Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:42:35.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humidity Reactions of Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) and Camnula pellucida (Scudd.) (Orthoptera, Acrididae): Reactions of Normal Grasshoppers1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. Wm. Riegert
P. Wm. Riegert
Affiliation:
Canada Department of Agriculture Research Laboratory, Saskatoon, Sask
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nymphs of the clear-winged grasshopper, Camnula pellucida (Scudd.) have been observed to evacuate local habitats by marching (11). Except for a few stragglers, apparently all occupantsof the habitat moved in the same direction. Rarely, if ever, did these marches continue for more than 300 yardsin one direction, nor did the insects show much tendency to maintain identity as a band; nevertheless, the capacity of this species to march was clearly shown. The marches always occurred during the day and when the temperature was above 20°C. (8). In all recorded cases the nymphs moved into a cooler and more humid area. The authorhas not observed, or received reports of, instances of marching in the comparatively sluggish two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 91 , Issue 1 , January 1959 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bentley, E. W. 1944. The biology and behaviour of Ptinus tectus Boie. (Coleoptera, Ptinidae), a pest of stored products. V. Humidity reactions, J. Expt. Biol. 20: 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fraenkel, G. S. 1930. Die Orientierung von Schistocerca gregaria zu strahlender Wärme. Zeitschr. vergl. Physiol. 13: 300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gunn, D. L., and Kennedy, J. S.. 1936. Apparatus for investigating the reactions of land arthropods to humidity, J. Expt. Biol. 13: 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gunn, D. L. 1937. The humidity reactions of the wood louse, Porcellio scaber (Latreille). J. Expt. Biol. 14: 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gunn, D. L., and Cosway, C. A.. 1938. The temperature and humidity relations of the cockroach. V. Humidity preference. J. Expt. Biol. 15: 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kennedy, J. S. 1937. The humidity reactions of the African migratory locust, Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.), gregarious phase. J. Expt. Biol. 14: 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kennedy, J. S. 1945. Observations on the mass migrations of desert locust hoppers. Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc. London. 95: 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Parker, J. R. 1930. Some effects of temperature and moisture upon Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus Saussure and Camnula pellucida Scudder (Orthoptera). Montana Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 223.Google Scholar
9.Perttunen, V., and Erkkila, H.. 1952. Humidity reaction in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 169: 78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Pielou, D. P., and Gunn, D. L.. 1940. The humidity behaviour of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L. I. The reactions to differences of humidity. J. Expt. Biol. 17: 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Riegert, P. W. 1948. The field biology of Camnula pellucida (Scudd.). M.Sc. thesis. Montana State College.Google Scholar
12.Roth, L. M., and Willis, E. R.. 1951. Hygroreceptors in adults of Tribolium (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). J. Expt. Zool. 116: 527–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Roth, L. M., and Willis, E. R.. 1951. The effects of desiccation and starvation on the humidity behaviour and water balance of Tribolium confusum and Tribolium castaneum. J. Expt Zool. 118: 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Smith, R. W. 1952. Another method of rearing grasshoppers (Orthoptera) in the laboratory. Canadian Ent. 84: 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Solomon, M. E. 1951. Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, or other solutions. Bull. Ent. Res. 42: 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Uvarov, B. P. 1931. Insects and climate. Trans. Ent. Soc. London 79: 1–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Willis, E. R., and Roth, L. M.. 1950. Humidity reactions of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). J. Expt. Zool. 115: 561–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar