Analysis of the Surface Roughness of a Tube Drawn by a Fixed Mandrel

[1] H. Palkowski, S. Brueck, T. Pirling, A. Carradò. Investigation on the Residual Stress State of Drawn Tubes by Numerical Simulation and Neutron Diffraction Analysis. Materials 6 (2013) 5118-5130.

DOI: 10.3390/ma6115118

Google Scholar

[2] H.J. Gummert. Drawing. in: Mang T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Lubricants and Lubrication. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2014).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Sheu, S. Lin, Ch. Yu. Optimum Die Design for Single Pass Steel Tube Drawing with Large Strain Deformation, Procedia Engineering, Volume 81 (2014) 688-693 DOI:/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.061.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.061

Google Scholar

[4] E. M. Rubio, A. M. Camacho, M. Marcos & M. A. Sebastián. Analysis of the Energy Vanished by Friction in Tube Drawing Processes with a Fixed Conical Inner Plug by the Upper Bound Method, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 23:7 (2008) 690-697,.

DOI: 10.1080/10426910802317060

Google Scholar

[5] F. Collins, B.K. Williams. Slipline fields for axisymmetric tube drawing. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 27 (4) (1985) 225-233.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(85)90081-5

Google Scholar

[6] K. Sawamiphakdi, G.D. Lahoti, P.K. Kropp. Simulation of a tube drawing process by the finite element method. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 27 (1991) 179-190.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(91)90052-g

Google Scholar

[7] S. Urbanski, M. Packo. Cylindrical mandrel drawing of tubes: a matrix method simulation compared with experiment. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 32 (1991) 531-543.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(92)90251-m

Google Scholar

[8] N.C. Guo, Z.J. Lou, G. Cui, Advanced technology of plasticity. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technology of Plasticity (1993) 1023.

Google Scholar

[9] K.-K. Um, D.N. Lee. An upper bound solution of tube drawing. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 63 (1997) 43-48.

Google Scholar

[10] S.W. Kim, Y.N. Kwon, Y.S. Lee, J.H. Lee. Design of mandrel in tube drawing process for automotive steering input shaft. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. (2007) 182-186.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.134

Google Scholar

[11] J. Gattmah, F. Oyturk, S. Orhan. Effects of the semi die/plug angles on cold tube drawing with a fixed plug by FEM for AISI 1010 steel tube. 4th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science, Turkey (2016) 1065-1074.

DOI: 10.16984/saufenbilder.291270

Google Scholar

[12] K. Yoshida, H. Furuya. Mandrel drawing and plug drawing of shape-memory-alloy fine tubes used in catheters and stents. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 153 (2004) 145-150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.182

Google Scholar

[13] F. O. Neves, S. T. Button, C. Caminaga, F. C. Gentile. Numerical and experimental analysis of tube drawing with fixed plug. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 27(4), (2005) 426-431.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-58782005000400011

Google Scholar

[14] T. Kuboki, M. Ishikawa, S. Kajikawa, M. Murata. An extrusion method of tube with spiral inner fins by utilizing generation of spiral outer fins/grooves. Manufacturing Technology 67, (2018) 305-308.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.023

Google Scholar

[15] Görög, I. Görögová, M. Martinkovič. Geometric reconstruction of the drawn tube shape. In Novel Trends in Production Devices and Systems V (NTPDS V) : Special topic volume with invited peer reviewed papers only. 1. vyd. Zurich : Trans Tech Publications (2019) 13-21.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.952.13

Google Scholar

[16] STN 41 1353. 1983. Steel 11 353. Bratislava: SUTN.

Google Scholar