Ann Dermatol. 2023 Oct;35(5):367-373. English.
Published online Sep 22, 2023.
Copyright © The Korean Dermatological Association and The Korean Society for Investigative Dermatology
Original Article

Clinical Findings, Response to Steroid Treatment, and Recurrence Rate in Alopecia Areata Patients with or without a Nonsynonymous Variant of Coiled-Coil Alpha-Helical Rod Protein 1

Satoshi Koyama,1 Nagisa Yoshihara,1 Atsushi Takagi,1 Etsuko Komiyama,1 Akira Oka,3,4 and Shigaku Ikeda1,2
    • 1Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
    • 2Atopy (Allergy) Research Center, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
    • 3The Institute of Medical Sciences, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
    • 4Department of Molecular Life Sciences, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Received January 04, 2023; Revised May 15, 2023; Accepted May 22, 2023.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is considered complex genetic and tissue-specific autoimmune disease. We recently discovered a nonsynonymous variant in the coiled-coil alpha-helical rod protein 1 (CCHCR1) gene within the AA risk haplotype. And a water avoidance stress test on CCHCR1 knockout mice induced AA-like lesions.

Objective

To investigate the difference clinical findings of AA in patients with the CCHCR1 variant and without.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data from 142 AA patients. Among these patients, 20 (14.1%) had a variant of CCHCR1. We evaluated the sex distribution of the patients, age at onset, distribution of the clinical types, prevalence of a positive family history of AA, prevalence of association of AA with atopic dermatitis, response to steroid therapy, and recurrence rate. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis and Fisher’s exact test for statistical analysis. We also investigate electron microscopic observations of hair samples with the CCHCR1 variant and without.

Results

The results showed a significant correlation between the CCHCR1 variant and the recurrence rate compared with the variant-negative group (p=0.0072). Electron microscopy revealed abnormalities in the hair shaft structure and hair cuticle in patients with the CCHCR1 variant (p=0.00174).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that AA with CCHCR1 variant is clinically characterized by a high recurrence rate and hair morphological abnormality.

Keywords
Alopecia areata; CCHCR1; Genes; Phenotype

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) is a disease in which oval nonscarring hair loss occurs on the head or the whole body, sometimes recurrently1. Although factors such as autoimmunity and heredity are thought to be involved, the precise cause of AA remains unknown. A study investigating the incidence of AA and the predominant age and sex groups affected by the disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, United States, reported an incidence of 20.2 per 10,000 people (0.2%), a mean age of the affected population of 33 years, and no sex differences in incidence2. In addition, genome-wide association studies have suggested an association between AA and the gene encoding human leukocyte antigen (HLA) located on the short arm of chromosome3, which is known to be genetically associated with number of autoimmune diseases4, 5, 6.

We recently discovered a variant (rs142986308, p. Arg-587Trp) in the coiled-coil alpha-helical rod protein 1 gene (CCHCR1) as the only non-synonymous variant un the AA risk haplotype3. The mice engineered to have this risk allele showed AA-like hair loss. These results indicate the possibility of elucidating the pathogenesis of AA, the cause of which is unknown, and developing new diagnostic methods and treatment methods for each type based on the presence or absence of risk alleles. The variant rs142986308 was detected only in East Asian individuals (allele frequency: 0.0277), suggesting that it is population specific. According to the alle frequency aggregator project, which provides total allele frequencies from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes, the minor allele frequency of rs142986308 is A=0.001434/280. We also reported that approximately 15% of AA patients carry a mutated CCHCR1 gene, that CCHCR1-variant genome-edited mice and CCHCR1 knockout mice show AA-like hair loss, and that expression of keratinization-related proteins involved in hair shaft formation is altered in both mice and AA patients carrying the variant3, 7. These findings suggest involvement of CCHCR1 in the pathogenesis of AA. CCHCR1 has been reported to be related to psoriasis vulgaris, and there are some studies suggesting a relationship with keratinizing-related protein, keratin, and hair-related protein. In this study, we statistically analyzed the clinical findings of AA in patients with the CCHCR1 variant. Patients with the variant responded well to steroid treatment but showed a significantly higher recurrence rate than the variant-negative group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

