A False Sense of Privacy: Towards a Reliable Evaluation Methodology for the Anonymization of Biometric Data
Authors: Simon Hanisch (Center for Tactile Internet (CeTI), Technical University Dresden), Julian Todt (KASTEL, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Jose Patino (Cerence), Nicholas Evans (Digital Security Department, EURECOM), Thorsten Strufe (KASTEL, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
Volume: 2024
Issue: 1
Pages: 116–132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2024-0008
Abstract: Biometric data contains distinctive human traits such as facial features or gait patterns. The use of biometric data permits an individuation so exact that the data is utilized effectively in identification and authentication systems. But for this same reason, privacy protections become indispensably necessary. Privacy protection is extensively afforded by the technique of anonymization. Anonymization techniques protect sensitive personal data from biometrics by obfuscating or removing information that allows linking records to the generating individuals, to achieve high levels of anonymity. However, our understanding and possibility to develop effective anonymization relies, in equal parts, on the effectiveness of the methods employed to evaluate anonymization performance. In this paper, we assess the state-of-the-art methods used to evaluate the performance of anonymization techniques for facial images and for gait patterns. We demonstrate that the state-of-the-art evaluation methods have serious and frequent shortcomings. In particular, we find that the underlying assumptions of the state-of-the-art are quite unwarranted. State-of-the-art methods generally assume a difficult recognition scenario and thus a weak adversary. However, that assumption causes state-of-the-art evaluations to grossly overestimate the performance of the anonymization. Therefore, we propose a strong adversary which is aware of the anonymization in place. This adversary model implements an appropriate measure of anonymization performance. We improve the selection process for the evaluation dataset, and we reduce the numbers of identities contained in the dataset while ensuring that these identities remain easily distinguishable from one another. Our novel evaluation methodology surpasses the state-of-the-art because we measure worst-case performance and so deliver a highly reliable evaluation of biometric anonymization techniques.
Keywords: privacy, biometric, methodology, anonymization, evaluation
Copyright in PoPETs articles are held by their authors. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
