J Korean Acad Periodontol. 2009 Mar;39(1):53-58. Korean.
Published online Mar 31, 2009.
Copyright © 2009 Korean Academy of Periodontology
Original Article

Comparison of root resection and tunnel preparation in the clinical outcome of furcation-involved mandibular molars

Cheol-Woo Kim, Jin-Woo Park, Jo-Young Suh and Jae-Mok Lee
    • Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Received January 13, 2009; Accepted May 16, 2009.

Abstract

Purpose

The resective treatment in mandibular Degree III furcation areas includes root resection and tunnel preparation. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate which treatment procedure(root resection vs tunnel preparation) has more favorable prognosis in mandibular Degree III furcation involvement.

Materials and methods

The subjects of this study were patients who were treated their mandibular posteriors with either root resection(22 teeth on 22 patients) or tunnel preparation(24 teeth on 22 patients) and have participated in periodic recall check program for at least 2 years. Failure rate, plaque index, bleeding on probing and probing pocket depth were measured and the results were compared and statistically analysed.

Results

Failure rates of root resection and tunnel praparation were 13.6% and 16.7%, respectively, and showed no significant difference between two procedures. No significant differences were observed between two procedures with respect to plaque index, bleeding on probing and probing pocket depth.

Conclusion

root resection and tunnel preparation are both effective procedures to treat mandibular posterior furcation involvement, if adequate treatment of choice is made and patient's cooperation is accompanied. However, tunnel preparation is more preservative procedure in mandibular posterior furcation involvement since root canal treatment and prosthetic restoration are needed additionally, in case of root resection.

Keywords
root resection; tunnel preparation; mandibular Degree III furcation areas

Figures

Figure 1
Tunneling of #36: preoperative radiograph and photo.

Figure 2
Tunneling of #36: postoperative radiograph and photo (25 months).

Figure 3
Root resection of #46: preoperative radiograph and photo.

Figure 4
Root resection of #46: postoperative radiograph and photo (5 years).

Tables

Table 1
Failure Rate(Number of Extracted Teeth)

Table 2
Distribution of Teeth by Plaque Index(by Number of Teeth)

Table 3
Bleeding on Probing(by Number of Surfaces)

Table 4-1
Probing Pocket Depth-Root Resection(by Number of Surfaces)

Table 4-2
Probing Pocket Depth-Tunnel Preparation(by Number of Surfaces)

References

    1. Hamp SE, Nyman S, Lindhe J. Periodontal treatment of multirooted teeth. Results after 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:126–135.
    1. Loos B, Nylund K, Claffey N, Egelberg J. Clinical effects of root debridement in molar and non-molar teeth. A 2-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:498–504.
    1. Wang HL, Burgett FG, Shyr Y, Ramfjord S. The influence of molar furcation involvement and mobility on future clinical periodontal attachment loss. Journal of periodontology 1994;65:25–29.
    1. Kalkwarf KL, Khal WB, Patil KD. Evaluation of furcation region response to periodontal therapy. Journal of periodontology 1988;59:794–804.
    1. Dannewitz B, Krieger JK, Hüsing J, Eickholz P. Loss of molars in periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis five years or more after active periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:53–61.
    1. Vandersall DC, Detamore RJ. The mandibular molar class III furcation invasion: a review of treatment options and a case report of tunneling. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:55–60.
    1. Garrett S, Gantes B, Zimmerman G, Egelberg J. Treatment of mandibular class III periodontal furcation defects. Coronally positioned flaps with and without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes. J Periodontol 1994;65:592–597.
    1. Smulker H, Tagger M. Vital root amputation. A clinical and histolotgical study. J Periodontol 1976;47:324–330.
    1. Buhler H. Survival rates of hemisected teeth: an attempt to compare them with survival rates of alloplastic implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:536–543.
    1. Little LA, Beck FM, Bagci B, Horton JE. Lack of furcal bone loss following the tunneling procedure. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:637–641.
    1. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121–135.
    1. Langer B, Stein SD, Wagenberg B. An evaluation of root resections. A ten-years study. J Periodontol 1981;52:719–722.
    1. Buhler H. Evaluation of root-resected teeth. Results after 10 years. J Periodontol 1988;59:805–810.
    1. Carnevale G, Gianfranco D, Tonelli M, Martin C, Massimo F. A retro-spective analysis of the periodotal prosthetic treatment of molars with interradicular lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:189–205.
    1. Hellden LB, Elliot A, Steffensen B, Steffensen JE. The prognosis of tunnel preparations in treatment of class III furcations. A follow-up study. J Periodontol 1989;60:182–187.
    1. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding-a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971;15:107–113.
    1. Ravald N, Hamp SE. Prediction of root surface caries in patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:400–414.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 4

Tables

1 / 5

PERMALINK