Effect of planting techniques and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water use efficiency of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata)

AMIT PAINYULI; M.S. PAL; AMIT BHATNAGAR; A.S. BISHT

doi:10.59797/ija.v58i3.4197

Authors

AMIT PAINYULI
M.S. PAL
AMIT BHATNAGAR
A.S. BISHT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i3.4197

Keywords:

Cumulative pan evaporation, Economics, Planting technique, Irrigation schedule, Sweet corn

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Pantnagar in spring of 2009 and 2010 to study the response of planting techniques and irrigation schedules on productivity and profitability of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata). The ex- periment consisted of three planting techniques viz. flat planting, flat planting followed by earthing up at 25 days after sowing and ridge planting, and four irrigation schedules i.e. irrigation at 50, 75 and 100 mm CPE and crop critical growth stages (knee high, tasseling, silking and grain filling ) was laid out at factorial randomized block de- sign with three replications. The pooled results revealed that the increase in green cobs and fodder yields was 5.1 and 15.2% and 5.0 and 12.6% on ridge planted over flat + earthing up and flat planted sweet corn, respectively. Similarly ridge planting was found superior with highest water use efficiency and net profit. Among the irrigation schedules, irrigation at 75 mm CPE gave 5.9, 10.7 and 13.9% higher green cobs than irrigation scheduled at 50 mm CPE and 100 mm CPE and critical growth stages, respectively. Besides, ridge planting with irrigation sched- uled at 75 mm CPE had the highest water use efficiency and net profit. It is therefore concluded that spring sweet corn may be planted on ridges and irrigation be scheduled at 75 mm CPE for higher productivity, profitability and water use efficiency.

References

Bakht, J., Ahmed, S., Mahmood, T., Habeeb, A. and Shafi, M. 2006.

Response of maize to planting methods and fertilizer N.

Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1(3): 812. FAO. 1998. Crop evapotranspirationGuidelines for computing crop

water requirements. FAO, United Nations, Rome, Bulletin

Galiakberov, A.G. 2006. Maize cultivation on ridges. Kukuruza I Sorgo 5: 1415.

Javaid, A.T. and Khalid, U. 2009. Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of maize crop. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 25(3): 44150.

Kumar, A. 2008. Growth and water use efficiency of different maize (Zea mays) based cropping systems under varying methods and irrigation levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 78(3): 24447.

Mallikarjunaswamy, S.N., Ramachandrappa, B.K. and Nanjappa,

H.V. 1999. Effect of scheduling irrigation at different phenophases of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata) and delineation of critical stages based on stress day index. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 182(3): 16166.

Memon, S.Q., Mirza, B.B. and Mari, G.R. 2007. Tillage practices and effect of sowing methods ongrowth and yield of maize crop. Agricultura Tropica Et Subtropica 40(3): 89100.

Sangakkara, U.R., Amarasekera, P. and Stamp, P. 2010. Irrigation regimes affect early root development, shoot growth and yields of maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical minor seasons. Plant, Soil and Environment 56(5): 22834.

Shafiq, M., Hassan, I. and Hussain, Z. 2003. Maize crop production and water use efficiency as affected by planting methods. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2(1): 14144.

Shinde, S.A., Shelk, D.K. and Sawargaonkar, G.L. 2009. Effect of irrigation schedules and integrated nutirnet management on yield and nutrient uptake by rabi maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Plant Sciences 4(1): 2426.

Singh, R.N., Nath, N.N., Singh, S.K., Mohan, T.K. and Shahi, J.P. 2006. Effect of agronomic management practices on growth, yield and quality of kharif maize (Zea mays) under excessive moisture conditions. Crop Research 32(3): 30205.

Thakur, H.S., Girothia, O.P., Holkar, S. and Sharma, R.A. 2003. Effect of land treatments on productivity of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grown on Vertisols of Madhya Pradesh. Crop Research 26(1): 7578.