Exploration on the Value of Circulation Quality Control Intervention Mode in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7037Keywords:
circulation quality control, coronary heart disease with chronic heart failure, percutaneous coronary intervention, clinical valueAbstract
Background: Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) often have other diseases due to organ dysfunction, among which chronic heart failure (CHF) is the most common. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the mainstream method for the treatment of such diseases. Because most of the patients are the elderly and the functions of various organs are declining, it is necessary to implement scientific and efficient management methods. Objective: To explore the application value of circulation quality control intervention (CQCI) mode in PCI of patients with CHD and CHF. Time: From June 2021 to June 2023. Methods: The clinical data of 197 CHD patients with CHF were retrospectively analyzed, and 14 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. According to different perioperative management methods, the remaining cases were divided into the reference group (RG, receiving routine clinical management) and observation group (OG, receiving routine clinical management and CQCI). The cardiac function indexes and emotional state before and after management were compared between the two groups, and the quality of life in two groups was compared. Results: In this study, 100 patients were included in the RG and 83 patients were included in the OG finally. Compared with the RG, the OG had lower levels of left ventricular end systolic diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter after management (p < 0.05), while the OG had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction level (p < 0.001). The OG had overtly higher clinical satisfaction than the RG (p < 0.05). After management, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score in the OG were distinctly lower than those in the RG (p < 0.001). After management, the OG had significantly higher scores of physiological field, psychological field, social relationship and environmental field than the RG (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The application of CQCI mode in the perioperative period of PCI has certain benefits for improving the cardiac function of patients. At the same time, this program can also improve the quality of life of patients to a certain extent, which is helpful to accelerate postoperative rehabilitation.
References
Xia Y, Brewer A, Bell JT. DNA methylation signatures of incident coronary heart disease: findings from epigenome-wide association studies. Clinical Epigenetics. 2021; 13: 186.
Parikh PB, Bhatt DL, Bhasin V, Anker SD, Skopicki HA, Claessen BE, et al. Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021; 77: 2432–2447.
Dąbrowski EJ, Kożuch M, Dobrzycki S. Left Main Coronary Artery Disease-Current Management and Future Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11: 5745.
Rymer JA, Rao SV. Anemia and coronary artery disease: pathophysiology, prognosis, and treatment. Coronary Artery Disease. 2018; 29: 161–167.
Leitmann A, Reinert S, Weise H. Surgical suture course for dental students with the Peyton-4-step approach versus the PDCA cycle using video assisted self-monitoring. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20: 365.
Chen Y, Zheng J, Wu D, Zhang Y, Lin Y. Application of the PDCA cycle for standardized nursing management in a COVID-19 intensive care unit. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2020; 9: 1198–1205.
Moyce S, Claudio D, Velazquez M. Using the PDCA cycle to uncover sources of mental health disparities for Hispanics. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2023; 32: 556–566.
Demirel A. Improvement of hand hygiene compliance in a private hospital using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) method. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019; 35: 721–725.
Li JL, Chen G. Application of PDCA circulation in drug safety in cancer patients. Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospitals of China. 2015; 15: 1252–1253. (In Chinese)
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983; 67: 361–370.
Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation. 1993; 2: 153–159.
Tang B, Lin D, Zhang F, Yan M, Shao A. The “Plan-Do-Check-Action” Plan Helps Improve the Quality of the “Standardized Training of Resident Physicians”: An Analysis of the Results of the First Pass Rate. Frontiers in Public Health. 2021; 8: 598774.
Thandavarayan RA, Chitturi KR, Guha A. Pathophysiology of Acute and Chronic Right Heart Failure. Cardiology Clinics. 2020; 38: 149–160.
Biondi-Zoccai G, Antonazzo B, Giordano A, Versaci F, Frati G, Ronzoni S, et al. Oral antiplatelet therapy in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an umbrella review. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020; 12: 1656–1664.
Li M, Ling T, Shen W, Liu Y. Application of PDCA cycle in the national centralized drug use management system in a Grade A hospital. Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies. 2023; 26: 477–480. (In Chinese)
Deng YY, Wan Q, Tong YF, Zhou B. Application of PDCA cycle management method in prevention and control of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Chinese Journal of Infection Control. 2018; 17: 165–168. (In Chinese)
Sun J, Cao W, Song Y, Yuan C. Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) Cycle Nursing Model Reduces the Risk of Hemangioma in Hemodialysis Patients. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2021; 50: 2560–2566.
