The “Normative Structure” of Social Science: Merton’s Ideas as a Story of Success and Side Effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/serendipities.v6i2.130014Keywords:
Sociology of science, scientific ethos, scientific practices, research, scholarship, Robert K. Merton, Mertonian normsAbstract
Based on available literature, this essay looks at trends in scholarly attitudes and academic practices, primarily within the sphere of social sciences, and asks whether they have been in line with Robert K. Merton’s institutional principles of science as they were formulated in his famous essay “The Normative Structure of Science.” This essay argues that these principles have not been fully implemented but have become increasingly recognised and widely accepted as normative points of reference also in large parts of the social sciences. However, there have been both marked deviations and significant side effects. Given the internal heterogeneity of a discipline like sociology, practices that selectively interpret the Merton principles may add to existing internal cleavages.
References
Alvares, Claude (2011) A Critique of Eurocentric Social Science and the Question of Alternatives, Economic and Political Weekly 46(22): 72–81.
Beall, Jeffrey (2012) Predatory Publishers are Corrupting Open Access, Nature 489(7415): 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2011) Historical Sociology, Modernity, and Postcolonial Critique, American Historical Review 116(3): 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.116.3.653.
Boncourt, Thibaud (2017) The Struggles for European Science: A Comparative Perspective on the History of European Social Science Associations Serendipities 2(1): 10–32. https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.1.2.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1992) Homo academicus, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Raphael C. Cunha, Roumen A. Varbanov, Yee Shwen Hoh, Margaret L. Knisley, and Mary Alice Holmes (2015) Survival Analysis of Faculty Retention and Promotion in the Social Sciences by Gender, PLoS One 10(11): e0143093. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0143093.
Broucker, Bruno, and Kurt De Wit (2015) New Public Management in Higher Education, in: Jeroen Huisman, Harry de Boer, David D. Dill, and Manuel Souto-Otero (Eds.) The Palgrave Interna-tional Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance, 57–75. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_4.
Campanario, Juan Miguel (2009) Rejecting and Resisting Nobel Class Discoveries: Accounts by Nobel Laureates, Scientometrics 81(2): 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2141-5.
Chen, George, and Leslie Chan (2021) University Rankings and Governance by Metrics and Algorithms, in: Ellen Hazelkorn and Georgiana Mihut (Eds.) Research Handbook on University Rankings: Theory, Methodology, Influence and Impact, 424–441, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Christensen, Garret, Jeremy Freese, and Edward Miguel (2019a) Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to Do Open Science, Oakland: University of California Press.
Christensen, Garret, Zenan Wang, Elizabeth Levy Paluck, Nicholas Swanson, David J. Birke, Edward Miguel, and Rebecca Littman (2019b) Open Science Practices Are on the Rise: The State of Social Science (3S) Survey. MetaArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5rksu.
Clemens, Elisabeth S., Walter W. Powell, Kris McIlwaine, and Dina Okamoto (1995) Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations, American Journal of Sociology 101(2): 433–494. https://doi.org/10.1086/230730.
Cole, Stephen, Jonathan R. Cole, and Gary A. Simon (1981) Chance and Consensus in Peer Review, Science 214(4523): 881–886. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7302566.
Coser, Lewis A. and Christian Fleck (2007) Robert K. Merton (1910–2003), in: Dirk Kaesler (Ed.) Klassiker der Soziologie, Vol. 2, 152–179. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Csiszar, Alex (2016) Peer Review: Troubled from the Start, Nature 532: 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/532306a.
Csiszar, Alex (2018) The Scientific Journal: Authorship and the Politics of Knowledge in the Nine-teenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Daston, Lorraine (1995) The Moral Economy of Science, Osiris 10: 2–24. https://doi.org/
1086/368740.
de Solla Price, Derek J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
DFG [German Research Foundation] (2019) Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice: Code of Conduct. Bonn: DFG.
Di Trocchio, Federico (1998) Newtons Koffer: Geniale Außenseiter, die die Wissenschaft blamierten. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Di Trocchio, Federico (2006) Ist die wissenschaftliche Abhandlung ein Betrug? in: Anne-Kathrin Reulecke (Ed.) Fälschungen: Zu Autorschaft und Beweis in Wissenschaften und Künsten, 244–264. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Else, Holly, and Richard Van Noorden (2021) The Fight Against Fake-Paper Factories that Churn out Sham Science, Nature 591: 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00733-5.
Falk, Armin, and James J. Heckman (2009) Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences, Science 326(5952): 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244.
Fleck, Ludwik (1980) [1935] Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Ein-führung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Freese, Jeremy, and David Peterson (2017) Replication in Social Science, Annual Review of Sociol-ogy 43: 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053450.
Gans, Joshua S., and George B. Shepherd (1994) How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.165.
Guardian (2015) How to Get Published in an Academic Journal: Top Tips from Editors, The Guard¬ian (https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/03/how-to-get-published-in-an-academic-journal-top-tips-from-editors, accessed 2 Nov. 2021).
Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Encarnación, Manuela Boatcă and Sérgio Costa (Eds.) (2010) Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches. Farnham: Ashgate.
Heilbron, Johan, Madeline Bedecarré and Rob Timans (2017) European Journals in the Social Sciences and Humanities, Serendipities 2(1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.25364/11.2:2017.1.3.
Hillmert, Steffen (2003) Altersstruktur und Karrierewege der Professorinnen und Professoren in der deutschen Soziologie, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 55(1): 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-003-0006-8.
Ioannidis, John P.A. (2012) Why Science is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting, Perspectives on Psycho-logical Science 7(6): 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056.
Jaworski, Gary D. (1998) Contested Canon: Simmel Scholarship at Columbia and the New School, The American Sociologist 29(2): 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-998-1024-9.
Jungbauer-Gans, Monika, and Christiane Gross (2013) Determinants of Success in University Careers: Findings from the German Academic Labor Market, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 42(1): 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2013-0106.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kwiek, Marek (2021) The Prestige Economy of Higher Education Journals: A Quantitative Approach Higher Education 81: 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y.
Lea, John (2009) Political Correctness and Higher Education: British and American Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Long, J. Scott, and Mary Frank Fox (1995) Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism, Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401.
Long, J. Scott, and Robert McGinnis (1981) Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity, American Sociological Review 46(4): 422–442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095262.
Lotka, Alfred J. (1926) The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16(12): 317–323.
Mabe, Michael (2003) The Growth and Number of Journals, Serials 16(2): 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1629/16191.
Macfarlane, Bruce, and Ming Cheng (2008) Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms, Journal of Academic Ethics 6: 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y.
McLennan, Gregor (2003) Sociology, Eurocentrism and Postcolonial Theory, European Journal of Social Theory 6(1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431003006001561.
Merton, Robert K. (1938) [1936] Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England, Osiris 4: 360–632. https://doi.org/10.1086/368484.
Merton, Robert K. (1968) [1949] Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1973) [1942] The Normative Structure of Science, in: Norman W. Storer (Ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, Robert K. (1988) The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbol-ism of Intellectual Property, ISIS 79(4): 606–623. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848.
Merton, Robert K. (1976) The Ambivalence of Scientists, in Robert S. Cohen, Paul K. Feyerabend and Marx W. Wartofsky (Eds.) Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, 433–455. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Merton, Robert K., and Elinor Barber (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mills, C. Wright (1959) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitroff, Ian I. (1974) Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists, American Sociological Review 39(4): 579–595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094423.
Moksony, Ferenc, Rita Hegedűs, and Melinda Császár (2014) Rankings, Research Styles, and Publi-cation Cultures: A Study of American Sociology Departments, Scientometrics 101: 1715–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1218-y.
Munafò, Marcus R., Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, Katherine S. Button, Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware, and John P. A. Ioannidis (2017) A Manifesto for Reproducible Science, Nature Human Behaviour 1: 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
Oancea, Alis (2014) Research Assessment as Governance Technology in the United Kingdom: Find-ings from a Survey of RAE 2008 Impacts, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17: 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0575-5.
Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, and David Moher (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews, BMJ 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Popper, Karl R. (1962) Die Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 14(2): 233–248.
Popper, Karl R. (1989 [1934]) Logik der Forschung (9th ed.). Tübingen: Mohr.
Revers, Matthias, and Richard Traunmüller (2020) Is Free Speech in Danger on University Campus? Some Preliminary Evidence from a Most Likely Case, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 72(3): 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-020-00713-z.
Rossiter, Margaret W. (1993) The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science, Social Studies of Science 23(2): 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004.
Schimank, Uwe (2010) Reputation statt Wahrheit: Verdrängt der Nebencode den Code? Soziale Systeme 16(2): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2010-0204.
Slavov, Nikolai (2014) Papers that Triumphed over Their Rejections (https://majesticfor-est.wordpress.com/2014/08/15/papers-that-triumphed-over-their-rejections/, accessed: 23 May 2022).
Stehr, Nico (1978) The Ethos of Science Revisited: Social and Cognitive Norms, Sociological Inquiry 48(3–4): 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1978.tb00825.x.
Tenopir, Carol, and Donald W. King (2014) The Growth of Journals Publishing, in: Bill Cope and Angus Phillips (Eds.) The Future of the Academic Journal (2nd ed.), 105–123. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Thelen, Philip (2011) Vergleich in der Weltgesellschaft. Zur Funktion nationaler Grenzen für die Globalisierung von Wissenschaft und Politik. Bielefeld: transcript.
Turner, Stephen (2007) Merton’s “Norms” in Political and Intellectual Context, Journal of Classical Sociology 7(2): 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07078034.
U-Multirank (2021) U-Multirank Gender Monitor (https://www.umultirank.org/export/sites/
default/.galleries/generic-images/Gender-Monitor-2021/u-multirank-gender-monitor-2021.pdf, accessed: 2 Nov. 2021).
UNESCO/International Social Science Council (ISSC) (2010) World Social Science Report 2010—Knowledge Divides. Paris: UNESCO.
Vanderstraeten, Raf, and Joshua Eykens (2018) Communalism and Internationalism: Publication Norms and Structures in International Social Science, Serendipities 3(1): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.25364/11.3:2018.1.2.
Ware, Mark (2011) Peer Review: Recent Experience and Future Directions, New Review of Infor-mation Networking 16(1): 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2011.566812.
Weber, Max 2002 [1919] Wissenschaft als Beruf, in: Dirk Kaesler (Ed.) Max Weber: Schriften 1894–1922, 474–511. Stuttgart: Kröner.
Weingart, Peter (1998) Ist das Wissenschafts-Ethos noch zu retten? Mertons Verhaltensregeln und die veränderten Bedingungen der Wissensproduktion, Gegenworte 2, 13–17.
Weingart, Peter (2008) Ökonomisierung der Wissenschaft, NTM Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine 16: 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-008-0311-4.
Wennerås, Christine, and Agnes Wold (1997) Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review, Nature 387: 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/387341a0.
West, Jevin D., Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M. King, Shelley J. Correll, and Carl. T. Bergstrom (2013) The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship, PLoS One 8(7): e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0066212.
Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luis Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Mercè Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J.G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A.C. ’t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Monds, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan van der Lei, Erik van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, and Barend Mons (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship, Scientific Data 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Wolfe, Alan (1990) Books vs. Articles: Two Ways of Publishing Sociology, Sociological Forum 5(3): 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115097.
Ziman, John M. (2000). Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman, Harriet A. (1968) Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology 74(3): 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1086/224641.
Zuckerman, Harriet, and Robert K. Merton (1971) Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionali-sation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System, Minerva 9(1): 66–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553188.
Zuckerman, Harriet, and Robert K. Merton (1972) Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science, in: Matilda White Riley, Marylin Johnson and Anne Foner (Eds.) Aging and Society—Volume Three: A Sociology of Age Stratification, 292–356. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Steffen Hillmert
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC-BY-NC-ND
