Paper Titles

Challenges and Process Strategies Concerning Multi-Pass Double Sided Incremental Forming
p.1122

Feasibility of Motion-Capture Techniques Applied to Tube Bending
p.1128

Shape Factors and Feasibility of Sheet Metal Hydroformed Components
p.1134

Numerical – Experimental Correlation of Sheet Hydroformed Component
p.1140

Predicting Tube Ovalization in Cold Bending: An Analytical Approach
p.1146

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Multistage Sheet-Bulk Metal Forming Process with Compound Press Tools
p.1153

Assessing 3 and 5 Degrees of Freedom Toolpath Strategy Influence on Single Point Incremental Forming
p.1159

Uncertainty Management of Cutting Forces Parameters and its Effects on Machining Stability
p.1165

Study of an Industrial FEM Tool for Line Boring Process of Cylinder Blocks
p.1171

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 651-653Predicting Tube Ovalization in Cold Bending: An...

Predicting Tube Ovalization in Cold Bending: An Analytical Approach

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ovalization (or flattening) of tubes in cold bending operations causes dimensional inaccuracy that may lead to loss of fit-up and function of the formed product. The particular distortion mechanism is governed by radial bending stress components forcing the extremities of the tube section towards the neutral layer of the cross-section. Thus, the magnitude of distortions is limited by the instantaneous stiffness of the tube section upon plastic bending. In order to proactively consider tube ovalization in the product design process, it is necessary to develop a practical methodology that takes into account the impact of governing parameters such as material, tool and section geometries. In the present work, an analytical model of the ovalization problem has been developed using the deformation theory of plasticity. The results show that the diameter of the tube is the most important parameter with respect to tube ovalization, while the thickness of the tube section and the bending radius are of the same relative importance. The developed model indicates that strain hardening is the most important material parameter, whereas tube ovalization is nearly unaffected by the initial yield stress. The present model shows good correlation with a number of experiments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Material Forming ESAFORM 2015

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

1146-1152

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.1146

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2015

Authors:

Togeir Welo*, Frode Paulsen

Keywords:

Analytical Model, Dimensional Accuracy, Tube Bending, Verification

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. P. Timoshenko, Bending Stresses in Curved Tubes of Rectangular Cross-Section. Trans. ASME 45, 135 (1923).

[2] L. G. Brazier, On the Flexure of Thin Cylindrical Shells and other Thin, Sections. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys. A116, 104 (1927).

[3] R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity. Oxford Science Publications, 287, Oxford (1950).

[4] C. S. Ades, Bending Strength of Tubing in the Plastic Range. J. Aero. Sci. 24, 605 (1957).

[5] S. Gellin, The Plastic Buckling of Long Tubes under Combined Bending and Pressure Loads. Int. J. Solids Struct. 10, 397 (1980).

[6] O. Fabian, Elastic-Plastic Collapse of Long Tubes under Combined Bending and Pressure Loads. Ocean Engng. 8, 295 (1981).

DOI: 10.1016/0029-8018(81)90027-5

[7] P. K. Shaw and S. Kyriakides, Inelastic Analysis of Thin-Walled Tubes under Cyclic Bending. Int. J. Solids Struct. 21, 1073 (1985).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(85)90044-7

[8] S. Kyriakides and G. T. Ju, Bifurcation and Localization Instabilities in Cylindrical Shells under Bending¾I. Experiments. Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 1117 (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90139-k

[9] G. T. Ju and S. Kyriakides, Bifurcation and Localization Instabilities in Cylindrical Shells under Bending¾II. Predictions. Int. J. Solids Structures 29, 1143 (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(92)90140-o

[10] S. R. Reid, T. X. Yu and J.L. Yang, Hardening-Softening Behaviour of circular Pipes under Bending and Tension. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 36, 1073 (1994).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(94)90059-0

[11] E. Corona and S. P. Vaze, Buckling of Elastic-Plastic Square Tubes under Bending. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 38, 753 (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(95)00081-x

[12] F. Paulsen and T. Welo, Cross-sectional Deformations of Rectangular Hollow Sections in Bending: Part II ¾Analytical Models. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 131 (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00107-1

[12] F. Paulsen and T. Welo, Cross-sectional Deformations of Rectangular Hollow Sections in Bending: Part II ¾Analytical Models. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 131 (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00107-1

[13] W. Wu, P. Zhang, X. Zeng, L. Jin, S. Yao and Luo A.A., Bendability of the wroght magnesioum alloy AM30 tubes using a rotary draw bender, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 486 (1-2), pp.596-601 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.033

[14] A. Mentella and M. Strano, Rotary Draw Bending of Small Diamater Copper Tubes: Predicting the Quality of the Cross Scetion, Proc. IMechE PartB: J. Eng. Manuf., 226, pp.267-278 (2012).

DOI: 10.1177/0954405411416306

[15] H. Li, H. Yang. Z.Y. Zhang, G.J. Li, N. Liu and T. Welo, Multiple instability-constrained tube bending limits, J. of Materials Processing Technology, 214 pp.445-455, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.09.027

[16] C. E. Greene, Graphical Method for the Analysis of Bridge Trusses, D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc., 35, New York (1875).