Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T22:53:03.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks on Invariant Subspace Lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Peter Rosenthal*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

If A is a bounded linear operator on an infinite-dimensional complex Hilbert space H, let lat A denote the collection of all subspaces of H that are invariant under A; i.e., all closed linear subspaces M such that x ∈ M implies (Ax) ∈ M. There is very little known about the question: which families F of subspaces are invariant subspace lattices in the sense that they satisfy F = lat A for some A? (See [5] for a summary of most of what is known in answer to this question.) Clearly, if F is an invariant subspace lattice, then {0} ∈ F, H ∈ F and F is closed under arbitrary intersections and spans. Thus, every invariant subspace lattice is a complete lattice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1969

References

1. Bernstein, A.R. and Robinson, A., Solution to an invariant subspace problem of K. T. Smith and P. R. Halmos. Pacific J. Math. 16 (1966) 421431.Google Scholar
2. Brickman, L. and Fillmore, P. A., The invariant subspace lattice of a linear transformation. Canad. J. Math. 19 (1967) 810822.Google Scholar
3. Halmos, P.R., Invariant subspaces. Proc. 1968 Oberwolfoch Conference on Approximation Theory (to appear).Google Scholar
4. Hoffman, K., Banach spaces of analytic functions. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1962).Google Scholar
5. Rosenthal, Peter, Examples of invariant subspace lattices. Duke Math. J. (to appear).Google Scholar