Morphometric Examination of Anogenital Distance, Penis and Clitoris Dimensions in Human Fetuses
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
P: 252-257
September 2023

Morphometric Examination of Anogenital Distance, Penis and Clitoris Dimensions in Human Fetuses

J Ankara Univ Fac Med 2023;76(3):252-257
1. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Mersin, Türkiye
2. Mersin Üniversitesi, İçel Sağlık Yüksek Okulu, Mersin, Türkiye
3. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anatomi Anabilim Dalı, Mersin, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 14.08.2023
Accepted Date: 10.09.2023
Publish Date: 24.10.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

In the study, morphometric measurements of anogenital distance, penis and clitoris dimensions were taken in female and male fetuses. In this way, it is aimed to contribute to the determination of antenatal period standards related to the subject.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty-five fetuses were included in the study. The anogenital distance was measured as the anus midline-posterior fourchette in girls, and the anus midline-posterior scrotal raphe in boys. Clitoris length and clitoral glans width were measured in female fetuses. Penis (glans) width and penis length were measured in male fetuses.

Results:

Of the 55 fetuses, 29 were female, 26 were male. Anogenital distance values were found to be significantly higher in male fetuses in both second and third trimesters compared to female fetuses (p=0.031). While a significant relationship was found between anogenital distance and phallus length values in male fetuses, no significant relationship was found in female fetuses (p<0.001), (p=0.212). In the second trimester, values of phallus length less than 5.58 mm and phallus width less than 4.55 mm are associated with female gender. In the third trimester, phallus length less than 4.79 mm and phallus width less than 5.08 mm were found to be associated with female gender (p<0.0001), (p=0.0003).

Conclusion:

It is thought that the reference values determined in the study regarding the phallus dimensions and the relationship of these values with the anogenital distance may contribute to the issues of deviation from normal and sex determination in the antenatal period.

Keywords: Anogenital Distance, Penis, Clitoris

REFERENCES

1Odeh M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Hypospadias mimicking female genitalia on early second trimester sonographic examination. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36:581-583.
2Romano-Riquer SP, Hernández-Avila M, Gladen BC, et al. Reliability and determinants of anogenital distance and penis dimensions in male newborns from Chiapas, Mexico. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:219-228.
3İsbir C, Elvan Ö, Taşkınlar H, et al. Assessment of clitoral anatomy in human fetuses. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42:453-459.
4Taşkınlar H, Elvan Ö, İsbir C, et al. Anogenital distance and anal position index in cadaveric human fetuses. Anat Sci Int. 2023;98:155-163.
5Leihy MW, Shaw G, Wilson JD, et al. Development of the penile urethra in the tammar wallaby. Sex Dev. 2011;5:241-249.
6Butler CM, Shaw G, Renfree MB. Development of the penis and clitoris in the tammar wallaby, Macropus eugenii. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1999;199:451-457.
7Zimmer EZ, Blazer S, Blumenfeld Z, et al. Fetal transient clitoromegaly and transient hypertrophy of the labia minora in early and mid pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:409-415.
8Efrat Z, Akinfenwa OO, Nicolaides KH. First-trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;13:305-307.
9Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, et al. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology. 2016;4:616-625.
10Hernández-Peñalver AI, Sánchez-Ferrer ML, Mendiola J, et al. Assessment of anogenital distance as a diagnostic tool in polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37:741-749.
11Aydin E, Holt R, Chaplin D, et al. Fetal anogenital distance using ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39:527-535.
12Vocel J, Marková H. Význam vrásnĕní plosky a délky nohy pro upresnĕní gestacního vĕku novorozence [Signifivance of sole dermatoglyphics and of foot length in the accurate determination of gestational age in newborn infants]. Cesk Pediatr. 1978;33:618-620.
13Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, et al. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:132-135.
14Liu C, Xu X, Huo X. Anogenital distance and its application in environmental health research. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21:5457-5764.
15Salazar-Martinez E, Romano-Riquer P, Yanez-Marquez E, et al. Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environ Health. 2004;3:8.
16Suryana Y, Makhmudi A. Assessment of the normal anal position index (API) of Indonesian neonates. J Med Sci. 2018;50:431-435.
17Bowman CJ, Barlow NJ, Turner KJ, et al. Effects of in utero exposure to finasteride on androgen-dependent reproductive development in the male rat. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74:393-406.
18Swan SH, Main KM, Liu F, et al. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1056-1061.
19Kutlu A, Akbiyik F. Clitoral length in female newborns: a new approach to the assessment of clitoromegaly. Turk J Med Sci. 2011;41:495-499.
20Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity? Horm Res. 2001;55:278-281.
21Asafo-Agyei SB, Ameyaw E, Chanoine JP, et al. Clitoral size in term newborns in Kumasi, Ghana. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;2017:6.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House