Abstract
Ecosystem services (ES) are the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems. The term became popular in both scientific literature and common parlance around the turn of the century. The concept of ecosystems as the organisms and the non-living environment with which they interact has been popular for a long time, but it was not until the latter part of the twentieth century that its relevance started getting recognized and the study of the environment and environmental conservation became prominent. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, carried out by the United Nations with the involvement of all its member states, was a significant landmark in ecosystem research and development. It categorized the ES into four broad groups: Provisioning (products from ecosystems, such as genetic resources, food, fiber, fodder, and freshwater), Regulating (benefits from ecosystem processes, such as the regulation of climate, water, and some human diseases), Cultural (non-material benefits from ecosystems through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, recreation, etc.), and Supporting (biomass production, soil formation, and nutrient cycling, etc. that are necessary for producing all other ES) services. Over the years, ES as applied to agroforestry has come to embrace a wide variety of such services. Two of the prominent ES of AFS – climate-change mitigation and biodiversity conservation are – discussed in Chapters. 20 and 21, respectively. Other, relatively less-studied ones, are clubbed together in Chapter 23.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrios E, Valencia V, Jonsson M, Brauman A, Hairiah K, Mortimer PE, Okubo S (2018) Contribution of trees to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Int J Biodiv Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 14:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1399167
Beenhouwer M, Aerts R, Honnay O (2013) A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry. Agric Ecosyst Environ 175:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.003
Dawson IK, Leakey R, Clement CR, Weber JC, Cornelius JP, Roshetko JM, Vinceti B, Kalinganire A, Zac T, Masters E, Jamnadass R (2014) The management of tree genetic resources and the livelihoods of rural communities in the tropics: Non-timber forest products, smallholder agroforestry practices and tree commodity crops. For Ecol Manage 333:9–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.021
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373):270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
Ehrlich P, Mooney H (1983) Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. Bioscience 33(4):248–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1309037
George SJ, Harper RJ, Hobbs RJ, Tibbett M (2012) A sustainable agricultural landscape for Australia: A review of interlacing carbon sequestration, biodiversity and salinity management in agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosys Environ 163:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.022
IPBES (2017) Update on the classification of nature’s contributions to people by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Available at https://www.ipbes.net/system/tdf/downloads/pdf/ipbes-5-inf-24.pdf
Kremen C, Miles A (2012) Ecosystem Services in Biologically Diversified versus Conventional Farming Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-Offs. Ecol Soc 17:40. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05035-170440
Kuyah S, Öborn I, Jonsson M, Dahlin AS, Barrios E, Muthuri C, Malmer A, Nyaga J, Magaju C, Namirembe S et al (2016) Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 12:255–273
Letourneau DK, Armbrecht I, Rivera BS, Lerma JM, Carmona EJ, Daza MC, Escobar S, Galindo V, Gutierrez C, Lopez SD, Mejia JL, Rangel AMA, Rangel JH, Rivera L, Saavedra CA, Torres AM, Trujillo AR (2011) Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol Appln 21:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2026.1
MA (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
Maes J, Liquete C, Teller A, Erhard M, Paracchini ML, Barredo JI, Grizzetti B, Cardoso A, Somma F, Petersen J (2016) An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosyst Serv 17:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
Nicholls CI, Altieri MA (2013) Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review. Agron Sust Dev 33:257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0092-y
Notte AL, D’Amato D, Mäkinen H, Paracchini ML, Liquete C, Egoh B, Geneletti D, Crossman ND (2017) Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework. Ecol Indicators 74:392–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030
Pumarino L, Sileshi GW, Gripenberg S, Kaartinen R, Barrios E, Muchane MN, Midega C, Jonsson M (2015) Effects of agroforestry on pest, disease and weed control: a meta-analysis. Basic Appl Ecol 16:573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.08.006
Rosenstock TS, Dawson IK, Aynekulu E, Chomba S, Degrande A, Fornace K, Jamnadass R, Kimaro A, Kindt R, Lamanna C, Malesu M, Mausch K, McMullin S, Murage P, Namoi N, Njenga M, Nyoka I, Valencia AMP, Sola P, Shepherd K, Steward P (2019) A Planetary Health Perspective on Agroforestry in Sub-Saharan Africa, pp 330–344. One Earth 1, November 22, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.017
Santos PZF, Crouzeilles R, Sansevero JBB (2019) Can agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in agricultural landscapes? A meta-analysis for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manage 433:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.064
Torralba M, Fagerholm N, Burgess PJ, Moreno G, Plieninger T (2016) Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002
Wilson CM, Matthews WH (eds) (1970) Man’s impact on the global environment: report of the study of critical environmental problems (SCEP). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 319p
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H, Hertel D, Hölscher D, Juhrbandt J, Kessler M, Perfecto I, Scherber C, Schroth G, Veldkamp E, Wanger TC (2011) Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes - a review. J Appl Ecol 48:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01939.x
Tsonkova P, Bohm C, Quinkenstein A, Freese D (2012) Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: a review. Agroforest Syst 85:133–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9494-8
Wratten SD, Gillespie M, Decourtye A, Mader E, Desneux N (2012) Pollinator habitat enhancement: benefits to other ecosystem services. Agric Ecosyst Environ 159:112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M., Nair, V.D. (2021). Ecosystem Services of Agroforestry: An Introduction. In: An Introduction to Agroforestry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75357-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75358-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)