open access

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)
Review article
Submitted: 2022-12-15
Accepted: 2023-01-02
Published online: 2023-03-24
Get Citation

Medical training of seafarers: International Maritime Health Foundation (IMHF) Expert Panel Consensus Statement

Nebojša Nikolić1, Jon Magnus Haga2, Jens Tülsner3, Per Otto Årland4, Alf Magne Horneland2, Bill Kavanagh5, Klaus Seidenstucker6, Spike Briggs7, Inger Lund-Kordahl2, Cecilia Simolin Pernilla2
·
Pubmed: 36974489
·
IMH 2023;74(1):15-23.
Affiliations
  1. International Maritime Health Foundation Management Board, Croatia
  2. Norwegian Centre for Maritime and Diving Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
  3. Marine Medical Solutions, Germany
  4. Norwegian Maritime Authority, Norway
  5. National Maritime College of Ireland, Munster Technological University, Ireland
  6. International Maritime Health Foundation Expert Panel, Germany
  7. Medical Support Offshore, United Kingdom

open access

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)
MARITIME/OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE Review article
Submitted: 2022-12-15
Accepted: 2023-01-02
Published online: 2023-03-24

Abstract

Background: Medical emergencies and on-going medical conditions on board may seriously impair seafarers’ health and safety, and also negatively impact on future work prospects for seafarers. When a seafarer gets ill or injured on a ship, medical treatment often relies on the competences on his colleagues on board. The aim of this project was to establish a consensus-based minimum standard for medical education for seafarers, in order to ensure competency for adequate management of ill-health on board. Materials and methods: International Maritime Health Foundation (IMHF) conducted a workshop on medical training of seafarers. A research-based approach to gain consensus on core learning outcomes/competences developed by the Tuning Project, has been used. This method was used by Tuning (Medicine) to gain consensus on core learning outcomes for primary medical degrees (Master of Medicine) across Europe. Results: The result of the project is a set of learning outcomes/competences in medical training for merchant seafarers. Conclusions: The project resulted in a set of learning outcomes/competences on medical training of the seafarers that will be submitted to the relevant bodies of International Maritime Organization (IMO) in the process of the development of model courses 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15.

Abstract

Background: Medical emergencies and on-going medical conditions on board may seriously impair seafarers’ health and safety, and also negatively impact on future work prospects for seafarers. When a seafarer gets ill or injured on a ship, medical treatment often relies on the competences on his colleagues on board. The aim of this project was to establish a consensus-based minimum standard for medical education for seafarers, in order to ensure competency for adequate management of ill-health on board. Materials and methods: International Maritime Health Foundation (IMHF) conducted a workshop on medical training of seafarers. A research-based approach to gain consensus on core learning outcomes/competences developed by the Tuning Project, has been used. This method was used by Tuning (Medicine) to gain consensus on core learning outcomes for primary medical degrees (Master of Medicine) across Europe. Results: The result of the project is a set of learning outcomes/competences in medical training for merchant seafarers. Conclusions: The project resulted in a set of learning outcomes/competences on medical training of the seafarers that will be submitted to the relevant bodies of International Maritime Organization (IMO) in the process of the development of model courses 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15.

Get Citation

Keywords

medical training, seafarers, learning outcomes

About this article
Title

Medical training of seafarers: International Maritime Health Foundation (IMHF) Expert Panel Consensus Statement

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 74, No 1 (2023)

Article type

Review article

Pages

15-23

Published online

2023-03-24

Page views

2431

Article views/downloads

510

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2023.0002

Pubmed

36974489

Bibliographic record

IMH 2023;74(1):15-23.

Keywords

medical training
seafarers
learning outcomes

Authors

Nebojša Nikolić
Jon Magnus Haga
Jens Tülsner
Per Otto Årland
Alf Magne Horneland
Bill Kavanagh
Klaus Seidenstucker
Spike Briggs
Inger Lund-Kordahl
Cecilia Simolin Pernilla

References (49)
  1. Horneland AM, Jeżewska M, Jaremin B, et al. Establishment of the International Maritime Health Foundation: the next step in scientific publishing in maritime health. Int Marit Health. 2018; 69(3): 153–156.
  2. International Maritime Health, Via Medical Journals. https://journals.viamedica.pl/international_maritime_health (Accessed on 06.11.2022).
  3. International Maritime Health Foundation. https://www.imhf.pl/ (Accessed on 06.11.2022).
  4. ILO Guidelines for implementing the occupational safety and health provisions of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006, Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office; 2015. Sectoral Policies Department and International Labour Standards Department: 3-5.
  5. Carter T. Mapping the knowledge base for maritime health: illness and injury in seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2011; 62(4): 224–240.
  6. Sagaro GG, Dicanio M, Battineni G, et al. Incidence of occupational injuries and diseases among seafarers: a descriptive epidemiological study based on contacts from onboard ships to the Italian Telemedical Maritime Assistance Service in Rome, Italy. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3): e044633.
  7. Grappasonni I, Petrelli F, Amenta F. Deaths on board ships assisted by the Centro Internazionale Radio Medico in the last 25 years. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2012; 10(4): 186–191.
  8. Roberts SE, Marlow PB. Traumatic work related mortality among seafarers employed in British merchant shipping, 1976-2002. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(3): 172–180.
  9. McKay MP. Maritime health emergencies. Occup Med (Lond). 2007; 57(6): 453–455.
  10. Montocchio-Buadès C, Daurat M, Ducombs M, et al. Management of a polytrauma in the maritime environment. Int Marit Health. 2018; 69(2): 126–128.
  11. Herttua K, Gerdøe-Kristensen S, Vork JC, et al. Age and nationality in relation to injuries at sea among officers and non-officers: a study based on contacts from ships to Telemedical Assistance Service in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(12): e034502.
  12. Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational risks and challenges of seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010; 52(5): 249–256.
  13. IMO model courses 1.13, 1.14, 1.15. London: IMO; 2001.
  14. Revised Guidelines for the development, review, and validation of model courses (MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.15). https://homeport.uscg.mil/Lists/Content/Attachments/55317/Enclosure%205d%20-%20Sample%20Model%20Course%20Terms%20of%20Reference%20Template,%20IMO%20Format.pdf (Accessed on 06.11.2022).
  15. Brebner EM, Brebner JA, Ruddick-Bracken H, et al. The importance of setting and evaluating standards of telemedicine training. J Telemed Telecare. 2003; 9 Suppl 1: S7–S9.
  16. Blignault I, Kennedy C. Training for telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1999; 5 Suppl 1: S112–S114.
  17. Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health. 2007; 13(5): 573–590.
  18. Guitton MJ. Telemedicine at sea and onshore: divergences and convergences. Int Marit Health. 2015; 66(1): 18–21.
  19. Oldenburg M, Rieger J, Sevenich C, et al. Nautical officers at sea: emergency experience and need for medical training. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014; 9: 19.
  20. Nikolić N, Horneland A, Denisenko I, et al. A Medical Support in Offshore Racing Workshop on Learning Competences/Outcomes, 4–5 November 2016, Barcelona, Spain. Int Marit Health. 2017; 68(3): 178–182.
  21. Norum J, Gunnar Moksness S, Larsen E. A Norwegian study of seafarers' and rescuers' recommendations for maritime telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare. 2002; 8(5): 264–269.
  22. Schlaich C, Reinke A, Savenich C, et al. Guidance to the International Medical Guide for Ships 3(rd) edition: interim advice regarding the best use of the medical chest for ocean-going merchant vessels without a doctor onboard: joint statement of WHO Collaborating Centres for the health of seafarers and the International Maritime Health Association - 2009 version. Int Marit Health. 2009; 60(1-2): 51–66.
  23. Quantification addendum: international medical guide for ships, third edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. WHO Press. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44341 (Accessed on 13.11.2022).
