Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47003

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : DC06 - DC12 Full Version

Novel Synthetic Peptide-based Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Antibody Detection in Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52812.16573
Ragini I Tiwari, Shraddha S Bhullar, Nitin H Chandak, Neeraj N Baheti, Hatim F Daginawala, Lokendra R Singh, Rajpal S Kashyap

1. Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Research Scholar, Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Neurologist, Department of Neurology, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Neurologist, Department of Neurology, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 5. Honorary Research Consultant, Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 6. Director, Department of Neurology, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 7. Director, Research Wing, Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rajpal S Kashyap,
Biochemistry Research Laboratory, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur-440010, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: rajpalsingh.kashyap@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Viral infections of Central Nervous System (CNS) are associated with severe neurological sequelae and can lead to significant morbidity if not adequately diagnosed and treated. An immunological assay detecting antibodies in the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) of the patients is widely used for diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS. In the present study, diagnostic efficacy of in-house designed synthetic peptide based Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was evaluated for detection of antibodies against neurotropic viruses panel such as Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV), Japanese Encephalitis Virus (JEV), Dengue (DENV), West Nile Virus (WNV) and Chandipura Virus (CHPV) in CSF of suspected cases.

Aim: To determine the diagnostic efficacy of in-house developed synthetic peptide-based ELISA in viral infections of the CNS.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Central India Institute of Medical Science, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. The suspected case of CNS viral infections of the patients were enrolled in this study from January 2013 to December 2015. Total 150 suspected cases of viral CNS infections and 135 control cases were recruited. Total 32 synthetic peptides of highly immunogenic proteins of respective seven neurotropic viruses were designed and synthesised. The designed peptides were evaluated in CSF samples of both the viral CNS infections and control cases for detection of Imunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies using in-house developed antibody detection method. The developed tests were further compared with commercially available antibody detection ELISA kit. The sensitivity and specificity of peptide-ELISA were determined by Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis and p-value was calculated by comparison of means by t-test.

Results: Out of total 150 cases of CNS viral infections, a total of 31 CSF samples including 15 for CMV and 16 of JEV were positive by in-house peptide ELISA. The synthetic peptides STGDVVDISP, KQKSLVEL, RTLEVFKE, RSSNVED of CMV and ITYECPK, RRSVSVQT, GESSLVN of JEV showed a significant difference in mean absorbance value for IgM and IgG antibodies in CSF of suspected cases of viral CNS infection.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that the synthetic peptide-based ELISA is rapid, cost-effective, simple and efficient immunodiagnostic assay for initial screening of viral CNS infection.

Keywords

Bioinformatics, Central nervous system viral infection, Cerebrospinal fluid, Commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Neurotropic viruses

Viral infections of the CNS occur sporadically and have been extensively studied because of potential for permanent neurological damage or death (1). The neurotropic viruses are the main aetiological agent for infections of the CNS. The common neurotropic viruses causing CNS infection belongs to herpesviruses, flaviviruses, coxsackievirus and adenovirus families along with several others like mumps, measles, polio, echo and rabies viruses (2). Among all neurotropic viruses, major outbreaks of JEV, DENV, WNV and CHPV have been reported in India with significant mortality and morbidity (3),(4),(5),(6). Herpes virus family members including VZV, CMV and EBV have been known for long causing infections of the CNS (7),(8),(9).

Clinical diagnosis of viral CNS infections remains difficult due to non specific clinical presentations, thus posing a major challenge to clinicians in confirmatory diagnosis. The present clinical and laboratory diagnosis of CNS viral infection is based on medical history and examination of CSF for protein and glucose content. Neuroimaging such as Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography are also performed for diagnosis (10). However, these methods lack specificity for the identification of the infecting organism. Molecular diagnostic assays using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) are widely used for diagnosis of viral infections of the CNS, due to high sensitivity. However, such techniques although sensitive but require elaborate infrastructure facilities and are beyond most diagnostic capacities in underdeveloped regions (11). An immunological assay detecting antibodies against viruses provides a less expensive method for early diagnosis (12). In the current serological assay for the detection of viral antibodies, the viral lysate is mostly used (13). However, the standardisation of viral lysate composition is difficult as it contains many viral antigens which may cause cross-reactivity and give a false positive result.

Earlier study have reported the diagnostic utility of synthetic peptide-based ELISA methods for detection of antibodies in some neurological viral infection like Herpes simplex encephalitis and Chikungunya (14),(15). Some immunodiagnostic methods based on synthetic peptides derived from antigenic proteins of viruses and bacteria has been reported in human infections in recent years (16), (17). Synthetic peptide-based assay helps to differentiate subtle changes in monoclonal antibody specificities and has the major advantage of being cost-effective, than conventional antigen based tests. In the present study, authors report a utility of novel and cost-effective in-house developed synthetic peptide-based ELISA assay for the detection of viral CNS infections in patients with suspected viral infections admitted to the territory care hospital.

Material and Methods

The retrospective study was conducted in patients admitted to the Inpatient Department (IPD) wards of Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India with suspected viral CNS infections were enrolled in this study from January 2013 to December 2015 and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Central India Institute of Medical Sciences (CIIMS), Nagpur (CIIMS/IEC/04/2008). Written consents were obtained from all the patients or their relatives those enrolled in the study.

Sample size: The sample size was calculated by using Raosoft online sample size calculator.

Study subjects and samples

The patients admitted to the IPD wards of Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India with suspected viral CNS infections was enrolled in this study from January 2013 to December 2015 and were analysed in the same duration. Neurological diagnostic investigations were performed during the first week of hospitalisation; these investigations included the acid fast staining, India ink and Gram stain, microbial culture, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status, estimation of protein and sugar level and cell counts in CSF, CT scan and MRI of the brain. In CT plain/contrast imaging of the brain was done, whereas, for MRI T1 & T2-weighted, DWI and FLAIR images were taken. The HIV and Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) positive samples were excluded from the study.

Approximately 3-5 mL of CSF was collected under all aseptic precautions by standard lumbar puncture technique from all the patients. The collected samples were divided into two fractions, one fraction was subjected for IgG/IgM/PCR/antigen analysis and the other fraction was used for microbial analysis along with cell count, protein and sugar content. All the samples were stored at -20°C until further analysis. The initial samples were collected from patients before treatment and from some of the patients whenever possible during treatment. The clinical data of patients was collected from case record forms. Clinically, all the patients (n=285) were divided as discussed below-

a) Suspected viral infections of the CNS cases (n=150)

The patient’s inclusion criteria involved the presence of headache, altered mental status (low level of consciousness, behaviour or personality changes) with acute onset of fever, clinical features consistent with viral encephalitis and other clinical manifestations (e.g. focal neurological deficits, seizures) and CSF findings showing mild increase in protein, glucose often normal and mild pleocytosis.

b) Non-viral infections of the CNS cases control

1. Non infectious neurological disorders (n=105)

Patients who had no evidence of CNS or extra-CNS bacterial or viral infections were grouped in the non infectious neurological disorders group/control group. Patients included in this group had hypertension, status epilepticus, stroke, or other disorders.

2. Other infectious cases (n=30)

Patients included in this group had Tuberculous Meningitis (TBM), pyogenic meningitis or fungal meningitis.

TBM: Diagnosis of TBM was based on clinical features including sub-acute or chronic fever with features of meningeal irritation such as headache, neck stiffness and vomiting, with or without other features of CNS involvement and patients showed good clinical response to antituberculous drugs.

Non tuberculous infectious meningitis: This group included patients having pyogenic or fungal meningitis.

Peptide Designing and Synthesis

For designing of antigenic peptide, immunogenic antigens of viruses namely glycoprotein B (gB) of CMV, glycoprotein E (gE) of VZV, glycoprotein E (gE) of WNV and glycoprotein G (gG) of CHPV, membrane protein Early antigen- diffuse (EA-D) of EBV, premembrane protein (prM) of JEV and non structural proteins (NS) of DENV were targeted. Sequences of respective viral proteins were obtained by using EXPASY proteomic server – UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. The antigenic peptides were determined on the basis of Kolaskar AS and Tongaonkar PC methods by using online software “Molecular Immunology Foundation- Bioinformatics (18). The designed peptides sequences were then subjected to multiple sequence alignment to check homology with other organisms and to obtain the sequence similarities with other non redundant protein database sequences of different species using NCBI BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information) (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). A total of 32 peptides were designed having varying antigenicity.

Peptides synthesis: Peptides were custom synthesised by HongKong GenicBio BioTech Co., limited with 95% purity and quantity of 10 mg each with no modification. The peptides were finally dissolved in a concentration of 1 mg/mL of Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), pH 7.4.

Standardisation of Peptide ELISA

Prior to the development of synthetic peptide-based ELISA for antibody detection, peptide concentration was initially standardised using 100 ng to 800 ng of peptide per well (14),(15). 100 μL of different concentration of peptides were diluted in PBS and coated in microtitre wells and incubated overnight at 4°C. Next day after giving one wash with Phosphate Buffered Saline with Tween20 (PBST), wells was blocked with 0.5% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and incubated for 2 hrs at 37°C. The plate was washed three times with PBS and 100 μL of 1:5, 1:10; 1:20 and 1:40 diluted CSF samples were added to the wells and incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. After washing three times with PBST, 100 μL of secondary antibody 1:5000, 1:10000, 1:20000 and 1:40000 (Goat anti-human IgG/IgM Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP) conjugate Bangalore, Genei) were separately added and incubated for 45 min at 37°C. The plate was washed again with PBST and 100 μL of 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)/H2O2 substrate solution was added and the plate was incubated for 3 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL of 2.5N H2SO4 in each well. The absorbance of the colour developed in each well was read at 450 nm.

Antibody detection by indirect ELISA

Indirect ELISA protocol was followed as previously standardised for Herpes simplex virus and Chikungunya viral CNS infections (14),(15). Peptides (500 ng/100 μL) for individual viruses were separately diluted in PBS and coated in the clear microtiter well plate and incubated at 4°C for overnight. Next day after giving one wash with PBST, wells was blocked with 0.5%BSA and incubated for 2 hrs at 37°C. The plate was washed three times with PBS and 100 μL of diluted CSF samples (1:10) of suspected viral CNS infections cases along with known positive and negative control of respective viruses, and blank were added to the wells and incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. After washing three times with PBS 100 μL of secondary antibody (Goat anti-Human HRP conjugated antibody, 1:5000 for IgM and1:10,000 for IgG) were separately added and incubated for 45 min at 37°C. The plate was washed again with PBS and 100 μL of TMB/H2O2 substrate solution was added and the plate was incubated for 3 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL of 2.5N H2SO4 in each well. The absorbance of the colour developed in each well was read at 450 nm.

Positive and Negative reference control in ELISA

Negative reference control was selected from the pooled CSF of non infectious controls that had no prior history of viral infections. For positive reference control, commercial antibodies were taken are as follows- EBV and DENGUE (Biorbyt, USA), CMV, VZV and JEV (Abnova, USA) and for CHPV and WNV (Invitrogen USA). Antibodies were used as per the manufacturer's instructions. ELISA was run with the positive control, negative control and sample blank (PBS).

JEV antibody detection by using commercial kit: JEV ELISA kit (InBios, Seattle, WA, USA) was used for the detection of IgG/IgM antibodies. This assay employs a recombinant antigen named as JERA which acts as a rapid serological marker for the detection of JEV infections. The protocol for JEV IgG/IgM detection was followed as per kit instructions.

CMV antibody detection by using commercial kit: The LUCIO CMV ELISA kit (Germany) was used for the qualitative detection of IgG/IgM antibodies for CMV in CSF of suspected viral encephalitis patients. The protocol for CMV IgG/IgM detection was followed as per kit instructions.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using Medcalc (version 10) statistical software. A cut-off point for optimal sensitivity and specificity for the ELISA tests was determined using the ROC curve analysis. A p-value was calculated by comparison of means by Paired t-test.

Results

The CSF samples were collected from the patients from the IPD wards of Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur and categorised into suspected CNS viral infection cases and control groups based on the clinical history, biochemical, microbiological and pathological analysis of CSF samples and neuroimaging findings. The peptides selected for antibody detection in patient’s samples showed less or no homology among them using NCBI BLAST tool. (Table/Fig 1) shows the list of viral antigens and their synthetic peptide sequences for antibody detection. (Table/Fig 2), (Table/Fig 3) shows the Mean±SD value of absorbance of all synthetic peptides for binding of IgG and IgM antibodies in CSF from suspected and control groups. Among all 32 peptides, significant difference in mean absorbance value for IgG and IgM antibodies were obtained in peptides namely A2, A3, A4, A5 of CMV and E1, E2, E3 of JEV in suspected group as compared to control groups. The cut-off values were found to be >0.331, >0.332, >0.387, >0.389 for IgG and >0.304, >0.352, >0.372, >0.391 for IgM antibodies of CMV Similarly, in case of JEV the cut-off values are >0.333, >0.328, >0.316 for IgG and >0.357, >0.391, >0.322 for IgM antibodies. The cut-off value for absorbance of these peptides as determined by ROC analysis and on the basis of cut-off values, the positivity of IgG and IgM antibodies in CSF samples of suspected cases were determined for peptides showing a significant difference between suspected and control groups. No significant difference was obtained in Mean±SD value of EBV, VZV, DENV, WNV and CHPV viral peptides.

(Table/Fig 4) shows total % positivity of IgG and IgM antibodies for CMV and JEV detected by peptide ELISA in suspected viral CNS infections cases.

To ascertain diagnostic efficacy of in-house ELISA, ELISA positive cases of JEV and CMV were also compared with the commercial kit (Table/Fig 5). Out of total 150 suspected cases of CNS viral infections, a total of 31 samples were positive by in-house ELISA. Out of these 31 positive cases, 25 cases were positive by the commercial kit.

(Table/Fig 6) shows the clinical characteristics of viral suspected cases were also compared in two groups namely; peptide ELISA positive and peptide ELISA negative cases. Out of total 150 viral suspected cases, 119 were peptide ELISA negative and 31 were positive by peptide ELISA. Out of these, 15 cases were positive for CMV and 16 cases for JEV. Neck stiffness, lesion in brain, reduced level of consciousness and behaviour disturbance was significantly (p=0.019, p=0.044, p=0.003, p=0.026) more in peptide ELISA positive cases as compared to negative cases. The clinical outcome of positive and negative cases showed significant variation (p=0.006). It was observed that more number of cases showed severe clinical outcome in peptide ELISA positive cases as compared to negative cases. No significant variation was observed in other clinical characteristics of patients between both the groups.

(Table/Fig 7) shows concordance in CNS viral infections cases between peptide ELISA and commercial ELISA. Twenty five samples were positive while 119 were negative by both the tests. Thus, the concordance existed between the results of the peptide ELISA and commercial ELISA was found to be 96%. The confirmed viral CNS infections cases of CMV and JEV were also compared with controls cases as determined by the cut-off values of antigenic peptides of respective viruses and significant variation was observed between confirmed case and controls groups (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

In the present study, authors have described a utility of synthetic peptide-based ELISA for rapid diagnosis of viral CNS infection. As viruses are largely responsible for a majority of infectious diseases of the CNS (1). The identification of the infectious agent is challenging because laboratory findings and clinical symptoms may mimic each other. In recent years, antibody detection in the CSF has become one of the widely used tests for the diagnosis of CNS viral infections when other methods such as cultivation and antigen detection are unsuitable, costly or give negative results. Although PCR is recognised as the standard laboratory techniques for diagnosis of viral CNS infections but has some limitations; it remains negative in cases where samples have been obtained at a later period or when viral load in samples is less and it required sophisticated technology, well-trained personnel and still not available in many centers of developing countries (15). In a case of some medically important flaviviruses IgM capture, ELISA is most commonly used as a diagnostic assay in many laboratories (19).

Earlier studies have reported the use of antigenic viral proteins for selection of peptides used for the detection of antibodies (20),(21),(22). For ideal peptide-based seroassay, peptides should be designed on a well conserved and specific region of the viral proteins that evoke a strong antibody response. The major antigenic determinants used in serological assays are the glycoproteins, membrane proteins and non structural proteins of the viruses. In herpesviruses such as VZV, CMV, and EBV; gE, gB, and EA-D respectively, have been shown to be the major immunogenic antigens for neutralising antibodies (23),(24),(25). In flaviviruses, glycoprotein such as gE (WNV) membrane proteins such as prM (JEV), non-structural proteins such as NS (DENV) and gG (CHPV) elicits strong antibody response thus acting as major antigenic determinants (26),(27),(28),(29). These sequences of proteins in viruses were selected for peptides designing on the basis of antigenic epitope prediction analysis by Kolaskar AS and Tongaonkar PC method (18).

Several studies have reported the use of the peptide as a marker for diagnosing of the CNS viral infections. In a study done by Jun Xu et al., they designed a synthetic peptide of JEV envelope protein and used it for detection of antibodies in JEV CNS infections (30). A study performed by Giessauf A et al., has reported the role of synthetic peptides in screening of rubella virus infection. (31). Similarly, Smith RS et al., used this peptide-based approach for Epstein-Barr virus diagnosis by using a peptide designed specifically against the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen (EBNA) (32). In the similar pattern, the present study was intended to design, synthesise and evaluate the synthetic peptides of respective viral proteins instead of whole viral protein for detection of antibodies in CSF of patients with suspected viral infections of the CNS. A total of 32 peptides of viruses consisting of five peptides each for CMV, EBV, and VZV, eight peptides of DENV serotypes (1, 2, 3, 4), three for JEV, two for WNV and four for CHPV were synthesised and analysed in cases of suspected viral infections and controls groups. Present study results indicated that out of 32 peptide sequences peptides of only CMV and JEV showed a significant difference for antibody analysis in CSF samples of suspected cases.

JEV infection is most prevalent in eastern and southern Asia and causes an estimated 50,000 cases and 15,000 deaths annually. In India, approximately 1,500 to 4,000 cases are reported every year and major epidemics are reported from northern India (33). CMV infection of the CNS occurs most commonly in immunosuppressed patients, newborn infants and some studies also reported that CMV reactivation and sever infections in immunocompetent patients (34). It is estimated that about 40,000 children are born with CMV, resulting in about 400 fatal cases each year and up to 10-15% of the infection, develop one or more long-term neurological sequelae (35).

The results obtained from the present study suggested that the peptides STGDVVDISP, KQKSLVEL, RTLEVFKE, RSSNVED of CMV and ITYECPK, RRSVSVQT, GESSLVN of JEV are highly conserved and antigenic therefore the synthetic peptides of glycoprotein gB of CMV and membrane protein prM of JEV can consider as a potential biomarker for diagnosis of CMV and JEV CNS infection. On comparing the peptide ELISA results with the commercial kit it was found that approximately 81% of peptide ELISA positive cases (approximately, 73% of CMV and 62% of JEV) were also positive in commercial ELISA kit. Martinez Viedma MDP et al., used the synthetic peptide-based ELISA for the diagnosis of Zika virus infections and reported the diagnostics efficacy of peptide-ELISA as compared to commercial kit (36). Similarly, Saxena V used the Peptide-based ELISA and PCR as diagnostic tools for diagnosis of JEV infection and reported 61% positivity by ELISA, however all samples were negative for PCR (37). However, the negativity for some of the samples by the commercial kit depicts the enhanced sensitivity of the in-house peptide ELISA in detecting cases with lower baseline levels of antibodies against specific epitopes of the viral antigen in their CSF. None of the cases were found to be positive for VZV, EBV, DENV, WNV, and CHPV by peptide ELISA for these viruses in present study cohort. After tracking the clinical history of this peptide ELISA negative cases the patients responded well on antiviral and mix therapies. So, there would be the possibility that these cases have unknown viral aetiology or may have non infectious aetiology. The peptide-based ELISA is being developed for small infrastructure laboratories and it requires simple to handle technology which can be beneficial for initial screening of CNS viral infections. The most important part for the development of successful peptide ELISA is the choice and design of the peptides. Specificity of peptide-based ELISA can be enhanced by averting the selection of cross-reactive sequence from the antigenic proteins.

Limitation(s)

The study has certain limitations, as the cases positive by peptide ELISA was confirmed by only one of the commercial kit and more number of samples is required to justify the difference in positivity index (20% in present study) with the two reported assays under the study and the sample size was less because it was focused on only those patients referred to our tertiary care centre over a limited time period.

Conclusion

The results obtained from the study demonstrated that the synthetic peptides derived from the immunogenic antigen of JEV and CMV having the potential to detect the serological response of these viruses in CNS infection cases. The in-house developed synthetic peptide-based ELISA is a reliable, rapid, cost-effective and less cumbersome procedure which can be adopted in any diagnostic laboratory with limited resources, especially in developing countries for the initial screening of selected neuroviruses CNS infections.

Acknowledgement

All authors would like to acknowledge Central India Institute of Medical Sciences (CIIMS), Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, for funding this in house study.

References

1.
Cassady KA, Whitley RJ. Infection of the Central Nervous System. Wolters Kluwer Health. 4th ed 2004.
2.
Misra UK, Kalita J, Goel D, Mathur A. Clinical radiological and neurophysiologic spectrum of JEV encephalitis and other non-specific encephalitis during post-monsoon period in India. Neurol India. 2003;51(1):55-59.
3.
Paramasivan R, Mishra AC, Mourya DT. West Nile virus: The Indian scenario. Indian J Med Res. 2003;118:101-08.
4.
Chadha MS, Arankalle VA, Jadi RS, Joshi MV, Thakare JP, Mahadev PV, et al. An outbreak of Chandipura virus encephalitis in the eastern districts of Gujarat state, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(3):566-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Gupta N, Srivastava S, Jain A, Chaturvedi UC. Dengue in India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136(3):373-90.
6.
Tiwari S, Singh RK, Tiwari R, Dhole TN. Japanese encephalitis: A review of the Indian perspective. Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16(6):564-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Gershon A, Steinberg S, Greenberg S, Taber L. Varicella-zoster-associated encephalitis: Detection of specific antibody in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;12(6):764-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Fujimoto H, Asaoka K, Imaizumi T, Ayabe M, Shoji H, Kaji M. Epstein-Barr virus infections of the central nervous system. Intern Med. 2003;42(1):33-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Cinque P, Cleator GM, Weber T, Monteyne P, Sindic C, Gerna G. Diagnosis and clinical management of neurological disorders caused by cytomegalovirus in AIDS patients. European Union Concerted Action on Virus Meningitis and Encephalitis. J Neurovirology. 1998;4:120-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Steiner I, Budka H, Chaudhuri A, Koskiniemi M, Sainio K, Salonen O. Viral encephalitis: A review of diagnostic methods and guidelines for management. Eur J Neurol. 2005;12(5):331-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: Uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(6):337-48. [crossref]
12.
Greijer AE, van de Crommert JM, Stevens SJ, Middeldorp JM. Molecular fine-specificity analysis of antibody responses to human cytomegalovirus and design of novel synthetic-peptide-based serodiagnostic assays. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:179-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Landini MP. New approaches and perspectives in cytomegalovirus diagnosis. Prog Med Virol. 1993;40:157-77.
14.
Morey SH, Kashyap RS, Purohit HJ, Taori GM, Daginawala H. An approach towards peptide-based antibody detection for diagnosis of Chikungunya infection. Biomarkers. 2010;15:546-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Bhullar SS, Chandak NH, Baheti NN, Purohit HJ, Taori GM, Daginawala HF. Identification of an immunodominant epitope in glycoproteins B and G of herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) using synthetic peptides as antigens in assay of antibodies to HSV in herpes simplex encephalitis patients. Acta Virol. 2014;58:267-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Pattnaik P, Srivastava A, Abhyankar A, Dash PK, Parida MM, Lakshmana Rao PV. Fusogenic peptide as diagnostic marker for detection of flaviviruses. J Postgrad Med. 2006;52(3):174-78.
17.
Gómara MJ, Haro I. Synthetic peptides for the immunodiagnosis of human diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(5):531-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett. 1990;172-4. Pei-Yong Shi. Molecular Virology and Control of Flaviviruses. Caister Academic Press. 2012. [crossref]
19.
Merrifield RB. Solid phase peptide synthesis. The Synthesis of a Tetrapeptide. Journal of the American Chemical Society.1963;85:2149-54. [crossref]
20.
Meloen RH, Langedijk JP, Langeveld JP. Synthetic peptides for diagnostic use. Vet Q. 1997;19(3):122-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Velumani S, Ho HT, He F, Musthaq S, Prabakaran M, Kwang J. A novel peptide ELISA for universal detection of antibodies to human H5N1 influenza viruses. PLoS One. 2011; 6. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Haumont M, Jacquet A, Massaer M, Deleersnyder V, Mazzu P, Bollen A. Purification, characterization and immunogenicity of recombinant Varicella-Zoster Virus glycoprotein IgE secreted By Chinese Hamster ovary cells. Virus Res. 1996;40:199-20. [crossref]
23.
Robert I Fox, La Jolla, Richard Houghton, Solana Beach. Synthetic Polypeptides and Antibodies Related to Epstein - Barr virus Early Antigen-Diffuse. United States Patent. Patent No. US 04879213. 1989.
24.
Britt WJ, Vugler L, Stephens EB. Induction of complement-dependent and-independent neutralizing antibodies by recombinant-derived human cytomegalovirus gp55-116 (gB). J Viro. 1988;62(9):3309-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Wang T, Anderson JF, Magnarelli LA, Bushmich S, Wong S, Koski RA. West Nile virus envelope protein: Role in diagnosis and immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;951:325-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Pei-Yong Shi. Molecular Virology and Control of Flaviviruses. Caister Academic Press. 2012.
27.
Cardosa MJ, Wang SM, Sum MS, Tio PH. Antibodies against prM protein distinguishes between previous infection with dengue and Japanese encephalitis viruses. BMC Microbiol. 2002;02-09.
28.
Jacobs MG, Robinson PJ, Bletchly C, Mackenzie JM, Young PR. Dengue virus non-structural protein 1 is expressed in a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked form that is capable of signal transduction. FASEB J. 2000;14:1603-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Cherian SS, Gunjikar RS, Banerjee A, Kumar S, Arankalle VA. Whole genomes of Chandipura virus isolates and comparative analysis with other Rhabdoviruses. Plos Ons. 2012; 7. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Xu J, Fan JM, Zhang YJ, Zheng WM, Zhao Y, Yao W. Development of synthetic peptides based ELISA assay for the detection of Japanese Encephalitis virus antibody. J Biolo Research. 2012;1.
31.
Giessauf A, Letschka T, Walder G, Dierich MP, Würzner R. A synthetic peptide ELISA for the screening of rubella virus neutralizing antibodies in order to ascertain immunity. J Immunol Methods. 2004;287(1-2):01-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Smith RS, Rhodes G, Vaughan JH, Horwitz CA, Geltosky JE, Whalley AS. A synthetic peptide for detecting antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen in sera from patients with infectious mononucleosis. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:885-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Tsai TF. Factors in the changing epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis and West Nile fever. Factors in the Emergence of Arboviral Diseases. 1997;179-89.
34.
Jain M, Duggal S, Chugh T. Cytomegalovirus infection in non-immunosuppressed critically ill patients. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011;5(8):571-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Wreghitt TG, Teare EL, Sule O, Devi R, Rice P. Cytomegalovirus infection in Immunocompetent patients. CID. 2003; 37. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Martinez Viedma MDP, Panossian S, Gifford K, García K, Figueroa I, Parham L, et al. Evaluation of ELISA-based multiplex peptides for the detection of human serum antibodies induced by zika virus infection across various countries. Viruses. 2021;13(7):1319. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Saxena V, Mishra VK, Dhole TN. Evaluation of reverse-transcriptase PCR as a diagnostic tool to confirm Japanese encephalitis virus infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(4):403-06. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52812.16573

Date of Submission: Oct 12, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 24, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Funded by Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 13, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Feb 14, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com