Nutrient requirement of Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Authors

  • J.A. HOSMATH
  • D.P. BIRADAR
  • V.C. PATIL
  • Y.B. PALLED
  • L.H. MALLIGAWAD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i1.4531

Keywords:

Bt-cotton, Crop management, Economics, Fibre quality, Foliar nutrition, Growth regulator, Leaf nutrient content, Polyethylene mulching

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on Ver tisols of Dharwad, Karnataka during the rainy seasons of 2007 and 2008, to ascertain the nutrient requirement of Bt cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) with the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF, 1206060 kg N P O K O/ha) advocated to the conventional non-Bt cotton hybrid. The investiga- 2 5 2 tion focused on varying the recommended nitrogen application levels into 7 splits10% as basal, remaining 90% in equal splits at 30, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 days after sowing (DAS)with entire dose of P and K coupled with the soil application of MgSO @ 25 kg/ha, foliar nutrition of urea (2%), DAP (2%), MgSO (1%), KNO (2%), calcium 4 4 3 nitrate (1%), multimicronutrient (1%), Cytokinin (2 ppm) and polyethylene mulching (100 micron thickness). Bunny Bt (NCS 145) cotton genotype was sown with 90 cm 60 cm spacing. Foliar application of KNO 2%, soil 3 and foliar application of MgSO @ 25 kg/ha and 1% respectively, and soil application of MgSO @ 25 kg/ha alone 4 4 increased the seed-cotton yield by 25.0, 24.4 and 24.3% respectively, over the RDF. Sympodial branches and total number of bolls/plant followed the similar trend. At 120 DAS, increase in leaf potash content (1.02%) was recorded with foliar application of 2% KNO and the increase in leaf magnesium (1.86%) was noticed with soil and foliar ap- 3 plication of MgSO @ 25 kg/ha and 1% respectively. Significantly increased 2.5% span length (33.1 mm) and 4 bundle strength (24.8 g/tex) were observed with foliar application of KNO (2%) over the other treatments. Foliar 3 application of KNO (2%) (3 sprays on 15 October, 1 November and 31 November) significantly increased the 3 seed-cotton yield (2.54 t/ha), gross returns ( 56.2 103/ha), net returns ( 27.8 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (1.98).

References

AICCIP. 2013. All India Coordinated Cotton Improvement Project. Annual Report 201213. Project Coordinators Report. Coimbatore. pp. 114.

Blaise, D. and Kranthi K.R. 2011.Cry1Ac Expression in Transgenic Bt Cotton Hybrids Is Influenced by Soil Moisture and Depth. Current Science 101(6): 78386.

Blaise, D., Singh, J.V. and Bande, A.N. 2009. Response of rainfed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to foliar application of potassium. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(4): 5055.

Brar, M.S., Gill, M.S., Sekhon, K.S., Sidhu, B.S., Sharma, P. and Singh, A. 2008. Effect of soil and foliar application of nutrients on yield and nutrient concentration in Bt cotton. Journal of Research, Punjab Agriculture University, Ludhiana

(3 and 4): 12631.

Cho. 2002. Plant Growth Regulation 36: 21521. Cited in http:// www.agriculture. com/contents/ppi/

Dong, H., Li, W., Li, Z., Tang, W. and Zhang, D. 2005. Evaluation of production systems in China thatuses reduced plant densities and retention of vegetative branches. Journal of Cotton Science 9: 19.

Gandhi, V.P. and Namboodiri. N.V. (Eds) 2006. The adoption and economics of Bt cotton in India. Preliminary results from a study, 225 pp. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmadabad, India.

Hebbar, K.B., Rao, R.K. and Khadi, B.M. 2007. Synchronized boll development of Bt cotton hybrids and their physiological consequences. Current Science 93: 69395.

Halemani, H.L., Hugar, A.Y., Aladakatti, Y.R. and Nandagavi, R.A. 2009. Studies on effect of polyethylene mulching on cotton genotypes under rainfed conditions. Influence on growth, yield components and seed cotton yield. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22(2): 28083.

Ikisan. 2004. In: Cotton : Crisis Management. (www.ikisan.com)

Kaur, M., Kaur, M. and Brar, A.S. 2007. Effect of potassium on the growth and yield of American cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Cotton Research and Development 21(2): 18790.

Kranthi, K.R., Naidu, S., Dhawad, C.S., Tatwawadi Mate, K. Patil, E., Bharose, A.A., Behere, G. T., Wadoshar, R.M. and Kranti,

S. 2005. Temporal and inter plant variability of Cry 1 Ac expression in Bt cotton and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm. Current Science 89(2): 29198.

Sharma, S.K. and Singh, Sunder. 2007. Yield, yield attributes and quality of cotton as influenced by foliar application of potassium. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 21(1): 5154.

Venugopalan, M. V., Challa, O., Ramamurthy and Kalsarpe, S. 2004. Role of soil and climatic factors in modulating cotton fibre quality parameters. International Symposium on Strategies for Sustainable Cotton Production A global vision 2, Crop production, 2325 November, held at UAS, Dharwad, Karnataka (India), pp. 13537.

Wright, P. R.1999. Premature senescence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Predominantly a potassium disorder caused by an imbalance of source and sink. Plant and Soil 211: 23139.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

J.A. HOSMATH, D.P. BIRADAR, V.C. PATIL, Y.B. PALLED, & L.H. MALLIGAWAD. (2001). Nutrient requirement of Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 59(1), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i1.4531