Special Autonomy Policy of Papua Province

Authors

  • Rusdianto Abu Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Jayapura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i1.219

Keywords:

Policy, Special Autonomy, Papua Province

Abstract

Papua Province has a special regulation that regulates the sustainability of the wheels of government in Papua Province, namely the Special Autonomy of Papua Province. Law number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy of Papua which has been amended into Law Number 2 of 2021 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua Province. Provide traffic for Papua Province to carry out special autonomy. Referring to this explanation, the author is interested in being able to conduct a study on the Special Autonomy Policy of Papua Province. This research uses Qualitative techniques with Snow Ball Technique research informants. The conclusions of the research results are as follows: Special autonomy policy has not been implemented effectively. Limitations of policy implementation in satisfying (1) the interests of affected parties, (2) the types of benefits received, (3) the expected rate of change, (4) the location of decision making, (5) program implementers, and (6) resource commitments, theoretically, indicate a lack of intended optimality. In addition, deficiencies were identified in (7) estimating player strength; (8) foresee the interests of actors; (2009) predicted the tactics of the actors; 10) foresee regime and institutional features; (11) estimating compliance; and (12) estimate the response. In practice, the implementation of special autonomy policies has improved the Human Development Index of Papua Province. There are three types of obstacles that hinder Papua Province's efforts in implementing the special autonomy policy and improving the Human Development Index: structural, cultural, and conditional. Structural constraints are caused by the power dynamics of the political elite as well as the work culture, leadership, and mindset of the bureaucratic apparatus, most of which are KKKN. Cultural limitations are a result of the scarcity of human, social, and traditional resources that have been deeply embedded in the daily lives of indigenous Papuans. Conditional restrictions are restrictions caused by poverty caused by limitations, community decline, and remote locations. resources with an individual focus

References

Ananda, R. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Transfer Daerah Dalam Meningkatkan Pembangunan Nasional (Case Study: Kepemimpinan SBY dan JKW).

Elisabeth, A. (2021). Mosaik Cenderawasih-Pembangunan dan Kesejahteraan di Tanah Papua. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

H Hermanto Suaib, M. M. (2017). Suku Moi: nilai-nilai kearifan lokal dan modal sosial dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. An1mage.

Imanto, R., Panorama, M., & Sumantri, R. (2020). Pengaruh Pengangguran dan Kemiskinan terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Al-Infaq: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 11(2), 118–139.

Katharina, R. (2019). Menakar capaian otonomi khusus Papua. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Wijaya, I. P. D., & Suryawan, I. M. Y. (2021). Problematika pelaksanaan kebijakan otonomi khusus kepada daerah Papua dan Papua Barat dengan perspektif kebijakan publik. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 9(2), 168–178.

Murofikoh, D. I. (2023). Analisis pertimbangan penolakan Hakim terhadap permohonan pengujian Undang-Undang nomor 2 tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang nomor 21 tahun 2001 tentang Otonomi Khusus bagi Provinsi Papua dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 43/PUU-XX/2022. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Nero, P., Suradinata, E., & Mulyati, D. (2021). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKSANAAN “PROSPEK”(PROGRAM STRATEGIS PEMBANGUNAN KAMPUNG) DALAM MEMBERDAYAKAN MASYARAKAT PAPUA MANDIRI DAN SEJAHTERA DI KABUPATEN JAYAPURA PROVINSI PAPUA (Studi Kasus di Distrik Sentani Barat, Sentani, dan Sentani Timur). VISIONER: Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, 13(2), 425–440.

Pamungkas, C., & Triindriasari, D. (2018). Pemilihan Gubernur Papua 2018: Politik Identitas, Tata Kelola Pemerintahan dan Daya Hidup Orang Papua. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya.

Rahman, A. A., Malik, I., & Tirto, D. (2023). ANALISIS MANAJEMEN KONFLIK MELALUI KONFLIK ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA (OPM) DI INDONESIA. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(2), 803–812.

Sawir, M. (2020). Birokrasi Pelayanan Publik Konsep, Teori, Dan Aplikasi. Deepublish.

Sitepu, R. K.-K. (2023). Kajian Pembangunan Daerah Pada Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Tahun 2023. Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara.

Sukmalalana, S., Ramadhan, F., Pidhegso, A. Y., Huda, F. N., & Fadli, S. D. (2020). Akuntabilitas Dana Otonomi Khusus Provinsi Papua dan Papua Barat. Pusat Kajian Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara Badan Keahlian DPR RI.

Tryatmoko, M. W. (2016). Politik Kebijakan Pengelolaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(1), 18.

Yudanto, D., Rochaida, E., & Priyagus, P. (2020). Pengaruh pendapatan perkapita dan inflasi serta suku bunga terhadap konsumsi rumah tangga makanan dan non makanan serta pengaruhnya terhadap kesejahteraan masyarakat di provinsi kalimantan timur. KINERJA, 17(2), 287–297.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25