Primary Bladder Sarcoma: A multi-institutional experience from the Rare Cancer Network


Published: July 25, 2023
Abstract Views: 799
PDF: 240
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Purpose or Objective: Primary sarcoma of the urinary bladder (SUB) is a rare but aggressive form of bladder cancer (BCa). Available evidence on SUB is limited to case reports and small series. The aim of the present multi-institutional study was to assess the clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of patients with SUB. Materials and methods: Using a standardized database, 7 institutions retrospectively collected the demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment modalities and follow-up data on patients with SUB between January 1994 and September 2021. The main inclusion criteria included BCa with soft tissue tumor histology and sarcomatoid differentiation. Results: Fifty-three patients (38 men and 15 women) were identified. Median follow-up was 18 months (range 1-263 months). Median age at presentation was 69 years (range 16-89 years). Twenty-six percent of patients had a prior history of pelvic radiotherapy (RT), and 37% were previous smokers. The main presenting symptoms at diagnosis were hematuria (52%), pelvic pain (27%), and both hematuria and pelvic pain (10%). American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8 th edition stage II, III and IV at diagnosis were 21%, 63% and 16%, respectively. Treatment modalities included surgery alone (45%), surgery plus neo- or adjuvant-chemotherapy (17%), surgery plus neo- or adjuvant-RT (11%), RT with concurrent chemotherapy (4%), neo-adjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery plus adjuvant RT (2%) and palliative treatment (21%). Rates of local and distant recurrences were 49% and 37%, respectively. Five-year overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were 66.5% and 37.6%, respectively. No statistically significant differences in PFS between the treatment modalities were observed. Conclusions: Primary SUB is a heterogeneous disease group, commonly presenting at advanced stages and exhibiting aggressive disease evolution. In contrast to urothelial carcinoma, the primary pattern of recurrence of SUB is local, suggesting the need for multimodal approaches. Continuous international collaborative efforts seem warranted to provide guidance on how to best tailor treatments based on SUB-specific indices.


Lopez-Beltran A, Pacelli A, Rothenberg HJ. Carcinosarcoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the bladder: clinicopathological study of 41 cases. J Urol. 1998; 159:1497-1503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199805000-00023

Mukhopadhyay S, Shrimpton AE, Jones LA. Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder following cyclophosphamide therapy: evidence for monoclonal origin and chromosome 9p allelic loss. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004; 128:e8-e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5858/2004-128-e8-COTUBF

Wick MR, Swanson PE. Carcinosarcomas: current perspectives and an historical review of nosological concepts. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1993; 10:118.

Wright JL, Black PC, Brown GA, et al. Differences in survival among patients with sarcomatoid carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2007; 178:2302-2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.038

EAU (European Association of Urology). Guidelines on Muscleinvasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. 2021 Edition. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-andmetastatic/.

NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network). Bladder Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx#bladder.

Lobo N, et al. What Is the Significance of Variant Histology in Urothelial Carcinoma? Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15; 6:653-663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.003

Blay JY, Coindre JM, Ducimetière F, Ray-Coquard I. Rare cancers: the value of research collaborations and consortia in rare cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17:e62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00388-5

DeSantis CE, Kramer JL, Jemal A. The burden of rare cancers in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017; 67:261-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21400

Zieschang H, Koch R, Wirth M, Froehner M. Leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder in adult patients: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. UrolInt. 2019; 102:96-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000494357

Li S. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with primary bladder sarcoma: a SEER-based retrospective study. BMC Urol. 2021; 21:162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00929-x

Callesen LB, et al. Radiation-induced sarcoma: a retrospective population-based study over 34 years in a single institution. Clin Oncol. 2021; 33:e232-e238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2020.12.009

Lee JS. Management of pelvic sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022; 48:2299-2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.011

Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N, Singer S. Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2014; 260:416-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000869

Chouliaras K, Senehi R, Ethun CG, et al. Recurrence patterns after resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas: an eight-institution study from the US Sarcoma Collaborative. J Surg Oncol. 2019; 120:340-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25606

Trans-Atlantic RPSWG. Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:256-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3965-2

Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E, Brennan MF. Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2003; 238:358-70, discussion 370-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086542.11899.38

Stojadinovic A, Leung DH, Hoos A, Jaques DP, Lewis JJ, Brennan MF. Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2,084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg. 2002; 235:424-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200203000-00015

Molina G, Hull MA, Chen YL, et al. Preoperative radiation therapy combined with radical surgical resection is associated with a lower rate of local recurrence when treating unifocal, primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114:814-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24427

Bonvalot S, Gronchi A, Le Pechoux C, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:1366-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30446-0

Bettoli, P., Liu, Z., Jara, N., Bakal, F., Wong, W., Terlizzi, M., Sargos, P., Zilli, T., Thariat, J., Sole, S., Ploussard, G., Goyal, S., Chung, P., Berlin, A., & Sole, C. (2023). Primary Bladder Sarcoma: A multi-institutional experience from the Rare Cancer Network. Archivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologia, 95(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.11533

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations