Teacher-centered or Student-centered Teaching Methods and Stu-dent Outcomes in Secondary Schools: Lecture/Discussion and Pro-ject-based Learning/Inquiry Pros and Cons

Main Article Content

Gregg Levitt
Steven Grubaugh

Abstract

Teacher-centered approaches, such as direct instruction, can be efficient at delivering information but may not promote deep learning or engagement. Student-centered approaches, like project-based learning and inquiry methods, can foster critical thinking and engagement, but can be more resource-intensive for teachers. Educators and administrators can encourage the use of student-centered approaches by providing professional development and support, promoting collaboration and networking, modeling, and encouraging self-reflection. It is important for teachers to use a variety of teaching methods that facilitate active learning.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Levitt, G., & Grubaugh, S. (2023). Teacher-centered or Student-centered Teaching Methods and Stu-dent Outcomes in Secondary Schools: Lecture/Discussion and Pro-ject-based Learning/Inquiry Pros and Cons. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v1i2.16
Section
Opinion Articles

References

Barker, R. L., & Gansneder, B. M. (1995). The effectiveness of selected teaching methods in the social studies: A meta-analysis. Social Education, 59(3), 150-154. DOI: 10.5070/ncassr.1995.59.3.150

Davies, R. S. (2021). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 65(2), 176-188.

Buckley, J., & Rice, J. (2013). An exploration of student-centered learning in the middle years of schooling: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 10, 71-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.001

DeLuca, C., & Olah, L. (2015). The impact of teacher-centered and student-centered instructional approaches on student achievement in secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(3), 321-342. DOI: 10.1080/09340239.2015.1074115

Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Hattie, J. (2020). The Distance Learning Playbook, Grades K-12: Teaching for Engagement and Impact in Any Setting. Corwin.

Hattie, J., & Brown, M. (2013). The role of direct instruction and student-centered approaches in promoting student learning. Educational Review, 65(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/00131881.2012.750050

Kauffman, D., & Wetzel, K. (2014). A review of social studies teaching methods: Their impact on student learning. Social Studies Research and Practice, 9(1), 94-108. DOI: 10.1080/15512159.2014.893936

Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2013). The impact of teaching method on student engagement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 25(3), 309-327. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-012-9209-y

Rutkiene, A., & Tandzegolskiene, I. (2015). Students’ Attitude Towards Learning Methods for Self-Sufficiency Development in Higher Education. Society. Integration. Education, 1, 348-357. DOI: 10.17770/sie2015vol1.291

Wright, T. (2015). Promoting citizenship education through social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 43(1), 64-92. DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2014.976507