Analyzing the Role of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Customer’s Repeat Purchase Intention in Online Shopping

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Lata
Dr. Muhammad Hassan
Prof. Dr. Gobind M. Herani
Mujahid Kamal

Abstract

Consumer buying behavior has recently become a topic of discussion in both developing countries and under developing. Marketers, researchers, supply chain analyst, and policy maker everyone is paying special attention on this. Due to complex nature of human and decision making process many countries are still working to understand this phenomenon. Using Mean End Chain (MEC) theory, the goal of this study is to examine how hedonic and utilitarian values, as well as issues with e-service and product quality, affect customers' intentions to make more purchases when they buy online. Data were gathered from 209 universities students through online Google survey form. SPSS and smart PLS were used to analyze the collected data. The finding of this research demonstrated that hedonic value and utilitarian value both have a significant impact on repeat purchase intention. An e-service quality is contributing in different ways. Lastly the quality of a product is influencing the customer to repeat customer i.e. if the product is according to the demand of customer so they will rebuy the product. The findings of this paper will help marketers and supply chain experts in their fields specially the one who owns a retail store. This paper will guide them to develop and implement such practices that would force the customer to retained customer/ repeat customer.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Lata, L., Muhammad Hassan, D., Herani, G. and Kamal, M. 2024. Analyzing the Role of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Customer’s Repeat Purchase Intention in Online Shopping. Journal of Policy Research. 10, 1 (Mar. 2024), 18–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00163.

References

  1. Abu Bakar, A. R., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2015). Technology motivation in e-marketing adoption among Malaysian manufacturers. Journal of Transnational Management, 20(2), 126-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2015.1038949
  2. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of retailing, 79(2), 77-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1
  3. Arruda Filho, E. J. M., Simões, J. D. S., & De Muylder, C. F. (2020). The low effect of perceived risk in the relation between hedonic values and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(1-2), 128-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1697725
  4. Bao, J. (2015). The impacts of e-service quality on customers’ repurchase intention in platform online retailing: An empirical investigation. Wuhan International Conference on E-Business 2015 Proceedings,
  5. Cetto, A., Klier, J., & Klier, M. (2015). Why should I do it myself? Hedonic and utilitarian motivations of customers' intention to use self-service technologies. Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germani, 1-16
  6. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  7. Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., Lai, H., & Chang, C.-M. (2012). Re-examining the influence of trust on online repeat purchase intention: The moderating role of habit and its antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 835-845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.021
  8. Chiu, C. M., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y. H., & Huang, H. Y. (2014). Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x
  9. Cnnic, I. (2015). The 35th Statistical report on internet development in China. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC), China.
  10. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  11. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506
  12. Escobar-Rodríguez, T., & Bonsón-Fernández, R. (2017). Analysing online purchase intention in Spain: fashion e-commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 15(3), 599-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0319-6
  13. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of marketing, 46(2), 60-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600207
  14. Gutman, J. (1997). Means–end chains as goal hierarchies. Psychology & marketing, 14(6), 545-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199709)14:6<545::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-7
  15. Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational research methods, 17(2), 182-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
  16. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  17. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 277-319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  18. Hsiao, K. L., Lin, J. C. C., Wang, X. Y., Lu, H. P., & Yu, H. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations: An empirical study in social shopping. Online Information Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011099414
  19. Hsu, M.-H., Chang, C.-M., Chu, K.-K., & Lee, Y.-J. (2014). Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS success model and trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 234-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.065
  20. Kesari, B., & Atulkar, S. (2016). Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.03.005
  21. Koch, J., Frommeyer, B., & Schewe, G. (2020). Online shopping motives during the COVID-19 pandemic—lessons from the crisis. Sustainability, 12(24), 10247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410247
  22. Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016). A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. Journal of marketing, 80(6), 146-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0415
  23. Liu, F., Xiao, B., Lim, E. T., & Tan, C.-W. (2017). The art of appeal in electronic commerce: Understanding the impact of product and website quality on online purchases. Internet Research, 27(4), 752-771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-09-2016-0280
  24. McGuire, W. (1974). J.(1974). Psychological motives and communication gratification. The uses of mass communication: Current perspectives on gratifications research, 3, 167-196.
  25. Morganosky, M. A., & Cude, B. J. (2000). Consumer response to online grocery shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(1), 17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550010306737
  26. Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, T. D., & Barrett, N. J. (2007). Hedonic shopping motivations, supermarket attributes, and shopper loyalty in transitional markets: evidence from Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 19(3), 227-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850710772914
  27. Pappas, N. (2016). Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 29, 92-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007
  28. Pavur, R., Abdullah, A., & Murad, M. W. (2016). Factors influencing web customers’ willingness to engage in online shopping with an internet retailer. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 292-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2016.1223930
  29. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  30. Ramanathan, U., Subramanian, N., & Parrott, G. (2017). Role of social media in retail network operations and marketing to enhance customer satisfaction. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(1), 105-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0153
  31. Rohm, A. J., & Swaminathan, V. (2004). A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. Journal of business research, 57(7), 748-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00351-X
  32. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. john wiley & sons.
  33. Santo, P. E., & Marques, A. M. A. (2022). Determinants of the online purchase intention: hedonic motivations, prices, information and trust. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(1), 56-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2021-0140
  34. Singh, H., Saufi, R. A., & Hassan, A. A. G. (2017). Export market orientation strategy, external environment, and export performance of SMEs in Malaysia. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 32-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119979
  35. Ur Rahman, S., Khan, M. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Motivations and barriers to purchasing online: understanding consumer responses. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 111-128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-11-2016-0088
  36. Wen, C., Prybutok, V. R., Blankson, C., & Fang, J. (2014). The role of E-quality within the consumer decision making process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(12), 1506-1536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2013-0352