DNA was collected from blood samples from 227 patients who had visited Juntendo University Hospital and had been diagnosed with AA by a dermatologist according to Japanese guidelines for AA8. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA blood kit (QIAGEN) under standardized conditions to prevent variations in DNA quality. For additional quality control, we used 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis to check for DNA degradation and/or RNA contamination and performed optical density measurements to assess protein contamination. The final DNA concentration was determined with 3 successive measurements using a PicoGreen fluorescence assay (Molecular Probes; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Data from 142 patients, of whom 20 had been identified as carrying the variant of CCHCR1, who could be followed up subsequently for all of the following clinical assessments, were compared to evaluate the clinical symptoms of AA patients without the variant. The clinical items assessed in this study were the sex distribution of the patients, age at onset, distribution of the clinical types, prevalence of a positive family history of AA, prevalence of the association of AA with atopic dermatitis, response to systemic steroid therapy, and recurrence rate. Seven of the AA patients with the CCHCR1 variant and 18 patients without the variant continued to visit our hospital. We telephoned and interviewed those patients who did not visit our hospital during the research and patients who did not have sufficient medical records.

The types of hair loss were classified into solitary, multifocal, ophiasis, totalis, and universalis according to the guidelines. A family history of AA in first- and second-degree relatives was obtained. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by two or more dermatologists. Systemic steroid therapy included oral steroid and intravenous injection but did not include topical treatment. Recurrence-free cases were defined as no recurrence from the time of symptom improvement to the present study period, and those with no recurrence persisting for more than one year. This study was a retrospective study conducted 10 years after the first visit.

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of Juntendo University (reference number: 2013097) and Ethics Committee of Tokai University (reference number: 131-07). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Statistical analysis

The analysis software which name is Easy R was used for the statistical analyses9. The 10% confidence intervals (CIs) of the means were calculated for the continuous variables. For intergroup comparisons of categorical data, we used multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the odds ratios, their 95% CIs, and p values to determine the significant differences between the groups with and without the variant. In addition, for analysis of the therapeutic efficacy and recurrence rate, Fisher’s exact test was used. We also used Student's t-test to compare hair cross-sections. p values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Electron microscopy

To examine the morphology of the hair shaft, approximately 10 hair samples near the site of hair loss in three AA patients with the variant and one AA patient without the variant were cut as close as possible to the root for comparison by electron microscopic. The hair shafts were dehydrated in 100% ethanol. After coating with platinum, the samples were examined with an S-4800 field-emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi). To objectively evaluate the shape of the cross-section of the hairs, we measured the length of the major axis and the length of the minor axis. Values are reported rounded down to the third decimal place.

RESULTS

All 227 patients diagnosed with AA were of Japanese origin. Of the 227, the variant was identified by DNA analysis in 25 (11.0%) patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of 142 patients who could be followed up. Of the 142 patients, 20 (14.1%) had the variant, while the remaining 122 (85.9%) did not.

The group with the variant included 8 males (40.0%) and 12 females (60.0%), and the group without the variant consisted of 48 males (39.3%) and 74 females (60.7%) (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
The relationship between each parameter with and without the variant. There was a significant difference between the patients with or without a variant in terms of recurrence. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in other clinical features. In each figure, the group with Variant is on the left side, and the group without Variant is on the right side. (A) Sex. (B) Age distribution. (C) Pattern of AA. (D) Family history of Alopecia areata (AA). (E) Atopic dermatitis complication. (F) Oral corticosteroids. (G) Therapeutic effect. (H) Recurrence. N.S.: nonsignificant, AU: alopecia universalis, AT: alopecia totalis, MAA: multifocal AA, SAA: solitary AA. *Statistical significance by Fisher’s exact test (p<0.05).

The age at onset of hair loss (mean±standard deviation) was 33.45±10.52 years in the group with the variant and 27.52±2.84 years in the group without the variant. Thus, while the age at onset of hair loss was not significantly different between the two groups, it tended to be higher in the group with the variant. Fig. 1B shows the age distribution in the two groups. In the group with the variant, although AA was experienced by males of all ages, in the female subgroup, the disease mainly manifested in women who were in their 30s or older. On the other hand, in the group without the variant, AA was not experienced by any male patients in their 40s or older, while it manifested in females of all ages.

Next, regarding the types of hair loss in patients with AA, multifocal AA (MAA) was the most common (n=12) type, accounting for 60.0% of all cases, followed by alopecia universalis (AU) (n=4; 20.0%) and alopecia totalis (AT) (n=4, 20.0%) in the group with the variant. None of the patients had solitary AA (SAA) or ophiasis AA (OAA). On the other hand, 59 (48.4%) had MAA, 45 (36.9%) had AU, 10 (8.2%) had AT, 4 (3.3%) had OAA, and 4 (3.3%) had SAA in the patient group without the variant. (Fig. 1C). Five (25.0%) of the 20 patients with the variant and 32 of the 122 patients (26.2%) without the variant had a positive family history (Fig. 1D). Five of the 20 (25.0%) patients with the variant and 29 of the 122 patients (23.8%) without the variant had atopic dermatitis (including childhood atopic dermatitis alone) (Fig. 1E).

Of the 20 patients with the variant, 15 (75.0%) received systemic steroid therapy (prednisolone 0.2~0.4 mg/kg/day). Of the remaining 5 patients in this group who did not receive systemic steroid therapy, 4 had MAA, and the remaining 1 had AT. These patients received a local injection of betamethasone sodium phosphate and topical betamethasone butyrate propionate application. Of the 122 patients without the variant, 68 (55.7%) received systemic steroid therapy (Fig. 1F), and the remaining received local injection of betamethasone sodium phosphate injection, topical betamethasone butyrate propionate application, oral glycyrrhizin/glycine/DL-methionine combination tablets, oral cepharanthine tablets, or other treatments.

Regarding the therapeutic efficacy, all 20 (100%) patients with the variant responded to systemic or topical steroid therapy; however, all 20 (100%) patients experienced recurrence within a relatively short time after therapy discontinuation. On the other hand, in the group without the variant, the symptoms improved or resolved in 65 of the 68 patients (95.6%) who had received steroid therapy and 47 of the 54 patients (87.0%) who had not. Of the 112 who responded to treatment, 48 (70.6%) of the patients who had received steroid therapy and 42 (77.8%) of the patients who had not received steroid therapy developed recurrence of the disease (Fig. 1G, H). Two-tailed Fisher’s test revealed that the recurrence rate was significantly higher in AA patients with the variant than in those without the variant (p=0.0248) (Fig. 1H). In addition, no risk factors such as sex, age at onset, type of hair loss (solitary, universalis, etc.), family history of AA, and/or atopic dermatitis complications were identified. Electron microscopic observations of hair samples revealed disorganized hair epithelium in the close skin surface and intermediate region in patients with the variant compared to those without the variant. Moreover, the long-axis/short-axis ratio was close to 1 in the patient without the variant, but it was significantly larger in the group with the CCHCR1 variant (p=0.00174). This result suggests that the transverse hair sections were circular in patients without the variant but elliptical in those with the variant (Fig. 2, 3).

Fig. 2
Electron microscopic findings of hair. Electron microscopic findings of hair were performed using AA patients. Electron microscopic findings showed abnormalities in hair shaft structure and hair epithelium in the hair of patients with CCHCR1 variants but no abnormalities in the hair morphology of patients without CCHCR1 variants. CCHCR1: coiled-coil alpha-helical rod protein 1.

Fig. 3
Comparison of the long-axis/short-axis ratio of hair. Comparison of the long-axis/short-axis ratio of hair between the patients with the variant and the patient without the variant. The ratio was significantly larger in the group with the CCHCR1 variant (p=0.00174). *Significance by Fisher’s exact test (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

The prevalence and lifetime incidence of AA are thought to be 0.1% to 0.2% and approximately 2%, respectively. AA occurs even in young age groups, and in particular, AT or AU markedly reduces the quality of life of patients by affecting their appearance10. Although treatment with steroids or local immunotherapy improves AA in many cases, there are some refractory patients, and others develop repeated recurrences, with no adequately effective treatment having been developed to date. The autoimmune response against the anagen hair bulb is thought to be the major mechanism underlying the development of AA. As the background for such predisposition, many genes and other factors are thought to be involved in the development of AA, and research to identify the precise causative genes for AA is underway around the world.

We recently identified the CCHCR1 gene as a susceptibility gene by association analysis and next-generation sequencing of the HLA region. We further revealed that CCHCR1-variant genome-edited mice and CCHCR1 knockout mice develop AA-like lesions, indicating that the CCHCR1 variant or defect is a risk factor for AA6, 7.

Among AA patients, while the clinical symptoms look similar, the clinical course is often variable. For example, in cases of AT, steroid pulse therapy is often used, but the response to therapy can differ. Therefore, it remains difficult to predict the clinical course and determine who will relapse before treatment. It would be favorable to know which factors (i.e., age at onset, clinical types, family history of AA, complications of atopic dermatitis) could predict the risk of recurrence of AA11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.

