanofibers for active food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 142, 108864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Duan, M.; Sun, J.; Yu, S.; Zhi, Z.; Pang, J.; Wu, C. Insights into electrospun pullulan-carboxymethyl chitosan/PEO core-shell nanofibers loaded with nanogels for food antibacterial packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. El-Nawasany, L.I.; Sundookh, A.; Kadoum, L.A.; Yasin, M.A.; AlSalem, H.S.; Binkadem, M.S.; Al-Goul, S.T.; Zidan, N.S.; Shoueir, K.R. Ameliorating characteristics of magnetically sensitive TPU nanofibers-based food packaging film for long-life cheese preservation. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zou, Y.; Farooq, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H. Novel Ag-coated nanofibers prepared by electrospraying as a SERS platform for ultrasensitive and selective detection of nitrite in food. Food Chem. 2023, 412, 135563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, Y.; Yang, K.; Qin, Z.; Zou, Y.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, H. Cross-linked gluten/zein nanofibers via Maillard reaction with the loading of star anise essential oil/β-cyclodextrin inclusions for food-active packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 34, 100950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bian, X.; Sun, X.; Min, T.; Zhou, L.; Du, H.; Zhu, Z.; Bian, Y.; Jiao, X.; Wen, Y. Functionalized polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers with visible light-triggered antibacterial and ethylene scavenging capabilities for food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2023, 36, 101056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lin, L.; Luo, C.; Li, C.; Abdel-Samie, M.A.; Cui, H. Eugenol/silk fibroin nanoparticles embedded Lycium barbarum polysaccharide nanofibers for active food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 32, 100841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nixon, E.J.; Sakthivel, R.; ALOthman, Z.A.; Ganesh, P.S.; Chung, R.J. Lanthanum nickelate spheres embedded acid functionalized carbon nanofiber composite: An efficient electrocatalyst for electrochemical detection of food additive vanillin. Food Chem. 2023, 409, 135324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wagh, R.V.; Khan, A.; Priyadarshi, R.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.W. Cellulose nanofiber-based multifunctional films integrated with carbon dots and anthocyanins from Brassica oleracea for active and intelligent food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mendes, J.F.; Norcino, L.B.; Corrêa, T.Q.; Barbosa, T.V.; Paschoalin, R.T.; Mattoso, H.L.C. Obtaining poly (lactic acid) nanofibers encapsulated with peppermint essential oil as potential packaging via solution-blow-spinning. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 230, 123424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zhou, Y.; Liu, R.; Zhou, C.; Gao, Z.; Gu, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, Q.; Yan, B. Dynamically crosslinked chitosan/cellulose nanofiber-based films integrated with γ-cyclodextrin/curcumin inclusion complex as multifunctional packaging materials for perishable fruit. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 144, 108996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hu, G.; Luo, F.; Han, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, C.; Yang, C.; Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Hu, Y. EGCG/HP-β-CD inclusion complexes integrated into PCL/Chitosan oligosaccharide nanofiber membranes developed by ELS for fruit packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 144, 108992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Shen, C.; Yang, Z.; Wu, D.; Chen, K. The preparation, resources, applications, and future trends of nanofibers in active food packaging: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Forghani, S.; Zeynali, F.; Almasi, H.; Hamishehkar, H. Accurate Monitoring of Shrimp Freshness via Cornflower Anthocyanins-Loaded Bio-based Nanofiber Mats and Casted Films. J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 31, 4258–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Singh, A.K.; Itkor, P.; Lee, Y.S. State-of-the-Art Insights and Potential Applications of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels in Food Packaging: Advances towards Sustainable Trends. Gels 2023, 9, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Castro-Muñoz, R.; Kharazmi, M.S.; Jafari, S.M. Chitosan-based electrospun nanofibers for encapsulating food bioactive ingredients: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 245, 125424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yang, F.; Wang, F.; Mazahreh, J.; Hu, X. Ultrasound-assisted air-jet spinning of silk fibroin-soy protein nanofiber composite biomaterials. Ultrason. Sonochem 2023, 94, 106341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Das, P.P.; Kalyani, P.; Kumar, R.; Khandelwal, M. Cellulose-based natural nanofibers for fresh produce packaging: Current status, sustainability and future outlook. Sustain. Food Technol. 2023, 1, 528–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Okonkwo, E.C.; Namany, S.; Fouladi, J.; Almanassra, I.W.; Mahmood, F.; Al-Ansari, T. A multi-level approach to the energy-water-food nexus: From molecule to governance. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2023, 8, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Malakar, A.; Cooper, J.A. Nanotechnology at the Juncture of Water, Food, and Energy Nexus: Boon or Bane. In Food, Energy, and Water Nexus; Ray, C., Muddu, S., Sharma, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 233–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Abdelzaher, M.A.; Farahat, E.M.; Abdel-Ghafar, H.M.; Balboul, B.A.A.; Awad, M.M. Environmental Policy to Develop a Conceptual Design for the Water–Energy–Food Nexus: A Case Study in Wadi-Dara on the Red Sea Coast, Egypt. Water 2023, 15, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lodge, J.W.; Dansie, A.P.; Johnson, F. A review of globally available data sources for modelling the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2023, 243, 104485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Herrera-Franco, G.; Bollmann, H.A.; Lofhagen, J.C.P.; Bravo-Montero, L.; Carrión-Mero, P. Approach on water-energy-food (WEF) nexus and climate change: A tool in decision-making processes. Environ. Dev. 2023, 46, 100858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Villicaña-García, E.; Cansino-Loeza, B.; Ponce-Ortega, J.M. Applying the “matching law” optimization approach to promote the sustainable use of resources in the water-energy-food nexus. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zolghadr-Asli, B.; McIntyre, N.; Djordjevic, S.; Farmani, R.; Pagliero, L. The sustainability of desalination as a remedy to the water crisis in the agriculture sector: An analysis from the climate-water-energy-food nexus perspective. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 286, 108407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sánchez-Zarco, X.G.; Ponce-Ortega, J.M. Water-energy-food-ecosystem nexus: An optimization approach incorporating life cycle, security and sustainability assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 414, 137534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ye, W.; Ma, E.; Liao, L.; Hui, Y.; Liang, S.; Ji, Y.; Yu, S. Applicability of photovoltaic panel rainwater harvesting system in improving water-energy-food nexus performance in semi-arid areas. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 896, 164938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdú, P.; Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Kiss, A.; Solberg, S.Ø.; Prokisch, J. Biotechnological Applications of Mushrooms under Water–-Energy–-Food Nexus: Crucial Aspects and Prospects from Farm to Pharmacy. Foods 2023, 12, 2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Sári, D.; Ferroudj, A.; Muthu, A.; Prokisch, J.; Fawzy, Z.F.; Brevik, E.C.; Solberg, S.Ø. Nanofarming: Promising Solutions for the Future of the Global Agricultural Industry. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Massaglia, G.; Frascella, F.; Chiadò, A.; Sacco, A.; Marasso, S.L.; Cocuzza, M.; Pirri, C.F.; Quaglio, M. Electrospun Nanofibers: From Food to Energy by Engineered Electrodes in Microbial Fuel Cells. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wahid, F.; Zhao, X.Q.; Cui, J.X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, F.P.; Jia, S.R.; Zhong, C. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose with TiO2-ZnO nanocomposites as a multifunctional membrane for water remediation. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Diep, E.; Schiffman, J.D. Electrospinning Living Bacteria: A Review of Applications from Agriculture to Health Care. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2023, 6, 951–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hassoun, A.; Prieto, M.A.; Carpena, M.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Marvin, H.J.P.; Pallarés, N.; Barba, F.J.; Bangar, S.P.; Chaudhary, V.; Ibrahim, S.; et al. Exploring the role of green and Industry 4.0 technologies in achieving sustainable development goals in food sectors. Food Res. Int. 2022, 162, 112068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Zhuang, J.; Pan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Xu, Z. Rapid adsorption of directional cellulose nanofibers/3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane/polyethyleneimine aerogels on microplastics in water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 235, 123884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chausali, N.; Saxena, J.; Prasad, R. Nanotechnology as a sustainable approach for combating the environmental effects of climate change. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 12, 100541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Putnis, N.; Neilson, M. Environmental sustainability and quality care: Not one without the other. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2022, 34, mzac066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. He, J.; Li, J.; Gao, Y.; He, X.; Hao, G. Nano-based smart formulations: A potential solution to the hazardous effects of pesticide on the environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 456, 131599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Premnath, S.; Selvamani, C.; Yadav, R.K.; Ahirwar, J.P.; Naidu, S.C.V.R.M.; Boopathi, B.; Sivaram, P. Effective utilization of biodiesel blends with nano additives on diesel engine towards eco-sustainability. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Roy, S.; Rautela, R.; Kumar, S. Towards a sustainable future: Nexus between the sustainable development goals and waste management in the built environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 415, 137865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Pokhriyal, M.; Rakesh, P.K.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S. Effect of alkali treatment on novel natural fiber extracted from Himalayacalamus falconeri culms for polymer composite applications. Biomass Conv. Biorefin. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Maguteeswaran, R.; Prathap, P.; Satheeshkumar, S.; Madhu, S. Effect of alkali treatment on novel natural fiber extracted from the stem of Lankaran acacia for polymer composite applications. Biomass Conv. Biorefin. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Joe, M.S.; Sudherson, D.P.S.; Suyambulingam, I.; Siengchin, S.; Rajeshkumar, G. Characterization of novel cellulosic plant fiber reinforced polymeric composite from Ficus benjamina L. stem for lightweight applications. Biomass Conv. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 14267–14280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Priyadharshini, G.S.; Velmurugan, T.; Suyambulingam, I.; Sanjay, M.R.; Siengchin, S.; Vishnu, R. Characterization of cellulosic plant fiber extracted from Waltheria indica Linn. stem. Biomass Conv. Biorefin. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Parida, P.K.; Pradhan, A.K.; Pandit, M.K. Characterization of Cellulose Fiber Extracted from Stems of Myriostachya wightiana (MW) Plants: A Viable Reinforcement for Polymer Composite. Fibers Polym. 2023, 24, 489–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bhunia, A.K.; Mondal, D.; Parui, S.M.; Mondal, A.K. Characterization of a new natural novel lignocellulose fiber resource from the stem of Cyperus platystylis R.Br. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Shazleen, S.S.; Sabaruddin, F.A.; Ando, Y.; Ariffin, H. Optimization of Cellulose Nanofiber Loading and Processing Conditions during Melt Extrusion of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) Bionanocomposites. Polymers 2023, 15, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ranamalla, S.R.; Porfire, A.S.; Tomuță, I.; Banciu, M. An Overview of the Supramolecular Systems for Gene and Drug Delivery in Tissue Regeneration. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yan, X.; Yao, H.; Luo, J.; Li, Z.; Wei, J. Functionalization of Electrospun Nanofiber for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2022, 14, 2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhu, S.; He, Z.; Ji, L.; Zhang, W.; Tong, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Meng, X.; Bi, Q. Advanced Nanofiber-Based Scaffolds for Achilles Tendon Regenerative Engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 897010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Baran, E.T.; Tahmasebifar, A.; Yilmaz, B. Co-axial electrospinning of PLLA shell, collagen core nanofibers for skin tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Appl. 2023, 37, 1645–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ju, Y.X.; Song, P.; Wang, P.Y.; Chen, X.X.; Chen, T.; Yao, X.H.; Zhao, W.G.; Zhang, D.Y. Cartilage structure-inspired elastic silk nanofiber network hydrogel for stretchable and high-performance supercapacitors. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242 Pt 2, 124912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Dorkhani, E.; Noorafkan, Y.; Salehi, Z.; Ghiass, M.A.; Tafti, S.H.A.; Heirani-Tabasi, A.; Tavafoghi, M. Design and fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride-graphene oxide/gelatine nanofibrous scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2023, 34, 1195–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Jin, C.; Chen, D.; Zhu, T.; Chen, S.; Du, J.; Zhang, H.; Dong, W. Poly(ferulic acid)-hybrid nanofibers for reducing thrombosis and restraining intimal hyperplasia in vascular tissue engineering. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 146, 213278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Sahrayi, H.; Hosseini, E.; Ramazani Saadatabadi, A.; Atyabi, S.M.; Bakhshandeh, H.; Mohamadali, M.; Aidun, A.; Farasati Far, B. Cold atmospheric plasma modification and electrical conductivity induction in gelatin/polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers for neural tissue engineering. Artif. Organs. 2022, 46, 1504–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Choe, J.A.; Uthamaraj, S.; Dragomir-Daescu, D.; Sandhu, G.S.; Tefft, B.J. Magnetic and Biocompatible Polyurethane Nanofiber Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng. Part. A. 2023, 29, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Hama, R.; Reinhardt, J.W.; Ulziibayar, A.; Watanabe, T.; Kelly, J.; Shinoka, T. Recent Tissue Engineering Approaches to Mimicking the Extracellular Matrix Structure for Skin Regeneration. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Phutane, P.; Telange, D.; Agrawal, S.; Gunde, M.; Kotkar, K.; Pethe, A. Biofunctionalization and Applications of Polymeric Nanofibers in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Polymers 2023, 15, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kanjwal, M.A.; Ghaferi, A.A. Graphene Incorporated Electrospun Nanofiber for Electrochemical Sensing and Biomedical Applications: A Critical Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 8661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Huang, C.; Xu, X.; Fu, J.; Yu, D.G.; Liu, Y. Recent Progress in Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber-Based Wound Dressing. Polymers 2022, 14, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tahir, R.; Albargi, H.B.; Ahmad, A.; Qadir, M.B.; Khaliq, Z.; Nazir, A.; Khalid, T.; Batool, M.; Arshad, S.N.; Jalalah, M.; et al. Development of Sustainable Hydrophilic Azadirachta indica Loaded PVA Nanomembranes for Cosmetic Facemask Applications. Membranes 2023, 13, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ghajarieh, A.; Habibi, S.; Talebian, A. Biomedical Applications of Nanofibers. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2021, 94, 847–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Al-Mayahi, A.M.W. The effect of humic acid (HA) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPS) on in vitro regeneration of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Quntar. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 145, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. El-Bialy, S.M.; El-Mahrouk, M.E.; Elesawy, T.; Alaa El-Dein Omara, A.E.D.; Elbehiry, F.; El-Ramady, H.; Áron, B.; Prokisch, J.; Brevik, E.C.; Solberg, S.Ø. Biological Nanofertilizers to Enhance Growth Potential of Strawberry Seedlings by Boosting Photosynthetic Pigments, Plant Enzymatic Antioxidants, and Nutritional Status. Plants 2023, 12, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Nalci, O.B.; Nadaroglu, H.; Pour, A.H.; Gungor, A.A.; Haliloglu, K. Effects of ZnO, CuO and γ-Fe3O4 nanoparticles on mature embryo culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2019, 136, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Dağlioğlu, Y.; Açikgöz, M.A.; Özcan, M.M.; Kara, S.M. Impact of Al2O3 NPs on Callus Induction, Pigment Content, Cell Damage and Enzyme Activities in Ocimum basilicum Linn. J. Int. Environ. Appl. Sci. 2022, 17, 22–33. [Google Scholar]
