Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:38:50.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Game Theory and Business Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Extract

In 1954, Richard Braithwaite chose as the topic of his inaugural lecture at Cambridge The Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. Braithwaite argued that by using the recently developed mathematical theory of games, philosophers could resolve certain problems in moral philosophy previously considered unsolvable. Formal game theory is a product of the twentieth century. John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern established game theory as an important new branch of social science with the publication of their 1944 treatise Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. However, the basic idea that motivates game theory has much older intellectual roots in the work of philosophers such as Hobbes (1651) and Hume (1740). This basic idea can be expressed in the following way: How agents behave in a given social interaction depends crucially upon their reciprocal expectations. To give an example adapted from Braithwaite’s lecture, if you and I wish to have a telephone conversation, then exactly one of us must call. I should wait for your call precisely when I expect you to call, which you should do when you expect me to wait. Even in an example this simple, issues of fairness can come into play. We both want to coordinate our behavior and have our telephone chat. But each of us may prefer to call, so as to avoid having the other pay for the call. Braithwaite used game theory to model this example, and to propose a method for assigning the roles of caller and receiver equitably. He conjectured that this method could be applied in general to problems of distributive justice.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologice. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Bros., 1273, 1948.Google Scholar
Aumann, Robert. “Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1 (1974): 6796.Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken. Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath and Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Richard. Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Cudd, Ann. “Game Theory and the History of Ideas About Rationality,” Economics and Philosophy 9 (1993): 101133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1651, 1991.Google Scholar
Kavka, Gregory. Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kreps, David. Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. Duncan and Raiffa Howard. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. rev. 2nd. ed., ed. Nidditch, P. H.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1740, 1888, 1976.Google Scholar
Nash, John. “Equilibrium points in n-person games,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 36 (1950): 4849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, John. “Non-Cooperative Games,” Annals of Mathematics 54 (1951): 286295.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1776, 1976.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert. The Economics of Rights, Cooperation and Welfare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar
Vanderschraaf, Peter. “Hume’s Theory of Convention as Strategic Interaction.” 1998.Google Scholar
von Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944.Google Scholar