Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer

by Rajesh K. Singh 1
1
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shivalik College of Pharmacy, Nangal, Ropar, 140126, Punjab, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
IJCMR  2023, 11; 1(3), 11; https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030011
Received: 4 September 2023 / Accepted: 9 October 2023 / Published Online: 10 October 2023

Abstract

Background:

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the impact of gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer.

There are-now-a-variety-of-viewpoints-on-gastrectomy-versus-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection-for-early-stomach-cancer,-and-there-are-not-many-thorough-assessments-that-are-pertinent.

Methods:

A-systematic-literature-search-up-to-July-2022-was-performed-and-2456-related-studies-were-evaluated.-The-chosen-studies-comprised-15461-early-stomach-cancer-subjects-who-participated-in-the-selected-studies'-baseline-trials;-6503-of-them-used-the-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection, while 8958 used gastrectomy. Odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of the gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer by the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed effect model.

Results:

The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection resulted in significantly lower 5-year overall survivals (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77, p<0.001), lower the 5-year overall survival in propensity score-matched patients (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59, p<0.001), higher recurrences (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 5,03-9.70, p<0.001), and higher synchronous lesion (OR, 7.24; 95% CI, 2.78-18.83, p<0.001), and higher metachronous lesion (OR,10.05; 95% CI, 6.44-15.67, p<0.001) compared to the gastrectomy for early stomach cancer.

However, no significant difference was found between submucosal dissection and gastrectomy for early stomach cancer in recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.00, p=0.05), disease-free survival (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16-1.16, p=0.10), and disease-specific survival (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.38-2.89, p=0.92).

Conclusions:

The use of endoscopic submucosal dissection resulted in significantly lower 5-year overall survival, lower 5-year overall survival in propensity score-matched patients, higher recurrences, higher-synchronous lesion, and higher metachronous lesion, however, no significant difference was found in recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival compared to the gastrectomy for early stomach cancer. The small number of studies in several comparisons calls for care when analyzing the results.


Copyright: © 2023 by Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Singh, R. K. A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2023, 1, 11. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030011
AMA Style
Singh R K. A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer. International Journal of Clinical Medical Research; 2023, 1(3):11. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030011
Chicago/Turabian Style
Singh, Rajesh K. 2023. "A meta-analysis of the impact on gastrectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stomach cancer" International Journal of Clinical Medical Research 1, no.3:11. https://doi.org/10.61466/ijcmr1030011

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Ferlay, J., E. Steliarova-Foucher, J. Lortet-Tieulent, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European journal of cancer 49(6): p. 1374-1403 (2013).
  2. Ferlay, J., M. Colombet, I. Soerjomataram, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. European journal of cancer 103: p. 356-387 (2018).
  3. Hiki, Y. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 97(4): p. 273-278 (1996).
  4. Bonenkamp, J., J. Hermans, M. Sasako, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 340(12): p. 908-914 (1999).
  5. Hartgrink, H., C. Van de Velde, H. Putter, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. (2004).
  6. Ono, H., H. Kondo, T. Gotoda, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48(2): p. 225-229 (2001).
  7. Tsujitani, S., S. Oka, H. Saito, et al. Less invasive surgery for early gastric cancer based on the low probability of lymph node metastasis. Surgery 125(2): p. 148-154 (1999).
  8. Oka, S., S. Tanaka, I. Kaneko, et al. Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 64(6): p. 877-883 (2006).
  9. Gotoda, T., A. Yanagisawa, M. Sasako, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric cancer 3(4): p. 219-225 (2000).
  10. Degiuli, M. and F. Calvo Survival of early gastric cancer in a specialized European center. Which lymphadenectomy is necessary? World journal of surgery 30(12): p. 2193-2203 (2006).
  11. Ishikawa, S., A. Togashi, M. Inoue, et al. Indications for EMR/ESD in cases of early gastric cancer: relationship between histological type, depth of wall invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Gastric Cancer 10(1): p. 35-38 (2007).
  12. Takenaka, R., Y. Kawahara, H. Okada, et al. Risk factors associated with local recurrence of early gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 68(5): p. 887-894 (2008).
  13. Lian, J., S. Chen, Y. Zhang, et al. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 76(4): p. 763-770 (2012).
  14. Uedo, N., H. Iishi, M. Tatsuta, et al. Longterm outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9(2): p. 88-92 (2006).
  15. Stroup, D.F., J.A. Berlin, S.C. Morton, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Jama 283(15): p. 2008-2012 (2000).
  16. Liberati, A., D.G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology 62(10): p. e1-e34 (2009).
  17. Gupta, S., G. Rout, A.H. Patel, et al. Efficacy of generic oral directly acting agents in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Journal of viral hepatitis 25(7): p. 771-778 (2018).
  18. Sheikhbahaei, S., T.J. Trahan, J. Xiao, et al. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The oncologist 21(8): p. 931-939 (2016).
  19. Higgins, J.P., S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj 327(7414): p. 557-560 (2003).
  20. Chiu, P.W.Y., A.Y.B. Teoh, K.F. To, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric neoplasia: a retrospective cohort study. Surgical endoscopy 26(12): p. 3584-3591 (2012).
  21. Park, C.H., H. Lee, D.W. Kim, et al. Clinical safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 80(4): p. 599-609 (2014).
  22. Kim, D.Y., S.J. Hong, G.S. Cho, et al. Long-term efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with surgery for early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Gut and liver 8(5): p. 519 (2014).
  23. Choi, I.J., J.H. Lee, Y.-I. Kim, et al. Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 81(2): p. 333-341. e1 (2015).
  24. Ryu, S.J., B.-W. Kim, B.G. Kim, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgical resection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study on immediate and long-term outcome over 5 years. Surgical endoscopy 30(12): p. 5283-5289 (2016).
  25. Cho, J.-H., S.-W. Cha, H.G. Kim, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a comparison study to surgery using propensity score-matched analysis. Surgical endoscopy 30(9): p. 3762-3773 (2016).
  26. Pyo, J.H., H. Lee, B.-H. Min, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection vs. surgery for early gastric cancer: a non-inferiority-matched cohort study. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG 111(2): p. 240-249 (2016).
  27. Fukunaga, S., Y. Nagami, M. Shiba, et al. Long-term prognosis of expanded-indication differentiated-type early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery using propensity score analysis. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 85(1): p. 143-152 (2017).
  28. Chang, J.Y., K.-N. Shim, C.H. Tae, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: a single-institute study. Medicine 96(30) (2017).
  29. Shin, D.W., H.Y. Hwang, and S.W. Jeon Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for differentiated type early gastric cancer within the expanded criteria. Clinical Endoscopy 50(2): p. 170-178 (2017).
  30. Gong, E.J., D.H. Kim, J.Y. Ahn, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer 20(1): p. 84-91 (2017).
  31. Park, J.C., Y.K. Lee, S.Y. Kim, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in comparison to surgery in undifferentiated-type intramucosal gastric cancer using propensity score analysis. Surgical endoscopy 32(4): p. 2046-2057 (2018).
