Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.65(4) > 1007355

Sherid, Sifuentes, Sulaiman, Samo, Husein, Tupper, Spurr, and Sridhar: Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Dabigatran, a Comparative Study with Warfarin: A Multicenter Experience

Abstract

Background/Aims

The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with dabigatran when compared to warfarin has been controversial in the literature. The aim of our study was to assess this risk with the use of dabigatran.

Methods

We examined the medical records of patients who were started on dabigatran or warfarin from October 2010 to October 2012. The study was conducted in two hospitals.

Results

A total of 417 patients were included (208 dabigatran vs. 209 warfarin). GI bleeding occurred in 10 patients (4.8%) in the dabigatran group compared to 21 patients (10.1%) in the warfarin group (p=0.0375). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who were on dabigatran for ≤100 days had a higher incidence of GI bleeding than those who were on it for >100 days (p=0.0007). The odds of GI bleeding in patients who were on dabigatran for ≤100 days was 8.2 times higher compared to those who were on the drug for >100 days. The incidence of GI bleeding in patients >65 years old was higher than in those <65 years old (p=0.0453, OR=3). History of previous GI bleeding was another risk factor for GI bleeding in the dabigatran group (p=0.036, OR=6.3). The lower GI tract was the most common site for GI bleeding in the dabigatran group (80.0% vs. 38.1%, p=0.014).

Conclusions

The risk of GI bleeding was lower with dabigatran. The risk factors for GI bleeding with dabigtran were the first 100 days, age >65 years, and a history of previous GI bleeding.

References

1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:1139–1151.
crossref
2. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. RE-COVER Study Group. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:2342–2352.
crossref
3. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Gansser D, Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 64:292–303.
crossref
4. Stangier J, Stähle H, Rathgen K, Fuhr R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008; 47:47–59.
5. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Mazur D. Influence of renal im-pairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single-centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010; 49:259–268.
6. Walenga JM, Adiguzel C. Drug and dietary interactions of the new and emerging oral anticoagulants. Int J Clin Pract. 2010; 64:956–967.
crossref
7. Dans AL, Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, et al. Concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy with dabigatran or warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2013; 127:634–640.
crossref
8. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011; 123:2363–2372.
9. Larsen TB, Rasmussen LH, Skj⊘th F, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:2264–2273.
10. Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Büller HR, et al. BISTRO II Study Group. A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2005; 3:103–111.
crossref
11. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, et al. ACTIVE W Investigators. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation. 2008; 118:2029–2037.
crossref
12. White HD, Gruber M, Feyzi J, et al. Comparison of outcomes among patients randomized to warfarin therapy according to anticoagulant control: results from SPORTIF III and V. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167:239–245.
13. Jones M, McEwan P, Morgan CL, Peters JR, Goodfellow J, Currie CJ. Evaluation of the pattern of treatment, level of anticoagulation control, and outcome of treatment with warfarin in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation: a record linkage study in a large British population. Heart. 2005; 91:472–477.
crossref
14. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, et al. RE-LY investigators. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at dif-ferent levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet. 2010; 376:975–983.
crossref
15. Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Goldstein LB, et al. Quality of anticoagulation management among patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a review of medical records from 2 communities. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:967–973.
16. Sarawate C, Sikirica MV, Willey VJ, Bullano MF, Hauch O. Monitoring anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006; 21:191–198.
crossref
17. McBride D, Brüggenjürgen B, Roll S, Willich SN. Anticoagulation treatment for the reduction of stroke in atrial fibrillation: a cohort study to examine the gap between guidelines and routine medical practice. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007; 24:65–72.
crossref
18. Southworth MR, Reichman ME, Unger EF. Dabigatran and post-marketing reports of bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:1272–1274.
crossref
19. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Reilly PA, Wallentin L. Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy Investigators. Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:1875–1876.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Cumulative gastrointestinal bleeding free survival in total subjects, including both warfarin and dabigatran groups.
kjg-65-205f1.tif
Fig. 2.
The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding for both drugs over time.
kjg-65-205f2.tif
Fig. 3.
The survival rate without gastrointestinal bleeding for both drugs over time.
kjg-65-205f3.tif
Table 1.
Patients' Characteristics in Both Groups
Characteristic Dabigatran group (n=208) Warfarin group (n=209) p-value
Mean age (yr) 72.72 71.83 0.474
Age >85 yr 35 (16.8) 29 (13.9) 0.403
Sex (female) 104 (50.0) 113 (54.1) 0.406
Race (Caucasian) 190 (91.4) 198 (94.7) 0.130
Indication for drug: atrial fibrillation 206 (99.0) 149 (71.3) 0.001 a
Dose (mg)      
 150 166 (79.8) NA NA
 75 42 (20.2) NA NA
Mean duration being on drug (day) 289.66 355.86 0.004 a
Duration ≤100 days 47 (22.6) 46 (22.0) 0.886
Drug was discontinued 39 (18.8) 51 (24.4) 0.161
Concomitant use with      
 Aspirin 100 (48.1) 101 (48.3) 0.960
 Thienopyridines 26 (12.5) 33 (15.8) 0.929
 Dual antiplatelet agents 16 (7.7) 19 (9.1) 0.607
 NSAIDs 14 (6.7) 14 (6.7) 0.990
GFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 10 (4.8) 8 (3.8) 0.622
Previous GI bleeding 11 (5.3) 19 (9.1) 0.053

