搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

动态热风辅助再结晶策略改善CsPbI2Br钙钛矿在大气环境下的结晶及其光电性能

张子发 袁翔 鹿颖申 何丹敏 严全河 曹浩宇 洪峰 蒋最敏 徐闰 马忠权 宋宏伟 徐飞

引用本文:
Citation:

动态热风辅助再结晶策略改善CsPbI2Br钙钛矿在大气环境下的结晶及其光电性能

张子发, 袁翔, 鹿颖申, 何丹敏, 严全河, 曹浩宇, 洪峰, 蒋最敏, 徐闰, 马忠权, 宋宏伟, 徐飞

Improving crystallization and photoelectric performance of CsPbI2Br perovskite under ambient air via dynamic hot-air assisted recrystallization strategy

Zhang Zi-Fa, Yuan Xiang, Lu Ying-Shen, He Dan-Min, Yan Quan-He, Cao Hao-Yu, Hong Feng, Jiang Zui-Min, Xu Run, Ma Zhong-Quan, Song Hong-Wei, Xu Fei
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • CsPbI2Br薄膜在大气环境下制备存在覆盖率低、结晶质量差和结构稳定性差等问题. 本文提出了一种动态热风辅助再结晶策略(dynamic hot-air assisted recrystallization, DHR), 在相对湿度大于60% (>60% RH)的大气环境下, 制备出高覆盖率、(100)择优取向、大尺寸晶粒、结构稳定、光电性能好的CsPbI2Br薄膜. 这是由于动态热风过程能够有效提高薄膜的覆盖率和获得(100)择优取向的结晶, 但晶粒尺寸会显著减小(Rave = 0.32 μm)并伴随着大量的晶界形成, 从而加剧载流子的非辐射复合(τave = 99 ns); 而通过再结晶过程, 可进一步提高(100)择优取向的结晶和显著增大晶粒尺寸(Rave = 2.63 μm), 从而提高薄膜的光致发光强度和荧光寿命(τave = 118 ns). 由DHR策略制备的未封装CsPbI2Br太阳能电池具备高光电转换效率(power conversion efficiency, PCE = 17.55%)、低迟滞因子(hysteresis index, HI = 2.34%)和长期的储存稳定性(air, >60% RH, 40天, 初始PCE的96%)等特性.
    Organic cations such as methylamine or formamidine in organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites readily react with oxygen or water at high temperatures, leading the perovskite structure to decompose into organic gases and lead iodide finally. In order to solve the instability problem of organic cations, researchers have studied the heat-resistant all inorganic CsPbX3 (X is Cl, Br, I or mixed halide) perovskites. Mixed halide perovskite CsPbI2Br, serving as a top cell in semi-transparent solar cells and tandem cells because of its excellent thermal stability and suitable bandgap (1.90 eV), has attracted much attention. Although high-performance CsPbI2Br solar cells can be prepared in a glove box, this preparation method not only increases its cost but also has complex manufacturing process, unsuitable for low-cost commercial manufacturing. However, CsPbI2Br thin films prepared in ambient air are susceptible to humidity, resulting in low coverage, poor crystallization quality, numerous pinholes, and easy transformation into non perovskite phases. To overcome the troubles of pervoksite fabrication in ambient air, a feasible way is to reduce the moisture around the films as much as possible according to dynamic hot-air assisted strategy. However, the hot air accelerates the evaporation rate of solvent, resulting in the decrease of grain size. In order to improve the crystal growth and long-term stability in dynamic hot-air assisted strategy, in this work, we present a dynamic hot-air assisted recrystallization (DHR) strategy to prepare high-quality CsPbI2Br thin films in ambient air (i.e. the CsPbI2Br thin films prepared via dynamic hot-air strategy are recrystallized by using a green solvent (methylamine acetate) with high viscosity coefficient). Under ambient air with high humidity (RH>60%), the CsPbI2Br thin film with high coverage, (100) preferred orientation, large average grain size, and stable structure is prepared via DHR strategy. The dynamic hot-air process can effectively reduce the moisture around the film and increase the nucleation sites in the precursor solution, thereby improving the coverage of the film. However, this process inevitably results in the significant decrease of grain size (Rave= 0.32 μm) (i.e. more grain boundaries), exacerbating non-radiative recombination of carriers associated with trap states at these boundaries. The high coverage increases the grain-to-grain contact area, facilitating complete recrystallization. Thus, the recrystallization process can significantly increase the grain size (Rave = 2.63 μm) and obtain a (100) preferred orientation (I(110)/I(200) = 0.006), resulting in high photoluminescence intensity and long fluorescence lifetime (118 ns). The unencapsulated CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cell (PSC) optimized via DHR strategy with low hysterescence factor (2.34%) and high repeatability exhibits a high power conversion efficiency (PCE = 17.55%), which is higher than those of most CsPbI2Br PSCs prepared in ambient air and gloveboxes previously reported. Moreover, the unencapsulated CsPbI2Br PSC possesses an excellent storage stability under ambient air with high humidity (RH > 60%), remaining 96% of the original PCE after aging 40 days. This provides a promising approach for achieving high-performance and long-term stable CsPbI2Br films under ambient air with high humidity, which is expected to promote the commercialization process of perovskite/silicon tandem cells and semi-transparent devices.
  • 图 1  对照组和优化组薄膜的 (a) OM表面形貌图、(b) AFM表面形貌图、(c)晶粒尺寸统计图、(d) XRD图谱和(e)示意图

    Fig. 1.  The (a) OM images, (b) AFM images, (c) grain size statistics, (d) XRD patterns, and (e) schematic of the control group and optimized group thin films.

    图 2  CsPbI2Br单胞的 (a)晶体结构和(b)能带结构; 对照组和优化组薄膜的(c)紫外可见吸收光谱及PL光谱(实线表示玻璃基底上PVSK的PL光谱; 方块表示SnO2上PVSK的PL光谱)

    Fig. 2.  (a) Crystal structure and (b) band structure of CsPbI2Br unit cell; (c) UV-vis absorption spectra and PL spectra of the control group and optimized group thin films. (the solid line represents the PL spectra of PVSK on glass; the square dots represent the PL spectra of PVSK on SnO2).

    图 3  对照组和优化组薄膜的 (a)吸收系数的对数形式与光子能量的曲线图, (b)透射光谱, (c)TRPL光谱, 以及(d)—(g)老化图像及其紫外可见吸收光谱

    Fig. 3.  The (a) ln(α) versus energy, (b) transmission spectra, (c) TRPL spectra, and (d)–(g) photos and UV-vis absorption spectra with aging time of the control group and optimized group thin films.

    图 4  对照组和优化组钙钛矿太阳能电池的 (a)光电流密度-电压曲线, (b)光电流密度-电压正反扫曲线, (c)外量子效率, (d)转换效率统计分布图, (e)短路电流统计分布图, (f)开路电压统计分布图, (g)填充因子统计分布图, (h)开路电压随光照强度变化, (i)电流-电压曲线, (j)储存稳定性

    Fig. 4.  The (a) J-V curves, (b) hysteresis curves, (c) EQE spectra, (d) PCE statistics, (e) JSC statistics, (f) VOC statistics, (g) FF statistics, (h) light intensity-dependent VOC variation, (i) current-voltage curves, and (j) storage stability of the control group and optimized group perovskite solar cells.

    表 1  对照组与优化组CsPbI2Br薄膜TRPL光谱的拟合参数

    Table 1.  Fitting parameters of TRPL spectra for the control group and optimized group CsPbI2Br thin films.

    SampleA1τ1 /nsA2τ2 /nsτave/ns
    Control0.926.450.0811875
    REC0.917.350.09160112
    DHA0.712.770.2910599
    DHR0.699.360.31135118
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  采用动态热风辅助再结晶策略的CsPbI2Br太阳能电池与其他CsPbI2Br太阳能电池的性能比较

    Table 2.  Performance comparison of CsPbI2Br solar cells via dynamic hot-air assisted recrystallization strategy with other reports.

    年份制备环境策略效率/%稳定性文献
    2022N2Doping16.2088.6%, 42 day
    (air, 30% RH)
    [35]
    2023N2Interface engineering17.3388.7%, 42 day
    (air, 10% RH)
    [36]
    2023N2Doping17.7097%, 42 day
    (air, 10% RH)
    [37]
    2019air, 25~35% RHDHA14.8590%, 17 day
    (air, 85 ℃)
    [17]
    2020air, 30% RHPrecursor engineering16.1493%, 35 day
    (air, 30% RH)
    [18]
    2021air, 35% RHDHA+Doping17.4680%, 17 day
    (air, 30% RH)
    [38]
    2023air, —DHA+Doping16.7490%, 17 day
    (air, 25% RH)
    [39]
    2023air, 20% RHDHA+Doping17.3984%, 9 day
    (N2, 85 ℃)
    [19]
    2023air, —Doping17.3890%, 42 day
    (air, 25% RH)
    [40]
    2023air, —DHA+Doping17.4087.25%, 30 day (air, 14% RH)[41]
    2024air, >60% RHDHR17.5596%, 40 day
    (air, >60% RH)
    This work
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Zhang H, Pfeifer L, Zakeeruddin S M, Chu J H, Grätzel M 2023 Nat. Rev. Chem. 7 632Google Scholar

    [2]

    Zhang S, Ye F Y, Wang X Y, Chen R, Zhang H D, Zhan L Q, Jiang X Y, Li Y W, Ji X Y, Liu S J, Yu M J, Yu F R, Zhang Y L, Wu R H, Liu Z H, Ning Z J, Neher D, Han L Y, Lin Y Z, Tian H, Chen W, Stolterfoht M, Zhang L J, Zhu W H, Wu Y Z 2023 Science 380 404Google Scholar

    [3]

    Park J, Kim J, Yun H S, Paik M J, Noh E, Mun H J, Kim M G, Shin T J, Seok S I 2023 Nature 616 724Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ahn N, Kwak K, Jang M S, Yoon H, Lee B Y, Lee J K, Pikhitsa P V, Byun J, Choi M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 13422Google Scholar

    [5]

    Xu D F, Wang J A, Duan Y W, Yang S M, Zou H, Yang L, Zhang N, Zhou H, Lei X R, Wu M Z, Liu S Z, Liu Z K 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 2304237Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wang J A, Che Y H, Duan Y W, Liu Z K, Yang S M, Xu D F, Fang Z M, Lei X R, Li Y, Liu S Z 2023 Adv. Mater. 35 2210223Google Scholar

    [7]

    Li Y R, Zhang Y, Zhu P D, Li J B, Wu J W, Zhang J Y, Zhou X Y, Jiang Z Y, Wang X Z, Xu B M 2023 Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 2309010Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zeng Q S, Zhang X Y, Feng X L, Lu S Y, Chen Z L, Yong X, Redfern S A T, Wei H T, Wang H Y, Shen H Z, Zhang W, Zheng W T, Zhang H, Tse J S, Yang B 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705393Google Scholar

    [9]

    Guo Y X, Yin X T, Liu J, Wen S, Wu Y T, Que W X 2019 Sol. RRL 3 1900135Google Scholar

    [10]

    Long Y, Liu K, Zhang Y L, Li W Z 2021 Molecules 26 3398Google Scholar

    [11]

    Sun S Q, Xu X W, Sun Q, Yao Q, Cai Y T, Li X Y, Xu Y L, He W, Zhu M, Lv X, Lin F C R, Jen A K Y, Shi T T, Yip H L, Fung M K, Xie Y M 2023 Adv. Energy Mater. 13 2204347Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shan S Q, Xu C, Wu H T, Niu B F, Fu W F, Zuo L J, Chen H Z 2023 Adv. Energy Mater. 13 2203682Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu X Y, Lian H J, Zhou Z R, Zou C, Xie J, Zhang F, Yuan H Y, Yang S, Hou Y, Yang H G 2022 Adv. Energy Mater. 12 2103933Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang Y, Mahmoudi T, Rho W Y, Hahn Y B 2019 Nano Energy 64 103964Google Scholar

    [15]

    Cheng Y H, Xu X W, Xie Y M, Li H W, Qing J, Ma C Q, Lee C S, So F, Tsang S W 2017 Sol. RRL 1 1700097Google Scholar

    [16]

    Gao H, Ban C X, Li F M, Yu T, Yang J, Zhu W D, Zhou X X, Fu G, Zou Z G 2015 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 9110Google Scholar

    [17]

    Duan C Y, Cui J, Zhang M M, Han Y, Yang S M, Zhao H, Bian H T, Yao J X, Zhao K, Liu Z K, Liu S Z 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 2000691Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mali S S, Patil J V, Hong C K 2019 Nano Lett. 19 6213Google Scholar

    [19]

    Xiao H R, Zuo C T, Zhang L X, Zhang W H, Hao F, Yi C Y, Liu F Y, Jin H L, Ding L M 2023 Nano Energy 106 108061Google Scholar

    [20]

    Blochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yin G N, Zhao H, Jiang H, Yuan S H, Niu T Q, Zhao K, Liu Z K, Liu S Z 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1803269Google Scholar

    [22]

    Wang J X, Liu Y B, Xiao X D, Bi Z N, Lu Y, Sheng G Z, Cai X S, Zhu Y Q, Xu X Q, Xu G 2021 Sol. Energy 216 7Google Scholar

    [23]

    Yu F Y, Han Q J, Wang L, Yang S Z, Cai X Y, Zhang C, Ma T L 2021 Sol. RRL 5 2100404Google Scholar

    [24]

    Cao R N, Xu F, Zhu J B, Ge S, Wang W Z, Xu H T, Xu R, Wu Y L, Ma Z Q, Hong F, Jiang Z M 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1600814Google Scholar

    [25]

    曹汝楠, 徐飞, 朱佳斌, 葛升, 王文贞, 徐海涛, 徐闰, 吴杨琳, 马忠权, 洪峰, 蒋最敏 2016 物理学报 65 188801Google Scholar

    Cao R N, Xu F, Zhu J B, Ge S, Wang W Z, Xu H T, Xu R, Wu Y L, Ma Z Q, Hong F, Jiang Z M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 188801Google Scholar

    [26]

    Wang X J, Ran X Q, Liu X T, Gu H, Zuo S W, Hui W, Lu H, Sun B, Gao X Y, Zhang J, Xia Y D, Chen Y H, Huang W 2020 Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 59 13354Google Scholar

    [27]

    Hong F, Li Y, Xiang W, Liu X, Jiang Z M, Ma Z Q, Xu F 2021 Chem. Lett. 50 1500Google Scholar

    [28]

    Chao L F, Xia Y D, Li B X, Xing G C, Chen Y H, Huang W 2019 Chem 5 995Google Scholar

    [29]

    Haque M A, Troughton J, Baran D 2020 Adv. Energy Mater. 10 1902762Google Scholar

    [30]

    Xu F, Wang X, Li Y, Jiang B, Dong Z R, Yang Z C, Kang J X, Shu X, Jiang Z M, Hong F, Xu R, Ma Z Q, Chen T, Xu Z, Xu H T 2022 Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2200930Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xue Q F, Bai Y, Liu M Y, Xia R X, Hu Z C, Chen Z M, Jiang X F, Huang F, Yang S H, Matsuo Y, Yip H L, Cao Y 2017 Adv. Energy Mater. 7 1602333Google Scholar

    [32]

    Gau D L, Galain I, Aguiar I, Marotti R E 2023 J. Lumines. 257 119765Google Scholar

    [33]

    Yang B, Dyck O, Poplawsky J, Keum J, Puretzky A, Das S, Ivanov I, Rouleau C, Duscher G, Geohegan D, Xiao K 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 9210Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhu Z K, Shang J T, Tang G Q, Wang Z, Cui X X, Jin J J, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Zhang D, Liu X W, Tai Q D 2023 Chem. Eng. J. 454 140163Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wang A L, Wang J W, Niu X B, Zuo C T, Hao F, Ding L M 2022 InfoMat 4 e12263Google Scholar

    [36]

    Guo Q, Dai Z, Dong C Q, Ding Y J, Jiang N Z, Wang Z B, Gao L, Duan C, Guo Q, Zhou E R 2023 Chem. Eng. J. 461 142025Google Scholar

    [37]

    Jeong M J, Jeon S W, Kim S Y, Noh J H 2023 Adv. Energy Mater. 13 2300698Google Scholar

    [38]

    Mali S S, Patil J V, Shinde P S, de Miguel G, Hong C K 2021 Matter 4 635Google Scholar

    [39]

    Patil J V, Mali S S, Sadale S B, Hong C K 2023 Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 3213

    [40]

    Hu Y Q, Cai L J, Xu Z, Wang Z, Zhou Y F, Sun G P, Sun T M, Qi Y B, Zhang S F, Tang Y F 2023 Inorg. Chem. 62 5408Google Scholar

    [41]

    Bahadur J, Ryu J, Pandey P, Cho S W, Cho J S, Kang D W 2023 Nanoscale 15 3850Google Scholar

  • [1] 万城亮, 潘俞舟, 朱丽萍, 李鹏飞, 张浩文, 赵卓彦, 袁华, 樊栩宏, 孙文胜, 杜战辉, 陈乾, 崔莹, 廖天发, 魏晓慧, 王天琦, 陈熙萌, 李公平, Reinhold Schuch, 张红强. 基于玻璃毛细管的大气环境MeV质子微束的产生与测量. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240301
    [2] 王松, 周闯, 李素文, 牟福生. 基于法布里-珀罗干涉仪测量大气环境CO2的方法. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231224
    [3] 王桂强, 王东升, 毕佳宇, 常嘉润, 孟凡宁. 苯基硫脲调控CsPbIBr2钙钛矿结晶及其光电性能. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230593
    [4] 孙雪, 黄锋, 刘桂雄, 苏子生. 纳米成核点辅助结晶对钙钛矿光电探测器性能的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220189
    [5] 胡紫婷, 舒鑫, 王香, 李跃, 徐闰, 洪峰, 马忠权, 蒋最敏, 徐飞. 双配体策略制备大气环境下性能稳定的CsPbIBr2光电探测器. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212143
    [6] 吴甜, 姚梦丽, 龙孟秋. 钙钛矿CsPbX3(X=Cl, Br, I)与五环石墨烯范德瓦耳斯异质结的界面相互作用和光电性能的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201246
    [7] 张晨, 张海玉, 郝会颖, 董敬敬, 邢杰, 刘昊, 石磊, 仲婷婷, 唐坤鹏, 徐翔. 氧化锌纳米棒形貌控制及其在钙钛矿太阳能电池中作为电子传输层的应用. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200555
    [8] 刘晓敏, 李亦回, 王兴涛, 赵一新. 有机铵盐表面稳定化CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190303
    [9] 程静云, 康朝阳, 宗海涛, 曹国华, 李明. Ag缓冲层对ZnO:Al薄膜结构与光电性能的改善. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.027702
    [10] 史晓慧, 许珂敬. 溶胶-凝胶-蒸镀法制备高性能FTO薄膜. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.138101
    [11] 康小卫, 陈龙, 陈洁, 盛政明. 大气环境下飞秒激光对铝靶烧蚀过程的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.055204
    [12] 谭毅, 耿超, 李新阳, 罗文, 罗奇. 大气环境下基于目标照明回光的视轴误差校正实验研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.024216
    [13] 史久林, 郭鹏峰, 黄育, 钱佳成, 王泓鹏, 刘娟, 何兴道. 温度、湿度及压强对激光在水中衰减特性的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.024215
    [14] 黄立静, 任乃飞, 李保家, 周明. 激光辐照对热退火金属/掺氟二氧化锡透明导电薄膜光电性能的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034211
    [15] 侯清玉, 吕致远, 赵春旺. Nb高掺杂量对锐钛矿TiO2导电和光学性能影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.017201
    [16] 郑莹莹, 邓海涛, 万静, 李超荣. 有机-无机杂化钙钛矿自组装量子阱结构的能带调控和光电性能的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.067306
    [17] 曾乐贵, 刘发民, 钟文武, 丁芃, 蔡鲁刚, 周传仓. Nb/SnO2复合薄膜的制备、结构及光电性能. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.038203
    [18] 宋雪云, 张俊兵, 曾祥华, 董雅娟. 电极形状对GaN基发光二极管芯片性能的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4989
    [19] 方 方, 郑时有, 周广有, 陈国荣, 孙大林. 氢致LaMg2Ni合金薄膜的光电性能变化. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3813
    [20] 徐金宝, 郑毓峰, 李 锦, 孙言飞, 吴 荣. 丝网印刷FeS2(pyrite)薄膜的结构及光电性能. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3229
计量
  • 文章访问数:  384
  • PDF下载量:  14
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-22
  • 修回日期:  2024-02-19
  • 上网日期:  2024-03-08

/

返回文章
返回