ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

In silico analysis of the action of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids against Echinococcus granulosus fatty-acid-binding protein 1

[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
PUBLISHED 19 Apr 2024
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS AWAITING PEER REVIEW

Abstract

Background

The zoonotic infection caused by tapeworms Echinococcus is a neglected tropical disease in poor regions with limited access to suitable sanitary conditions. Hydatid cysts produced by Echinococcus granulosus use fatty-acid-binding proteins (FABP) to obtain the fatty acids and cholesterol necessary for their survival from the host. In this work, we analyzed the behaviour of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids against EgFABP1.

Methods

We used computational biology and chemistry techniques and binding free energy estimations by molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA).

Results

This research has enabled us to clarify the EgFABP1 isoforms identified in the database, suggesting their potential involvement in diverse cellular activities of Echinococcus granulosus. Conversely, examining the global and local chemical reactivity of 14 fatty acids revealed that liposolubility is contingent upon the degree of unsaturation in the FAs. Additionally, FAs exhibited acceptable levels of oral absorption and bioavailability. The binding of EgFABP1 with FAs analyzed by molecular dynamics simulation showed us that these are highly stable, where the best affinity was with docosahexaenoic acid.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the action of fatty acids could play an interesting role in detecting early Echinococcus granulosus.

Keywords

Echinococcus granulosus, EgFABP1, fatty acids, gene ontology, quantum mechanics, molecular dynamics simulation, MM/GBSA

Introduction

Parasitic nematodes are responsible for significant human suffering, with an astounding 1.5 billion individuals suffering from helminth infections brought on by soil. They infect people, injure cattle, and reduce food production, which results in morbidity and mortality on a global scale.1 The cestode species of the genus Echinococcus,24 currently divided into the species Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato species complex, Echinococcus multilocularis, Echinococcus shiquicus, Echinococcus vogeli, and Echinococcus oligarthra, cause echinococcosis, also known as hydatid disease, and it is estimated that over a million people are afflicted worldwide.5 While the disease manifests clinically as cystic (CE), alveolar (AE), and neotropical (NE) echinococcosis, CE is the most common worldwide, producing substantial morbidity and relative mortality among human populations and is caused by E. granulosus complex.6

Benzimidazoles (BMZ), specifically albendazole and mebendazole when albendazole is not well tolerated, are the only medications now available against CE and AE in clinical settings. In CE, BMZ is additionally used to stop recurrence caused by protoscolece leakage following surgery or percutaneous treatment, either by itself or in combination.7 Much of the parasites’ success is due to their ability to disguise themselves from host immune defenses. However, despite the importance of these organisms to human and animal health, little is understood about the molecular mechanisms that underpin these stealth processes. Increasing our knowledge of how parasitic nematodes influence the immune system has tremendous potential to guide the development of new therapies for immunological dysregulation.8

The acquisition, storage, and transportation of lipids for the formation of hydatid cysts is made possible in this situation by the E. granulosus fatty-acid-binding protein 1 (EgFABP1). To promote the uptake of lipids, the ligand-binding association with EgFABP1 causes a conformational change in the protein structure. This modification of the interaction mechanism with membranes is also feasible,9 which has made fatty acids (FAs) interesting drug targets. These are classified as saturated fatty acids (SFAs, without double bonds) and unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs, with the presence of double bonds). Also, UFAs are classified as monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) which have only one double bond, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) which have two or more double bonds.10

It has been demonstrated that PUFAs have anti-inflammatory and antibacterial effects, including their effectiveness in protecting against several parasite-related disorders.11 Jae-Won Choi et al.12 suggested that (ω)-3 PUFAs could be a potential therapeutic candidate for preventing diseases such as toxoplasmosis and other parasitic infections by intracellular protozoa. Moreover, Muturi K.N. et al.13 has shown that a diet of (ω)-6 and (ω)-3 PUFAs is important in immunity against nematode parasites. However, according to Katdare Aakash et al.14 there are many studies of fatty acids as therapeutic additives, but more studies are still required to confirm these as unique therapeutic agents. Because of this, there is a need for greater research to determine how effective certain FAs are at preventing parasite infections caused by E. granulosus.

In this study, we evaluated the binding free energy of fatty acids against EgFABP1 using molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) methodology. Additionally, EgFABP1 analysis was performed regarding phylogeny and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction network analysis. The study also delved into the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties of various fatty acids, coupled with an examination of their chemical reactivity using quantum mechanics. Finally, an in-depth exploration was undertaken through all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to analyze the binding free energy of the EgFABP1 complex.

Computational details

Computational biology methods

The FASTA sequence of the Echinococcus granulosus fatty acid-binding protein 1 (EgFABP1) protein from Echinococcus granulosus (ID: Q02970) was retrieved from the UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/),15 and subjected to the Blastp tool,16 followed by a sequence similarity search performed on E. granulosus (taxid:6210) within the non-redundant protein sequence database. To investigate the evolutionary relationship of EgFABP1 proteins, the retrieved sequences were uploaded in MegaX software and aligned using ClustalW.17 Utilizing the neighbor-joining technique utilized by iTOL, the resulting multiple sequence alignments was used to reconstruct and show a distance-based phylogenetic tree.18 Also, the EgFABP1-related sequences were uploaded into the Cytoscape platform,19 where the plugin StringApp19 was used to retrieve and extend the molecular network information from the STRING database20 and the plugin cytoHubba was used to score and rank the nodes according to network properties, affording to the Maximal Clique Centrality (MCC) topological analysis method.21 The default parameters of Cytoscape were used to show the network; node size and color were manually changed according to the scores obtained from the MCC analysis. Finally, StringApp was also used to retrieve functional enrichment for Gene Ontology (GO) terms, regarding Biological Processes (BP), Molecular Functions (MF), and Cellular Components (CC), while the results were expressed in bubble plots employing the SRplot online platform (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/srplot).

Molecular geometry optimization

In this work, fourteen FAs were selected from PubChem database.22 The PubChem CID access code and chemical structure are described in Table 1. The geometries of these compounds were optimized using B3LYP/6-311++g(d,p) basis set level, implemented in ORCA software version 4.1.2.23,24 The ground-state was verified by counting the imaginary frequencies of each compound.

Table 1. Fatty acids abbreviation, PubChem CID and 2D Representation.

FAsAbbrev.PubChem CID2D Representation
Myristic acidMRT11005graphic1.gif
Pentadecanoic acidPDN13849graphic2.gif
Palmitic acidPLM985graphic3.gif
Stearic acidSTA5281graphic4.gif
-Hexadecenoic acidHDN543268graphic5.gif
Oleic acidOLE445639graphic6.gif
Palmitoleic acidPLA445638graphic7.gif
Trans-Vaccenic acidTVA5281127graphic8.gif
Cis-Vaccenic acidCVA5282761graphic9.gif
Arachidonic acidARA444899graphic10.gif
Docosahexaenoic acidDHA445580graphic11.gif
Eicosapentaenoic acidEPA446284graphic12.gif
Linoleic acidLIN5280450graphic13.gif
Linolenic acidLNA5280934graphic14.gif

The FAs optimized geometries were used for global and local reactivity descriptors calculation; the methodology is described below.

Global reactivity descriptors

Global reactivity descriptors are derived from conceptual Density Functional Theory (DFT),25 this type of analysis allows us to understand the relationships among structure, stability and reactivity.26 The global reactivity descriptors were calculated by the mean Koopmans’ theorem, which considers the HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital) and LUMO (Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital) energy orbitals (Table 2).

Table 2. Global chemical reactivity descriptors calculated from Koopmans’ theorem.

Reactivity descriptorsEquationReferences
Ionization Potential (I)I=(εH)a27,28
Electroaffinity (A)A=(εL)b27,28
Chemical Potential (μ)μ=12(εL+εH)27,29,30
Global Hardness (η)η=12(εLεH)27,29,30
Global Softness (S)S=1εLεH27,29,30
Electronegativity (χ)χ=12(εL+εH)27,29,30
Electrophilicity (ω)ω=(εL+εH)22(εLεH)31,32
Electron Acceptor (ω)ω=(εL+3εH)216(εLεH)33
Electron Donator (ω˚)ω˚=(3εL+εH)216(εLεH)32,33
Net Electrophilicity (Δω)Δω=ω+ω˚34
HOMO-LUMO gap (ΔE gap)ΔE gap=εLεH

a HOMO orbital energy.

b LUMO orbital energy.

