Study on Parameter Optimization and Tool Wear of Milling Compacted Graphite Iron RuT450 Cylinder Block

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the milling process of compacted graphite iron cylinder block in practical, cutting parameters optimization experiment was conducted when cutting parameters were set as independent variable, and cutting efficiency and spindle power were set as optimization objective. The results showed that spindle power increased as the cutting speed and feed per tooth increasing, but cutting torque increased initially and then decreased as the cutting speed increasing. Feed force decreased with the increasing cutting speed and decreasing feed per teeth. Matlab software was used to optimize the cutting parameters when cutting efficiency and empirical formula of spindle power were settled as the objective functions. The most suitable parameters were abtained as V=164m/min and fz=0.28mm/z. The tool rake face mainly took place crater wear and material sticking. The main wear mechanisms for rake wear and fland wear were abrasive wear and adhesion wear.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

351-360

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Heck, H M. Ortner, S. Flege, etal. Int. J. Refract.Met. & Hard Mater. Vol.26 (2008) No.3, pp.197-206.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Dawson and F. Zhang. World Foundry Congress (2010), pp.241-246.

Google Scholar

[3] V. Nayyar, J. Kaminski, A. Kinnander and L. Nyborg. Procedia CIRP Vol.1 (2012), pp.488-493.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.087

Google Scholar

[4] V. Nayyar, G. Grenmyr and J. Kaminki. Int. J. Machining and Machinability Mate. Vol.13 (2013) No.1, pp.67-90.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Holtzer, M. Górny, R. Dańko. Springer International Publishing, (2015).

Google Scholar

[6] Y H. Shy, C H. Hsu, S C. Lee and C Y. Hou. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 278(2000) No.1-2, pp.54-60.

Google Scholar

[7] V V D. Oliveira, P A D C. Beltrão and G. Pintaude. Wear Vol.271 (2011) No.9, pp.2561-2569.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Abele, A. Sahm and H. Schulz. CIRP Annals-Manuf. Tech. Vol.51 (2002) No.1, pp.53-56.

Google Scholar

[9] M B D. Silva, V T G. Naves, J D B D. Melo, etal. Wear Vol.271 (2011) No.9, pp.2426-2432.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Guo, C Y. Wang, H. Yuan, etal. Mater. Sci. Forum (2014), pp.32-36.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Chen, L. Jiang, G Q. Guo, etal. Transactions of Tianjin University Vol.17 (2011) No.4, pp.235-241.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Gabaldo, A E. Diniz, C L F. Andrae, etal. J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng.Vol.32 (2010), pp.511-517.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Sharma and R. Sham. Int. J. Current Eng. and Tech. Vol.5 (2015) No.5, pp.3182-3185.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Berhane. MSc. Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, (2011).

Google Scholar

[15] K P. Varghese and A K. Balaji. ASME/STLE 2007 Int. Joint Tribology Conference (2007).

Google Scholar

[16] E. Trent and P. Wright. Metal Cutting, Wobrun: Butterworth-Heinemann Pubisher (2000),p.446.

Google Scholar

[17] F A. Xavier. MSc. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil, (2003), p.146.

Google Scholar

[18] C. Doré. MSc. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil, (2007), p.132.

Google Scholar