Impact of crusher type on coal raw material quality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2023.01.01.08

Keywords:

coal charge, crusher, coke, granulometric size, crushing criterion

Abstract

The suitability of coal charge for coking depends significantly on the level of its grinding. At the same time, the quality of the charge deteriorates both large pieces and small ones. The most valuable from this point of view are the 3-0.5 mm size classes. The charge, consisting of coal grains of different sizes and stages of metamorphism, should be thoroughly mixed according to the amount of loading. At the same time, at each point of the volume, the charge will have the same technological properties, which will cause the same parameters of the plastic layer as it advances in a well-averaged loading and the same properties of the coke volume of the piece. Adjusting the optimal particle size distribution of the charge is the most effective method of improving the quality of blast furnace coke, which is very important in the future due to the decrease in the sintering ability of the coal charge, as the share of Zh and K coals in the charge decreases. Regulation of the optimal granulometric composition of the charge is the most effective method of improving the quality of blast furnace coke, this is very important in the future in connection with the decrease in the sintering ability of the coal charge, as the proportion of Z and K coal in the charge decreases. The laboratory study analyzed the effect on the particle size distribution of the coal charge of the design of crushing equipment: models of roller, jaw, impact, hammer, and disintegrator crushers. To obtain a charge with an optimal particle size distribution, it is rational to use selective crushing of only a large part of the charge. This can be achieved by using rotary crushers, in which small fractions pass through the crushing chamber in transit, i.e. without interaction with the working body. To optimize the crushing process, we propose to increase the number of revolutions in a rotary crusher by 20 %, since the result of crushing in a rotary crusher is closest to the optimal one. We also propose an adjusted crushing criterion, which takes into account that the optimal content of the (-0.5) mm fraction.

References

Kelly, E.G. & Dawe, G.A. (1989). Modified Bond method for the evaluation of crusher efficiency. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 6, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03402519

Kim, D., Choi, G. & Oh, H.-S. (2020). Ensemble patch transformation: a flexible framework for decomposition and filtering of signal. J. Adv. Signal Process, 1, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13634-020-00690-7

Leikin, V.Z. (2008). Development of Equipment and Perfection of Technology to Prepare Fuel for the Firing and Gasification in Circulating and Stationary Fluidized Beds. Therm. Eng, 55, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040601508010175

Lyalyuk, V. P., Sheremet, V. A., Kekukh, A. V., Otorvin, P. I, Pisar, S. А., Uchitel А. D., Lyahova, I. A. & Kassim D. A. (2010). Rational Crushing of Coal Charge for Improvement of Coke Quality for Blast-Furnace Smelting. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 2(2), 81-86. https://metaljournal.com.ua/assets/Uploads/attachments/Lyalyuk-81.pdf

Lyalyuk, V. P., Sokolova V.P., Lyahova, I. A., Kassim D. A. & Shmeltser E.O. (2013). O racionalnoj stepeni drobleniya ugolnyh shiht dlya koksovaniya s vysokim soderzhaniem zhirnyh uglej. Girnichij visnik, 96, 170-173. http://ds.knu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/1584

Meshram, A., Dash, P.S., Nag, D. & Singh R. (2022). Enhancement of coking potential of coals with improvised crushing mechanism. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 42(11), 3399-3414. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2021.1963710

Miroshnichenko, D. V. (2013). Crushing Properties of Coal. Coke and Chemistry, 56(12), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X13120090

Nomura, S., Arima, T., Dobashi, A. & Doi K. (2011). Coking Pressure Control by Selective Crushing of Yigh Coking Pressure Coal. ISIJ International, 51(9), 1425-1431. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/isijinternational/51/9/51_9_1425/_pdf

Popolov, D., Zaitsev, G., Zaselskiy, I., Velitchenko, V. & Konovalenko, V. (2020). Experimental Studies of the Process of Crushing Coal Charge on Hammer Mill with the View of Introducing Technologies and Products 4.0 at the Industrial Enterprises. III International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient Intelligence (ISC-SAI 2020). Advances in Economics. Business and Management Research, 129, 110-115. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/isc-sai-20/125937204

Rejdak, M. & Wasielewski R. (2015). Mechanical compaction of coking coals for carbonization in stamp-charging coke oven batteries. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process, 51(1), 151−161. http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/ppmp150114

Yancey, N., Wright, C. & Westover, T. (2013). Optimizing hammer mill performance through screen selection and hammer design. Biofuels, 4(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.12.77

Zaselskiy, V., Popolov, D., Zaytsev, H. & Shepelenko, M. (2021). Upgrade of Conveyor Line for CoalCharge Preparation with the Use of Modern Grading-and-Mixing Equipment. Sci. innov. 17(3), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.03.067

Zaselskiy, V., Zaitsev, G. & Zaselskaya, T. (2012). Influence of the granulometric composition of coal batch on the energy requirements of a hammer mill. Coke and Chemistry, 55(7), 282-285. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X12070101

Published

2023-10-25

How to Cite

Impact of crusher type on coal raw material quality. (2023). Economics and Technical Engineering, 1(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.62911/ete.2023.01.01.08