Ce0.9(Mg,Ni)0.1O2: Composite or Solid Solution

M. N. Smirnova; Смирнова М. Н.; G. D. Nipan; Нипан Г. Д.; M. A. Kop’eva; Копьева М. А.; G. E. Nikiforova; Никифорова Г. Е.; G. A. Buzanov; Бузанов Г. А.; E. I. Kozhukhova; Кожухова Е. И.; I. V. Kozerozhets; Козерожец И. В.; A. D. Yapryntsev; Япрынцев А. Д.; A. A. Arkhipenko; Архипенко А. А.; M. S. Doronina; Доронина М. С.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600159

Ce0.9(Mg,Ni)0.1O2: Composite or Solid Solution

Authors: Smirnova M.N.¹, Nipan G.D.², Kop’eva M.A.¹, Nikiforova G.E.¹, Buzanov G.A.¹, Kozhukhova E.I.³, Kozerozhets I.V.¹, Yapryntsev A.D.¹, Arkhipenko A.A.¹, Doronina M.S.¹
Affiliations:
1. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3. National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute,” IREA
Issue: Vol 68, No 7 (2023)
Pages: 896-903
Section: СИНТЕЗ И СВОЙСТВА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0044-457X/article/view/136356
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600159
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RIKAIU
ID: 136356

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Samples of the composition Ce0.9(Mg1 – xNix)0.1O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1, step x = 0.1) have been obtained by gel combustion followed by hydrothermal treatment. X-ray powder diffraction data have showed that after gel combustion and annealing at 1100°C, composite CeO2 (fluorite structure)/solid solution Mg1 – xNixO (halite structure) is formed, and additional hydrothermal treatment followed by annealing promotes the formation of limited solid solution Ce0.9(Mg1 – xNix)0.1O2. According to the results of IR spectroscopy, the CeO2/Mg1 – xNixO composite does not adsorb CO2 even in the presence of water vapor, which is also confirmed by diffuse reflectance spectra in the UV-visible region. On the contrary, the Ce0.9(Mg1 – xNix)0.1O2 solid solution absorbs CO2, as evidenced by the results of IR spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis.

Keywords

cerium oxide, gel combustion method, polyvinyl alcohol, hydrothermal treatment, CO2 sorption

References

Shcherbakov A.B., Zholobak N.M., Ivanov V.K. // Cerium Oxide (CeO2): Synthesis, Properties and Applications. 2020. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815661-2.00008-6
Slostowski C., Marre S., Dagault P. et al. // J. CO2 Util. 2017. V. 20. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.03.023
Kanahara K., Matsushima Y. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019. V. 166. № 12. B978. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0691912jes
Izu N., Matsubara I., Itoh T. et al. // J. As. Ceram. Soc. 2016. V. 4. № 2. P. 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jascer.2016.04.001
Li M., Tumuluri U., Wu Z., Dai S. // Chem. Sus. Chem. 2015. V. 8. 3651. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201500899
Jin S., Bang G., Liu L. et al. // Microporous and Mesoporous Mater. 2019. V. 288. P. 109587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109587
Martra G., Marchese L., Arena F. et al. // Top. Catal. 1994. V. 1. № 1–2. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379576
Jang W.-J., Kim H.-M., Shiem J.-O. et al. // Green Chem. 2018. V. 20. № 7. P. 1621. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC03605A
Nguyen T.H., Kim H.B., Park E.D. // Catalysts. 2022. V. 12. № 2. P. 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12020212
Preda M., Dinescu R. // Rev. Roum. Chim. 1976. V. 21. № 7. P. 1023.
Longo V., Meriani S., Ricciardiello F. et al. // Am. Ceram. Soc. 1981. V. 64. № 2. P. 38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09574.x
Ivanova A.S., Moroz B.L., Moroz E.M. et al. // J. Solid. State Chem. 2005. V. 178. № 11. P. 3265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2005.08.001
Manríquez-Ramirez M.E., Elizalde I. et al. // React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2020. V. 131. № 2. P. 769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-020-01868-8
Shafighi S., Mohammad Shafiee R.M., Ghashang M. et al. // J. Sulfur Chem. 2018. V. 39. № 4. P. 402. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2018.1436710
Saito M., Itoh M., IwamotoJ. et al. // Catal. Lett. 2006. V. 106. № 3–4. P. 107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-005-9615-3
Abimanyu H., Ahn B.S., Kim C.S. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007. V. 46. № 24. P. 7936. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070528d
Chen M., Fang W.-M., Zheng X.-M. // Acta Chim. Sinica. 2004. V. 62. № 20. P. 2051.
Chen M., Zheng H., Shi C. et al. // J. Mol. Catal. A. 2005. V. 237. № 1–2. P. 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.04.038
Hrovat M., Hole J., Bernic S. et al. // Mater. Res. Bull. 1998. V. 33. № 8. P. 1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5408(98)00103-2
Wang C.-C., Li J.-H., Sun Y.-F. et al. // Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2011. V. 27. № 10. P. 2421. http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/Y2011/V27/I10/2421
Pound B.G. // Solid State Ionics. 1992. V. 52. № 1–3. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(92)90104-W
Ranlov J., Poulsen F.W., Mogensen M. // Solid State Ionics. 1993. V. 61. № 4. P. 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(93)90392-G
Pound B.G. // Solid State Ionics. 1993. V. 61. № 4. P. 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(93)90393-H
Lu B., Kawamoto K. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2014. V. 53. P. 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.043
Hilaire S., Luo L., Rechberger F. et al. // Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014. V. 640. № 5. P. 733. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201300567
Huang Z., Zhao Z., Qi H. et al. // J. Energy Chem. 2020. V. 40. P. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.02.007
Keneko H., Tamaura Y. // J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2009. V. 70. № 6. P. 1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.05.015
Thurber A., Reddy K.M., Shutthanandan V. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2007. V. 76. P. 165206. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165206
Zinkevich M., Geupel S., Aldinger F. // J. Alloys. Compd. 2005. V. 293. P. 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.09.069
Prostakova V., Chen J., Jak E. et al. // Calphad. 2012. V. 37. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2011.12.009
Smirnova M.N., Kop’ev M.A., Nipan G.D. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 978. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622070221
Smirnova M.N., Kop’ev M.A., Nipan G.D. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. P. 1823. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622600824
Arkhipenko A.A., Koshel E.S., Baranovskaya V.B. // Industrial laboratory. Diagnostics of materials. 2021. V. 87. № 11. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-11-19-25
Miri A., Sarani M. // Ceram. Int. 2018. V. 44. № 11. P. 12642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.063
Binet C., Daturi M., Lavalley J.-K. // Catal. Today. 1999. V. 50. № 2. P. 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00504-5
Ding Y.D., Song G., Liao Q. et al. // Energy. 2016. V.112. P. 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.064
Sandhya K.L., Prabhakar R.P., Lakshmipathy R.M. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2008. V. 461. № 1–2. P. 509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.07.055
Brito P.C.A., Santos D.A.A., Duque J.G.S. et al. // Phys. B. Condens. Mater. 2010. V. 405. № 7. P. 1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2010.01.054
Zhang G., Li L., Li G. et al. // Solid State Sci. 2009. V. 11. P. 671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2008.10.01
Polezhaeva O.S., Yaroshinskaya N.V., Ivanov V.K. // J. Inorg. Chem. 2007. V. 52. P. 1184. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023607080049
Köck E.-M., Bernard J., Podewit M. et al. // Chem. Eur. J. 2020. V. 26 P. 285. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201904142
Kolle J.M., Fayaz M., Sayari A. // Chem. Rev. 2021. V. 121. № 13. P. 7280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762
Baltrusaitis J., Schuttlefield J., Zeitler E. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2011. V. 170. P. 471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.041
Knoblauch N., Simon H., Schmücker M. // Solid State Ionics. 2017. V. 301. P. 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.01.003