  174. Mazaheri-Tirani, M.; Dayani, S. In vitro effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Nicotiana tabacum callus compared to ZnO micro particles and zinc sulfate (ZnSO4). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 140, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Yoshihara, S.; Yamamoto, K.; Nakajima, Y.; Takeda, S.; Kurahashi, K.; Tokumoto, H. Absorption of zinc ions dissolved from zinc oxide nanoparticles in the tobacco callus improves plant productivity. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2019, 138, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Hasanin, M.; El-Henawy, A.; Eisa, W.H.; El-Saied, H.; Sameeh, M.J. Nano-amino acid cellulose derivatives: Eco-synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 132, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kim, D.H.; Gopal, J.; Sivanesan, I. Nanomaterials in plant tissue culture: The disclosed and undisclosed. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 36492–36505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kulus, D.; Tymoszuk, A. Gold nanoparticles affect the cryopreservation efficiency of in vitro-derived shoot tips of bleeding heart. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 146, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ibrahim, A.S.; Fahmy, A.H.; Ahmed, S.S. Copper nanoparticles elevate regeneration capacity of (Ocimum basilicum L.) plant via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2019, 136, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Cuong, D.M.; Du, P.C.; Tung, H.T.T.; Ngan, H.T.M.; Luan, V.Q.; Phong, T.H.; Khai, H.D.; Phuong, T.T.B.; Nhut, D.T. Silver nanoparticles as an effective stimulant in micropropagation of Panax vietnamensis—A valuable medicinal plant. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 146, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Venkatachalam, P.; Malar, S.; Thiyagarajan, M. Effect of phycochemical coated silver nanocomplexes as novel growth stimulating compounds for plant regeneration of Alternanthera sessilis L. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ha, N.T.M.; Do, C.M.; Hoang, T.T.; Ngo, N.D.; Bui, L.V.; Nhut, D.T. The effect of cobalt and silver nanoparticles on overcoming leaf abscission and enhanced growth of rose (Rosa hybrida L. ‘Baby Love’) plantlets cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 141, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Jadczak, P.; Kulpa, D.; Bihun, M.; Przewodowski, W. Positive effect of AgNPs and AuNPs in in vitro cultures of Lavandula angustifolia Mill. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2019, 139, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Abbas, H.K.; Abdulhussein, M.A.A. Improving Shoot Multiplication of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa L. Cv. Roby Gem) In Vitro By Using AgNPs and Iron Nanoparticles. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2021, 8, 2521–2530. [Google Scholar]
  185. Dehkourdi, E.H.; Mosavi, M. Effect of Anatase Nanoparticles (TiO2) on Parsley Seed Germination (Petroselinum crispum) In Vitro. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2013, 155, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Hasanin, M.; Hashem, ·A.H.; Lashin, I.; Hassan, S.A.M. In Vitro improvement and rooting of banana plantlets using antifungal nanocomposite based on myco-synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles and starch. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 8865–8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Elakkiya, T.V.; Meenakshi, R.V.; Kumar, S.P.; Karthik, V.; Shankar, R.K.; Sureshkumar, P.; Hanan, A. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Sesbania aculeata to enhance the plant growth and antimicrobial activities. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Mozafari, A.; Havas, F.; Ghaderi, N. Application of iron nanoparticles and salicylic acid in in vitro culture of strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to cope with drought stress. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2018, 132, 511–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ghanti, F.; Somayeh, B. Effect of methyl jasmonate and silver nanoparticles on production of secondary metabolites by Calendula officinalis L. (Asteraceae). Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Javed, R.; Mohamed, A.; Yücesan, B.; Gürel, E.; Kausar, R.; Zia, M. CuO nanoparticles significantly influence in vitro culture, steviol glycosides, and antioxidant activities of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2017, 131, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Chung, M.; Rekha, K.; Rajakumar, G.; Thiruvengadam, M. Production of bioactive compounds and gene expression alterations in hairy root cultures of Chinese cabbage elicited by copper oxide nanoparticles. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2018, 134, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khan, A.K.; Kousar, S.; Tungmunnithum, D.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anjum, S. Nano-Elicitation as an Effective and Emerging Strategy for In Vitro Production of Industrially Important Flavonoids. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Iqbal, Z.; Javad, S.; Naz, S.; Shah, A.A.; Shah, A.N.; Paray, B.A.; Gulnaz, A.; Abdelsalam, N.R. Elicitation of the in vitro Cultures of Selected Varieties of Vigna radiata L. With Zinc Oxide and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles for Enhanced Phytochemicals Production. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 908532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Rahmawati, M.; Mahfud, C.; Risuleo, G.; Jadid, N. Nanotechnology in Plant Metabolite Improvement and in Animal Welfare. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Tymoszuk, A.; Kulus, D. Silver nanoparticles induce genetic, biochemical, and phenotype variation in chrysanthemum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 143, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Niazian, M.; Nalousi, A.M.; Azadi, P.; Ma’mani, L.; Chandler, S.F. Perspectives on new opportunities for nano-enabled strategies for gene delivery to plants using nanoporous materials. Planta 2021, 254, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Sarmast, M.K.; Salehi, H. Silver Nanoparticles: An Influential Element in Plant Nanobiotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 2016, 58, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Sreelekshmi, R.; Siril, E.A.; Muthukrishnan, S. Role of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles on Hyperhydricity Reversion in Dianthus chinensis L. an In Vitro Model Culture. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 41, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mozafari, A.; Dedejani, S.; Ghaderi, N. Positive responses of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) explants to salicylic and iron nanoparticle application under salinity conditions. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2018, 134, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Asl, A.G.; Mozafari, A.; Ghaderi, N. Iron nanoparticles and potassium silicate interaction effect on salt-stressed grape cuttings under in vitro conditions: A morphophysiological and biochemical evaluation. Cell Dev. Biol—Plant 2019, 55, 510–518. [Google Scholar]
  201. Ramirez-Mosqueda, M.A.; Sanchez-Segura, L.; Hernandez-Valladolid, S.L.; Bello-Bello, E.; Bello-Bello, J.J. Influence of silver nanoparticles on a common contaminant isolated during the establishment of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2020, 143, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Timoteo, C.O.; Paiva, R.; dos Reis, M.V.; Claro, P.I.C.; da Silva, D.P.C.; Marconcini, J.M.; de Oliveira, J.E. Silver nanoparticles in the micropropagation of Campomanesia rufa (O. Berg) Nied. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2019, 137, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Tung, H.T.; Thuong, T.T.; Cuong, D.M.; Luan, V.Q.; Hien, V.T.; Hieu, T.; Nam, N.B.; Phuong, H.T.N.; Vinh, B.V.T.; Khai, H.D.; et al. Silver nanoparticles improved explant disinfection, in vitro growth, runner formation and limited ethylene accumulation during micropropagation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2021, 145, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Safavi, K. Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Plant Tissue Culture Media for Enhance Resistance to Bacterial Activity. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2014, 3, 163–166. [Google Scholar]
  205. Wang, W.; Yang, R.; Li, T.; Komarneni, S.; Liu, B. Advances in recyclable and superior photocatalytic fibers: Material, construction, application and future perspective. Compos. Part. B Eng. 2021, 205, 108512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wang, W.; Li, T.; Komarneni, S.; Lu, X.; Liu, B. Recent advances in Co-based co-catalysts for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 1553–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Xiang, W.; Yuan, J.; Wu, Y.; Luo, H.; Xiao, C.; Zhong, N.; Zhao, M.; Zhong, D.; He, Y. Working principle and application of photocatalytic optical fibers for the degradation and conversion of gaseous pollutants. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 3632–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Azmoon, P.; Farhadian, M.; Pendashteh, A.; Navarchian, A.H. Synergistic effect of adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of oilfield-produced water by electrospun photocatalytic fibers of Polystyrene/Nanorod-Graphitic carbon nitride. J. Environ. Sci. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Gallegos-Cerda, S.D.; Hernández-Varela, J.D.; Chanona Pérez, J.J.; Huerta-Aguilar, C.A.; Victoriano, L.G.; Arredondo-Tamayo, B.; Hernández, O.R. Development of a low-cost photocatalytic aerogel based on cellulose, carbon nanotubes, and TiO2 nanoparticles for the degradation of organic dyes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 324, 121476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Yang, J.; Song, H.; Wu, J.; Zhu, X. Preparation of SiO2@CN/BTO membrane and its enhanced photocatalytic performance. Mater. Res. Bull. 2024, 169, 112546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Seo, H.J.; Im, E.; Myung, Y.; Min, Y.; Hyun, D.C.; Moon, G.D. Flexible, cuttable, origami-enabling ceramic nanofiber mat for visible light-driven catalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 643, 158711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Pathak, D.; Sharma, A.; Sharma, D.P.; Kumar, V. A review on electrospun nanofibers for photocatalysis: Upcoming technology for energy and environmental remediation applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2023, 18, 100471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Xing, W.; Wang, Y.; Mao, X.; Gao, Z.; Yan, X.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, L.; Tang, J. Improvement strategies for oil/water separation based on electrospun SiO2 nanofibers. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2024, 653, 1600–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Kenry; Lim, C.T. Nanofiber technology: Current status and emerging developments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 70, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Shi, H.; Liu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Lv, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.G. Progress in defect engineering strategies to enhance piezoelectric catalysis for efficient water treatment and energy regeneration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 330, 125247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Varun, S.; George, N.M.; Chandran, A.M.; Varghese, L.A.; Mural, P.K.S. Multifaceted PVDF nanofibers in energy, water and sensors: A contemporary review (2018 to 2022) and future perspective. J. Fluor. Chem. 2023, 265, 110064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Hiwrale, A.; Bharati, S.; Pingale, P.; Rajput, A. Nanofibers: A current era in drug delivery system. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Solangi, N.H.; Karri, R.R.; Mubarak, N.M.; Mazari, S.A. Mechanism of polymer composite-based nanomaterial for biomedical applications. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The main sources of natural fiber resources that can be used in the agro-productivity, whereas (A) refers to the plant sources of natural fibers, (B) animal sources, and (C) is mineral sources.
Figure 1. The main sources of natural fiber resources that can be used in the agro-productivity, whereas (A) refers to the plant sources of natural fibers, (B) animal sources, and (C) is mineral sources.
Agronomy 13 02734 g001
Figure 2. The main basic information on nanofibers, their definition, classification, and applications.
Figure 2. The main basic information on nanofibers, their definition, classification, and applications.