In this study, we compared the sex, age at onset, clinical types, family history, association of atopic dermatitis, response to steroid therapy, and recurrence rate between patients with and without the variant. We also evaluated the structure of hair obtained from patients with or without the variant by electron microscopy.

The results showed that the mean age at disease onset in patients with the variant was 33.45±10.52 years and tended to be higher than that in the group without the variant. In addition, in the group without the variant, AA was experienced by women of all ages, while in the group with the variant, there were no cases in women younger than 30 years of age (Fig. 1B). The relationship between CCHCR1 variants and age of onset of AA is currently unknown.

The CCHCR1 gene has been reported to be involved in the development of the hair shaft structure6, 7. Based on electron micrographs of hair samples from patients with the variant, the hair epithelium was disordered, with cross-sectional deformation. In general, immune privilege collapse around hair follicles is thought to be the mechanism underlying the development of AA18, 19, 20. Our previous and present studies imply that other pathological conditions, such as hair fragility, may be involved in the development of AA in a subset of patients with the CCHCR1 variant6, 7. Our basic research reveals that rack of CCHCR1 shows the reduction of the expression of keratinization-related proteins and the expression of hair-related genes. Fuentes-Duculan et al.21 showed downregulation of several hair keratins in lesions of AA patients and demonstrated concurrent activation of Th1 and Th2 immune axes in AA. Similarly, Th1/Th2 may act together in CCHCR1-related AA, and we also need to analyze cytokine expression in the future.

AA is a multifactorial disease involving many triggers. Variant of CCHCR1 gene is thought to be one of many causative factors. For example, it has been reported that the combination of certain drugs and certain genetic mutations can cause generalized pustular psoriasis22. Similarly, this type of AA may be a multifactorial disease triggered by stress load and other factors.

Regarding the function of the CCHCR1 protein, it has been reported to be involved in multiple different biological processes, including not only keratinization of the skin and hair but also cytoskeletal regulation and muscle differentiation23, 24, 25, 26. Furthermore, a CCHCR1 gene variant (CCHCR1*WWCC) has been reported to reduce the amount of pregnenolone in steroidogenic cells and may have some effect on the intrinsic immune privilege of the anagen hair bulb27. The finding that all patients with the variant responded to treatment but had a high rate of recurrence might support this possibility.

The treatment of AA has entered a new era, and not only steroids but also JAK inhibitors have been added to the treatment options. CCHCR1 may be used as a prognostic marker for choosing short-term steroid administration in deciding treatment options, and further research is needed to investigate the relationship between AA and CCHCR1.

Our goal for the future is tailor-made medical treatment, such as whether to perform systemic steroid therapy according to diagnosis based on the presence or absence of the CCHCR1 variant. This approach may reduce the frequency of unnecessary systemic steroid therapy, and further studies are needed to increase the number of patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Biomedical Research Core Facilities, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:The authors have nothing to disclose.

FUNDING SOURCE:This work was supported in part by s Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (AO or SI).

