Repeatability and variability of measurements of methane and carbon dioxide production in cattle housed in open-circuit respiration chambers
Abstract
Las pruebas de recuperación de gases son necesarias cuando se emplea la técnica de cámara de respiración para medir los gases de efecto invernadero exhalados por animales domésticos. Se obtuvo un conjunto de datos de 98 mediciones individuales de producción de metano y dióxidos de carbono de ganado alojado en dos cámaras de respiración para evaluar la recolección y repetibilidad de las mediciones realizadas. Se realizó un análisis de varianza para evaluar si existían diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre cámaras y entre animales. Los resultados mostraron las ocurrencias de variaciones en la produccion de metano entre las camaras.Estas variaciones pueden deberse muy probablemente a la fuga de aire de las cámaras oa las incertidumbres en los conductos de muestra de aire y las mediciones de flujo.
Downloads
References
Arceo-Castillo, J. I., Montoya-Flores, M. D., Molina-Botero, I. C., Piñeiro-Vázquez, A. T., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., Ayala-Burgos, A. J., Solorio-Sánchez, F. J., Castelán-Ortega, O. A., Quintana-Owen, P., & Ku-Vera, J. C. (2019). Effect of the volume of methane released into respiration chambers on full system methane recovery. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 249, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.001
Beauchemin, K. A., Ungerfeld, E. M., Eckard, R. J., & Wang, M. (2020). Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal, 14, s2-s16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003100
Brask, M., Lund, P., Hellwing, A. L. F., Poulsen, M., & Weisbjerg, M. R. (2013). Enteric methane production, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed different forages with and without rapeseed fat supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 184(1-4), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.06.006
Canul-Solis, J. R., Piñeiro Vázquez, A. T., Arceo Castillo, J. I., Alayón Gamboa, J. A., Ayala Burgos, A. J., Aguilar Pérez, C. F., Solorio Sánchez, F. J., Castelán Ortega, O. A., Lachica López, M., Quintana Owen, P., & Ku Vera, J. C. (2017). Design and construction of low-cost respiration chambers for ruminal methane measurements in ruminants. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 8(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i2.4442
Congio, G. F. de S., Bannink, A., Mayorga Mogollón, O. L., Jaurena, G., Gonda, H., Gere, J. I., Cerón-Cucchi, M. E., Ortiz-Chura, A., Tieri, M. P., Hernández, O., Ricci, P., Juliarena, M. P., Lombardi, B., Abdalla, A. L., Abdalla-Filho, A. L., Berndt, A., Oliveira, P. P. A., Henrique, F. L., Monteiro, A. L. G., … Hristov, A. N. (2021). Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693
Cottle, D. J., Nolan, J. V., Wiedemann, S. G., Cottle, D. J., Nolan, J. V., & Wiedemann, S. G. (2011). Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: A review. Animal Production Science, 51(6), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10163
Dhumez, O., Tessier, J., Eugène, M., Martín-García, A. I., Eymard, A., Giger-Reverdin, S., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Muñoz-Tamayo, R. (2022). Dynamic data for determining the accuracy of four open-circuit respiration chambers designed to quantify methane emissions from goats. Animal - Open Space, 1(1), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anopes.2022.100006
Gardiner, T. D., Coleman, M. D., Innocenti, F., Tompkins, J., Connor, A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Moorby, J. M., Reynolds, C. K., Waterhouse, A., & Wills, D. (2015). Determination of the absolute accuracy of UK chamber facilities used in measuring methane emissions from livestock. Measurement, 66, 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.029
Garnsworthy, P. C., Difford, G. F., Bell, M. J., Bayat, A. R., Huhtanen, P., Kuhla, B., Lassen, J., Peiren, N., Pszczola, M., Sorg, Diana., Visker, M. H. P. W., & Yan, T. (2019). Comparison of Methods to Measure Methane for Use in Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle. Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, 9(10), 837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100837
Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (Eds.). (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Gerrits, W., Labussiere, E. Dijkstra, J., Metgess, C., Kuhla, B., Lund, P. & Weisbjerg, M.R. (2017). Letter to the Editor: Recovery test results as a prerequisite for publication of gaseous exchange measurements. Journal of Animal Science. 95:5175
Gislon, G., Colombini, S., Borreani, G., Crovetto, G. M., Sandrucci, A., Galassi, G., Tabacco, E., & Rapetti, L. (2020). Milk production, methane emissions, nitrogen, and energy balance of cows fed diets based on different forage systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(9), 8048-8061. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-18134
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Makkar, H. P. S., Adesogan, A. T., Yang, W., Lee, C., Gerber, P. J., Henderson, B., & Tricarico, J. M. (2013). SPECIAL TOPICS — Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options1. Journal of Animal Science, 91(11), 5045-5069. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6583
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995). Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 73(8), 2483-2492. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382483x
Machado, F. S., Tomich, T. R., Ferreira, A. L., Cavalcanti, L. F. L., Campos, M. M., Paiva, C. A. V., Ribas, M. N., & Pereira, L. G. R. (2016). Technical note: A facility for respiration measurements in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(6), 4899-4906. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10298
McAllister, T. A., Meale, S. J., Valle, E., Guan, L. L., Zhou, M., Kelly, W. J., Henderson, G., Attwood, G. T., & Janssen, P. H. (2015). RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Use of genomics and transcriptomics to identify strategies to lower ruminal methanogenesis1,2,3. Journal of Animal Science, 93(4), 1431-1449. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8329
Olivier, J. G. J. (2022). Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2021 Summary Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague. 72p.
Olivier, J. G. J., & Peters, J. A. H. W. (2020). Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2019 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, 70.
Patra, A. K. (2013). The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: A meta-analysis. Livestock Science, 155(2-3), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.023
Tricarico, J. M., de Haas, Y., Hristov, A. N., Kebreab, E., Kurt, T., Mitloehner, F., & Pitta, D. (2022). Symposium review: Development of a funding program to support research on enteric methane mitigation from ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-21397
United Nations Environment Programme, (UNEP). (2021). Emissions Gap Report 2021: The Heat Is On – A World of Climate Promises Not Yet Delivered. Nairobi; 112p, ISBN 978-92-807-3890-2. http://www.unep.org/es/resources/emissions-gap-report-2021
Copyright (c) 2023 Ever del Jesus Flores Santiago, Juan Carlos Ku Vera, Roberto González Garduño, Humberto Vaquera Huerta , Paulina Vásquez Mendoza, Jesús Miguel Calzada Marin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