  32. Jeon, H.K., G.H. Kim, B.E. Lee, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection is comparable to that of surgery for early gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Gastric Cancer 21(1): p. 133-143 (2018).
  33. Lee, S., K.D. Choi, M. Han, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in early gastric cancer meeting expanded indication including undifferentiated-type tumors: a criteria-based analysis. Gastric Cancer 21(3): p. 490-499 (2018).
  34. Hahn, K.Y., C.H. Park, Y.K. Lee, et al. Comparative study between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery in patients with early gastric cancer. Surgical endoscopy 32(1): p. 73-86 (2018).
  35. Bausys, R., A. Bausys, J. Stanaitis, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for treatment of early gastric cancer in a Western setting. Surgical Endoscopy 33(10): p. 3228-3237 (2019).
  36. Hong, T.-C., J.-M. Liou, C.-C. Yeh, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection comparing with surgical resection in patients with early gastric cancer–a single center experience in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 119(12): p. 1750-1757 (2020).
  37. Guo, A., C. Du, S. Tian, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for treating early gastric cancer of undifferentiated-type. Medicine 99(22): p. e20501 (2020).
  38. Pourmousavi, M.K., R. Wang, T. Kerdsirichairat, et al. Comparable cancer-specific mortality of patients with early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic therapy vs surgical resection. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 18(12): p. 2824-2832. e1 (2020).
  39. Ahn, J.Y., Y.-I. Kim, W.G. Shin, et al. Comparison between endoscopic submucosal resection and surgery for the curative resection of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer within expanded indications: a nationwide multi-center study. Gastric Cancer 24(3): p. 731-743 (2021).
  40. Quero, G., C. Fiorillo, F. Longo, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of short-and long-term outcomes between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for intestinal type early gastric cancer (EGC) of the middle and lower third of the stomach: a European tertiary referral center experience. Surgical Endoscopy 35(6): p. 2592-2600 (2021).
  41. Hirasawa, T., N. Yamamoto, and T. Sano Is endoscopic resection appropriate for type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumors? Retrospective multicenter study. Digestive Endoscopy 33(3): p. 408-417 (2021).
  42. Lee, G.H., E. Lee, B. Park, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated intramucosal gastric cancer regardless of size. World Journal of Gastroenterology 28(8): p. 840 (2022).
  43. Kim, J.-H., Y.-I. Kim, J.Y. Ahn, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection followed by additional surgery after non-curative resection in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a nationwide multi-center study. Surgical Endoscopy 36(3): p. 1847-1856 (2022).
  44. Choi, Y.K., J.Y. Ahn, H.K. Na, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm in chronic kidney disease patients: propensity score-matched case–control analysis. Gastric Cancer 22(1): p. 164-171 (2019).
  45. Kondo, A., E.G.H. de Moura, W.M. Bernardo, et al. Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: systematic review. World Journal of Gastroenterology 21(46): p. 13177 (2015).
  46. Meng, F.-S., Z.-H. Zhang, Y.-M. Wang, et al. Comparison of endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy 30(9): p. 3673-3683 (2016).
  47. Ning, F.-L., C.-D. Zhang, P. Wang, et al. Endoscopic resection versus radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in Asia: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 48: p. 45-52 (2017).
  48. Park, Y.-M., E. Cho, H.-Y. Kang, et al. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surgical endoscopy 25(8): p. 2666-2677 (2011).
  49. Farhat, S., S. Chaussade, T. Ponchon, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in a European setting. A multi-institutional report of a technique in development. Endoscopy 43(08): p. 664-670 (2011).
  50. Kitano, S., N. Shiraishi, I. Uyama, et al. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Annals of surgery 245(1): p. 68 (2007).
  51. Ryu, K.W., Y.-W. Kim, J.H. Lee, et al. Surgical complications and the risk factors of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 15(6): p. 1625-1631 (2008).
  52. Gu, L., P.A. Khadaroo, L. Chen, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 23(7): p. 1493-1501 (2019).
  53. Benites-Goñi, H., F. Palacios-Salas, A. Carlin-Ronquillo, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas: Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva (2022).
  54. Abdelfatah, M.M., M. Barakat, D. Ahmad, et al. Long‐term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 31(4): p. 418-424 (2019).
  55. Liu, Q., L. Ding, X. Qiu, et al. Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 73: p. 28-41 (2020).
  56. Huh, C.-W., D.W. Ma, B.-W. Kim, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Endoscopy 54(2): p. 202-210 (2021).
  57. Yang, H.-J., J.-H. Kim, N.W. Kim, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer meeting the expanded criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy: p. 1-12 (2022).