Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 33699

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ZC26 - ZC30 Full Version

Effect of Ageing, Staining and Polishing on the Colour Stability of a Single, a Group Shade and Nano Fill Dental Composite: An In-vitro Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57606.16627
Fatin A Hasanain

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Western Region, Saudi Arabia.

Correspondence Address :
Fatin A Hasanain,
PO Box 80209, Jeddah, Western Region, Saudi Arabia.
E-mail: fhasanain@kau.edu.sa

Abstract

Introduction: With the increase in aesthetic requirements, more people are requesting tooth coloured fillings. An anterior restoration is deemed unacceptable if its colour changes significantly.

Aim: To assess the colour stability of a single shade, a group shade and a nano fill dental resin composite which comes in multiple shades.

Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted in the month of August 2021 at the Advanced Technology Dental Research Laboratory at the King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Western region, Saudi Arabia. Three composites were tested; a single shade (Omnichroma), a group shade (Optishade Light (OL) and Optishade Medium (OM)) and a conventional nano fill (Z350) 40 cylindrical discs (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth) were fabricated in total. Each material and shade to be tested had 10 samples per group (n=10). The materials were aged in a thermocycler for 5000 cycles then stained with either green tea or coffee for six days. Upon completion of the staining protocol, they were then polished with soflex diamond polishing system. Colour measurements were taken at each stage, calculated and compared. Mixed model repeated Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine significance of the colour change (?E00) between materials and treatments and Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparison between groups.

Results: The effect of ageing varied according to individual material; Z350 had lower ?E00 when compared to other materials. After staining with tea, it was found that Z350 and Omnichroma exhibited a significant change (p<0.05) in ?E00 when compared to OL. Polishing improved the ?E00 in all the materials. All green tea-stained materials with the exception of Omnichroma returned to a clinically acceptable E00 after polishing. After polishing coffee stained samples, OL and OM remained above the clinically acceptable threshold while Z350 and omnichroma were returned to a clinically acceptable level.

Conclusion: All the materials showed a change in ?E00 after ageing, with OM and Z350 being the only materials to exhibit a clinically acceptable change. While polishing decreased ?E00 in all the materials, it did not return them all to a clinically acceptable level. Thus, polishing helps improve the appearance of stained restorations but may not be enough to completely remove stains, even in newly introduced direct aesthetic dental materials.

Keywords

Aesthetic dental filling, Discolouration, Omnichroma, Optishade

Currently the material of choice for direct restorations among most dental practitioners is dental resin composites (1),(2). This is due to their excellent aesthetics and material properties (3). Providing the patient with a functional, yet imperceptible aesthetic restoration is the ultimate goal of a dental practitioner. As a means to that end, dental resin composite systems were created with a myriad of shades to enable the clinician to match the surrounding tooth structure seamlessly. Unfortunately, the placement of perfectly camouflagued restorations remains an unattained goal in many clinical cases (4). Recently, in an attempt to make the process of shade selection easier while improving the final result, manufacturers created dental resin composite materials which have one or very few shades to replace the multiple shades used previously (5). These materials are called ‘single shade’ or ‘group shade’ dental resin composites and have been found to blend into the surrounding tooth structure very well (6),(7).

Among the requirements for a successful aesthetic restoration is that it maintain its colour and shade [8,9]. Colour change is among the main reasons for the replacement of anterior dental resin composite restorations (9). Some of the most common reasons for such discolouration include the consumption of dietary substances such as tea and coffee [10-13]. These drinks stain teeth as well as dental resin composite restorations and can change the perceived shade of the filling (10),(14). Although the most recent formulations of dental resin composites often maintain colour over extended periods of time, they are still prone to staining and discolouration. Chairside polishing is a method frequently used to decrease the appearance of stains in mildly discoloured teeth and restorations (15),(17),(18). While other studies have recorded the effect of polishing pastes or chairside polishing on stains in dental resin composites, they did so in the absence of ageing and for varying periods of time (16),(17),(18). This study aimed to mimic the clinical scenario by ageing the materials as well as simulate a typical biannual dental visit prior to testing if polishing would improve the discolouration in a single and group shade dental resin composite. The colour stability was tested after ageing, staining with green tea or coffee and subsequently polishing. The null hypothesis was that none of the treatments would affect the colour stability of the materials, irrespective of the material used.

Material and Methods

This in-vitro study was conducted in the month of August 2021 at the Advanced Technology Dental Research Laboratory at the King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Western region, Saudi Arabia with Ethical approval number 071-03-19. Three commercially available, widely used dental resin composite systems were chosen. The details of each system as given by their respective manufacturers are shown in (Table/Fig 1). Two of the systems used in this study, Omnichroma and Optishade, possess colour adjustment potential according to their manufacturers. The Omnichroma is supplied in one shade only, while Optishade has three available shades, of which OL and OM were chosen to simulate the filling of anterior teeth. The third composite system tested, Z350, is among the most commonly used in dental practices. Z350 does not have a chameleon effect. A2 is one of the most popular shades so it was chosen to be included in the study.

Study Procedure

In total 40 cylindrical discs (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in depth) were fabricated. Each material and shade to be tested had 10 samples per group (n=10). The specimens were made using a custom-made silicon mould. The mould was placed on a glass microscope slide which rested on a glass slab. The composite was then adapted into the mould and covered with another glass slide to remove the excess. The specimen was immediately light cured for 20 seconds on the top and bottom using a LED Light Curing Unit (LCU) (3M ESPE Elipar, St Paul, MN, USA). The power density was measured with digital radiometer (Bluephase Meter II, Ivoclar, Amherst, NY, USA) at 1100 mW/cm2 immediately before specimen preparation.The specimen preparation setup is illustrated while showing a completed specimen (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3). The methodology for the study is illustrated in (Table/Fig 4).

Specimens were then polished using the sof-lex diamond polishing system. The colour parameters of each sample were then determined using a clinical spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade Advance 5, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany). As per the manufacturer’s instructions, the spectrophotometer was calibrated prior to use using the white calibration plate provided. To determine a specimen’s colour parameters, the measurement tip was placed in direct contact and perpendicular to the sample surface. A positioning jig was used to place the measuring tip on each specimen in a reproducible manner. Each sample was measured three times and the mean values were used for analysis. Recalibration was done after 10 samples were analysed.

Ageing procedure: All the samples were artificially aged in a custom made thermocycling unit. The thermocycling chambers had a temperature of 5°C and 55°C (15 seconds dwell time in each temperature chamber) for 5000 cycles (19).

Staining and polishing samples: Each material group was divided into two (n=5) and immersed in one of two staining solutions; coffee (1 teaspoon coffee in 180 mL of just boiled water, Nescafe Classic, USA) or green tea (one teabag brewed in just boiled water for two minutes, (Twinings Green Tea, Twinings, UK). It has been reported that the average coffee drinker consumes 3.2 cups per day and spends 15 minutes drinking a single cup (13). Thus, storage in coffee for 24 hours simulates about one month of coffee consumption (13). The specimens were stored in their respective staining solutions in an incubator (Memmert, Schwabach, Germany) at 37°C for six days, which represents approximately six months of tea or coffee drinking. After the immersion time was completed, the samples were removed from their respective containers, rinsed for 10 seconds, air dried and then their colour parameters were recorded. Samples were then polished using sof-lex diamond polishing system (3 M ESPE) and their colour parameters measured once again. The samples were placed in separate containers to ensure that the same sample was measured each time.

Measurement of colour change: Baseline shades for all samples were taken immediately after sample preparation was completed. The colour parameters of each sample was measured at four different time points; immediately after preparation (T0), after ageing (T1), after staining (T2) and finally after polishing (T3). Samples were measured in the same location in the laboratory each time and a positioning jig was used to standardise the placement of the probe on the specimen during measurement of the colour parameters.

Each specimen’s colour change was calculated according to the CIEDE2000 formula (?E00) (20).

The CIEDE2000 colour-difference formula in Microsoft Excel was used for this analysis as proposed by Sharma G et al., (21).

To determine the Threshold of Perceptability (PT) and Threshold of Acceptability (AT), the parameters described by Paravina RD et al., were used (22). The CIEDE2000 (?E00) values in dentistry were 50:50 PT was found to be 0.8 and 50:50% AT was found to be 1.8 (22). Thus, the colour change was considered undetectable when ?E00 ≤0.8 and considered clinically unacceptable when ?E00 ≥1.8 (22).

Statistical Analysis

Mixed model repeated ANOVA was performed to determine ?E00 between materials and treatments and Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparison between groups. Statistical software, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Ver. 17 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was utilised at 0.05 significance level.

Results

The mean ?E00 and standard deviations of all the materials after ageing, staining and polishing are shown in (Table/Fig 5). The mixed model repeated ANOVA showed that the staining solution, material and polishing all had a statistically significant effect on ?E00 (p<0.001) as shown in (Table/Fig 6). Furthermore, the statistical difference is material dependant in all the processes which the samples were subjected to. Pairwise comparisons are shown in (Table/Fig 7). It shows that there is a significant difference between Z350 and Omni. Z350 showed significantly less of a change in ?E00 values after ageing. Z350 and Omni both had significantly higher ?E00 values (p<0.001) when stained with green tea, while coffee did not have a significant effect on the value of ?E00. On comparison with Z350, OL showed significantly higher ?E00 values when stained with coffee (p<0.05). Polishing coffee stained samples showed no significant differences during pairwise comparisons as shown in (Table/Fig 7).

In spite of the significant differences or lack of it, OL, Omni and Z350 all showed a clinically unacceptable change in ?E00 when stained with either green tea or coffee. When aged, OM had a ?E00 of 1.5, and 1.6 when stained with tea, which was reduced to 1.4 after polishing. Staining OM with coffee increased ?E00 to 3.1 which decreased to 2.1 after polishing. Regardless of the staining solution, differencepolishing in Z350 reduced the ?E00 to below 1.8. With the exception of Omni, all the materials had ?E00 of less than 1.8 after polishing green tea-stained samples. In the coffee-stained samples, polishing Omni and Z350 resulted in a clinically acceptable ?E00. Both OL and OM had ?E00 of above 1.8.

Discussion

Aesthetic restorations are frequently requested and placed in dental practices (3). Optishade and Omni are both aesthetic restorative materials that have recently been introduced into the dental marketplace. Z350 is a nano composite commonly used in dental practices with a long track record, thus it was chosen for this work. A vital marker of the success of an aesthetic restoration is its colour stability (23). Colour stability has been frequently evaluated by immersion of the test materials in staining solutions (12),(14),(18),(23),(24),(25). The choice of staining solutions was derived from commonly consumed beverages. Coffee is among the most commonly consumed beverages and green tea is becoming more popular among health conscious individuals (23),(26). The Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIELAB) colour difference formula has been used by several studies to evaluate colour stability (11),(14),(23). However, the CIEDE2000’s formula corrects for small colour variations and is a recommended formula which improves the perception of the visual colour difference (7),(27). Thus, CIEDE2000 was used in this work (22).

As soon as a material is placed in a patient’s mouth, it begins to age. In an effort to better simulate the clinical situation in the laboratory, all the materials tested were aged prior to staining. It has been reported that 10,000 cycles in a thermocycling machine are equivalent to one year of clinical function, thus the samples were aged for 5,000 cycles to simulate approximately six months of clinical service (28). The samples were placed in the staining solution for six days which simulated six months of the consumption of the chosen beverage (13). This study simulated the scenario of biannual dental check-ups, as recommended by dentists.

In this study, the null hypothesis was rejected because there was a significant difference in ?E00 in between the materials tested and the procedures that they were subjected to. Z350 and OM had a clinically imperceptible change in ?E00 after ageing, with Z350 being significantly different from OM. OL and Omni had ?E00 of just over 1.8, making their colour change clinically apparent and just over the acceptable threshold. Pairwise comparisons with OL showed that staining with green tea significantly increased ?E00 in Z350 and Omni while there was no significant difference in OM. This is in agreement with researchers who found that tea stained dental resin composites more than coffee did (13). The reason given for the staining potential of tea is the presence of tannins. This is an interesing finding as green tea has been found to have a lower percentage of tannins (3.1%) when compared with black tea (13.36%) (29). Despite the lower tannin content, both Z350 and Omni showed a significant difference after being stained with green tea. The lower tannin content may explain the positive effect polishing had on the green tea stained samples. The results of this study showed that staining with coffee caused a greater increase in ?E00 in OL, when compared to Omni or Z350. This is in agreement with a previous work by AlHamdan EM et al., which found the colour stability of Omni to be comparable to Z350 when staining with coffee (24). The OL and OM findings are in agreement with studies which found that coffee stained more than tea (11),(30). These findings are most likely due to the differences in the chemistry of the staining solutions themselves and their interactions with the individual material. Both Z350 and Omni have a similar filler loading and Urethane Dimethacrylate (UDMA) in their resin composition (31),(32), while OL and OM are two shades of the same material, with identical filler loading and no UDMA in the composition of their resin matrix (33). Even though the difference was not significant, OL appeared more stained when compared to OM. OL is the lighter shade and thus it is expected to stain more than a darker shade as has been reported previously (34).

As mentioned in the results section, all the materials exhibited clinically unacceptable changes in ?E00 after staining regardless of whether a significant difference was found or not. Polishing the samples decreased the ?E00 in all the materials to varying levels. After polishing, Z350 had a ?E00 of less than 1.8 regardless of the staining solution. Polishing coffee stained Omni also exhibited a clinically acceptable ?E00. OL and OM also showed a decrease to below 1.8 after polishing the green tea stained samples. These results are in agreement with researchers who found that extrinsic stains decreased after polishing (18),(25).

The absorption of colourants found in the different foods and beverages is a cause of staining in the oral environment. Water is the carrier for the staining pigments to travel into the resin matrix. Thus, water sorption has a major impact on colour stability and it is affected by the hydrophilicity of the resin matrix as well as the resin matrix to filler ratio. The higher the ratio of resin matrix to fillers within the restorative material, the more the water sorption and subsequent colour change (14),(35). It has been found that UDMA resin composites tend to have better colour stability when compared with Bisphenol-A-Glycidyl-Methacrylate Bis-GMA as UDMA has lower water sorption (14). Resin based materials which contain Bis-GMA or Triethyleneglycol Dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) are hydrophilic and thus may show higher rates of absorption (36),(37),(38).

In this study, the material without Bis-GMA, Omni, did not show more colour stability than all the other materials.

As with most processes in the oral cavity, multiple factors affect the final outcome. The results of this work may be better explained by looking at both the filler loading and resin composition. The material with the lowest filler loading in this study was Z350 at 78.5% by weight. The next highest filler loading was Omni at 79% by weight. OL and OM were both 81% (31),(32),(33). Thus, Z350 showed the most change when stained with tea, while OL and OM showed a smaller change.

The author has suggested that it is possible to remove stains on dental composite resin restorations through polishing (38). In this work, that was true for Z350 regardless of which solution stained it, OL and OM after tea staining, and Omni after coffee staining. Polishing did not fully remove the stains for OL and OM after coffee staining or Omni after green tea stained it. It did, however, markedly decrease ?E00 in all the materials tested. This is in agreement with a previous study which showed that even though the staining decreased, it was not completely removed (15).

Limitation(s)

As with all in-vitro studies, the limitation of this work is that it is not a complete simulation of the clinical situation, as in the mouth several factors are involved, such as toothbrushing and mastication along with ingestion of other types of food and drink. The staining solutions were also placed for an approximation of six months, which is a relatively short amount of time to judge the staining potential of a restoration. Further research involving the addition of toothbrushing to the processes which the samples are subjected to and a longer period of immersion would yield more information regarding the behaviour of the materials.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, several conclusions may be drawn regarding the colour stability of the materials tested. Among the most important for the clinician is that all the materials showed a change ?E00 after ageing, with OM and Z350 being the only materials to exhibit a clinically acceptable change. Then, when the materials were stained for an approximation of six months, nearly all the materials showed clinically unacceptable staining. Only OM showed a clinically imperceptible change when stained with green tea. While polishing decreased ?E00 the regardless of the staining medium, not all the materials went back to a clinically acceptable level of ?E00. Thus, it is important that a clinician is aware that aesthetic dental filling materials are susceptible to a visually apparent colour change after clinical service and that such a colour change does not automatically necessitate replacement of the restoration. Chairside polishing should improve the stained appearance but it may not completely remove the stain to return the material to the original perceived shade.

References

1.
Collares K, Opdam NJM, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Demarco FF, Correa MB, et al. Longevity of anterior composite restorations in a general dental practice-based network. J Dent Res. 2017;96(10):1092-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Eltahlah D, Lynch CD, Chadwick BL, Blum IR, Wilson NHF. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations. J Dent. 2018;72:01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Bayne SC, Ferracane JL, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, van Noort R. The evolution of dental materials over the past century: Silver and gold to tooth color and beyond. J Dent Res. 2019;98(3):257-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Kim BJ, Lee YK. Influence of the shade designation on the color difference between the same shade-designated resin composites by the brand. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):1148-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Perdigao J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L. Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(1):51-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
De Abreu JLB, Sampaio CS, Jalkh EBB, Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(2):269-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Iyer RS, Babani VR, Yaman P, Dennison J. Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi-shade composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(2):394-400. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(2):137-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Mundim FM, Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Garcia Lda F, Consani S. Colour stability, opacity and cross-link density of composites submitted to accelerated artificial aging. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;18(2):89-93.
10.
Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of aesthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(8):695-02.
11.
Domingos PA, Garcia PP, Oliveira AL, Palma-Dibb RG. Composite resin color stability: Influence of light sources and immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(3):204-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Ren YF, Feng L, Serban D, Malmstrom HS. Effects of common beverage colorants on color stability of dental composite resins: The utility of a thermocycling stain challenge model in-vitro. J Dent. 2012;40(Suppl 1):e48-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Ertas E, Guler AU, Yucel AC, Koprulu H, Guler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(2):371-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Bahbishi N, Mzain W, Badeeb B, Nassar HM. Color stability and micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite materials after exposure to common beverages. Materials. 2020;13(3):787. [crossref]
15.
Corcodel N, Hassel AJ, Sen S, Saure D, Rammelsberg P, Lux CJ, et al. Effects of staining and polishing on different types of enamel surface sealants. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):580-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Mundim FM, Garcia LdFR, Pires-de-Souza FdCP. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci: Revista FOB. 2010;18(3):249-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Türkün LS, Türkün M. Effect of bleaching and repolishing procedures on coffee and tea stain removal from three anterior composite veneering materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(5):290-01. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Spina DR, Grossi JR, Cunali RS, Baratto Filho F, da Cunha LF, Gonzaga CC, et al. Evaluation of discoloration removal by polishing resin composites submitted to staining in different drink solutions. Int Sch Res Notices. 2015;2015:853975. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Bauer H, Ilie N. Effects of aging and irradiation time on the properties of a highly translucent resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(4):592-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
CIE. Improvement to industrial colour-difference evaluation. Vienna: CIE Publication No. 142-2001, Central Bureau of the CIE; 2001.
21.
Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EN. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 2005;30(1):21-30. [crossref]
22.
Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(Suppl 1):S1-9. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Paolone G, Formiga S, De Palma F, Abbruzzese L, Chirico L, Scolavino S, et al. Color stability of resin-based composites: Staining procedures with liquids-A narrative review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;01-23. Doi:10.1111/jerd.12912. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
AlHamdan EM, Bashiri A, Alnashmi F, Al-Saleh S, Al-shahrani K, Al-shahrani S, et al. Evaluation of smart chromatic technology for a single-shade dental polymer resin: An in-vitro study. Appl Sci. 2021;11(21):10108. [crossref]
25.
Arregui M, Giner L, Ferrari M, Valles M, Mercade M. Six-month color change and water sorption of 9 new-generation flowable composites in 6 staining solutions. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):e123. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Khan N, Mukhtar H. Tea and health: Studies in humans. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(34):6141-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 2001;26:340-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049. [crossref]
28.
Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;29:295-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Khasnabis J, Rai C, Roy A. Determination of tannin content by titrimetric method from different types of tea. J Chem Pharm Res. 2015;7(6):238-41.
30.
Ashok N, Jayalakshmi S. Factors that influence the color stability of composite restorations. Int J Orofac Biol. 2017;1(1):01-03.
31.
Tokuyama. Omnichroma Every Shade, One Choice. Japan; 2018.
32.
ESPE M. Filtek Z350 XT Universal Restorative System Technical Profile. USA.
33.
Kerr. Optishade Technical Bulletin. 2021.
34.
Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Discoloration of facing and restorative composites by UV-irradiation and staining food. Dent Mater. 2006;22(1):63-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Kerby RE, Knobloch LA, Schricker S, Gregg B. Synthesis and evaluation of modified urethane dimethacrylate resins with reduced water sorption and solubility. Dent Mater. 2009;25(3):302-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, De Oliveira AL, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG. Chemical and morphological features of dental composite resin: Influence of light curing units and immersion media. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73(3):176-81. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33(5):389-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Fontes ST, Fernandez MR, de Moura CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a nanofill composite: Effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(5):388-91. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57606.16627

Date of Submission: May 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 20, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 11, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 19, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 16, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com