Concrete Fire Testing - A Review of the Thermal Boundary Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Experimental studies of concrete in fire or at elevated temperature have traditionally given relatively little scientific attention to quantifying the severity, and to some extent reproducibility, of the thermal boundary conditions imposed on specimens during testing. This paper examines the heat transfer fundamentals of fire testing when controlling the time-history of temperature inside a furnace (or oven), versus controlling the time-history of incident radiant heat flux at a specimen’s exposed surface. The thermal boundary conditions of a concrete specimen during fire testing are fundamentally based on conservation of energy, and thus typically formulated in terms of heat fluxes. While from the standpoint of concrete fire behaviour the aim is typically only to gauge the distribution of temperatures inside concrete; this is rarely explicitly acknowledged or quantified during concrete fire testing. This shows that continued unexamined use of varied heating techniques presents a serious threat to harmonization of the thermal boundary conditions imposed during concrete testing. The current work proposes adopting test control by in-depth temperature distributions or net heat fluxes for a rigorous comparison of the thermal boundary conditions imposed on test specimens when using different heating techniques.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

496-503

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Law M. (1981). Designing Fire Safety for Steel – Recent Work. Proceedings of the ASCE Spring Convention, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 16 pp.

Google Scholar

[2] CEN (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures – Parts 1-2: General Rules – Structural Fire Design (EN 1992-1-2: 2004). European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 100 pp.

Google Scholar

[3] Incropera, F.P. & DeWitt, D.P. (2002), Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, US.

Google Scholar

[4] CEN (2012). Eurocode: Fire Resistance Tests – Part 1: General Requirements (EN 1363-1: 2012). European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 56 pp.

Google Scholar

[5] Harmathy T.Z. and Mehaffey J.R. (1982). Normalized Heat Load: A Key Parameter in Fire Safety Design. Fire and Materials, 6 (1), 27-31.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.810060108

Google Scholar

[6] Wickström U. (1986). A Proposal Regarding Temperature Measurements in Fire Test Furnaces. Technical Report from the Nordtest Project 355-82, 37 pp.

Google Scholar

[7] Cooke G.M.E. (1994). Can Harmonisation Of Fire Resistance Furnaces Be Achieved By Plate Thermometer Control? Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science (IAFSS), Ontario, Canada, 1195-1207.

DOI: 10.3801/iafss.fss.4-1195

Google Scholar

[8] Kruppa J. and Curtat M. (1995). Comments on Wickström's The Plate Thermometer – A Simple Instrument for Reaching Harmonized Resistance Tests,. Fire Technology (letter to editor), 31 (1), 84-90.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01305271

Google Scholar

[9] Harmathy T.Z. (1969). Design of Fire Test Furnaces. Fire Technology, 5 (2), 140-150.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02591592

Google Scholar

[10] Babrauskas V. and Williamson R.B. (1978). The Historical Basis of Fire Resistance Testing – Part II. Fire Technology, 14 (4), 304-316.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01998390

Google Scholar

[11] Welch S. and Rubini P. (1997). Three-dimensional Simulation of a Fire-Resistance Furnace. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science (IAFSS), Melbourne, Australia, 1009-1020.

DOI: 10.3801/iafss.fss.5-1009

Google Scholar

[12] Torero J.L. (2013). Structures in Fire or Fires in Structures? Assessing the True Performance of Structures in Fire. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Cape Town, South Africa, 1919-(1923).

DOI: 10.1201/b15963-348

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM (2013). Standard Test Method for Heat and Visible Smoke Release Rates for Materials and Products Using an Oxygen Consumption Calorimeter (ASTM E1354). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 20 pp.

DOI: 10.1520/e1354-14e01

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM (2002). Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Material Flammability Using a Fire Propagation Apparatus (FPA) (ASTM E2058). American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 30 pp.

DOI: 10.1520/e2058-03

Google Scholar

[15] Maluk C., Bisby L., Krajcovic M., and Torero K.L. (2016). A Heat-Transfer Rate Inducing System (H-TRIS) Test Method. PhD Thesis, Fire Safety Journal (in press).

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.05.001

Google Scholar

[16] Robertson A.F. (1982). Development of an improved radiant heat source for fire testing, Fire and Materials, 6 (2), 68-71.

DOI: 10.1002/fam.810060206

Google Scholar

[17] Maluk C., Bisby L., and Terrasi G. (2014). Experimental parametric study on the effectiveness of polypropylene fibres at mitigating heat-induced concrete spalling. Concrete Institute of Australia. 40(3), 32-37 (invited paper).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.058

Google Scholar

[18] Hulin T., Maluk C., Bisby L., Hodicky K., Schmidt J.W., and Stang H. (2015). Experimental Studies on the Fire Behaviour of High Performance Concrete Thin Plates. Fire Technology. (accepted for publication).

DOI: 10.1007/s10694-015-0486-x

Google Scholar

[19] Maluk C. (2014). Development and Application of a Novel Test Method for Studying the Fire Behaviour of CFRP Prestressed Concrete Structural Elements. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, 473 pp.

Google Scholar