Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implications of the Open Call System in the Flemish Region of Belgium - Focusing on the Request for a Proposal System in South Korea -

벨기에 플란더스의 공공건축 오픈콜 제도 운영사례와 시사점 - 국내 제안공모 제도를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2022.12.10
  • Accepted : 2023.05.02
  • Published : 2023.05.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study integrated the planning and design stages of public buildings into one research scope, focusing on the domestic request for a proposal system. The open call system in the Belgian province of Flanders has been continuously striving to improve the quality of public buildings for more than 20 operating years. Through this system, several elegant public buildings were created there, ranging from close-to-life small buildings to large buildings that serve as local landmarks. As a result of analyzing this operation, the following implications for a proposal system request were derived. Further expanding the proposal competition to be applied to large-scale projects without limiting the recommended size is necessary. When evaluating a proposal request, avoiding a scoring system and pursuing a voting system is needed so that the evaluation effect of an architect's career and similar project performance is minimized, and innovative ideas can be adopted. When organizing the judging committee and considering the domestic situation, the evaluation effect can be reviewed in the order of organizational needs to participate as a jury member. The role and scope of work involving private experts should be expanded to the planning and design stages before and after the request for a proposal system, so that they play an overall and leading role rather than an auxiliary role. This study was meaningful in that it drew different implications from previous studies, such as the appropriate project size of a proposal request, design competition period, evaluation and screening, and the role of private experts and government architects. However, there was a limitation in that the implications related to the request for a proposal system were presented at the level of improvements; a more detailed analysis of the problems of the request for a proposal system and research for realistic improvement plans remain as future tasks.

Keywords

References

  1. Florian, H. (2022). Celebrating Public Architecture. Buildings From The Open Call In Flanders 2000-21. Jovis, 62-182.
  2. Kidder, S. (1961). The New Architecture Of Europe. World Publishing Company, 20.
  3. Lim, Y., Bang, J., Park, S., Yang, E., Lee, K., Lee, H., & Park, T. (2020). A strategy for National Public Building Center. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 12-36.
  4. National Public Building Center. (2022). The Guide Of Public Building Request For A Proposal, National Public Building Center, 8-78.
  5. Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy. (2020). The Guide Of City Architect, Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy, 76-85.
  6. Rennat, B. (1968). Het Lelijkste Land Ter Wereld. Davidsfonds, 51.
  7. Shin, H. (2022). Improvements and Issues Regarding the Public Architectural Planning System. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(4), 43-50.
  8. Sim, K., Lee, H., & Kim, M. (2020). Improvement of City Architect System in South Korea. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 73-126.
  9. Team, V. (2008). Open Call OO15 European Publication. Vlaams Bouwmeester, 1-4.
  10. Team, V. (2009). Open Call OO18 European Publication. Vlaams Bouwmeester, 1-4.
  11. Team, V. (2014). Open Call OO27 European Publication. Vlaams Bouwmeester, 1-3.
  12. Van, B. (2019). Open Call 20 Years Of Public Architecture. Vlaams Bouwmeester, 15-20.
  13. Youm, C., Park, S., & Lee, H. (2019). The Issues and Challenges of Public Building Design Procurement Methods. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 72-104.