Local reactivity descriptors: Fukui function

Electrophilic, nucleophilic and radical attacks were calculated using Fukui functions.35 The optimized geometries were selected compounds, and single point energy calculation was performed on the neutral, positive and negatively charged molecule using B3LYP/6-311++g(d,p) basis set implemented in ORCA software version 4.1.2.23,24 The Fukui functions were calculated using Multiwfn36 according to the following equations:

Nucleophilic attack:

(1)
f+(r)=ρ(N+1)(r)ρN(r)

Electrophilic attack:

(2)
f(r)=ρN(r)ρ(N1)(r)

Radical attack:

(3)
f0(r)=12(ρ(N+1)(r)ρ(N1)(r))

Where ρN is the electron density at a point r in space around the molecule. The N corresponds to the number of electrons in the molecule. N+1 corresponds to an anion with an electron added to the LUMO of the neutral molecule. N1 is the cation with an electron removed from the HOMO of the neutral.

Pharmacokinetic properties of FAs

The Molecular Weight (MW), Hydrogen Bonds (nHA, nHB), Polar Surface Area (PSA), Dissociation Constant (pKa), the logarithm of the molar solubility in water (logS), n-octanol/water partition coefficient (logP), n-octanol/buffer solution distribution coefficient at pH = 7.4 (logD7.4), and ADMET pharmacokinetic properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) were performed on the ADMETlab 2.0 online platform (https://admetmesh.scbdd.com/). The prediction of pKa values was obtained by MolGpKa web server (https://xundrug.cn/molgpka).

Protein preparation

The protein structure of Echinococcus granulosus fatty-acid-binding protein I (EgFABP1) was downloaded from the Protein Data Bank37,38 (https://www.rcsb.org) under access code PDB ID: 1O8V. This protein presents a hydroxylated cysteine (CSO63) that was considered in this work. We defined the AMBER99SB-ILDN force field parameters of the CSO63 and fourteen FAs in the ACPYPE39 server online (https://www.bio2byte.be/login/?next=/acpype/). Finally, the water molecules present in the crystal structure were removed.

Docking determination and molecular dynamics simulations of complex

The coupling systems were solved in the DockThor server40,41 (https://dockthor.lncc.br/v2) with a grid dimension of 5 × -7 × 10, the genetic algorithm settings with number of evaluations = 1000000, population size = 750, and number of runs = 24.

The molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was carried out using GROMACS v.2020.642 with the AMBER99SB-ILDN force field. Fifteen MD simulations, EgFABP1 without ligand and EgFABP1 coupled to fourteen FAs was considered. The topologies were prepared considering a cubic box of 1 nm from the edge of the box to the protein surface. The TIP3P water model was used for the solvation of the different systems. 200000 energy minimization steps were settled with the steep-descent algorithm. Equilibrium dynamics simulations in the canonical ensemble at constant volume and the production simulation in the isobaric-isothermal at constant pressure (1 bar of reference pressure with Parrinello-Rahman barostat) were applied. The calculation time in isobaric-isothermal ensemble (NPT) was 200 ns. In both MD simulations, the V-rescale thermostat regulated the temperature at 309.65 K. The analysis of the MD was carried out with the Gromacs tools and plotted in the Gnuplot v. 4.543 software. Additionally, hydrophobic interactions between FAs and EgFABP1 were analyzed using the PLIP (Protein-Ligand Interaction Profiler) server.44 The graphical visualizations were evaluated in the VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics)45 and UCSF Chimera v.1.1546 software.

Binding free energy estimation by MM/GBSA analysis

The binding free energy from each coupling system (EgFABP1-FAs) was calculated by Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) method. The mmpbsa.py47 module from AmberTools 2048 program and gmx MMPBSA v1.4.149 were used for these assays. The equations related to calculations of binding free energies (ΔGbind) were the following:

(4)
ΔGbind=Gcomplex(Gprotein+Glig)
(5)
ΔGbind=ΔEMM+ΔGGB+ΔGSATΔS
(6)
ΔGbind=ΔEvdw+ΔEele+ΔGGB+ΔGSATΔS

Where ΔEMM is the variation between the minimized energy of the protein-ligand complexes (EgFABP1-FAs) that includes the van der Waals (ΔEvdw) and electrostatic (ΔEele); ΔGGB is the electrostatic solvation energy, ΔGSA is the difference in surface area energies for protein and ligand and TΔS refers to the contribution of entropy to temperature (T).

