Productivity, nitrogen-use efficiency and economics of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) genotypes as influenced by different levels of nitrogen

Authors

  • KHALED MIRI
  • D.S. RANA
  • K.S. RANA
  • ASHOK KUMAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v57i1.4614

Keywords:

Economics, Ethanol yield, Genotypes, Grain yield, Nitrogen-use efficiency, Sweet sorghum.

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi, during rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 to evaluate 3 sweet

References

Amal G, Ahmed N, Zaki M and Hassanein M S. 2007. Response of

grain sorghum to different nitrogen sources. Research Jour

nal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 3(6):100208. Buah, S.S.J. and Mwinkaara, S. 2009. Response of sorghum to ni

trogen fertilizer and plant density in the Guinea Savanna

Zone. Journal of Agronomy 8(4): 12430.

Hugar, A.Y., Jayadeva, H.M., Rangaswamy, B.R., Shivanna, S. and Handrappa,H. 2010. Assessing the effect of nitrogen and harvesting stages on yield and yield attributes of sweet sorghum genotypes. Agricultural Science Digest 30(2): 139 41

Table 3. Effect of nitrogen levels and genotypes on nitrogen use efficiency and economics of sweet sorghum production (Data pooled over two years)

Treatment Nitrogen-use efficiencies Cost of Ethanol Gross returns (103 ` /ha) from Net Net PFP* ANUE* CRE* (%) PNUE* cultivation processing Ethanol Fodder Grain Total returns B:C (103 ` /ha) cost yield yield yield ratio (103 ` /ha) (103 ` /ha)

Nitrogen levels (kg/ha)

Control ----10.6 18.0 36.9 6.0 10.8 53.8 25.2 0.88

35.6 12.5 63.5 20.1 10.8 27.8 44.5 7.7 16.2 68.4 36.2 1.12 100 23.2 11.6 63.5 18.6 11 29.8 60.2 9.6 20.7 90.5 49.7 1.22 150 17.2 9.4 46 20.7 11.3 32.7 66.4 10.1 23.4 99.9 55.9 1.27 SEm 1.17 0.67 2.2 1.71 --1.6 0.27 0.36 1.89 1.13 CD (P=0.05) 3.23 1.86 7.5 NS --5.6 0.90 1.17 6.6 3.45

RSSV9 24.2 10.4 54.0 19.8 10.8 25.8 52.6 7.9 16.2 76.8 40.2 1.09 SSV 84 21.0 8.7 47..1 19.0 10.8 16.4 33.2 6.9 15.3 55.4 28.2 1.03 CSH22 SS 30.7 14.5 72.0 20.6 11.6 34.6 70.5 10.1 21.6 102.1 55.9 1.21 SEm 0.5 0.58 2.4 5.6 --1.4 0.37 0.18 1.56 0.8 CD (P=0.05) 1.16 1.27 6.3 ---4.1 1.08 0.72 4.69 2.38

PFP = Partial factor productivity (kg harvest product per kg N applied); ANUE = Agronomic N-use efficiency (kg yield increase per kg N applied); CRE (%) = Crop recoveryefficiency (kg increase in N uptake per kg N applied x100); PNUE = Physiological N-use efficiency (kg yield increase per kg increase in N uptake)

MIRI ET AL. [Vol. 57, No. 1

Kumar S R, Shrotria P K and Deshmukh J P. 2008. Characterizing nutrient management effect on yield of sweet sorghum genotypes. World Journal of Agricultural Science 4: 78789. Lakkana L, Sunan N, Penjit S, Preekamol K and Pattana L. 2009. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresource Technology 100: 4176182. Morris J B. 2006. Production of sweet sorghum for syrup in Kentucky. University of Kentucky Coperative Extension Service, Publication No. 122. 6pp. Pandey, R.K., Maranville, J.W. and Bako, Y. 2001. Nitrogen fertilizer response and use efficiency for three cereal crops In Niger. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32(10):1465482.

Poornima S. Geethalakshmi V and Leelamathi R M. 2008. Sowing dates and nitrogen levels on yield and juice quality of sweet sorghum. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 4: 65154

Rao, M.H., Kumar, S.R., Rao, S.S. and Rana, B.S. 2006. Sorghum In: Field Crop Production, edited by Rajendra Prasad. Indian council of Agricultural Research, New-Delhi, 110012. 821pp.

Ratnavathi, C.V., Suresh, K., Vijay Kumar, B.S., Pallavi, M., Komala V V and Seetharama N. 2010. Study on genotypic variation for ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 94752.

Reddy S G. 2006. Studies on production potential of sweet sorghum genotypes for grain and ethanol production as influenced by management practices. Ph.D thesis. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. 197 pp.

Sipos, B., Reczey, J., Somorai, Z., Kadar, Z., Dienes, D. and Reczey,

K. 2009. Sweet sorghum as feedstock for ethanol production: enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated bagasse. Application of Biochemical Biotechnology 1:15162.

Spencer G L and Meade G P. 1963. Cane Sugar Handbook (8th edition). John Wiley, New York, 646 pp.

Wortmann C S, Liska A J, Ferguson R B, Lyon D J, Klein R N and Dweikat I. 2010. Dryland performance of sweet sorghum and grain crops for biofuel in Nebraska. Agronomy Journal

: 31926.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

KHALED MIRI, D.S. RANA, K.S. RANA, & ASHOK KUMAR. (2001). Productivity, nitrogen-use efficiency and economics of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) genotypes as influenced by different levels of nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 57(1), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v57i1.4614