NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Image of characterization of Wolbachia infection across beetle species and populations based on data in the literature

Supplementary Table 1: Characterization of Wolbachia infection across beetle species and populations based on data in the literature.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3412v2/supp-1

Image of phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia wsp gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera

Supplementary Figure 1: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia wsp gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera (data downloaded from NCBI GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ ). Statistical supports (bootstrap values) are presented above the branches (shown only if > 0.50).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3412v2/supp-2

Image of phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia 16S rDNA gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera

Supplementary Figure 2: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia 16S rDNA gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera (data downloaded from NCBI GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ ). Statistical supports (bootstrap values) are presented above the branches (shown only if > 0.50).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3412v2/supp-3

Image of phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia ftsZ gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera

Supplementary Figure 3: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on Wolbachia ftsZ gene sequences obtained from hosts belonging to various species of Coleoptera (data downloaded from NCBI GenBank https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ ). Statistical supports (bootstrap values) are presented above the branches (shown only if > 0.50).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3412v2/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Lukasz Kajtoch conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Nela Kotásková performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code , except database of published articles used for systematic review, which are presented as Table 1 in the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grant DEC-2013/11/D/NZ8/00583 from the National Science Centre, Poland (to Kajtoch Ł.) and by Institutional Research Support grants (SGS15/PřF/2017) from the University of Ostrava (to Kotásková N.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads