KAJIAN IDEOLOGI PURA BUKIT INDRAKILA DI DESA DAUSA KECAMATAN KINTAMANI KABUPATEN BANGLI (PERSPEKTIF ETNOPEDAGOGI)

Gede Septiwima, Ni Luh Gede Hadriani, I Wayan Gata

Sari


This study aims to answer: (1) What is the shape of the building and the Most Gih in Pura Bukit Indrakila Based on Oral Tradition?, (2) What is the Function of Pura Bukit Indrakila, and (3) How to Instill Ideology Through an Ethnopedagogical Approach to the Young Generation of Hindu Temples Indrakila Hill in Dausa Traditional Village, Kintamani District, Bangli Regency? To answer the above problems, several theories are used, namely (1) Theory of Form (Nature as Exsemplar in Architeture) Soekmono, (1974), Joseph Rykwert 1991, Luddwigh Witgenstein, 1973), Giovani Pietro, 1672), (2) Ideological Theory Althusser, (2006) and (3) Ethnopedagogical Theory Hafid, et al (2015), (Priadi Surya, 2011), (Tilaar. 2015), Bernstein (2004) This study uses a phenomenological approach. With interview data collection techniques, Document Study., and Participation Observation (Participant Observation). Triangulation and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of the research on instilling ideology for the younger generation of Hindus are bright ideas that have been designed by the traditional and religious elders in the seka teruna teruni/deha teruna forum already have a vision and way of looking ahead as a comprehensive, as a way of looking at all things. something in general (see Ideology in everyday life) and some philosophical directions, or a group of ideas proposed by traditional and religious leaders to the younger generation of Hindus in particular and social groups of community members who are members of gebog satak in general as the proponents of Pura Bukit Indrakila in Dausa Village. The main purpose behind the planting of ideology is to offer change through a normative thought process, in this case the religious leaders and traditional leaders have fully designed the direction and goals to be achieved in terms of planting this ideology.

Keywords: Ethnopedagogical, Pura Bukit Indrakila


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Alwasilah. A. 2009. Etnopedagogik : Landasan praktek Pendidikan dan pendidikan guru, Kiblat Buku Utama. Bandung.

Althusser, L., 1969, For Marx(terj. B. Brewster), London & New York: Verso.

Althusser, L., 1971, Lenin and Philosophy and other essays, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Althusser, L.2006 Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation), Revised Edition, UK: Blackwell Publishing.

Althusser, L., 2007, Filsafat Sebagai Senjata Revolusi, Yogyakarta: Ressist Book.

Althusser, L., 2008, Tentang Ideologi; Marxisme Sturukturalis, Psikoanalis, Cultural Studies, Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Arikunto, Suharsini. 1997. Prosedur Penelitian ( Suatu Pendekatan Peraktek ). Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Basowi,Suwandi.2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Bogdan, dan Biklen. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education ,an Introduction to Theory and Methods. Second Edition. Allyn and Bacon A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.

Bungin, Burhan. 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Aktualisai Metodologis Kearah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Jakarta : Pt. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.

Bungin, Burhan (ed), 2001. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Conrady, Roland. 2007. Trends and Issues in Global Tourism. London: Springer.

Geertz, Clifford, 2003. Kebudayaan dan Agama, Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Jalaluddin,2008,Psikologi Agama (ed.Revisi), Jakarta:Raja Grafindo Persada

Kadjeng, I Nyoman, 2005Sarasamuçcaya, Surabaya: Paramita.

Kadjeng, I Nyoman, dkk. 2005.Sarasamuçcaya, Jakarta:Pustaka Mitra Jaya.

Kadjeng, I Nyoman, dkk. 2000. Sarasamuscaya: Dengan Teks Bahasa Sansekerta dan Jawa Kuno. Surabaya: Paramita.

Koentjaraningrat. 1997. Antropologi Budaya. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Koentjaraningrat. 2002. Pengantar Antropologi Pokok-pokok Etnografi II. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Milles, M.B, & Huberman, AM. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis. SagePublication Inc. Nelson, B.H. 1952. The Fifty-first Yearbook of One General Education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Moleong, Lexy. 2001. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, Lexy. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Moleong, Lexy. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Parisadha Hindu Dharma Pusat. 1985. Himpunan Keputusan Seminar Kesatuan Tafsir Terhadap Aspek-Aspek Agama Hindu I-XV. Denpasar.

Pudja, Gede, Cokorda Rai Sudharta. 1973.Manawa Dharma Sastra, Jakarta:Dirjen Bimas Hindu Budha.

Pudja, G. 1979. Sarasamuscaya. Proyek Pengadaan Kitab Suci Hindu Departemen Agama R.I: Jakarta.

Punyatmadja, IB Oka. 1984. Panca Sradha. Denpasar: Parisada Hindu Dharma Indonesia Pusat.

Pudja, Gede. 1999. Isa Upanisad, Surabaya:Paramita

Pudja, Gede, 1999 Bhagawadgita, Surabaya: Paramita.

Radhakrishnan, 2008. "Religious Truth and Symbolism" dalam "Recovery of Faith"; "Sejarah Filsafat India" oleh Dr. Heinrich Zimmer

Ramseyer, Urs dan Tisna, I Gusti Raka Panji. 2001. Bali: Living in Two Worlds. Basel: Museum der Kulturen Basel.

Semiawan, Conny, 1999. Pemikiran Fordik Tentang Reformasi Pendidikan. Harian Republika: Jakarta

Semiawan. R. Conny. 1999. Peningkatan Kemampuan Manusia Sepanjang hayat Seoptimal Mungkin, Jakarta : Grasindo

Sidharta, B Arief, 2008. Pengantar Logika. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Soebandi, Ktut. 1987. Sejarah Pembangungan Pura Pura di Bali, Denpasar : CV.KAYUMASAGUNG

Sugiyono. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D, Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta..

Titib, I Made. 1990. Pengertian Pura dan Bangunan Suci di Bali. Denpasar: Yayasan Panti Asuhan Hindu Dharmjati.

Titib, I Made. 1994. Untaian Ratna Sari Upanisad. Denpasar: Yayasan Dharma Narada.

Titib, I Made. 2003. Teologi dan Simbol-Simbol dalam Agama Hindu. Surabaya: Paramitha.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55115/bhuwana.v5i2.2302

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.