https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1117293.1
Document
NOT PEER REVIEWED
Download
CITE
How to cite this document:
Appelhoff S, Bates JF, Ghosh S et al. BIDS and the NeuroImaging Data Model (NIDM) [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1373
(document)
(https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1117293.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.
Policy document
BIDS and the NeuroImaging Data Model (NIDM)
Stefan Appelhoff1,
Julianna F. Bates2,
Satrajit Ghosh3,
David B. Keator4,
David N. Kennedy2,
Russell Poldrack5,
Jean-Baptiste Poline6,
Jason Steffener7,
B. Nolan Nichols8,
Franklin Feingold5,
Cyril Pernet9,
Gustav Nilsonne10,
Camille Maumet11,
Guillaume Flandin12,
Rémi Gau13,
Robert Oostenveld14,
Elizabeth Dupre6,
Arnaud Delorme15,
Christopher J. Markiewicz5,
Natacha Perez11,
Karl G. Helmer16,
Dorota Jarecka3,
Jeffrey S. Grethe17,
Dianne Patterson18,
Tibor Auer19,
Hauke Bartsch20,
Thomas E. Nichols21,
Vince Calhoun22
Published 07 Aug 2019
(https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1117293.1)
Author Affiliations
1 Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
2 University of Massachussetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
4 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
5 Stanford University, Stanford, USA
6 McGill University, Montréal, Canada
7 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
8 Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
9 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
11 French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA), Rennes, France
12 University College London, London, UK
13 Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
14 Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
15 University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
16 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA
17 University California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
18 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
19 University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
20 Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
21 Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
22 Tri-Institutional Center for translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
2 University of Massachussetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
4 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
5 Stanford University, Stanford, USA
6 McGill University, Montréal, Canada
7 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
8 Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
9 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
11 French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA), Rennes, France
12 University College London, London, UK
13 Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
14 Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
15 University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
16 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA
17 University California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
18 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
19 University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
20 Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
21 Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
22 Tri-Institutional Center for translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
Copyright © 2019 Appelhoff S et al. This is an open access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Metrics
- 482 Views
- 35 Downloads
How to cite this document:
Appelhoff S, Bates JF, Ghosh S et al. BIDS and the NeuroImaging Data Model (NIDM) [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1373
(document)
(https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1117293.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.
Copied OK
Part of the gateway
Published 07 Aug 2019
Policy document
BIDS and the NeuroImaging Data Model (NIDM)
Stefan Appelhoff1,
Julianna F. Bates2,
Satrajit Ghosh3,
David B. Keator4,
David N. Kennedy2,
Russell Poldrack5,
Jean-Baptiste Poline6,
Jason Steffener7,
B. Nolan Nichols8,
Franklin Feingold5,
Cyril Pernet9,
Gustav Nilsonne10,
Camille Maumet11,
Guillaume Flandin12,
Rémi Gau13,
Robert Oostenveld14,
Elizabeth Dupre6,
Arnaud Delorme15,
Christopher J. Markiewicz5,
Natacha Perez11,
Karl G. Helmer16,
Dorota Jarecka3,
Jeffrey S. Grethe17,
Dianne Patterson18,
Tibor Auer19,
Hauke Bartsch20,
Thomas E. Nichols21,
Vince Calhoun22
Author Affiliations
1 Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
2 University of Massachussetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
4 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
5 Stanford University, Stanford, USA
6 McGill University, Montréal, Canada
7 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
8 Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
9 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
11 French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA), Rennes, France
12 University College London, London, UK
13 Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
14 Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
15 University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
16 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA
17 University California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
18 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
19 University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
20 Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
21 Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
22 Tri-Institutional Center for translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
2 University of Massachussetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
4 University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
5 Stanford University, Stanford, USA
6 McGill University, Montréal, Canada
7 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
8 Genentech, South San Francisco, USA
9 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
10 Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
11 French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA), Rennes, France
12 University College London, London, UK
13 Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
14 Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
15 University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
16 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, USA
17 University California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
18 University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
19 University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
20 Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
21 Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
22 Tri-Institutional Center for translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
Abstract
Competing Interests
No competing interests were disclosed
Keywords
NIDM, neuroimaging, data model, data structure, provenance, metadata, INCF
BIDS and the NeuroImaging Data Model (NIDM) | Documents | F1000Research
All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies. The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment.
User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available.
Use of this website is subject to the F1000 Research Limited (F1000) General Terms and Conditions.
Submission of user comments to this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions. By clicking "I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions" before you submit your first comment, you agree to be bound by these conditions every time you submit a comment.
Terms relating to user comments