Abstract
The current study is a pilot survey of future research that seeks to record the views of Primary Education (PE) teachers with respect to the promotion of bioethics literacy in PE through the incorporation of bioethics in the syllabus of primary schools. In this study, which took place in Athens from March 10, 2020, until May 10, 2020, all the appropriate research tool refinements have been considered before its finalization. The snowball sampling method has been used for primary school teachers of various disciplines. Furthermore, the requirements of the mixed research (qualitative and quantitative – triangulation) are met. Research data have been collected through an open-ended type questionnaire comprising 10 questions pertaining to the incorporation of bioethics in the PE syllabus and the data process has been performed with the use of the Content Analysis Method. The majority of the participants showed a positive attitude towards the introduction of bioethics courses in PE and expressed their thoughts and concerns about the implementation of this endeavor. The most important finding is the perception on the importance of bioethics literacy in PE.
Keywords: Bioethics, Literacy, Primary Education, Good Practice
References
Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. Sage University Papers on Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Available at https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986205 accessed on 25/04/2020
Babiniotis G.F. (2005). Dictionary of Modern Greek, 2nd Ed. Athens, Lexicology Center
Booth J.M. & Garrett J.M. (2004). Instructors’ practices in and attitudes toward teaching ethics in the genetics classroom. Genetics, 2004, 168:3:1111-7
Chowning J.T., Griswold J.C., Kovarik D.N. & Collins L.J. (2012). Fostering Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Argumentation Skills through Bioethics Education. PLoS ONE. Available at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036791 accessed on 25/04/2020
Commission on The Teaching of Bioethics, Part two (1976). “The scope of Bioethics Teaching, In the Teaching of Bioethics”. (Pp:14-60). Hastings-On-Hudson, NY: The Hastings Center: Institute of Society, Ethics, and the Life sciences, p.49
Gardelli, Allerby & Persson (2014). Why philosophical ethics in school: Implications for Education in technology and in general. Ethics and Education, Vol 9, No:1, pp.16-28. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group
Georgiou M. (2016). The ability of Students to Develop Scientific Arguments in Biological Issues with Social Repercussions. Special Course Focused on the Issue of Biotechnology. PTDE, NKUA, National Archive of Ph.D. Theses
Glykofridi A. & Zapanidou Μ. (2019). Bioethics in Education. Vioithica, 5 (1), March 2019: 13-29
Helland D.E. (2001). What is Bioethics? Teaching Bioethics: Report from a seminar, November 2001, organized by the Nordic Committee on Bioethics, pp: 11-23
Klugland H. (2001). Teaching Bioethics Group Report and Final Discussions. Teaching Bioethics: Report from a seminar, November 2001, Organized by the Nordic Committee on Bioethics, pp:135-141
Knight, S. (2015). Ethical and Deliberative Skills across the Lifespan. Presentation to the Bioethics Commission. September 2, Retrieved March 23, 2016. Available at http://bioethics. gov/node/5267. /02/01/2020
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Bioethics for every generation, (2016). “Deliberation and education in Health, Science and Technology”. Washington D.C., May 2016. Available at http://www.bioethics.gov
Sadler T.D. & Donelly L.A. (2006). Socio-scientific argumentation: the effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, pp: 1463-1488
Shahadur M.D., Obbaydullah A.K.M, Sakila Y. & Chowdhury R. (2019). Teaching Moral and Ethics in Primary Education: Practices and Challenges. IJARIIE, Vol 5, issue 1, 2019, pp: 473-483.
Verma, G. & Mallick, K. (2004). Educational Research. Athens: Tipothito (in Greek)
