Abstract
The paper suggests that casting the choice problem in terms of alternative time-consuming activities can foster the fruitful cross-fertilization between economics and psychology along the lines suggested by Scitovsky in the Joyless Economy. The first part emphasizes how mainstream, utility-based choice theory has eradicated “time” from the analysis, in contrast with the seminal contribution to the subjective theory of value proposed by Gossen in 1858. The limits of Becker’s well-known approach to time-use are also analyzed. The second part opens with the presentation of an alternative approach based on activities, intended as productive processes allowing for pleasant time to be produced by consuming “direct” unpleasant time plus the “indirect” amount of unpleasant time equivalent to the market goods used up as inputs (Nisticò, Production of (Pleasant) Time by Means of (Unpleasant) Time: Some Notes on Consumption Theory and Time Use, 2014). Finally, the approach is applied to an intertemporal context by drawing on Hicks’s temporary equilibrium method. Scitovsky’s distinction between defensive and creative activities is discussed in conclusion, suggesting that individuals might refrain from engaging in more skilled, time-consuming activities because of the attractiveness of a certain, higher present-period rate of return of less skilled, goodsintensive activities.
References
Andrews, P.W.S. (1949). A Reconsideration of the Theory of the Individual Business. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 1(1): 54–89. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2661938?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041062Search in Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. The Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517. http://www.unc.edu/~shanda/courses/plcy289/Becker_EJ_Time.pdf10.2307/2228949Search in Google Scholar
Bianchi, M. (1998). The Active Consumer, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Camerer, C., Babcock L., Loewenstein G. and Thaler, R. (1997). Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 407–441. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/112/2/407.short10.1162/003355397555244Search in Google Scholar
Collewet, M. (2014). Approaches to Well-Being, Use of Psychology and Paternalism in Economics. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8 (2014-32): 1—25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-3210.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-32Search in Google Scholar
Eurobarometer (2012). Active Aging Report. Special Eurobarometer 378 / Wave EB76.2. Conducted by TNS Opinion & Social at the request of Directorate–General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_378_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, F. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40(2): 351–401. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/00220510232016131110.1257/jel.40.2.351Search in Google Scholar
Georgescu–Roegen, N. (1983). Herman Heinrich Gossen: His Life and Works in Historical Perspective. Introductory Essay to The Laws of Human Relations, by H. H. Gossen, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Glaeser, E.L. (2004). Psychology and the Market. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association 94( 2): 408–413.10.3386/w10203Search in Google Scholar
Gossen, H.H. 1983 [1854]. The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haisley, E., Mostafa, R. and Loewenstein, G. (2008), Subjective Relative Income and Lottery Ticket Purchases. Journal of Behavior Decision Making 21(3): 283–295. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdm.588/abstract10.1002/bdm.588Search in Google Scholar
Hahn F.H. (1984). Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Hargreaves Heap, S.P. (2014). Social Influences towards Conformism in Economic Experiments. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Vol. 8, 2014-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economicsejournal.ja.2014-22Search in Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R. (1925). The Economic Problem. London: Longmans, GreenSearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1946). Value and Capital. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. (1930). Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/econ116a/keynes1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Koopmans C. (1960). Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience. Econometrica 28(2): 287–309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907722?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.2307/1907722Search in Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy 74(2): 132–157. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1828835?origin=JSTORpdf&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1086/259131Search in Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer Demand: A New Approach. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Linder, S. (1970). The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. 8th edition. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J.S. (2001). Consumption, Preferences and the Evolutionary Agenda. In Witt, U. (ed.), Escaping Satiation. The Demand Side of Economic Growth. Berlin: Springer10.1007/978-3-662-04528-2_4Search in Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Search in Google Scholar
Moscati, I. (2007). Early Experiments in Consumer Demand Theory: 1930–1970. History of Political Economy 39(3): 359–401. http://hope.dukejournals.org/content/39/3/359.full.pdf10.1215/00182702-2007-015Search in Google Scholar
Moscati, I. (2013). Were Jevons, Menger and Walras Really Cardinalists? On the Notion of Measurement in Utility Theory, Psychology, Mathematics and Other Disciplines, 1870–1910. History of Political Economy 45: 373–414.Search in Google Scholar
Nisticò, S. (2002). Classical-type Temporary Positions: A Cost-plus Model. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 25(1): 83–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4538813?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1080/01603477.2002.11051350Search in Google Scholar
Nisticò, S. (2005). Consumption and Time in Economics: Prices and Quantities in a Temporary Equilibrium Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 943–957. http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/29/6/943.full.pdf10.1093/cje/bei070Search in Google Scholar
Nisticò, S. (2014). Production of (Pleasant) Time by Means of (Unpleasant) Time: Some Notes on Consumption Theory and Time Use. Metroeconomica 65(2): 276–297. DOI: 10.1111/meca.12040.ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v65y2014i2p276-297.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Nisticò, S. and D’Orlando F. (1998). Some Questions for New Keynesians. In New Keynesian Economics/Post Keynesian Alternatives. Edited by Roy Rotheim, London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Prelec D. and Loewenstein G. (1991). Decision Making over Time and under Uncertainty: A Common Approach. Management Science 37(7): 770–786. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632534?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770Search in Google Scholar
Scitovsky, T. (1992 [1976]). The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction. Revised edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L. (1943). The Expectational Dynamics of the Individual. Economica 10(38): 99–129. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2549459?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents10.2307/2549459Search in Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (2001). Consumption Takes Time—Implications for Economic Theory. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203519455Search in Google Scholar
Stigler G. J. and G. S. Becker (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review 67, (2): 76-90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1807222Search in Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. (1991). Quasi Rational Economics. London: Russell Sage Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Winston G.C. (1982). The Timing of Economic Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Witt, U. (2001). Escaping Satiation. The Demand Side of Economic Growth. Berlin, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-04528-2Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 Sergio Nisticò, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