Correlation analysis

Spearman’s Rho (also called Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient) was used to estimate the correlation between protein stability and binding free energy of the systems (EgFABP1-FAs). The coefficient was calculated using Python SciPy package.50 Spearman’s Rho is a rank-based non-parametric correlation measurement between two datasets, represented by a monotonic function. The Spearman’s Rho between feature X and Y is described by equation 7:

(7)
ρ=16(rank(xi)rank(y1))2n(n21)

Where ρ denotes the Spearman’s Rho and n is the sample size.

Results and discussion

Computational biology analysis

According to several studies, E. granulosus comprises a variety of strains with a comparatively high level of genetic variation. Also, numerous aspects of the parasite, such as its life cycle and transmission, pathogenicity, metabolic characteristics, and drug susceptibility, are impacted by this wide range of variety.51 Thirteen proteins with similarity to EgFABP1 were discovered by running a BLASTp search followed by phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences against the E. granulosus proteome (Figure 1A). Also, understanding how successfully the proteins interfere with the complex regulatory machinery is essential, as developments in network biology have demonstrated that single-protein targeting is ineffective in treating complex disorders52; the analysis of the extended protein network showed that the proteins with the highest centrality scores on the network are annotated as mediators of RNA polymerase II transcription (Figure 1B). Additionally, the analysis of the functional enrichment for Gene Ontology (GO) revealed that the terms linked to BP were retinol metabolic process (GO:0042572) and positive regulation of biological process (GO:0048518), while retinol and fatty acid-binding proteins have been associated to suppress host immunity during nematode infection.53 Also, the GO terms associated with CC found in the analysis were intracellular organelle (GO:0043229) and organelle (GO:0043226), while the MF term was lipid binding (GO:0008289). EgFABP1 isoforms were found in the cytosolic, nuclear, mitochondrial, and microsomal fractions of the experiments, indicating that these molecules may be engaged in a variety of cellular activities54 (Figure 1C).

fafebb38-d260-4cf5-a15a-8014768e1f66_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Illustration of EgFABP1 isoforms discovered by running a BLASTp.

A. Phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences against the E. granulosus proteome. B. Analysis of the extended protein network of E. granulosus. C. Analysis of the functional enrichment for Gene Ontology (GO).

Chemical reactivity of FAs

Global reactivity descriptors

DFT has been very successful in the last decade in predicting the chemical reactivity of various molecules.5558 Within the DFT theory, one of the most used to determine the stability and reactivity of a particular molecule are the frontier molecular orbitals HOMO and LUMO.59,60 In Table 3, the energy values of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals for all the studied molecules match those reported in the literature for organic molecules.61 It is necessary to highlight that SFAs molecules (MTR, PDN, PLM and STA) showed the most negative values of the HOMO orbital, meaning that these molecules are the most likely to donate electrons in a chemical reaction.60,61 According to the frontier orbital theory, the energy difference between the HOMO and LUMO orbitals (HOMO-LUMO gap) is a measure of the chemical stability of a molecule in a reaction.61,62 High differences between the HOMO concerning the LUMO orbital indicate high stability of the molecule in a chemical reaction.63 Analyzing the HOMO-LUMO gap energy behaviour shown in Table 3, the SFAs molecules obtained the greatest difference in this parameter compared to the other molecules, this means that SFAs compounds present greater chemical stability according to the frontier molecular orbitals theory and the global reactivity descriptors followed by the Koopmans theory,27,56 which means that the HOMO and LUMO frontier orbitals were considered in the calculation.

Table 3. Global chemical reactivity descriptors calculated from Koopmans’ theorem.

