- citati u SCIndeksu: 0
- citati u CrossRef-u:0
- citati u Google Scholaru:[]
- posete u poslednjih 30 dana:12
- preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:11
|
|
2014, vol. 42, br. 2, str. 115-129
|
Fazi modeli za merenje konkurentnosti u agroindustriji
Fuzzy models in measuring competitiveness of agroindustry
Sažetak
Konkurentnost je u protekle tri decenije sastavni deo modernog upravljanja razvojem i poslovanjem. Autori posmatraju 18 vojvođanskih preduzeća u periodu 2009-2013 iz sektora poljoprivrede i prerađivačke industrije i mere njihovu konkurentnost na osnovu angažovanosti intelektualnog kapitala. Autori dalje predlažu konstrukciju portfelja rešavanjem višekriterijumskog optimizacionog problema. Primenjena je fazi metodologija, prinosi su modelovani trapezoidnim fazi brojevima, a rizik se meri semi-devijacijom. Rezultati studije ukazuju na odstupanje u odnosu na Markowitzev model koji podrazumeva da su prinosi normalno raspoređeni, pri čemu je varijansa adekvatna mera rizika. Portfelje dobijene fazi metodologijom čine kompanije sa većim vrednostima intelektualnog kapitala u odnosu na kompanije koje su dobijene rešavanjem Markowitzevog problema.
Abstract
Over the past three decades, competitiveness has become an integral part of modern management and business development. The authors observe 18 enterprises in Vojvodina in the period 2009-2013 from Agriculture and Manufacturing sectors and measure their competitiveness based on the involvement of intellectual capital. The authors also propose the construction of a portfolio by solving the multiple criteria optimization problem. Fuzzy methodology has been applied: yields are modeled with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, and the risk is measured by semi-deviation. Results of the study indicate a deviation from the Markowitz model which assumes that the yields are normally distributed, and that the appropriate risk measure is the variance of returns. Portfolios obtained by fuzzy methodology are characterized by higher values of intellectual capital, when compared to its counterparts obtained from Markowitz optimization.
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A., Camm, J.D., Martin, K. (2012) An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making. Mason , OH: South-Western Cengage Learning
|
|
Bhattacharyya, R., Kar, S., Majumder, D.D. (2011) Fuzzy mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 61(1): 126
|
5
|
Brigham, E.F., Houston, J.F. (2012) Fundamentals of Financial Management. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning
|
|
Craven, B.D., Sardar, M.N.I. (2005) Optimization in Economics and Finance: Some Advances in Non-Linear, Dynamic, Multi-Criteria and Stochastic Models. Springer: Dordrecth, The Netherlands
|
|
Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1980) Systems of linear fuzzy constraints. Fuzzy sets and systems, 3(1): 37-4
|
|
Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1987) The mean value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy sets and systems, 24(3): 279
|
|
Garelli, S. (2008) Competitiveness 20 years later. u: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, Lausanne, Switzerland, : 29-34
|
|
Gupta, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Saxena, A. (2008) Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming. Information Sciences, 178(6): 17
|
|
Hirschey, M. (2009) Fundamental of Managerial Economics. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning
|
|
Jones, C.P. (2010) Investments Analysis and Management. Hoboken, NY: John Wiley & Sons
|
|
Kapil, S. (2011) Financial Management. Noida, India: Dorling Kindersley
|
1
|
Klir, G.J., Yuan, B. (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. New Jersey: Prentice hall, Chapter 10
|
|
Lee, R. (2010) Information Filtering, Human Capital Efficiency and Economic Growth in Poor Neighborhoods. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 33(1): 71
|
|
Li, X., Qin, Z., Kar, S. (2010) Mean-variance-skewness model for portfolio selection with fuzzy returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1): 23
|
|
Lin, C., Liu, Y.T. (2008) Genetic algorithms for portfolio selection problems with minimum transaction lots. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1): 39
|
|
Luptačik, M. (2010) Springer Optimization and Its Applications: Mathematical Optmization and Economic Analysis. New York, NY: Springer Science
|
5
|
Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1): 77-9
|
2
|
Siggel, E. (2006) International Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage: A Survey and a Proposal for Measurement. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2): 137-159
|
|
Speranza, M.G. (1993) Linear programming model for portfolio optimization. Finance, 14: 107
|
|
Stevenson, H. (2001) Emerging markets, downside risk and the asset allocation decision. Emerging markets review, 2: 50-66
|
|
Tanaka, H., Guo, P. (1999) Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions. European Journal of Operational Research, 114(1): 11
|
|
Vercher, E., Bermúdez, J.D., Segura, J.V. (2007) Fuzzy portfolio optimization under downside risk measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158(7): 76
|
|
Vercher, E. (2008) Portfolios with fuzzy returns: Selection strategies based on semi-infinite programming. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 217(2): 38
|
63
|
Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338
|
|
|
|