Making of the Other: Critiquing Baloch Historiography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v2i2.54Keywords:
Orientalism, Race, Migration Theories, Origin of Baloch and Pashtuns, Brahvi and Baloch division.Abstract
Orientalism is the critique of the European perspective about the creation of colonial discourse and this approach advocates that European colonialism has created a concept of “othering". The Occident and the Orient is a pure European construct, and it would see another world from the lens of Europe and give a verdict of being inferior about all those concepts, cultures and ideologies which are not in conformity with European perceptions. The present work is based on the colonial construction of the history of Balochistan, and colonial scholars had provided the landmark of historiography in Balochistan. These colonial scholars had derived their concepts of the cultures and histories of the indigenous people based on the official documents provided by the colonial masters. So, the primary premise of the colonial discourse was not to do academic research rather it was to control the indigenous people. This premise of colonial historiography was bequeathed after partition as the post-partition and indigenous scholars had followed the footsteps of colonial scholars especial in the theories of ethnic origins. The present work is a historiographical critique of colonial and post-independence historiography into Balochistan, and it has been endeavored to provide main themes of oriental historiography and its counter-narrative which based on a post-colonial perspective derived from primary and secondary sources. The paper is an attempt in opening of new debates in the historiography of peripheral regions like Balochistan and its an effort to shed light on the areas on which there is a historical silence.
References
For detail discussion on the colonial discourse construction, see, Edward Said, Orientalism (1978 rpt. London: Penguin Books, 2001).
Said, Orientalism, 3
Katherine Clarke, Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man, and Nature in Herodotus' Histories (Oxford University Press, 2018).
Romila Thapar, A History of India: A history of India up to 1300 AD introducing the beginnings of India's cultural dynamics (London: Penguin Books, 1964), p.9.
Breckenridge, Carol A., and Peter Van der Veer, eds. Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993).
B. Ramusck, The New Cambridge History of India: The Indian Princes and Their States (Vol. III). (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008): 45.
Samia Khalid and Muhammad Fiaz Anwar, "Orientalism and its Relevance to Colonial Sources of South Asia: An Analysis" Pakistan Social Sciences Review
Vol. 3, No.2, (December 2019): 380-390.
Joel M. Berry, "Orientalism and The Asiatic Society of Bengal." Journal of Asiatic Society of Bangladesh 51, no. 1 (2006): 1-10.
Hennery Pottinger, Travels in Beloochistan and Sinde. (London: Longman Hurst, 1816).
Robert A. Huttenback, British Relations with Sind 1799-1843: An Anatomy of Imperialism (University of California Press, 2022).
For a detailed discussion on the colonial ethnography, geography, and people of Balochistan, see, A. Hughes, The Country of Balochistan: Geography, Topography, Ethnology and History. Quetta: (Sales & Services, rpt. 2002).
The scientific or modern claim to prefer written history over oral history have been under critical debate within history. For details on this: Linda Smith Tuhiwai Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021).
Hughes. The Country of Balochistan: Geography, Topography, Ethnology and History: 41-48.
A.Q Mubarakpuri, Hindustan mai Arabon ki hakumaten (Urdu). (Delhi: Nadwa-tul-Musnnifin, 1967): 122-31.
Manzoor Ahmed and Gulawar Khan. "The History of Baloch and Balochistan: A Critical Appraisal" South Asian Studies 32, no. 1 (2020).
Gul Khan Naseer, Balochistan Qadeem Aur Jadeed Tareekh ki Roshni main (Urdu). (Quetta: Sales & Service, 1982):152-55.
Sharaf Bibi and Ghulam Farooq, “Critical Analysis of Roots of Baloch and its Relations with the Mughals in Historical Perspective” Balochistan Review, Vol XXXVII, No. 2, 2017: 293-306.
F. An Allami, Ain-i-Akbari (Second ed.). (L.-C. D. Phillot, Ed., & H. Blochmann, Trans.). (Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal, 1927): 178.
Eugenie C. Scott, Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2008).
Philip M. Nourbese, "White Man’s Burden." Border/Lines 40 (1997).
For a detail discussion on the Mission Civilization in India, see, B. Austine, Makers of Civilization in Race and History. (Kila, MT: Kessinger Publishing Co.,1929 {reprinted in 2004}).
J. Mark Kenoyer, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization. (Karachi: Oxford, 1998): 98.
Long M Dames, The Baloch Race: A Historical and Ethnographical Sketch. London: Royal Asiatic Society, 22, Albemarle Street, 1904): 182.
J. Shaffer, The Indo-Aryan Invasions: Cultural Myths and Archaeological Realities. In J. R. Lukacs, The People of South Asia: The Biological Anthropology of India, Pakistan, and Nepal (New York: Plenum Press, 1984): 77-91.
A. Elliott. Contemporary Social Theory: An Introduction (New York: Rutledge, 2009): 85.
David Arnold, "Europe, Technology, and Colonialism in the 20th Century" History and Technology 21, no. 1 (2005): 85-106.
D. Chakrabati, The Development of Archaeology in Indian subcontinent. World Archaeology, 1982: 326-44.
J. Shaffer, “The Indo-Aryan Invasions: Cultural Myths and Archaeological Realities,” In J. R. Lukacs, The People of South Asia: The Biological Anthropology of India, Pakistan, and Nepal. (NewYork: Plenum Press. 1984): 77-91.
Kenoyer, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization: 130.
M.K. Baloch, Searchlights on Baloch and Balochistan. (Karachi: Royal Book Company, 1974): 36.
Sayed Wiqar Ali Shah. North-West Frontier Provence: History and Politics. (Islamabad: National Institute of Historical and Cultural Research Center , 2007):52-56.
Nina Swidler, Remotely Colonial: History and Politics in Balochistan. Karachi: Oxford, 2014): 180.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jahanzeb Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