Values are presented as n (%).

GFR, glomerular filtration rate; GI, gastrointestinal; NA, not applicable.

a Statistically significant.

Table 2.
Characteristics of Patients with Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding in Both Groups
Characteristic Dabigatran group Warfarin group p-value
GI bleeding event 10 (4.8) 21 (10.1) 0.038 a
Mean age (yr) 79.20 75.86 0.441
Age >85 yr 3 (30.0) 4 (19.1) 0.495
Sex (female) 8 (80.0) 13 (61.9) 0.428
Race (Caucasian) 8 (80.0) 21 (100) 0.097
Indication for drug: atrial fibrillation 10 (100) 17 (81.0) 0.277
Dose (mg)      
 150 7 (70.0) NA NA
 75 3 (30.0) NA NA
Mean duration being on drug (day) 108.50 188.86 0.189
Duration ≤100 days 8 (80.0) 9 (42.8) 0.052
Concomitant use with      
 Aspirin 4 (40.0) 11 (52.4) 0.704
 Thienopyridines 1 (10.0) 7 (33.3) 0.165
 Dual antiplatelet agents 1 (10) 6 (28.6) 0.248
 NSAIDs 0 0 NA
GFR≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 2 (20.0) 2 (9.5) 0.416
Previous GI Bleeding 2 (20.0) 2 (9.5) 0.416
Upper GI tract 1 (10.0) 9 (42.8) 0.067
Lower GI tract 8 (80.0) 8 (38.1) 0.014 a
Occult obscure GI bleeding 1 (10.0) 4 (19.0) 1.00
Death related to GI bleeding 0 0 NA

Values are presented as n (%).

GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NA, not applicable.

a Statistically significant.

Table 3.
Multivariate Analysis for the Dabigatran Group
Variable Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
Age >65 years 2.989 (1.785-24.782) 0.0453 a
Sex (female) 2.732 (0.514-14.509) 0.238
Race (Caucasian) 0.612 (1.33-2.816) 0.528
Duration <100 days 8.176 (1.993-38.547) 0.0007 a
Concomitant with    
 Aspirin 1.739 (1.64-4.781) 0.657
 Thienopyridines 1.051 (0.752-7.438) 0.279
 Dual antiplatelet 0.856 (0.675-9.409) 0.492
 NSAIDs 1.297 (1.824-5.721) 0.573
GFR≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 4.534 (0.682-30.138) 0.118
Previous GI bleeding 6.284 (0.612-28.591) 0.036 a

GFR, glomerular filtration rate; GI, gastrointestinal.

a Statistically significant.

Table 4.
Source of Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding in Both Groups
Source of GI bleeding Dabigatran group (n) Warfarin group (n)
Upper GI tract Severe hemorrhagic gastritis with pneumatosis of gastric wall and portal vein air on CT scan (1) PUD (3)
    AVM in stomach/duodenum (3)
    Bleeding from sphinctertomy site that performed recently (1)
    Scopes were not performed a (2)
Lower GI tract Colorectal cancer (2) Colorectal cancer (2)
  Ischemic colitis (2) Internal hemorrhoids (1)
  Internal hemorrhoids/diverticulosis (1) Diverticulosis (1)
  Scopes were not performed because patients’ refusal b (3) Large cecal polyp (1)
    Sigmoid ulcer (1)
    Anal fissure (1)
    Scopes were not performed because patients’ refusal b (1)
Occult obscure GI bleeding EGD/colonoscopy/push enteroscopy were negative (1) EGD/colonoscopy/push enteroscopy were negative (4)

PUD, peptic ulcer disease; AVM, arteriovenous malformation; EGD, esophegogastroduodenoscopy.

a Patients had hematemesis or coffee ground emesis which indicated upper GI bleeding in their clinical scenarios, but scopes were not performed;

b patients had bright red blood per rectum which indicated lower GI bleeding in their clinical scenarios, but scopes were not performed because of patients’ refusal.

Table 5.
Secondary Aims of Our Study
Event Dabigatran group (n=208) Warfarin group (n=209) p-value
Major bleeding other than GI bleeding 3 (1.4) 9 (4.3) 0.080
ICH 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 1.00
Stroke or TIA 4 (1.9) 6 (2.9) 0.751
DVT or PE 0 (0) 3 (1.4) 0.083
ACS 4 (1.9) 17 (8.1) 0.006 a
Death 7 (3.4) 15 (7.2) 0.082

Values are presented as n (%).

GI, gastrointestinal; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; TIA, transient ischemic attack; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; ACS, acute coronary syndrome.

a Statistically significant.

Table 6.
Comparison of the Results of Our Studies with Other Studies
Study Indication Durationa (mo) Group (patient) Mean age (yr) Sex (male, %) Race (Caucasian, %) Drug discontinued c (%) GI bleeding Major bleeding d (%) ICH (%) Stroke or TIA (%) DVT/PE (%) ACS (%) Death
RE-LY AF 24 Dabigatran b (6,076) 71.5 63.20 NA 21.20 1.51%/yr 3.11/yr 0.30/yr 1.01/yr 0.15/yr 0.74/yr 3.64/yr
      Warfarin (6,022) 71.6 63.30 NA 16.60 1.02%/yr (p−0.001) 3.36/yr (p=0.31) 0.74/yr (p<0.001) )1.57/yr (p<0.001) 0.09/yr (p=0.21) 0.53/yr (p=0.048) 4.13/yr (p=0.051)
RE-COVER DVT/PE 6 Dabigatran b (1,274) 55 58 95.20 16 4.20% 1.60 0 NA 2.40 0.40 1.60
      Warfarin (1,265) 54.4 58.90 94.40 14.50 2.80% 1.90 0.23 NA 2.1 (p<0.001) 0.2 (p=0.73) 1.70
Danish registry AF 17 Dabigatran b (2,239) 67.4 61.50 NA NA 1.50% 2.20 0.10 3.50 0.20 0.90 3
      Warfarin (8,936) 69.7 59.80 NA NA 1.5% (p=0.26) 2.9/yr (p=0.15) 0.70 3 (p=0.05) 0.50 1.9 (p=0.06) 4.7 (p=0.03)
Mini-Sentinel initiative FDA   15 Dabigatran (12,195) NA NA NA NA 1.6 per 100,00 days at risk NA 00 0.90 NA NA NA NA
      Warfarin (119,940) NA NA NA NA 3.1 per 100,00 days at risk 00 NA 1.90 NA NA NA NA
Our study   24 Dabigtran (208) 72.72 50 91.40 18.80 4.80% 6.30 0 1.90 0 1.90 3.40
      Warfarin (209) 71.83 45.90 94.70 24.40 10.1% (p=0.0375) 14.40 0.50 2.9 (p=0.751) 1.4 (p=0.083) 8.1 (p=0.006) 7.2 (p=0.082)

GI, gastrointestinal; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; TIA, transient ischemic attack; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; AF, atrial fibrillation; NA, not available.

a Duration of the study;

b dabigatran 150 mg twice a day;

c drug was discontinued permanently; d including GI bleeding.

TOOLS
Similar articles