Effect of single-cross hybrids, plant population and fertility levels on productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays)

Authors

  • R. MOHAN KUMAR
  • S.M. HIREMATH
  • B.T. NADAGOUDA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i3.4475

Keywords:

Economics, Fertility levels, Maize hybrids, Plant population, Productivity

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Mudhol, Karnataka, to find out suitable maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and to optimize plant population and fertility levels for higher produc- tivity and profitability of maize. Treatments comprised 3 maize hybrids (NK 6240, Super 900 M and Arjun), 2 plant populations (111,111 and 83,333 plants/ha) and 5 fertility levels [(N P O K O (150, 65 and 65 kg/ha (150) 2 5(65) 2 (65), of N, P O K O respectively), N P O K O , N P O K O , N P O K O and N P O 2 5 2 (187) 2 5(81) 2 (81) (225) 2 5(97) 2 (97) (262) 2 5(114) 2 (114) (300) 2 5(130) K O )]. Among the hybrids, significantly higher grain yield (10.14 t/ha), stover yield (14.38 t/ha), gross returns ( 2 (130) 139,487/ha), net returns ( 87,560/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.68) were recorded in NK 6240. Plant population of 111,111 plants/ha gave significantly higher grain (9.80 t/ha) and stover yields (14.68 t/ha), gross returns ( 135,233/ha), net returns ( 84,563/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.65) over 83,333 plants/ha. Application of N (300) P O K O kg/ha showed significant improvement in growth and yield attributes and it was reflected in signifi- 2 5(130) 2 (130) cantly higher grain yield (10.42 t/ha) and stover yield (14.08 t/ha). The similar trend was also noticed in gross re- turns ( 142,969/ha), net returns ( 87,859/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.65). Interactive effects of hybrids, plant population and fertility levels reveled that, combination of hybrid NK 6240 under plant population of 111,111 plants/ha supplied with N P O K O kg/ha recorded significantly higher grain yield (12.14 t/ha), stover (300) 2 5(130) 2 (130) yields (16.65 t/ha) and uptake of nutrients (366.0 kg N/ha, 71.9 kg P/ha and 172.1 kg K/ha). Gross returns ( 166,759/ha), net returns ( 109,148/ha) were significantly higher in this treatment than rest of the treatments.

References

Azam, S., Ali, M., Amin, M., Bibi, S. and Arif, M. 2007. Effect of plant population on maize hybrids. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2(1): 1320.

Bisht, A.S., Amit, B. and Singh, V. 2013. Influence of plant density and integrated nutrient management on N, P and K contents and uptake of quality protein maize. Madras Agriculture Journal 100(13): 11012.

Gollar, R.G. and Patil, V.C. 2000. Effects of plant density on growth and yield of maize genotypes during rabi season. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13(1): 16.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, edn 2, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

Gregory, F.G. 1926. The effects of climatic conditions on the growth of barley. Annals of Botany 40: 126.

Indiastat.com, 2014. http//www.indiastat.com//maize//stat//india.

ICAR, New Delhi. 2013. Vision 2050. Directorate of Maize Research, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 38 pp.

Jat, N.K., Kumar, A., Meena, S.R., Rana, D.S., Meena, B.P. and Rana, K.S. 2012. Influence of integrated nutrient management on the productivity, quality and soil health of maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(4): 32732.

Jogdand, P.B., Kadam, G.L., Thalikar, A.S. and Karande, D.R. 2008. Response of maize hybrids to fertility levels in kharif season. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(1): 22530.

Nagaraju. 2005. Studies on optimization of agro-techniques to maximize productivity of winter maize (Zea mays L.) and evaluation of DSSAT V 3.5 CERES maize model. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences. Dharwad, Karnataka.

Pagad, S. 2014. Precision nutrient management in maize (Zea mays L.). M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences. Dharwad, Karnataka.

Paramasivan, M., Kumaresan, K.R. and Malarvizhi, P. 2011. Effect of balanced nutrition on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility of maize in vertisol of Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Agronomy 56(2): 13337.

Shrikanth, M., Amanullah, M.M. and Muthukrishanan, P. 2009. Influence of planting density and fertilizer on yield attributes, yield and grain quality of hybrid maize. Madras Agriculture Journal 96(16): 13943.

Singh, D. 2010. Impact of scheduling nitrogen on productivity of single cross maize hybrids. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(7): 64951.

Thavaprakaash, N., Velayudham, K. and Muthukumar, V.B. 2005. Effects of crop geometry, intercropping system and integrated nutrient management practices on productivity of baby corn based intercropping system. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological. Sciences 1: 29502.

Watson, S.J. 1952. The physiological basis for variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4 : 10145.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

R. MOHAN KUMAR, S.M. HIREMATH, & B.T. NADAGOUDA. (2001). Effect of single-cross hybrids, plant population and fertility levels on productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 60(3), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i3.4475