Academic Culture: Professional Communication and Entrepreneurship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56062/gtrs.2023.1.11.209Keywords:
Professional Communication, glocalization, feminist philosophy, entrepreneurship, tradition.Abstract
The biggest challenge for a professional in an age where academia is characterised by its ability to quickly and effectively cross borders is to reciprocate and convey the idea that what one has learned or attained should be put to use for the greater good of the people as well as the personal advantages one may accrue. According to this perspective, language plays a crucial role in that it may be utilised effectively as a tool to win business and build entrepreneurship in the context of the various disciplines involved. Academic settings and associated circumstances have influenced how things are done and how texts, facts, and presentations are conceived. In any academic culture, language has evolved into the handmaid of everyone in various patterns of usage for the objectives at hand. There is no replacement for entrepreneurs who strive to uplift people's spirits and minds. In order to ensure that the concept is successful when it is spread to a broad market, R.P. Singh advises to play fine tune to look at the facts on the ground. He achieved this by citing examples from the literature and creating a paradigm for language studies teaching and research where minuteness compensates for celebrating glocalization.
References
Works Cited:
Barker, Chris. Making Sense of Cultural Studies: Central Problems and Critical Debates. London: Sage Publications, New Delhi: Sage Publications,2002. Print.
Clarke David. “Varieties of Cultural Hybridity: Hong Kong Art in the Late Colonial Era.” Public Culture: Society for Transnational Cultural Studies HONG KONG 9.3(1997). 412. Print.
Chakraborty, Abin. Popular Culture. Ed. Krishna Sen. Hyderabad, India: Orient Blackswan, 2019. Print.
Cameron, D., 1985, Feminism and Linguistic Theory, Basingstoke and London: MacMillan.
–––, 1995, Verbal Hygiene, London: Routledge.
–––, 1998a, The Feminist Critique of Language, 2nd edition, London and New York: Routledge.
–––, 1998b, “Feminist Linguistic Theories”, in S Jackson and J Jones, Contemporary Feminist Theories, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1998: 147–161.
DiYanni ,Robert and Hoy II ,Pat C. , The Scribner Handbook for Writers. Allyn and Bacon, 2001
Giddens , A. Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge : Polity , 1991.Print.
HenryW. Lane, and Joseph Di Stefano. International Management Behaviour. Boston: PWS Kent, 1992, Pg.390. Print.
Madhavan, Shobhana. Cross – Cultural Management: Concepts and Cases. 2nd ed. New Delhi: OUP, 2016.
Ruscher,Janet B., Prejudiced Communication: A Social Psychological Perspective. Guilford, 2001
Saul, Jennifer, "Feminist Philosophy of Language", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/feminism-language/>.
Sapir, E., 1949, Selected Writings on Language, Culture, and Personality, Berkeley: University of California Press.
The Economist Style Guide, 10th ed. Profile Books, 2010
Singh, R.P. “Touching the Roots: Cultural Immersion Model of Teaching English”. The Indian Journal of English Studies, Vol. LVI, 2019.
Singh, R.P. “Reading Taboos as Allegory in O.V. Vijayan’s The Saga of Dharmapuri.” Journal of Applied Cultural Studies Vol. I 2015 URL= <http://jacs.amu.edu.pl/uploads/10.%20Singh%201.pdf>
Shakespeare , William . Hamlet.(1602) New Delhi : Oxford University Press; New
edition.1977.
--- --- ---. Julius Caesar. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.1938
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
