Managerial Ability and Managerial Knowledge for Technology Investment in 4.0 Era
PDF

Keywords

Managerial Ability
Investment Technology
Managerial Knowledge

Categories

How to Cite

Wardhanie, A. P. ., & Arnandy, D. A. . (2021). Managerial Ability and Managerial Knowledge for Technology Investment in 4.0 Era. Procedia Business and Financial Technology, 1. https://doi.org/10.47494/pbft.2021.1.5

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the influence of managerial skills and managerial knowledge on technology investment in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 on SMEs in the city of Surabaya. The sampling technique used was a survey by distributing questionnaires to respondents. The population selected in this study is the SMEs in the city of Surabaya. The number of samples in this study was 36 people. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple regression analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program. The results of this study are that managerial ability is not a partially significant positive effect on technology investment, but managerial knowledge has a significant positive effect on technology investment. However, simultaneously managerial skills and managerial knowledge have a significant positive effect on technology investment.

https://doi.org/10.47494/pbft.2021.1.5
PDF

References

T. Aquinus, “Pertumbuhan UKM Surabaya Terus Meningkat,” 2018. [Online]. Available: preneur.trubus.id. [Accessed: 16-Aug-2019].

B. C. Page, S. B., Stone, M. M., Bryson, J. M., &

Crosby, "Public value creation by cross-sector collaborations: A framework and challenges of assessment," Public Adm., vol. 93(3), pp. 715–732, 2015.

M. Kavaratzis, "Cities and their brands: Lessons from corporate branding," Place Brand. Public Dipl., vol. 5(1), pp. 26–37, 2009.

R. Paddison, "City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration," Urban Stud., vol. 30(2), pp. 339–350, 1993.

P. W. dan U. H. Hendarti, Handayani, “Analisis Fungsionalitas Open Source Software ERP untuk Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran ERP,” vol. 7 (2), pp. 118–125, 2011.

P. L. M. A.M. Adrian, S.H. Norwood, “Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies,” Comput. Electron. Agric, vol. 48, pp. 256– 271, 2005.

J. D. L. M.H. Castle, B.D. Lubben, “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies by Nebraska Producers Retrieved at: University of Nebraska Presentations,” 49, 2016.

T. E. S. J.B. Sorensen, “No TitleAging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 45 (1), pp. 81–112, 2000.

F. Annosia, M. C., Brunettab, F., Montic, A., Nati, “Is the trend your friend? An analysis of technology 4.0 investment decisions in agricultural SMEs,” Comput. Ind., vol. 109, pp. 59–71, 2019.

J. P. Walsh, “Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane,” Organ. Sci., vol. 6 (3), pp. 280–321.

C. Y. C. W.T. Hsu, H.L. Chen, “Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: the moderating effects of CEO attributes,” J. World Bus., vol. 48 (1), pp. 1–12,2013.

W. B. T. L. Tihanyi, “Information-processing demands and the multinational enterprise: a comparison of foreign and domestic earnings estimates,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 58 (3), pp. 285–292, 2005.

K. E. W. R.L. Daft, “Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 9, pp. 284–295, 1984.

W. Ocasio, “Towards an attention-based view of the firm,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 18, pp. 198–206, 1997.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Ayouvi Poerna Wardhanie, Didiet Anindita Arnandy