DATA SHARING STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

    1. Wasserman D, Guzman-Sanchez DA, Scott K, McMichael A. Alopecia areata. Int J Dermatol 2007;46:121–131.
    1. Safavi KH, Muller SA, Suman VJ, Moshell AN, Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of alopecia areata in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1975 through 1989. Mayo Clin Proc 1995;70:628–633.
    1. Oka A, Takagi A, Komiyama E, Yoshihara N, Mano S, Hosomichi K, et al. Alopecia areata susceptibility variant in MHC region impacts expressions of genes contributing to hair keratinization and is involved in hair loss. EBioMedicine 2020;57:102810
    1. Petukhova L, Duvic M, Hordinsky M, Norris D, Price V, Shimomura Y, et al. Genome-wide association study in alopecia areata implicates both innate and adaptive immunity. Nature 2010;466:113–117.
    1. Betz RC, Petukhova L, Ripke S, Huang H, Menelaou A, Redler S, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis in alopecia areata resolves HLA associations and reveals two new susceptibility loci. Nat Commun 2015;6:5966
    1. Forstbauer LM, Brockschmidt FF, Moskvina V, Herold C, Redler S, Herzog A, et al. Genome-wide pooling approach identifies SPATA5 as a new susceptibility locus for alopecia areata. Eur J Hum Genet 2012;20:326–332.
    1. Zhao Q, Koyama S, Yoshihara N, Takagi A, Komiyama E, Wada A, et al. The alopecia areata phenotype is induced by the water avoidance stress test in cchcr1-deficient mice. Biomedicines 2021;9:840
    1. Fukuyama M, Ito T, Ohyama M. Alopecia areata: current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines. J Dermatol 2022;49:19–36.
    1. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013;48:452–458.
    1. Rencz F, Gulacsi L, Pentek M, Wikonkal N, Baji P, Brodszky V. Alopecia areata and health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2016;175:561–571.
    1. Alkhalifah A, Alsantali A, Wang E, McElwee KJ, Shapiro J. Alopecia areata update: part I. Clinical picture, histopathology, and pathogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:177–188.
    1. Tosti A, Bellavista S, Iorizzo M. Alopecia areata: a long term follow-up study of 191 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:438–441.
    1. De Waard-van der Spek FB, Oranje AP, De Raeymaecker DM, Peereboom-Wynia JD. Juvenile versus maturity-onset alopecia areata--a comparative retrospective clinical study. Clin Exp Dermatol 1989;14:429–433.
    1. You HR, Kim SJ. Factors associated with severity of alopecia areata. Ann Dermatol 2017;29:565–570.
    1. Mohan GC, Silverberg JI. Association of vitiligo and alopecia areata with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2015;151:522–528.
    1. Goh C, Finkel M, Christos PJ, Sinha AA. Profile of 513 patients with alopecia areata: associations of disease subtypes with atopy, autoimmune disease and positive family history. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:1055–1060.
    1. Wang S, Ratnaparkhi R, Piliang M, Bergfeld WF. Role of family history in patchy alopecia areata. Dermatol Online J 2018;24:13030/qt0n19r7ps
    1. Paus R, Nickoloff BJ, Ito T. A 'hairy' privilege. Trends Immunol 2005;26:32–40.
    1. Paus R, Slominski A, Czarnetzki BM. Is alopecia areata an autoimmune-response against melanogenesis-related proteins, exposed by abnormal MHC class I expression in the anagen hair bulb? Yale J Biol Med 1993;66:541–554.
    1. Gilhar A, Paus R, Kalish RS. Lymphocytes, neuropeptides, and genes involved in alopecia areata. J Clin Invest 2007;117:2019–2027.
    1. Fuentes-Duculan J, Gulati N, Bonifacio KM, Kunjravia N, Zheng X, Suarez-Farinas M, et al. Biomarkers of alopecia areata disease activity and response to corticosteroid treatment. Exp Dermatol 2016;25:282–286.
    1. Sakai H, Nomura W, Fukushima H, Sugiura K, Iizuka H. Terbinafine-induced generalized pustular psoriasis in a patient carrying CARD14 mutation. J Dermatol 2019;46:e110–e112.
    1. Tervaniemi MH, Siitonen HA, Soderhall C, Minhas G, Vuola J, Tiala I, et al. Centrosomal localization of the psoriasis candidate gene product, CCHCR1, supports a role in cytoskeletal organization. PLoS One 2012;7:e49920
    1. Tervaniemi MH, Katayama S, Skoog T, Siitonen HA, Vuola J, Nuutila K, et al. Intracellular signalling pathways and cytoskeletal functions converge on the psoriasis candidate gene CCHCR1 expressed at P-bodies and centrosomes. BMC Genomics 2018;19:432
    1. Corbi N, Bruno T, De Angelis R, Di Padova M, Libri V, Di Certo MG, et al. RNA polymerase II subunit 3 is retained in the cytoplasm by its interaction with HCR, the psoriasis vulgaris candidate gene product. J Cell Sci 2005;118(Pt 18):4253–4260.
    1. Brenner LN, Mercader JM, Robertson CC, Cole J, Chen L, Jacobs SBR, et al. Analysis of glucocorticoid-related genes reveal CCHCR1 as a new candidate gene for type 2 diabetes. J Endocr Soc 2020;4:bvaa121
    1. Tiala I, Suomela S, Huuhtanen J, Wakkinen J, Holtta-Vuori M, Kainu K, et al. The CCHCR1 (HCR) gene is relevant for skin steroidogenesis and downregulated in cultured psoriatic keratinocytes. J Mol Med (Berl) 2007;85:589–601.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 3

PERMALINK