Thermostablity Study on Microstructure and Microhardness of Laser Shock Processed Ti-6Al-2.5Mo-1.5Cr-0.5Fe-0.3Si

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the microstructure and microhardness of laser shock processed (LSP) Ti-6Al-2.5Mo-1.5Cr-0.5Fe-0.3Si titanium alloy with and without annealing were examined and compared. The titanium alloy samples were LSP processed with 3 layers at 4.24GW/cm2. Some of the samples were vacuum annealed at 623K for 10 hours. The microscopic structure with and without annealing were tested and analyzed by SEM, TEM. The results indicated that after LSP, the shock wave provided high strain rate deformation and led to the formation of ultra-fine grain. Comparing with the samples without annealing, the dislocation density was lower and the grain-boundary was more distinct in the annealed samples, but the sizes of the ultra-fine grain didn’t grow bigger after annealing. On the other hand, the microhardness measurement was made on the cross-section. It is obviously that the laser shock processing improved the microhardness of the Ti-6Al-2.5Mo-1.5Cr-0.5Fe-0.3Si for about 12.2% at the surface, and the hardness affected depth is about 500 microns. The microhardness after annealing is 10 HV0.5 lower, but the affected depth is not changed. The titanium alloy after LSP is thermostable at 623K; thus break the USA standard AMS2546, in which titanium parts after LSP are subjected in subsequent processing should not exceed 589K.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 697-698)

Pages:

440-444

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] M. Greger, R. Kocich, L. Cizek, et al.: Ach in Mater and Manu. Eng. Vol. 18 (2006), p.103.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Gronostajski and K. Jaskiewicz; Pro. of the 11th ISC, 2002, p.219.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Hansen, X. Huang, R. Ueji and N. Tsuji.: Mater. Sci. and Eng., A Vol. 387 (2004), p.191.

Google Scholar

[4] K.J. Kurzydáowski: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 503-504 (2006), p.341.

Google Scholar

[5] G. Niewielski, D. Kuc, K. Rodak, et. al.: Mater. and Manu. Eng. Vol. 17 ( 2006), p.109.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Richert and B. Leszczyska: J. of Alloys and Comp. Vol. 382 (2004 ), p.305.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Rodak: J. of Ach. in Mater. and Manu. Eng. Vol. 20 (2007), p.491.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Rodak: J. of Ach. in Mater. and Manu. Eng. Vol. 20 (2007), p.179.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Peyre and R. Fabbro: Opt. Quant. Electron Vol. 27(1995), p.1213.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Peyre, R. Fabbro, et al.: Mater. Sci. and Eng. A Vol. 210( 1996), p.102.

Google Scholar

[11] Fabbro R, Peyre P, Berthe L, et al.: Laser Apply Vol. 10 (1998), p.265.

Google Scholar

[12] Li Wei, He Weifeng, Li Yinghong et al.: Chinese J. Lasers Vol. 36 (2009), p.2197.

Google Scholar

[13] Bassem S., EI-Dasher, Tania M. Zaleski, Jeremy J. Gray et al.: J appl. Phy. 103506(2006), p.99.

Google Scholar

[14] A.L. Ortiz and L. Shaw: Acta Materialia Vol. 52(2004), p.2185.

Google Scholar

[15] Gerland M, Hallouin M and Presles N. Mater.: Sci. and Eng., Vol. 156A (1992), p.175.

Google Scholar

[16] J.M. Yang, Y.C. Her, N. Han and A. Clauer: Mater. Sci. and Eng. A Vol. 298 (2001), p.296.

Google Scholar

[17] N. Poondla, T.S. Srivatsan, A. Patnaik and M. Petraroli: J Alloy and Comp, (2009), p.1563.

Google Scholar

[18] A.P. Zhilyaev, B.K. Kim, J.A. Szpunar, et al. Mater. Sci. and Eng., A Vol. 391 (2005), p.377.

Google Scholar