Agronomy 13 02734 g002
Figure 3. Suggested advantages (in the yellow boxes) and disadvantages (in the pink boxes) of producing methods of nanofibers.
Figure 3. Suggested advantages (in the yellow boxes) and disadvantages (in the pink boxes) of producing methods of nanofibers.
Agronomy 13 02734 g003
Figure 4. The electronic microscopic images using SEM of the fibers also demonstrate the production of nanofibers with homogeneous diameters. The source of SEM photos is Nano Food Lab, Debrecen University, Hungary.
Figure 4. The electronic microscopic images using SEM of the fibers also demonstrate the production of nanofibers with homogeneous diameters. The source of SEM photos is Nano Food Lab, Debrecen University, Hungary.
Agronomy 13 02734 g004
Figure 5. The main characterization of nanofiber composites.
Figure 5. The main characterization of nanofiber composites.
Agronomy 13 02734 g005
Figure 6. Main mechanisms of nanofibers during the water treatment (A), and list of the common types of nanofibers used in water treatment (B).
Figure 6. Main mechanisms of nanofibers during the water treatment (A), and list of the common types of nanofibers used in water treatment (B).
Agronomy 13 02734 g006
Figure 7. Main microbes converting the renewable feedback through bioprocessing to produce energy.
Figure 7. Main microbes converting the renewable feedback through bioprocessing to produce energy.
Agronomy 13 02734 g007
Figure 8. Main use of nanofibers in different fields of energy (part I) and suggested applications of nanofibers in the field of energy (part II).
Figure 8. Main use of nanofibers in different fields of energy (part I) and suggested applications of nanofibers in the field of energy (part II).
Agronomy 13 02734 g008
Figure 9. Main applications of nanofibers in food industry, food analyses, food production, and food packaging.
Figure 9. Main applications of nanofibers in food industry, food analyses, food production, and food packaging.
Agronomy 13 02734 g009
Figure 10. Different suggested research areas in WEF nexus and in each component as well.
Figure 10. Different suggested research areas in WEF nexus and in each component as well.
Agronomy 13 02734 g010
Figure 11. Different suggested research gaps in the WEF nexus and some solutions for each component in this nexus.
Figure 11. Different suggested research gaps in the WEF nexus and some solutions for each component in this nexus.
Agronomy 13 02734 g011
Figure 12. List of suggested biomedical applications of nanofiber composites (A), and list of applications of nanofibers in the therapy sector (B).
Figure 12. List of suggested biomedical applications of nanofiber composites (A), and list of applications of nanofibers in the therapy sector (B).
Agronomy 13 02734 g012
Figure 13. (a) One layer of nanofiber as a closure of the jar containing sterilized medium. (b) Evaporation of the medium and decomposition of the nanofiber after five weeks. (c) Double layers of nanofiber with less evaporation and without contamination. (d) Modified nanofiber (double face with a hole in the plastic cover of the jar of sterilized medium). (e) Double layers nanofiber (drying up the medium and death of the explants (RG apple shoots). (f) Modified nanofiber: the explants started to grow then died due to drying of the medium Photos were taken by Neama Abdalla.
Figure 13. (a) One layer of nanofiber as a closure of the jar containing sterilized medium. (b) Evaporation of the medium and decomposition of the nanofiber after five weeks. (c) Double layers of nanofiber with less evaporation and without contamination. (d) Modified nanofiber (double face with a hole in the plastic cover of the jar of sterilized medium). (e) Double layers nanofiber (drying up the medium and death of the explants (RG apple shoots). (f) Modified nanofiber: the explants started to grow then died due to drying of the medium Photos were taken by Neama Abdalla.
Agronomy 13 02734 g013aAgronomy 13 02734 g013b
Table 1. Studies on green nanofibers and their applications.
Table 1. Studies on green nanofibers and their applications.
Nanofiber TypePlant Source The Main FindingsRefs.
Cellulose nanofiberCassava pulpNanofibers improved the mechanical properties of injectable hydrogels for meniscus tissue engineering by promoting cell viability, and physico-chemical properties[56]
Green flexible nanofibers (GNF)Rice strawIsolated GNF was used in combination with ZnO-NPs to prepare flexible nano-paper films for electronic components[57]
Lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers (LCNFs)Sugar cane bagasseSustainable and eco-friendly nanofibers for producing LCNFs using microwave-assisted natural deep eutectic solvent with high-performance[58]
Lignin-based electrospun nanofiber Bamboo pulpThis nanofiber membrane decorated with photo-Fenton Ag@MIF-100(Fe) was with good wettability and high porosity as a green, sustainable, and efficient membrane for methylene blue dye removal and degradation (99%)[37]
Starch-based green electrospun nanofiberNatural polymer of pullulanGreen nanofibers as fast-dissolving nanofibers for delivery bioactives (cumin) in food and pharmaceutical fields[59]
MXene–cellulose nanofiber (CNF) compositesCellulose from biomass (wood, cotton, hemp, etc.)Green nanofibers are low cost and have biodegradability, process-ability, and a hydrophilic behavior, which leads to acceptable dispersion in water treatment by using the vacuum-assisted filtration [60]
Cellulose nanofibersBamboo chipsCellulose nanofiber-blended polylactic acid composite can be produced from bamboo under high-pressure steam and high-temperature for low-strength biodegradable polymer[61]
Lignin-containing cellulose nanofiber/glycerol compositePoplar pulpThis nanofiber composite can be applied for engineering light management, solar cells, food packaging, anti-glare film, and flexible optoelectronic devices [62]
Nano complexes-based nanofibersCellulose extracted from rice strawPolyvinyl alcohol/NC/cellulose nanocrystals could be applied for multi-functional water treatment and removing pathogenic microorganisms and other pollutants[63]
Nanofiber-hydrogel compositeDried chamomile flowerA polyamide/Pistacia atlantica (P.a) gum nanofiber and PEBAX/Polyvinyl alcohol/Ag hydrogel showed a high anti-microbial activity towards the E. coli[64]
Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)Sugar beet pulpCNFs had higher hydrophilicity, and tensile strength properties, whereas a decrease in air porosity when coated paper sheets after hydrothermal-depectinated pulp coating[65]
Cellulose nanofibers (CNFs)Salicornia ramosissima wasteProduced nanofibers can be used as reinforcing agents of polymeric composites, food packaging, pharmaceutical medical, and cosmetic industries [66]
Cellulose nanofiber-polyvinyl alcoholOil palm bunchesA good nanocomposite film has water vapor transmission rate and transparent film layer (1294.82 and 1395.91 g/(m2 0.24 h), resp. for gas barrier application on paper packaging[67]
Cellulose nanofiberArtificial produced by a company Using basil essential oil and corn starch coated nanofiber to prolong the shelf life of the mandarin orange by maintaining the fruit quality, and reducing weight loss of the coated fruits[68]
Stabilized cellulose nanofibersFrom wood fiberCoating nanofibers with chitosan NPs as edible coating for maintaining fruit quality against antifungal activities (Rhizopus stolonifera and Penicillium digitatum)[69]
The 2D layered materials are called “MXenes”.
Table 2. Studies on the role of nanofibers in improving microbial fuel under certain cases.
Table 2. Studies on the role of nanofibers in improving microbial fuel under certain cases.
Nanofiber TypeMethod of ProducingThe Adapted and Used NanofibersRefs.
Polyacrylonitrile nanofibersElectrospun nanofibersEnhanced oxygen reduction upon Ag-Fe-doped polyacrylonitrile@UiO-66-NH2 nanofibers [92]
Nitrogen-doped carbon nanofiberElectrospinning N-doped carbon nanofiber (Co/CoP/Co2P@N-CNF, Co/CoS2@N-CNF)[98]
Polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibersElectrospinning Free molding polyvinylidene fluoride @Ag nanofiber[99]
Carbon nanofiber-decorated graphite rodsElectrospinningAn effective and low-cost anode using a polyvinylidene fluoride electrospun nanofiber for industrial wastewater-driven microbial fuel cells[100]
Aligned C-nanofiber-bacteria hybridElectrospinning and co-filtration methodThis nanofiber has high-power output, low cost, facial fabrication, high-performance, and cost-effective microbial fuel cells in a large-scale[101]
Carbon nanofiber on (CoCu@N-CNFs)Metal–organic frameworks and electrospinningBimetal Cu/Co-N-doped porous C-nanofibers have high anti-bacterial capacity, inhibited the biofouling on the cathode surface, and best electrochemical activities were exhibited when Co to Cu was 1:1[97]
Fe-Co bimetallic with carbon nanofibers Electrospinning and metal–organic frameworkEnhances the bioelectrocatalysis activity and promotes the direct electron transfer process of electroactive bacteria to improve the sluggish extracellular electron transport process of microbial fuel cell anode[96]
Carbon nanofibersElectrospinning Decorated electrospinning C-nanofibers can save more exoelectrogens colonization, higher electrocatalytic activity, and more efficient interspecies interactions in the microbial fuel cell [92]
N-doped carbon nanofibersElectrospinningN-doped C-nanofibers embedded in vertical-grown nanosheets improved the surface area of the material, preventing the agglomeration of Co and Co-Fe alloy NPs as a new approach for regenerating and conversion of the clean energy[94]
Bacteria/electrospun oriented C-nanofibersElectrospinningThese nanofibers have a self-supporting anode using filtration strategy; electrospinning technology for bacteria colonization and fully utilized interior surface area [102]
Polymerized nanofiber polyanilineIn situ oxidative chemical polymerizationCystobasidium slooffiae JSUX1 yeast enhancing both hydrogen production and bioelectricity from xylose in microbial fuel cells by polymerized nanofiber polyaniline[95]
Table 3. Use of nanofibers in food packaging and multifunctional food packaging.
Table 3. Use of nanofibers in food packaging and multifunctional food packaging.
Nanofiber TypeFunctional ItemThe Outcome from Used NanofibersRefs.
Gelatin/chitosan nanofibersCurcumin Electrospun nanofibers have the potential as multifunctional packaging in protecting and monitoring the freshness of protein-rich animal foods (e.g., seafood and meat)[106]
Gelatin-based nanofibersXanthan gum and propolisNanofibers containing propolis showed a homogenous morphology with high antibacterial and antioxidant activities[107]
Gelatin/zein-based nanofibersCinnamaldehyde/thymolUsed nanofiber films showed blocking for UV light, excellent antioxidant, antibacterial, and reduced water vapor permeability[108]
Gelatin/pullulan nanofibersCarvacrol/cyclodextrinStudied nanofibers recorded the potential of carvacrol as a promising antioxidant and antibacterial that accelerated shelf-life test at 40 °C during active food packaging and as a bioactive compound[109]
Carboxymethyl chitosan/polyethylene oxide nanofibersNisin from Lactococcus lactisNanofiber had mechanical strength and good antibacterial activity that extended the shelf life of packed bass fish from 9 days to 15 days as preserved aquatic product[110]
Polyurethane nanofiberPolyurethane-enrolled Fe3O4-NPsGreen synthesis of Fe3O4-NPs using food waste (molasses) promoted packaging cheese as an antimicrobial and maintained quality, freshness, and extended its shelf-life to 40 days[111]
Ag-coated nanofiberNitrite detectionGluten/zein film-based Ag-coated nanofiber was effective for rapid nitrite detection in food and the nitrite content ranged from 10–1 to 10−4 mol L−1[112]
Gluten/zein nanofibers Anise essential oil/β-cyclodextrinSuggested sustainable, antioxidant, antimicrobial-loaded nanofibers against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli as a promising tool for active food packaging[113]
Sulfonated cobalt phthalocyanine–titanium dioxide NPsEthylene scavenging capabilityStudied nanofiber inhibited antibacterial activity of both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (over 90%) and ethylene removal during vegetable and fruit preservation[114]
Lycium barbarum polysaccharide nanofibersEugenol–silk fibroin NPsStudied nanofibers were antibacterial, thermal stable, and encapsulated eugenol into silk fibroin NPs suppressed its volatility and extended the needed time against bacteria activity[115]
La2NiO4 functionalized carbon nanofiberVanillin Studied nanofiber was applied for detecting the vanillin in studied food samples (i.e., ice cream and chocolate), through a promising electrochemical sensing strategy[116]
Composite films of cellulose nanofibersPackaging film of halochromic C-dots; anthocyanin The film had antimicrobial, antioxidant, and UV barrier properties, as an intelligent and active food packaging by changing color from red to colorless yellow during storage at 25 °C for 48 h during storage of fish, pork, and shrimp[117]
Poly (lactic acid)/polyethylene glycol nanofibersPeppermint essential oilThis hydrophobic nanofiber enhanced strawberries’ shelf-life by decreasing water vapor permeability, reducing weight loss after 5 days, and increasing firmness of fruits[118]
Chitosan/cellulose nanofiberγ-Cyclodextrin/curcuminCoating film is used to extend the shelf-life of tomato, banana, and cut apple slices by reducing water loss, and microbial attack due to its excellent antimicrobial/antioxidative properties[119]
Polycaprolactone/chito-oligosaccharide nanofiber-films(EGCG)/2-(HP-β-CD)This film had thermal stability as a good antibacterial agent for post-harvest fruit packaging due to its antifungal nanofiber membrane activities[120]
Abbreviation: Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)/2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD).
Table 4. Some trials on the possible application of nanofibers in the plant tissue technique.
Table 4. Some trials on the possible application of nanofibers in the plant tissue technique.
The Trials and Their DetailsObservations
Trial 1: The plastic cover of the jar, which contained a sterilized medium without plants, was replaced by nanofiber in one layer and wrapped with plastic stretch and rubber. After 10 days, the medium was very clean, where there was no contamination noticed but the problem was that a part of the medium was evaporated (Figure 13a).
After five weeks, the medium was nearly evaporated but still clean, and the fiber started to decompose due to its exposure to the dry air (Figure 13b).
Trial 2: To overcome the evaporation of the medium, the nanofiber is used in two or double layers to cover the jar which contains sterilized medium.After 10 days, the medium evaporated but less than one layer, however still without contamination (Figure 13c).
Trial 3: To decrease the evaporation of the medium, we reduced the surface area of the nanofiber exposure to the dry air (we try to modify the nanofiber to decrease the evaporation to a minimum, after that we can try using plants. We made a double-face nanofiber and made a hole in the plastic cover of the jar. After 10 days, the medium evaporated but still clean (Figure 13d).
Trial 4: Double-layer nanofiber without modified plastic cover.The medium became dry after 10 days and the explants (Royal Gala apple shoots) died (Figure 13e).
Trial 5: Double-layer nanofiber with modified plastic cover.The medium evaporated partially after 10 days, and the explants started to grow but the medium dried after a while and the plants died (Figure 13f).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prokisch, J.; Sári, D.; Muthu, A.; Nagy, A.; El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Dobránszki, J. Biotechnology of Nanofiber in Water, Energy, and Food Sectors. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112734

AMA Style

Prokisch J, Sári D, Muthu A, Nagy A, El-Ramady H, Abdalla N, Dobránszki J. Biotechnology of Nanofiber in Water, Energy, and Food Sectors. Agronomy. 2023; 13(11):2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prokisch, József, Daniella Sári, Arjun Muthu, Antal Nagy, Hassan El-Ramady, Neama Abdalla, and Judit Dobránszki. 2023. "Biotechnology of Nanofiber in Water, Energy, and Food Sectors" Agronomy 13, no. 11: 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop