DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Battle Management Language Application for the C4I and M&S Interoperation in ROK Forces

한국군에서의 C4I체계와 M&S 상호운용을 위한 BML 적용에 관한 연구

  • 정환식 (국방대학교 운영분석학과) ;
  • 이재영 (국방대학교 운영분석학과)
  • Received : 2009.10.29
  • Accepted : 2010.03.12
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

Battle Management Language (BML) is defined as an unambiguous language intended to provide for command and control of simulated and live forces in U.S. It has been developed to connect between command and control system and Modeling & Simulation in the U.S., including NATO M&S Working Group. Its goal is to provide situational awareness and offer a path forward for interoperation of C2 systems and simulations. This study deals with BML development in U.S. that begins from army and is being expanded in multinational environment. It also proposes the BML application for C4I and M&S interoperation in the Korean forces. Recent developments of BML in U.S. have shown the potential for interoperation between C2 systems and simulations in a coalition environment. Finally, this study proposes a general BML application method and shows the example of its application to the Korea Joint Command Control System (KJCCS). It provides an architecture and a milestone for BML application in the Korean forces.

전투관리언어인 BML은 미군에서 가상 부대 및 실제 부대를 지휘 및 통제하기 제공하기 위한 명확한 언어라고 정의할 수 있다. BML은 C2 체계와 M&S를 연결하기 위해 미국과 NATO에서 개발되었다. BML이 개발된 목적은 전장정보를 통해 상황인식을 제공하고, C2 체계와 M&S간 상호운용을 위한 해법을 제시하는 것이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 육군에서 시작하여 다국적국으로 구성된 환경으로 확장되고 있는 미국의 BML 개발과정에 대해서 설명하고, 한국군에서 C4I체계와 M&S간 상호운용을 위한 BML 적용 방안에 대해서 제안한다. 최근, 미국에서는 BML을 연합국으로 구성된 환경에서 적용하여 긍정적인 결과를 얻었는데, 이는 C2 체계와 M&S간 상호운용에 대한 가능성을 보여주었다. 마지막으로, 본 연구는 BML을 한국군에 적용하기 위한 방안으로 한국군 합동지휘통제체계를 중심으로 제안하였다. 이는 향후 한국군에서 BML 적용시 밑그림을 제공 할 것이라고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Y. K, "A Basic Study on the Analysis of Combat Contribution Effectiveness of Networking Weapon System," Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, Seoul in Korea, 2000.
  2. Pullen, J., K. Makienni, and P. McAndrews, "A Grammar- Based Web Service Enabling Multi-domain Distributed Interoperation of Command/Control and Simulation Systems," http://netlab.gmu.edu/pubs/pullenj-C2SimulationInterop.pdf
  3. Pullen. J. et al., "NATO MSG-048 Coalition Battle Management Initial Demonstration Lessons Learned and Way Forward," IEEE Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2008.
  4. Carey, S., M. Kleiner, M. Hieb, and R. Brown, "Standardizing Battle Management Language - A Vital Move Towards the Army Transformation," IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, 2001.
  5. Sudnikovich, W., J. Pullen, M. Kleiner, and S. Carey, "Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler," in SIMULATION, 80 : 669-680, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549704051194
  6. Perme, D., M. Hieb, J. Pullen, W. Sudnikovich, and A. Tolk, "Integrating Air and Ground Operations within a Common Battle Management Language," IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando FL, 2005.
  7. Sudnikovich, W., A. Ritchie, P. de Champs, M. Hieb, and J. Pullen, "NATO Exploratory Team - 016 Integration Lessons Learned for C2IEDM and CBML," IEEE Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, San Diego CA, 2006.
  8. Pullen, J., M. Hieb, S. Levine, A. Tolk, and C. Blais, "Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) - US Contribution to the C-BML PDG and NATO MSG-048 TA," IEEE European Simulation Interoperability Workshop, June 2007.
  9. Levine, S., M. Pullen, M. Hieb, C. Pandolfo, C. Blais, J. Roberts, and J. Kearly, "Joint Battle Management Language (JBML) Phase 1 Development and Demonstration Results," IEEE Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, 2007.
  10. Schade, U. and Hieb, M.R., "Formalizing Battle Management Language : A Grammar for Specifying Orders," IEEE Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, April 2006.
  11. Schade, U. and M. Hieb, "Development of Formal Grammars to Support Coalition Command and Control: A Battle Management Language for Orders, Requests, and Reports," Proceedings of the 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, CCRP Press, 2006.
  12. Bresnan, J., Lexical-Functional Syntax, Blackwell, Malden, MA, 2001.
  13. Levine, S. et al., "Integration of Simulations, Battle Command, and Technology," http://netlab.gmu.edu/pubs/ 09E-SIW-025.pdf
  14. Tolk, A, M. Hieb, K. Galvin, L. Khimeche, and J. Pullen, "Developing a Coalition Battle Management Language to facilitate Interoperability between Operation CIS and Simulations in support of Training and Mission Rehearsal," 10th Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, McLean, VA, 2005.
  15. Pullen. J. et al., "Adding Reports to Coalition Battle Management Language for NATO MSG-048," http://netlab. gmu.edu/pubs/09E-SIW-003.pdf
  16. Multilateral Interoperability Programme website, http://www/ mip-site.org
  17. Hieb, M., M. Powers, J. Pullen, and M. Kleiner, A Geospatial Battle management Language (GeoBML) for Terrain Reasoning, paper 110, 11th International Research and Technology Symposium, Cambridge, UK, 2007.
  18. deReus, N, Krom, P., Schade, U. and J. Pullen, Battle Management Language: Proof of Principle and Future Developments, paper 8166, InterService/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, FL, 2009.