Open Access, Peer-reviewed
pISSN 2093-4378
eISSN 2093-4386
    J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2013 Mar;20(1):28-33. Korean.
    Published online Mar 31, 2013.
    https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2013.20.1.28
    © Copyright 2013 Korean Society of Spine Surgery
    Original Article

    Usefulness of the ProSet MRI for Diagnosis of the Extraforaminal Disc Herniation

    Myun-Whan Ahn, M.D., Ui-Sik Kim, M.D. and Gi-Beom Kim, M.D.
      • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
    • Corresponding author: Myun-Whan Ahn, M.D. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daemyong-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu, South Korea. TEL: 82-53-620-3640, FAX: 82-53-628-4020, Email: mwahn@med.yu.ac.kr
    Received November 08, 2012; Revised December 27, 2012; Accepted March 18, 2013.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Study Design

    This is a retrospective study.

    Objectives

    The purpose of this study is to confirm the clinical usefulness of utilizing ProSet imaging for checking the nerve root compression and swelling in extraforaminal disc herniation.

    Summary of Literature Review

    Diagnosing extraforaminal disc herniations can be neglected with using a conventional MRI.

    Materials and Methods

    A retrospective analysis was performed on 25 patients, who underwent both conventional & Principles of the selective excitation technique (ProSet) MR imaging for the evaluation of extraforaminal disc herniation, from April 2008 to October 2010. Radiographic analysis was based on the notion that the degree of nerve root compression and swelling was decided by Pfirrmann's classification.

    Results

    Severe compression in the ProSet 3D rendering image was observed in 21 subjects, as compared with 8 subjects in the conventional axial image. Especially, nothing was ever detected in the conventional sagittal image. Severe compression in the ProSet 3D rendering image was observed in 4 subjects, while their nerve root compression was not clear in the conventional axial image. Severe compression and severe swelling in the ProSet 3D & coronal image was observed in 15 subjects, while their nerve root compression was none or not clear in the conventional sagittal image. The swelling degree of the ProSet coronal image turned out bigger than the swelling degree of conventional axial image, and the signal intensity change was also obvious.

    Conclusions

    ProSet imaging is regarded useful to investigate the symptom triggering nerves, because ProSet image not only observes better nerve root compression, but also identifies the swelling degree more easily than that of the conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Keywords
    Extraforaminal disc herniation; MRI; Principles of the selective excitation technique (ProSet) MRI

    Figures

    Fig. 1
    Schematic diagram of a system for grading lumbar nerve root compromise in coronal plane and axial plane. (A) No compromise of the nerve root. (B) Contact of disc material with the right exiting nerve root. The nerve root is in the normal position and is not dorsally deviated. (C) Dorsal deviation of the right exiting nerve root caused by contact with disc material. (D) Compression of the right exiting nerve root between disc material and the surrounding structure (e.g. pedicle). It may be appear flattened or be indistinguished from disc material.

    Fig. 2
    Comparison of conventional MRI axial view and Proset coronal view, extraforaminal herniation extended to the foramen at L5-S1. (A) Axial T2-weighted image shows left extraforaminal disc herniation with extension to foramen at L5-S1. (B,C) Swelling of the L5 nerve root(arrow) on Proset coronal view and 3D MR radiography is seen.

    Fig. 3
    Comparison of conventional MRI axial view and Proset coronal view of right extraforaminal herniation at L4-5. (A) Axial T2-weighted image shows contact of disc material with the right L4 exiting nerve root. The nerve root is in the normal position and is not dorsally deviated. (Pfirmann stage 1). (B,C) Swelling and compression of the right L4 exiting nerve root (arrow) between disc material and surrounding structure on Proset coronal view and 3D MR radiography is seen (Pfirmann stage 3).

    Tables

    Table 1
    Compression grades according to classification with relation to the types of MR image in extraforaminal disc herniation of the lumbar spine

    Table 2
    Nerve root compression grade in the conventional axial image with relation to the ProSet 3D rendering image grade according to Pfirrmann's classification.

    Table 3
    Nerve root compression grade in the conventional sagittal image with relation to the ProSet 3D rendering image grade according to Pfirrmann's classification.

    Table 4
    Degrees of the Nerve root swelling and signal intensity with relation to the types of MR image in the extraforaminal disc herniation of the lumbar spine

    References

      1. Benini A. Der Zugang zu den lateralen lumbalen diskushernien ambeispiel einer hernie L4/L5. Operat Orthop Traumatol 1988;10:103–116.
      1. Ohmori K, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Kimura T. Clinical features of extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation based on the radiographic location of the dorsal root ganglion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:662–666.
      1. Jackson RP, Glah JJ. Foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation : Diagnosis and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:577–585.
      1. Kunogi J, Hasue M. Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal & extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:1312–1320.
      1. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration: An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971;53:891–903.
      1. Abdullah AF, Ditton EW III, Byrd EB. Extreme-lateral lumbar disc herniations: Clinical syndrome and special problems of diagnosis. J Neurosurg 1974;41:229–234.
      1. Kim MH, Suh KJ, Lee JY, Min SH, Yoo HY. Usefulness of Coronal MR Image in Diagnosis of Foraminal and Extraforaminal Disc Herniation. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2008;15:165–173.
      1. Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: Reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology 2004;230:583–588.
      1. Lindblom K. Protrusions of disks and nerve compression in the lumbar region. Acta Radiol 1944;25:195–212.
      1. Epstein NE. Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: Surgical alternatives outcome measures. Spinal Cord 2002;40:491–500.
      1. Faust SE, Ducker TB, VanHassent JA. Lateral lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:97–103.
      1. Lee CK, Rauschning W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar canal stenosis: Classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:313–320.
      1. Forristall RM, Marsh HO, Pay NT. MRI & CT of the lumbar spine: Comparison of diagnotic methods and correlation with surgical findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:1049–1054.
      1. Byun WM, Kim JW, Lee JK. Differentiation between symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra: role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance lumbosacral radiculography. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:403–411.
      1. Byun WM, Ahn SH, Ahn MW. Value of 3D MR lumbosacral radiculopathy in the diagnosis of symptomatic chemical radiculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:529–534.
    Cited by
    Crossref 3
    Google Scholar 
    MeSH Terms
    Humans
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Radiculopathy
    Retrospective Studies
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 4

    PERMALINK