Either it has occurred in the same conditions as The First one, The Second Serbian uprising presented different approach for solving the social and political problems which have burdened reaya of Ottoman Serbia. Predestined by the choices of the leaders who guided them, they differ from each other in the same scale as the character of Karađorđe and prince Miloš. While Karađorđe led the Serbian people to their liberation with lot of aggression and military engagement, prince Miloš worked on that with much less blood and more bluffs in diplomacy. Due to that he has managed for a short period of time to legalize main goals of the Serbian rebels and to pave the road to modern Serbian state. That's why from the first year of it's lasting The Second Serbian uprising presented an ideal example of successful policy led by a leader of certain Balkan anti-Ottoman movement. Achieved balance of brute force, diplomacy, subvention and corruption have guaranteed him a success in a conflict with a state overwhelmed by social and cultural extremities, as Ottoman empire was.