  24. International Medical Guide for Ships, Third Edition. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43814/9789240682313_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed on 06.11.2022).
  25. Doarn CR, Doarn CR. Challenges and barriers to development of telemedicine programs. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 104: 41–48.
  26. Zeidler F, Načinović A, Rubinić M, et al. Frequency and quality of radio-medical advice service calls in Rijeka/Croatia. Medicina. 1999; 35: 55–59.
  27. Luger TJ, Giner R, Lorenz IH. Cardiological monitoring of sailors via offshore Internet connection. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001; 41(4): 486–490.
  28. Wyckoff MH, Singletary EM, Soar J, et al. COVID-19 Working Group. 2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group. Resuscitation. 2021; 169: 229–311.
  29. Dahl E. Briefing notes on maritime teledermatology. Int Marit Health. 2014; 65(2): 61–64.
  30. Dehours E, Roux P, Tabarly J, et al. French maritime procedures concerning the Ebola infection, experience of the French Tele-Medical Assistance Service (TMAS). Int Marit Health. 2015; 66(3): 184–185.
  31. Amenta F. The Centro Internazionale Radio Medico Symposium "The Way Forward of Maritime Telemedicine". Int Marit Health. 2016; 67(1): 56.
  32. Sagaro GG, Amenta F. Past, present, and future perspectives of telemedical assistance at sea: a systematic review. Int Marit Health. 2020; 71(2): 97–104.
  33. Battineni G, Amenta F. Designing of an Expert system for the management of Seafarer's health. Digit Health. 2020; 6: 2055207620976244.
  34. Kulasegaram K, Mylopoulos M, Tonin P, et al. The alignment imperative in curriculum renewal. Med Teach. 2018; 40(5): 443–448.
  35. Trainor A, Richards JB. Training medical educators to teach: bridging the gap between perception and reality. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021; 10(1): 75.
  36. DeBoer G. The globalization of science education. JRST. 2011; 48(6): 567–591.
  37. Dale R. Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education. Comparative Education. 2005; 41(2): 117–149.
  38. Carr SJ. Assessing clinical competency in medical senior house officers: how and why should we do it? Postgrad Med J. 2004; 80(940): 63–66.
  39. Gruppen LD. Outcome-based medical education: implications, opportunities, and challenges. Korean J Med Educ. 2012; 24(4): 281–285.
  40. Ross MT, Nikolić N, Peeraer G, et al. Report of the MEDINE2 Bachelor of Medicine (Bologna First Cycle) tuning project. Med Teach. 2014; 36(4): 314–321.
  41. Tuning Educational Structures in Europe – Final Report Pilot Project. http://tuningacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TuningEUI_Final-Report_EN.pdf (Accessed on 09.11.2022).
  42. Tuning Educational Structures in Europe – A Guide to Formulating Degree Program Profiles. http://tuningacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/A-Guide-to-Formulating-DPP_EN.pdf (Accessed on 09.11.2022).
  43. Gonzales J, Wagenaar R, Donà dalle Rose L. The Pilot Project “Tuning Educational Structures in Europe” and the Object-specific Competences for University Physics Students. In: Marisa Michelini ed. Quality Development in Teacher Education and Training. Second International GIREP Seminar 2003, Selected contributions. 2004: 333–343.
  44. Cumming AD, Ross M. The tuning project for medicine: learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Med Teach. 2007; 29(7): 636–641.
  45. Lifelong Learning Program 2007-13. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/lifelong-learning-programme-2007-13.html (Accessed on 09.11.2022).
  46. Tomorrow’s doctors. Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. General Medical Council 2099. http://www.ub.edu/medicina_unitateducaciomedica/documentos/TomorrowsDoctors_2009.pdf (Accessed on 13.11.2022).
  47. Cumming AD, Ross M. The Tuning Project (Medicine) - Learning outcomes / competences for undergraduate medical education in Europe. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297419241_The_Tuning_Project_Medicine_-_Learning_outcomes_competences_for_undergraduate_medical_education_in_Europe. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.1.4620.7765 (Accessed on 13.11.2022).
  48. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990; 65(9 Suppl): S63–S67.
  49. Sullivan GM, Artino AR. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5(4): 541–542.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl