Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 245778

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : NC01 - NC05 Full Version

Retinal Manifestations in Rhino-orbito-cerebral Mucormycosis: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55112.16590
Manisha Nada, Monika Dahiya, Jitender Phogat, Aakash Sharma, Manoj Shettigar, Surender Kumar

1. Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India. 6. Junior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Monika Dahiya,
21/11J, Medical Campus, PGIMS, Rohtak-124 001, Haryana, India.
E-mail: drmonika2410@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Rhino-orbito-cerebral Mucormycosis (ROCM) is an uncommon but devastating fungal infection caused by Mucoraceae family fungi, which are angiotropic and filamentous, with significantly high morbidity and mortality despite treatment. Post Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), there was a sudden surge in ROCM cases nationwide due to immunologically and metabolically compromised status.

Aim: To describe retinal manifestations in ROCM in a tertiary eye care centre of Northern India.

Materials and Methods: An analytic, cross-sectional and hospital-based study was conducted in Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India, from May 2021 to September 2021. This study was conducted on 200 admitted patients of RCOM in the institute, which was only designated Nodal centre in Haryana, India. Detailed history was recorded in every patient regarding presenting symptoms, history of COVID-19, hospital stay, oxygen inhalation, steroid intake and immunisation. Thorough ocular examination was done in every patient including visual acuity, ocular movements and pupillary reactions. Dilated fundus examination was done by Indirect Ophthalmoscopy (IDO) for posterior segment evaluation. Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI) brain with orbit and Paranasal Sinus (PNS) was done in every patient to see the extent of spread and planning further management.

Results: Out of 200 patients of ROCM, majority of patients (64/200) were of 51-60 year age group (32%) followed by 41-50 year age group (28%). Out of 200 cases of ROCM, 146 patients (73%) had history of COVID-19 infection in past and 134 (67%) patients had history of hospital stay during COVID-19 infection. Oxygen (O2) supplementation was given to 98 patients either at home or during hospital stay. History of steroid intake was present in 34 patients and 46 patients received injection Remedsivir. Only 12 patients had vaccine against COVID-19 and none of them were fully vaccinated. Most common presenting symptom was unilateral nasal stiffness (22%) followed by loss of vision (17%). Most common predisposing factor was Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in 78 patients (39%) followed by steroid intake in 34 patients (17%). Out of 200 patients, only 60 patients had retinal manifestations and most common was Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO) (35/60) and the main mechanism is the direct infiltration of central retinal artery due to angioinvasion of fungi from the orbit.

Conclusion: CE-MRI brain with orbit is an important tool in diagnosing and monitoring progression of RCOM but it cannot provide information regarding retinal findings like CRAO, central retinal venous occlusion (CRVO), disc pallor and optic atrophy. Thus, the fundus examination of every ROCM patient should be emphasised, as it not only helps in categorising ROCM but also tells about the visual potential of affected eye. Patients with CRAO and combined vascular occlusion should be considered for exenteration on urgent basis, so that intracranial spread can be prevented and patient’s life can be saved.

Keywords

Coronavirus, Central retinal artery occlusion, Mucorales infection, Retinal vein occlusions

In late 2019, multiple pneumonia cases were observed in Wuhan in Hubei province in China; caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2); also known as 2019 novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which is highly transmissible (1),(2). COVID-19 outbreak has affected millions globally, leading to the World Health Organisation (WHO) declaring it as a global pandemic (3). In post COVID-19 recovery patients, there was sudden surge in ROCM cases nationwide, due to the immunologically and metabolically compromised status of these patients. A complex interplay of factors i.e pre-existing DM, previous respiratory pathology, use of immunosuppressive therapy, prolonged hospitalisation and intensive care, oxygen supplementation, iron overload, direct cytopathological effects of virus and systemic immune alteration of COVID-19 infection may lead to secondary bacterial and fungal infections (4).

The ROCM is a rare, but devastating opportunistic fungal infection caused by angiotropic filamentous fungi of Mucoraceae family with significanly high morbidity and mortality. These fungi are angioinvasive in nature due to its predilection for the internal elastic lamina of blood vessels leading to thrombosis and haemorrhagic necrosis. Sinus infection spreads into the orbit and brain due to the same mechanism, leading to a spectrum of RCOM (5).

Mucormycosis is a fungal infection caused by a group of angioinvasive saprophytic fungi, which include the genera Rhizopus, Mucor and Absidia. These fungi are ubiquitous and saprophytic, which are found in fruits, dust, soil and manure and can be cultured from the nasal mucosa of healthy individuals (6),(7). The presence of debilitating diseases and compromised host defence allows the sporulation and growth of these fungi. The predisposing factors for ROCM are uncontrolled DM complicated by diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), organ-transplant recipients who are on immunosuppressants, patients on any steroid or cytotoxic therapy, leukaemia patients and other disseminated cancer patients. Among all, the most common predisposing factor for mucormycosis is uncontrolled DM, especially if complicated by ketoacidosis. It is secondary to various reasons including the hampering of host phagocytosis and mobilisation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, high blood glucose levels, ketoacidosis and increased free serum iron availability at low pH, all of these helps in growth of these fungi (3),(8).

The route of transmission of ROCM is inhalation and it always starts in the nasal or paranasal sinus mucosae after inhalation of fungal spores and thereafter it spreads in neighbouring tissues, including orbit and brain secondary to angioinvasion. Early symptoms of ROCM are unilateral nasal stiffness, facial numbness, retro-orbital pain, headache and fever. If patient presents at an early stage of mucormycosis, anterior rhinoscopy may reveal a black and necrotic turbinate or septum secondary to tissue infarction. Orbital involvement may manifest as chemosis, ophthalmoplegia (Table/Fig 1)a, infraorbital paraesthesia, black eschar over periorbital area (Table/Fig 1)b, proptosis, diplopia, loss of vision and orbital cellulitis (Table/Fig 1)c (9). Intracranial spread may occur via many routes including superior orbital fissure, ophthalmic vessels, cribriform plate and perineural route. Clinically central nervous system involvement manifests as altered sensorium, hemiparesis, brain abscess and meningeal signs (10).

The present study was conducted to describe the retinal manifestations in ROCM cases in a tertiary care referral centre of Northern India.

Material and Methods

An analytic, cross-sectional and hospital-based study was conducted in in Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana, India, from May 2021 to September 2021. Informed consent of patients and ethical clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee, PGIMS Rohtak was obtained prior to the study. The study was conducted on 200 admitted patients of RCOM in the institute. It is the only designated Nodal centre in Haryana, India.

Inclusion criteria: First consecutive 200 patients of RCOM fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study after taking their informed written consent.

Exclusion criteria: Patient not willing to participate in the study and having hazy media secondary to corneal opacity or mature senile cataract which was obscuring posterior segment details were excluded from the study.

Detailed history was recorded in every patient regarding presenting symptoms, history of COVID-19, hospital stay, oxygen inhalation, steroid intake and immunisation. Thorough ocular examination was done in every patient including visual acuity, ocular movements and pupillary reactions. Detailed dilated fundus examination was done with IDO for posterior segment evaluation. CE-MRI brain with orbit and PNS was done in every patient to see the extent of spread and planning further management.

Statistical Analysis

Microsoft excel was used for compiling the data and the data was recorded in values and percentages.

Results

Age distribution: Out of 200 patients of ROCM, majority of patients were of 51-60 year age group (32%) followed by 41-50 year age group (28%) (Table/Fig 2).

Gender distribution: In the present study, out of 200 patients of ROCM, 67% were males (134/200) while 33% (66/200) were females.

Detailed history was taken in every cases and out of 200 cases of ROCM, 146 patients had history of COVID-19 infection in past and 134 patients had history of hospital stay during COVID-19 infection. O2 supplementation was given to 98 patients either at home or during hospital stay. History of steroid intake was present in 34 patients and 46 patients received injection Remedsivir. Only 12 patients had vaccine against COVID-19 and none of them was fully vaccinated.

In present study, most common predisposing risk factor for ROCM was DM in (39%) followed by steroid intake (17%). About 28 (14%) patients developed diabetes mellitus after getting COVID-19 infection and were classified as DM de novo. Other risk factors were Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection in 4% and 2% cases respectively while in 24% cases, there was no risk factor found (Table/Fig 3).

In this present study, patients with ROCM presented with multiple symptoms and most common presenting symptom was unilateral nasal stiffness in 44 patients (22%) followed by loss of vision in 34 patients (17%) (Table/Fig 4).

Out of 200 cases, 24 patients presented with BCVA of 6/6-6/9, 36 patients had 6/12-6/18, 44 patients had 6/24-6/36, 24 patients had 6/60, 8 had BCVA of Finger counting at 3m - Finger counting 1m, Finger counting close to face (FCCF) – Hand movement (HM+ve) in 12 patients, Perception of light (PL+ve) in 16 patients while 36 patients did not perceive light on presentation (Table/Fig 5).

Out of 200 patients, pupillary reaction was essential normal in 44 cases (22%) and Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect (RAPD) was present in 24 cases (12%) (Table/Fig 6).

Ocular motility was checked in every patient in all nine gazes. Out of 200 cases of ROCM, ocular motility was normal in 78 cases (39%), restricted in 56 cases (28%) and complete ophthalmoplegia was noticed in 66 cases (33%).

Complete fundus examination was carried out in every patient of ROCM by IDO and smart phone fundus photography was done. Out of 200 patients of mucormycosis, only 60 patients had retinal manifestations. Fundus findings helps in staging ROCM (Stage 3c if CRAO present) (Table/Fig 7).

Out of 60 patients, most common retinal finding was central retinal artery occlusion in 35 patients (Table/Fig 8)a due to direct infiltration of central retinal artery by angioinvasion followed by combined retinal vascular occlusion (Table/Fig 8)b in five patients, disc pallor in four patients, optic atrophy in three cases and pre-existing diabetic retinopathy in 13 patients.

Every patient of ROCM was thoroughly investigated and CE-MRI brain with orbit with PNS (Table/Fig 9),(10) was done to see the extent of disease and plan further management. Every case was followed-up for a period of three months and were managed in a multidisciplinary way accordingly.

Other investigations were also done for confirmation of diagnosis, like Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) mount, culture and histopathological examination was done (Table/Fig 11)a-c.

Discussion

The ROCM is an opportunistic angio-invasive infection caused by group of saprophytic fungi, including Rhizopus, Mucor and Absidia (7). Due to lack of population based studies and its relatively rare occurrence, exact incidence of ROCM in India is not known. However, in global data, estimated prevalence of mucormycosis is 70 times higher in India (3). In post COVID-19 era, there was sudden surge in cases of ROCM leading to significant morbidity and mortality in India.

ROCM is classified into three categories: Possible, probable and proven ROCM. Mucormycosis is categorised as possible ROCM if symptoms and signs of ROCM with concurrent or recent (<6 weeks) COVID-19 infection are present. When clinical symptoms and signs of ROCM are supported by diagnostic nasal endoscopy or radiologically by CE-MRI or Computed Tomography (CT) scan, it is classified as probable ROCM. If clinicoradiological features along with microbiological confirmation on direct microscopy or culture or histopathology with special stains or molecular diagnostics are present, it is classified as proven ROCM (11).

CE-MRI brain with orbit is an important tool in diagnosing and monitoring progression of ROCM. It can definitely document orbital inflammation, muscle involvement, optic nerve involvement, optic sheath involvement, orbital apex involvement, cavernous sinus involvement and intracranial extension. But CE-MRI cannot document CRAO, CRVO, combined vascular occlusion, disc pallor, diabetic retinopathy and optic atrophy (12).

So authors would strongly emphasise on fundus examination of every ROCM patient as it not only helps in categorising ROCM but also tell about the visual potential of affected eye. If CRAO is present on fundus examination, it will be stage 3c. Despite the availability of fundus camera in our institute, authors had to rely on Smartphone fundus photography because of sick, immobile patients and it is an easy technique with short learning curve, not only for diagnosing and documenting fundus findings but also for monitoring its progression.

Smart Phone Fundus Photography: Role in ROCM

Smartphone fundus photography is a fantastic and easily available tool for fundus examination with a short learning curve. As ROCM patients are sick, immobile patients and transportation is very cumbersome and not feasible, smart phone fundus photography is a better alternative. It is an amazing technique, not only for diagnosing and documenting fundus findings but also monitoring its progression. Most patients of ROCM are having complete ophthalmoplegia and its not feasible for them to focus target on fundus photograph machine, so smart phone fundus photography gives an extra edge to document the fundus finding by moving in different directions and focusing different quadrants (13).

Early diagnosis and management of ROCM is utmost important to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with this lethal disease, therefore a high index of suspicion in appropriate clinical setting is prerequisite. As this fungal infection is well known to cause bony erosions and necrosis in advanced stages, therefore CT scan has an extra edge over MRI. However, CE-MRI brain with orbit with PNS is more helpful in diagnosing early vascular invasion, intracranial spread and early perineural spread. Therefore, ideal investigation of choice for RCOM for monitoring its progression is a T2 weighted MRI with fat saturation sequences or Short- TI Inversion Recovery (STIR) images (14).

For definite diagnosis of ROCM, microbiological confirmation on direct microscopy or culture or histopathology with special stains or molecular diagnostics is essential. On direct microscopy, characteristic ribbon-shaped, aseptate and irregularly branching hyphae are visualised in the tissue specimens and these findings are further strengthened if thrombosis of vessels signifying angioinvasion are seen. Even if culture report is negative and there is strong suspicion of ROCM, molecular diagnostic technologies like Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCR) can help in identification of the fungal species in histologic specimens (15).

The RCOM management is a medical as well as surgical emergency due to its aggressive angioinvasion nature. If ROCM is suspected based on risk factors, clinical features, and/or radiologic findings, early antifungal administration and extensive surgical debridement should be carried out empirically for better prognosis and outcome. The drug of choice for ROCM is intravenous (i.v.) liposomal amphotericin B in the dose of 5-10 mg per Kg body weight per day. If intracranial spread is present on MRI, high dose i.v. Amphotericin B is given at 10 mg/kg body weight. Amphotericin is also used for local instillation or irrigation of debrided cavities in surgical management. Transcutaneous Amphotericin B (TRAMB) is used as an adjuvant therapy in cases of progressive ROCM with significant thrombosis, done under aseptic conditions. The preferred site for TRAMB is above outer 1/3rd of inferior orbital rim. The complications which can be seen after TRAMB are chemosis, subconjunctival hemorrhage, retrobulbar hemorrhage and raised IOP. Post-injection Tb Diamox 2tab stat, e/d moxifloxacin 0.5% and e/d Carboxymethyl cellulose are given. Based on the clinical improvement, 5-7 injections of TRAMB are given (15).

Liposomal amphotericin B is given for several weeks in loading dose and when clinical improvement is achieved, the amphotericin is usually stepped down to oral posaconazole or isavuconazole. In the step-down therapy, followed regimen for oral posaconazole (delayed-release tablet) is 300 mg twice daily on the first day, followed by 300 mg once daily and for oral isavuconazole, 200 mg (2 x 100mg capsules) thrice daily for two days, followed by 200 mg once daily. However, oral posaconazole suspensions are not advisable due to inadequate bioavailability and fatty meal requirement for better absorption (15),(16).

Limitation(s)

Number of subjects in this study was small. Hence the results obtained and conclusion drawn cannot be generalised till a study is done in which sufficiently large number of subjects are studied.

Conclusion

The RCOM is an emerging ophthalmic emergency and early diagnosis and timely management is the key for not only saving sight, but also for saving the life of patient. CE-MRI brain with orbit is an important radiological investigation in diagnosing and monitoring progression of ROCM, but it also has few shortcomings. It cannot document various retinal manifestations of ROCM like CRAO, CRVO, disc pallor and optic atrophy. So fundus examination of every ROCM patient must be done by a trained Ophthalmologist, as it not only helps in categorising ROCM but also tell about the visual potential of affected eye. Exenteration on urgent basis should be considered for patients with CRAO and combined vascular occlusion, so that intracranial spread can be prevented and patient’s life can be saved.

References

1.
Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470-73. [crossref]
2.
Xia J, Tong J, Liu M, Shen Y, Guo D. Evaluation of coronavirus in tears and conjunctival secretions of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Med Virol. 2020;92(6):589-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Khanna RC, Honavar SG. All eyes on Coronavirus- What do we need to know as ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(4):549. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Nair AG, Gandhi RA, Natarajan S. Effect of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmic practice and patient care in India: Results of a survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(5):725. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Talmi YP, Goldschmied-Reouven A, Bakon M, Barshack I, Wolf M, Horowitz Z, et al. Rhino-orbital and rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002.1;127(1):22-31. [crossref]
6.
Peterson KL, Wang M, Canalis RF, Abemayor E. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis: Evolution of the disease and treatment options. The Laryngoscope. 1997;107(7):855-62. [PubMed] [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Taylor R, Shklar G, Budson R, Hacket R. Mucormycosis of the oral mucosa. Archives of Dermatology. 1964;89(3):419-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Yanagisawa E, Friedman S, Kundargi RS, Smith HW. Rhinocerebral phycomycosis. The Laryngoscope. 1977;87(8):1319-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Schwartz JN, Donnelly EH, Klintworth GK. Ocular and orbital phycomycosis. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1977.1;22(1):3-28. [crossref]
10.
Press GA, Weindling SM, Hesselink JR, Ochi JW, Harris JP. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis: MR manifestations. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1988;12(5):744-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Naik MN, Rath S. The ROC staging system for COVID-related rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022;37(3):279-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Therakathu J, Prabhu S, Irodi A, Sudhakar SV, Yadav VK, Rupa V. Imaging features of rhinocerebral mucormycosis: A study of 43 patients. The Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2018;49(2):447-52. [crossref]
13.
Chhablani J, Kaja S, Shah VA. Smartphones in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(2):127. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Reed C, Bryant R, Ibrahim AS, Edwards Jr J, Filler SG, Goldberg R, Spellberg B. Combination polyene-caspofungin treatment of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(3):364-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Luo QL, Orcutt JC, Seifter LS. Orbital mucormycosis with retinal and ciliary artery occlusions. British J Ophthalmol. 1989;73(8):680-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Kohn R, Hepler R. Management of limited rhino-orbital mucormycosis without exenteration. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(10):1440-44. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55112.16590

Date of Submission: Jan 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 16, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 27, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 05, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 19, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com