Fatty acidHOMO (eV)LUMO (eV)ΔE gapIAμηSχωωω˚Δωμ*
SFAsMTR-7.8256-0.70207.12367.82560.7020-4.26383.56180.14044.26385.10425.12920.86545.99464.4949
PDN-7.8283-0.70477.12367.82830.7047-4.26653.56180.14044.26655.11075.13380.86736.00124.4682
PLM-7.8283-0.70477.12367.82830.7047-4.26653.56180.14044.26655.11075.13380.86736.00124.4724
STA-7.8283-0.70757.12097.82830.7075-4.26793.56040.14044.26795.11595.13700.86916.00604.4525
MUFAsHDN-6.7154-0.37556.33996.71540.3755-3.54553.17000.15773.54553.96544.15170.60624.75791.7457
OLE-6.6909-0.42456.26656.69090.4245-3.55773.13320.15963.55774.03974.19040.63264.82301.5998
PLA-6.6828-0.37286.31006.68280.3728-3.52783.15500.15853.52783.94464.13060.60284.73331.7051
TVA-6.6719-0.35376.31826.67190.3537-3.51283.15910.15833.51283.90614.10440.59164.69591.6521
CVA-6.6801-0.42186.25836.68010.4218-3.55093.12920.15983.55094.02954.18130.63044.81181.2909
PUFAsARA-6.2148-0.11706.09786.21480.1170-3.16593.04890.16403.16593.28743.60770.44194.04962.4058
DHA-6.3182-0.15246.16586.31820.1524-3.23533.08290.16223.23533.39523.70060.46534.16591.0092
EPA-6.3399-0.18236.15766.33990.1823-3.26113.07880.16243.26113.45423.74250.48144.22391.1220
LIN-6.7263-0.45716.26926.72630.4571-3.59173.13460.15953.59174.11554.24540.65374.89921.7346
LNA-6.2700-0.21776.05236.27000.2177-3.24383.02620.16523.24383.47723.73880.49494.23371.2608

* μ correspond to Dipole Moment (debye).

Regarding the dipole moment, we observed that the value decreases depending on the unsaturation degree of the FAs due to their liposolubility.64

To delve into the biological behaviour of the FAs under study, it is necessary to analyze the local reactivity descriptors such as the molecular electrostatic potential and the Fukui function. The molecular electrostatic potential provides information on the atoms of the chemical structure of a molecule with positive or negative charge density; and the Fukui function is a chemical observable that gives us the measure of which part of the molecule is more susceptible to a nucleophilic, electrophilic, or radical attack.

Local reactivity descriptors

As can be seen in Figure 2 ARA, DHA, and EPA molecules (PUFAs with the longest chains) had the most pronounced charge densities of all the compounds studied due to the structure of minimum energy in geometry optimization. These molecules have a greater torsion degree than the others, this implies that their unsaturations in addition to the carboxyl group, are very close. This generates a distribution of negative charges greater than the others. In general, the negative charge density (red lines) for all molecules were lower than the positive charge density (yellow lines), this is due to the FAs structure. These FAs molecules have between 14 and 22 carbon atoms, where the hydrocarbon chain predominates with a negative charge density towards the backbone. Likewise, the negative charge density is only located in the carboxyl group and in the unsaturations.

fafebb38-d260-4cf5-a15a-8014768e1f66_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Contour lines of the electrostatic potential of the studied fatty acids.

The negative charge density in each atom is represented in red lines and the areas with positive charge density in each molecule are represented in yellow color.

The Fukui function is a local selectivity descriptor.6567 This parameter reveals the most susceptible molecule area of nucleophilic (f+), electrophilic (f), and radicalary (f0) attacks.65 The Figure 3 shows that DHA, PDN, STA, and TVA molecules were the FAs with areas most susceptible to nucleophilic and electrophilic attack. These compounds have a significant concentration of positive and negative charges; the negative charge density is oriented around the unsaturations (with respect to DHA and TVA) and the carboxyl group.

fafebb38-d260-4cf5-a15a-8014768e1f66_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Contour lines of the Fukui function of the studied fatty acids.

The negative isovalues in each atom are represented in purple lines and the areas with positive isovalues in each molecule are represented in light blue color.

The radicalary attack behavior was different from the f+ and f. In this case, the density obtained for all molecules was low. The f0 are focused fundamentally on the unsaturations from FAs. This result is due to fatty acids being susceptible to radical attack by reactive oxygen species in unsaturations.6872

The computed ADMET properties of FAs

The molecular weight (WM), number of hydrogen bond donors (nHBD), number of hydrogen bond acceptors (nHBA), and rotatable bonds (nRot) (see Table 4); have shown acceptable values according to the data based on the “Drug-Like Soft” rule (WM(100-600), nHBA(0-12), nHBD(0-7), and nRot(0-11)). The topological polar surface area (TPSA) values of all the compounds reported 37.30 A2, which is an optimal value according to Verber’s rule (140 A2). Therefore, these results show that FAs would have good absorption and permeability. Likewise, all FAs are accepted for Lipinski’s rule of five ((MW500; logP5; hydrogen bond acceptor10; hydrogen bond donors5), indicating acceptable oral absorption and bioavailability.

Table 4. Physicochemical properties of fatty acids.

Fatty acidMWanHBAbnHBDcTPSAdnRotelogSfLogD7.4gLog Po/whpKaiLipinski’s rule
SFAsMRT228.2102137.3012-4.3783.0235.8204.8Yes
PDN242.2202137.3013-4.8143.1356.2834.8Yes
PLM256.2402137.3014-5.2233.2356.7324.8Yes
STA284.2702137.3016-5.8793.4497.5714.8Yes
MUFAsHDN254.222137.3013-4.7913.3196.2934.8Yes
OLE282.2602137.3015-5.5593.5497.1314.8Yes
PLA254.2202137.3013-4.7913.3196.2934.8Yes
TVA282.2602137.3015-4.6283.7946.8304.8Yes
CVA282.2602137.3015-3.3083.4476.1694.8Yes
PUFAsARA304.242137.3014-5.3464.2476.5734.8Yes
DHA328.242137.3014-5.3844.8036.6994.6Yes
EPA302.2202137.3013-5.1284.3895.4904.8Yes
LIN280.2402137.3014-5.2303.5806.6524.8Yes
LNA278.2202137.3013-4.9733.6906.1564.8Yes

a Molecular weight in g/mol.

b Hydrogen bond acceptor.

c Hydrogen bond donor.

d Topology Polar Surface Area.

e rotatable bonds.

f Partition Coefficient.

g Logarithm of the aqueous solubility value.

h Logarithm of the n-octanol/water distribution coefficients at pH = 7.4.

i Dissociation constant.

The pharmacokinetic properties are reported in Table S1 from Supporting Information. The oral adsorption logP, distribution logD, and solubility logS descriptors were evaluated. The results showed that the logP values are above the desired range (0 to 3 log mol/L), indicating that these compounds are insoluble since they are trapped in the lipophilic bilayer. This could be confirmed by the resulting values of logD (1 to 3 log mol/L) that 197 are between 3 to 5, decreasing the solubility. Furthermore, all the compounds have a pKa = 4.8 except for 7-hexadecenoic acid with a pKa = 4.6. The fatty acids analyzed show optimal values for Caco-2 (>-5.15log cm/s); indicating that they have good permeability to intestinal cell membranes. They are also a substrate for P-glycoprotein (Pgp), where Pgp is a transporter efflux out of cells of xenobiotic molecules.

In general, the FAs have a high percentage (up to 90%) of plasma protein binding (PPB), contrary to DHA and EPA with PPB83.359% and PPB89.359%, respectively. This union is determined by the structural properties of fatty acids that influence the oral bioavailability of the compounds, where a portion of the free compound could be absorbed through the membranes. The penetration of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important for those components that have activity in the central nervous system (CNS), some fatty acids have a better facility to penetrate the BBB than others; the values of lipophilicity, molecular weight, and TPSA allow us to predict a good penetration of the compounds to the BBB.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms were also evaluated. The results indicated that fatty acids have a substrate/inhibitory effect on the CYP2C9 isoenzyme, which is important in the oxidation of xenobiotic compounds. ARA, DHA, and EPA fatty acids showed a moderate clearance of 6.011ml/min/kg, 9.988ml/min/kg, and 8.610ml/min/kg, respectively, while the other compounds had values below 5 ml/min/kg, indicating low excretion. Among the results, DHA and EPA present relative toxicity due to their high lipophilicity.

Docking and molecular dynamics simulation

Best protein-ligand binding models were obtained using a genetic algorithm from the Dockthor server. Additionally, an affinity prediction scoring was obtained among the fourteen FAs. This prediction affinity is used to rank different ligands in virtual screening experiments considering the “Total Energy” of each FAs.40,41 According to the score, DHA has a better affinity to EgFABP1 compared to the other FAs (see Table S2 from Supplementary Material).

Regarding Molecular Dynamics analysis, Figure 4 shows the plot of RMSD (root-mean-squared deviation), RMSF (root-mean-squared fluctuation), RG (radii of gyration), SASA (solvent-accessible surface area), and HBond (intramolecular hydrogen bonds from protein) during the simulation time of 200 ns in the isobaric-isothermal ensemble. The analysis of the RMSD plot showed us the MRT, ARA, and EPA with instability from 150 to 200 ns. Similar behaviour has the RMSF analysis, in which low and high fluctuations indicate the structural mobility of each residue in molecular dynamics. The RG plot indicates low compactness between EPA and ARA. While for the SASA study, we observed that the solvent access is similar in coupled systems and apparently, the number of HBonds is reduced in coupled systems.

fafebb38-d260-4cf5-a15a-8014768e1f66_figure4.gif

Figure 4. Graphical representation of the MD simulation.

A. Root-mean squared deviation. B. Root-mean squared fluctuation. C. Radii of gyration. D. Solvent-Accessible Surface Area. E. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds from protein.

The Table 5 shows the average values for RMSD, RMSF, RG, SASA, and HBond for the last 20 ns (same time used to estimate binding free energy by MM/GBSA). However hydrophobic interactions and salt bridges were calculated from the last frame. One of the most outstanding systems (receptor-ligand) was EgFABP1-EPA because it presents an average value of RMSD (0.50±0.07 nm), RMSF (0.17±0.08 nm), RG (1.53±0.02 nm), SASA (91.37±2.26) higher and HBond (98.00±5.00) lower than the other systems. The PLA and VAC systems show a lower RMSD (0.14±0.01 nm) and RMSF (0.10±0.04 nm) than the other systems, indicating that the protein is more stable. Additional information about the hydrophobic interactions between EgFABP1-FA are reported in Table S3 from Supplementary Material.

Table 5. RMSD, RMSF, RG, SASA and HBond average values, N° Hydrophobic Interactions and Salt Bridges.

SystemRMSD (nm)RMSF (nm)RG (nm)SASA (nm2)N° HBondsN° H.I.N° S.B.
EgFABP1 without ligand0.21±0.030.13±0.051.43±0.0183.38±1.80107.00±5.00--
SFAsMRT0.35±0.020.11±0.041.44±0.0183.00±1.81107.00±5.002.000.00
PDN0.17±0.010.12±0.041.42±0.0183.12±1.47105.00±6.007.001.00
PLM0.18±0.020.11±0.041.43±0.0182.25±1.71110.00±5.005.000.00
STA0.25±0.020.12±0.051.44±0.0284.11±1.81103.00±4.008.001.00
MUFAsHDN0.18±0.010.10±0.041.41±0.0180.29±1.35103.00±5.005.001.00
OLE0.20±0.010.11±0.041.43±0.0186.32±1.48103.00±5.002.001.00
PLA0.14±0.010.10±0.041.42±0.0182.41±1.42103.00±5.006.001.00
TVA0.14±0.010.10±0.041.42±0.0081.53±1.30104.00±5.007.001.00
CVA0.23±0.020.12±0.041.42±0.0182.66±1.50103.00±5.005.001.00
PUFAsARA0.34±0.020.12±0.041.44±0.0184.19±1.67104.00±5.005.001.00
DHA0.18±0.010.10±0.051.40±0.0182.23±1.57102.00±5.009.001.00
EPA0.50±0.070.17±0.081.53±0.0291.37±2.2698.00±5.003.001.00
LIN0.20±0.010.12±0.041.44±0.0184.60±1.9098.00±5.005.001.00
LNA0.22±0.020.12±0.051.43±0.0185.04±2.24103.00±5.005.000.00

Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) estimation

The binding free energy estimation was analyzed by MM/GBSA method. Table 6 shows that DHA (-38.52±2.60 kcal/mol ΔG) and PLA (-37.07±4.55 kcal/mol ΔG) obtained the best energy followed by the VAC (-36.52±2.25 kcal/mol ΔG) and OLE (-35.58±3.64 kcal/mol ΔG). All these four ligands are UFAs (i.e DHA correspond to PUFAs and the others correspond to MUFAs). These results suggest that the EgFAPB1 has a preference for unsaturated fatty acids. In parallel, it was observed that the Van der Waals energies give the greatest energy contribution.

Table 6. Calculated MM/GBSA binding free energy of EgFABP1-FAs.

SystemΔ TOTALVDWAALSEELEGBΔG gasΔG solv
SFAsMRT-31.92±3.18-37.29±3.04-3.82±4.5714.66±3.76-41.10±4.479.18±3.81
PDN-32.74±2.70-38.23±2.74-11.39±2.8322.43±2.41-49.62±3.1616.88±2.46
PLM-34.35±3.26-40.69±3.29-10.21±2.4122.48±2.41-50.90±4.1216.55±2.34
STA-33.75±4.19-37.58±3.49-10.80±4.6120.37±3.07-48.38±5.1714.63±3.01
MUFAsHDN-34.76±2.72-35.33±3.59-26.68±6.3432.84±3.19-62.01±4.7927.25±3.25
OLE-35.58±3.64-41.56±2.97-15.28±3.0127.36±2.31-56.84±4.3221.26±2.25
PLA-37.07±4.55-41.85±2.64-12.08±4.7423.12±2.99-53.93±5.6416.86±2.95
TVA-36.52±2.25-43.81±2.08-10.36±2.0423.99±1.87-54.17±3.0417.66±1.83
CVA-34.33±3.69-37.99±2.99-19.96±8.2029.50±5.32-57.95±8.1223.62±5.19
PUFAsARA-31.83±2.76-41.80±2.62-11.92±3.6928.05±3.36-53.72±4.2921.88±3.32
DHA-38.52±2.60-48.26±2.41-16.16±3.2232.91±2.45-64.41±3.7725.90±2.39
EPA-27.19±4.93-33.30±4.11-13.45±8.0124.57±6.46-46.74±9.6319.55±6.21
LIN-32.90±3.17-40.40±2.80-12.48±4.9726.04±4.06-52.88±5.3619.98±4.02
LNA-30.44±3.35-39.48±3.18-7.00±3.7321.89±2.91-46.47±4.0916.04±3.01

On the other hand, EPA obtained lower binding free energy than the other FAs. Figure 5, shows how DHA (better free energy) stabilizes the protein. However, EPA (lower free energy) destabilizes the protein. According to research by Undurti N. Das,73 this effect could be beneficial in overcoming drug resistance against parasitic infections. Likewise, we observe that EPA has fewer hydrophobic interactions than DHA.

fafebb38-d260-4cf5-a15a-8014768e1f66_figure5.gif

Figure 5. Interactions of DHA and EPA with EgFABP1.

Also, we evaluated Spearman’s Rho between RMSD and binding free energy (Δ TOTAL). In the systems with better free energy, the protein tends to be more stable than without ligand, which could be inversely related. We obtain a Spearman’s Rho = 0.73 and p-value = 0.0029. The results indicate that the relationship between RMSD and binding free energy is a significant (p-value below the usual threshold of 0.05) correlation. In addition, according to most of the research reviewed,74,75 the Spearman’s Rho obtained is classified as a strong correlation.

Conclusions

In summary, this work shows an in silico approximation of fourteen fatty acids against EgFABP1 from Echinococcus granulosus. The results of global chemical reactivity descriptors demonstrated the high chemical reactivity of fatty acids, and low toxicity analyzed by ADMET properties. Structural analysis of EgFABP1 showed that it is a protein with a wide pocket with a high affinity for hydrophobic ligands. It has been observed that during the simulation time, the receptor-ligand systems with better free energy stabilize the protein, showing that this type of ligand shows a favorable behavior in the binding site of EgFABP1. Our results showed that unsaturated fatty acids and saturated fatty acids have an affinity for the active site of EgFABP1 and the best coupling was made with docosahexaenoic acid. We also observed that that eicosapentaenoic acid may possess bioactive properties against EgFABP1. These findings suggest a compelling opportunity for further exploration into the therapeutic or functional implications of eicosapentaenoic acid. Finally, these in silico studies show us a promising action of fatty acids for the research and detection of EgFABP1 in the host.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Apr 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Paco-Chipana M, Mena-Ulecia K, Hidalgo Rosa Y et al. In silico analysis of the action of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids against Echinococcus granulosus fatty-acid-binding protein 1 [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] F1000Research 2024, 13:303 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146070.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status:
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 19 Apr 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.