The Fatal Embrace? A Critical Reflection on Carl Raschke’s Proposal, Why Conservative Evangelicals Must Embrace Postmodernity?

Authors

  • Hadje Sadje
https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v7i2.97

Keywords:

Appropriation, Evangelical Christian, Postmodernity, Postmodern Thinking, Reformation

Abstract

At the turn of the millennium, recent debates within evangelical Christian circles on ‘appropriating’ postmodern thinking into  evangelical Christian theology raised a number of issues on whether postmodern thinking can provide a suitable standpoint that  offers a philosophical critique on modern dualistic thinking, for some, that is imbedded in modern evangelical Christian theology. Carl Raschke, an evangelical scholar, critically contends that evangelical Christian scholars must embrace postmodernity (postmodernism) as a new form of Reformation. At first glance, Raschke ask whether evangelical Christians have such reason to embrace postmodern thinking, eventually, he critically presented why evangelical Christians do have good a reason for  ‘appropriating’ postmodern thinking. In this paper, firstly, I will introduce Carl Raschke as a Christian Evangelical postmodern thinker. Secondly, I will provide an exposition of Raschke’s main argument and criticism on evangelical Christian theology from his  popular book, The Next Reformation: Why Evangelicals Must Embrace Postmodernity (2004). Lastly, I will provide concluding  comments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“American’s Definition: What is Evangelical Christian?” http://greymatterresearch.com/index_files/Grey_Matter_Report_Americans_Define_Evangelical.pdf.

Barthes, Ronald. “The Death of the Author” trans. Richard Howard. Aspen 5/6. Online Edition. Fall/Winter, 1967.

Bassara, Czeslaw. Postmodern Hermeneutics and the Evangelical Response, A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology, From the Evangelical Theological Faculty-Leuven, Belgium. September,1967.

Cook, Deborah. “Symbolic Exchange in Hyperreality.” In D. Kellner (ed.), Baudrillard: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994:150–167, 1994.

Groothuis, Douglas. Truth Decay: Defending Christianity against the Challenges of Postmodernism. USA: InterVarsity Press, 2000.

Habermas, Jürgen. “Modernity versus Postmodernity,” translated by Seyla Ben-Habib, New German Critique, No. 22, Special Issue on Modernism.Winter, 1981: 3-14, 1981.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Tanslation from the French by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi Foreword by Fredric Jameson, Theory and History of Literature, Volume 10, USA: Manchester University Press: 71-84, 1984.

Michener, Ronald T. Postliberal Theology: A Guide for the Perplexed. (UK: Bloomsbury Publication, 2013.

Lee, Hock Siew. “Christianity and the Postmodern Turn: A Critique of Postmodern Epistemology,” A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Theology at the South African Theological Seminary, May 2009.

Raschke, Carl. Faculty & Staff, University of Denver, http://www.du.edu/ahss/religiousstudies/facultystaff/raschke.html.

__________. "The New Age: The Movement toward Self-Discovery". In Ferguson, Duncan. New Age Spirituality: An Assessment. Louisville, KY: Westminster/ John Knox Press, 1993.

Taylor, Victor. “From Alchemy to Revolution: A Conversation with Carl Raschke,” in Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory. vol. 12 no. 3: 149-160, 2013.

von Zon, Hans. “The Unholy Alliance of Neoliberalism and Postmodernism,” Poltieke Filosofie. Jaargang 47 Nummer 2 I:110-114, 2013.

Žižek, Slavoj. The Plague of Fantasises. New York: Verso Publications, 1997.

Downloads

Published

09/30/2018

How to Cite

Sadje, H. (2018). The Fatal Embrace? A Critical Reflection on Carl Raschke’s Proposal, Why Conservative Evangelicals Must Embrace Postmodernity?. Scientia - The International Journal on the Liberal Arts, 7(2), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v7i2.97

Issue

Section

Articles

CITATION